<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Defensive Four-pack: Investing in Airport Security]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/defensive-four-pack-investing-in-airport-security/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/defensive-four-pack-investing-in-airport-security/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/defensive-four-pack-investing-in-airport-security/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>"The attempted Christmas terrorist attack caused me to assess what stocks would benefit from increased attention to the security sector," says <a href="http://www.buildingwealth.ca/bookstore/productdetail.cfm?product_id=576">Glenn Rogers</a>.</p>
<p>In Gordon Pape's <a href="http://www.buildingwealth.ca/bookstore/productdetail.cfm?product_id=576">The Internet Wealth Builder</a>, he reviews four defense plays -- L-3 Communications (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/l-3-communications-holdings-inc/lll/nys">LLL</a>), Cogent Systems (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cogent-inc/cogt/nas">COGT</a>), American Scientific &amp; Engineering (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-science-and-engineering-inc/asei/nas">ASEI</a>) and OSI Systems (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/osi-systems-inc/osis/nas">OSIS</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/defensive-four-pack-investing-in-airport-security/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Defensive Four-pack: Investing in Airport Security</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/defensive-four-pack-investing-in-airport-security/">Defensive Four-pack: Investing in Airport Security</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/defensive-four-pack-investing-in-airport-security/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19337570/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/29/defensive-four-pack-investing-in-airport-security/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airport security stocks</category><category>AirportSecurityStocks</category><category>american science engineering</category><category>AmericanScienceEngineering</category><category>asei</category><category>cogent systems</category><category>CogentSystems</category><category>cogt</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>gordon pape</category><category>GordonPape</category><category>internet wealth builder</category><category>InternetWealthBuilder</category><category>l-3 communications</category><category>L-3Communications</category><category>lll</category><category>osi systems</category><category>osis</category><category>OsiSystems</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress does the right thing: Cuts F-22 fighter program]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/congress-does-the-right-thing-cuts-f-22-fighter-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/congress-does-the-right-thing-cuts-f-22-fighter-program/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/congress-does-the-right-thing-cuts-f-22-fighter-program/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/utx/" rel="tag">United Technologies (UTX)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></div>
Amid a budget process in which every dollar counts, and while Congress determines the most suitable revenue options for universal health care, legislators have weeded-out one wasteful government program: the F-22 fighter jet program. <br /><br />The Senate voted 58-40 Tuesday to block expansion of the expensive and controversial new jet, <a href="http:// http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/21/senate.f22/">CNN reported</a>, and in the process $1.75 billion will be saved.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/congress-does-the-right-thing-cuts-f-22-fighter-program/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress does the right thing: Cuts F-22 fighter program</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/congress-does-the-right-thing-cuts-f-22-fighter-program/">Congress does the right thing: Cuts F-22 fighter program</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/congress-does-the-right-thing-cuts-f-22-fighter-program/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19105634/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/congress-does-the-right-thing-cuts-f-22-fighter-program/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>afghanistan war</category><category>AfghanistanWar</category><category>defense spending</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseSpending</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>F 22</category><category>F22</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iraq war</category><category>IraqWar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin rises on strong earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/lmt-lockheed-martin-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Lockheed Martin Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">LMT</a>) have moved strongly higher in today's action after the defense contractor put up <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hZkhmKP6a2dr8IIcXjoRIBou_BSQD95S9UG80">better than expected numbers</a> for its fourth quarter this morning.<br /><br />Going into today's earnings release, analysts had been expecting to see the company show <a href="http://earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=lmt">$1.92 per share</a>, but the company came in well above those estimates, with a reported $2.05 a share for its quarter ending December 31.<br /><br />This morning's good news was slightly balanced by the company's announcement that its upcoming full year 2009 profit was probably going to be lower than it had previously forecast, a result of increasing pension expenses. The market was tough on the company's pension plan in 2008, and drove the plan's value down by 28%. The resulting increase in pension expenses forced Lockheed Martin to lower its full year 2009 profit guidance down to between $7.05 and $7.25 from a previous estimate of between $7.65 and $7.90 per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lockheed Martin rises on strong earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/">Lockheed Martin rises on strong earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1437755/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>defense</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>EarningsReports</category><category>forecast</category><category>LMT</category><category>Lockheed Martin</category><category>LockheedMartin</category><category>Obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bet on defense: Leeb's look at Lockheed (LMT)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/bet-on-defense-leebs-look-at-lockheed-lmt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/bet-on-defense-leebs-look-at-lockheed-lmt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/bet-on-defense-leebs-look-at-lockheed-lmt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>"Investors should be well rewarded in the coming years by buying with major U.S. defense companies at current prices," says <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Gregory Dorsey</a>. </p>
<p>The contributing editor to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Stephen Leeb's Income Performance Letter</a> explains, "The U.S. has more than doubled our sales of armaments to foreign nations over the past three years. And regardless of who wins the election, we expect this to continue."</p>
<p>"We're adding one for growth and income to our portfolio now. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Lockheed Martin</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">LMT</a>) is a premier defense contractor. It's best known for its fighter jets.</p>
<p>"For example, Lockheed is now developing the F-35, also known as the Joint Strike Fighter, the replacement for the current generation of front-line fighters.</p>
<p>"But the company is actually engaged in four broad business areas, each of which should enjoy strong growth for years to come.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/bet-on-defense-leebs-look-at-lockheed-lmt/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bet on defense: Leeb's look at Lockheed (LMT)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/bet-on-defense-leebs-look-at-lockheed-lmt/">Bet on defense: Leeb's look at Lockheed (LMT)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/bet-on-defense-leebs-look-at-lockheed-lmt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1358724/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/bet-on-defense-leebs-look-at-lockheed-lmt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>defensive stocks</category><category>DefensiveStocks</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>gregory dorsey</category><category>GregoryDorsey</category><category>income stocks</category><category>IncomeStocks</category><category>leebs income performance letter</category><category>LeebsIncomePerformanceLetter</category><category>lmt</category><category>lockheed</category><category>military stocks</category><category>stephen leeb</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>StevenHalpern</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Defensive trio: Lockheed, Raytheon and L-3]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/defensive-trio-lockheed-raytheon-and-l-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/defensive-trio-lockheed-raytheon-and-l-3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/defensive-trio-lockheed-raytheon-and-l-3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/lmt-lockheed-martin-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />"As my high school football coach always quipped, 'Offense may win fans, but defense wins games,'" says leading growth stock expert <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2352">Louis Basenese</a>. </p>
<p>Here, the <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2352">Oxford Club</a> associate investment director takes a look at his three favorite defense stocks, noting, "When it comes to investing in the current environment, I'm convinced that you can't go wrong with this trio of companies."</p>
<p>"In my view, this sector willl never fall out of favor. The recent development with Russia serves to underscore another point I've been making for years. We always have to be prepared. </p>
<p>"Or, put another way, there will never be a good time for defense cuts, lest we want to leave our country vulnerable.Add it all up, and we can expect defense companies to enjoy steady demand. Even in the face of a recession. </p>
<p>"As the CEO of Rockwell notes, there has been absolutely no fallout in the defense industry as a result of the worldwide credit meltdown or other economic woes. So here's a quick run-down on the three defense companies we prefer for investors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/defensive-trio-lockheed-raytheon-and-l-3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Defensive trio: Lockheed, Raytheon and L-3</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/defensive-trio-lockheed-raytheon-and-l-3/">Defensive trio: Lockheed, Raytheon and L-3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/defensive-trio-lockheed-raytheon-and-l-3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1353379/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/defensive-trio-lockheed-raytheon-and-l-3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aerospace stocks</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>l-3 communications</category><category>L-3Communications</category><category>lll</category><category>lmt</category><category>lockheed martin</category><category>LockheedMartin</category><category>louis basenese</category><category>military stocks</category><category>MilitaryStocks</category><category>oxford club</category><category>OxfordClub</category><category>raytheon</category><category>rtn</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McCain stock: Defense play with General Dynamics (GD)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/election-bets-advisors-vote-on-mccain-and-obama-stocks/"><em>series</em></a><em> in which TheStockAdvisors.com asked financial experts to name their top stock pick if McCain or if Obama wins the election.</em> </p>
<p>"The GOP is traditionally known as the party that spends more on defense; thus, if McCain wins the election, one stock to benefit would be defense firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">General Dynamics</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">GD</a>)," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2447">John Reese</a>, editor of <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2447">Validea</a>, which follows the strategies of "legendary" investors such as Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch.</p>
<p>"While McCain has talked tough about reforming the defense budget, he has also pledged to increase the size of the military, modernize the armed services, and push hard for strong missile defense systems -- all of which require serious spending. </p>
<p>"As a major producer of battle tanks and assault vehicles, armaments and munitions, battleships and nuclear submarines, and military information technology systems, this Virginia-based firm is thus likely to have quite a bit of work on its hands during a McCain presidency. </p>
<p>"Just as importantly, General Dynamics' finances and fundamentals are very strong, earning approval from both my Peter Lynch and Warren Buffett-based Guru Strategies -- computer models that are each based on the approach of a different investing great. </p>
<p>"Because of its moderate 18.14% long-term growth rate and huge annual sales of $28.7 billion, General Dynamics is considered a 'stalwart' by my Lynch strategy, the type of large, steady firm that Lynch found offered protection during downturns or recessions. </p>
<p>"Two big reasons my Lynch model is high on this stalwart: its yield-adjusted P/E/Growth ratio of 0.75, which signals that the stock is a bargain right now, and its 18.79% debt/equity ratio, a sign that GD has the conservative financing Lynch liked to see."</p>
<p>My Buffett-based model, meanwhile, likes General Dynamics' consistency. Over the past decade, its EPS have declined just once, rising from $1.46 to $5.10 in that time.</p>
<p>"The company's annual return on equity -- a figure Buffett used to find firms with the 'durable competitive advantage' he famously prizes -- has been at least 16.4% every year. </p>
<p>"GD has also retained $22.30 in per-share earnings in the past decade while increasing EPS by $3.64, showing it can earn investors a 16.3% return on the earnings it keeps. That's a sign of the strong management Buffett is also known to look for."</p>
<p><em>Steven Halpern's </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em> offers a daily look at the latest market commentary and favorite stock picks and investment ideas from the nation's leading financial newsletter advisors.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/">McCain stock: Defense play with General Dynamics (GD)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1318089/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>GD</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>Peter Lynch</category><category>PeterLynch</category><category>Waren Buffett</category><category>WarenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Favorite funds for defense &amp; aerospace]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/favorite-funds-for-defense-and-aerospace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/favorite-funds-for-defense-and-aerospace/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/favorite-funds-for-defense-and-aerospace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>"Defense stocks never looked more attractive than they do now," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2347">Jim Powell</a>, who looks at two favorite ways to play the defense sector.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2347">Global Changes &amp; Opportunities Report</a>, he says, "The drop in defense stocks has more to do with the overall bear market in stocks than to any problems within the sector itself."</p>
<p>"Recent quarterly earnings from many defense companies are up, with signi?cant gains in revenues and earnings. </p>
<p>"Defense stocks have also been pushed down due to worries that the presidential election might go to Senator Obama, who is not expected to be a strong a supporter of the military. Historically, however, Republican and Democratic spending on defense has been about the same. </p>
<p>"Some investors may also be nervous about buying defense stocks if the U.S. is likely to reduce its presence in Iraq over the next few years. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/favorite-funds-for-defense-and-aerospace/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Favorite funds for defense &amp; aerospace</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/favorite-funds-for-defense-and-aerospace/">Favorite funds for defense &amp; aerospace</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/favorite-funds-for-defense-and-aerospace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1322130/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/favorite-funds-for-defense-and-aerospace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aerospace stocks</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>Fidelity Select Defense Aerospace</category><category>FidelitySelectDefenseAerospace</category><category>fsdax</category><category>Global Changes Opportunities Report</category><category>GlobalChangesOpportunitiesReport</category><category>Jim Powell</category><category>JimPowell</category><category>PowerShares Aerospace Defense</category><category>PowersharesAerospaceDefense</category><category>ppa</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>StevenHalpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A look at Lockheed (LMT): More than defense]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/a-look-at-lockheed-lmt-more-than-defense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/a-look-at-lockheed-lmt-more-than-defense/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/a-look-at-lockheed-lmt-more-than-defense/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>"Partial insulation from the economic slowdown, coupled with new military-aircraft programs, give <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Lockheed Martin</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">LMT</a>) attractive capital-gains potential over the next several years," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2246">Richard Moroney</a>. </p>
<p>In his blue chip oriented <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2246">Dow Theory Forecasts</a>, the advisor explains, "A diversified business mix provides investors a measure of safety in a dif?cult economic climate. The stock is a Focus List Buy."</p>
<p>"Lockheed seems well-positioned with regards to the U.S. defense budget, with very little exposure to Iraq. The company is capable of growing pro? ts even if the new U.S. president pulls troops out of the country. </p>
<p>"While defense-spending growth is likely to slow in coming years, ongoing security threats and the need to replace aging equipment should keep the baseline defense budget, which excludes war-related costs, growing through at least 2012. </p>
<p>"A diversified business mix provides investors a measure of safety in a dif?cult economic climate. After the Air Force, Lockheed's next-largest end market is civil government and homeland security, accounting for 26% of revenue. </p>
<p>"The U.S. Navy accounts for 20% of sales and the Army 10%. About 13% of sales are international, and the U.S. communications industry accounts for 3%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/a-look-at-lockheed-lmt-more-than-defense/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A look at Lockheed (LMT): More than defense</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/a-look-at-lockheed-lmt-more-than-defense/">A look at Lockheed (LMT): More than defense</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/a-look-at-lockheed-lmt-more-than-defense/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1278681/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/a-look-at-lockheed-lmt-more-than-defense/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aerospace stocks</category><category>AerospaceStocks</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>dow theory forecasts</category><category>DowTheoryForecasts</category><category>lmt</category><category>lockheed martin</category><category>LockheedMartin</category><category>recession resistant stocks</category><category>RecessionResistantStocks</category><category>richard moroney</category><category>RichardMoroney</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>StevenHalpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Raytheon says 'Game on']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/chasing-value-raytheon-says-game-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/chasing-value-raytheon-says-game-on/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/chasing-value-raytheon-says-game-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2008/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2008</a></p><p style="MARGIN: 0px"><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?from=view_symbol"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/rtn_logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>When you watch your kids playing war games on their computers, it must have occurred to you at some point that this might all be part of some grand scheme to get the next generation well-versed in a new set of skills. Hand-to-hand combat (except with their siblings) is out and unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs are in. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?from=view_symbol"><br /></a></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0px"><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?from=view_symbol"><br /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?from=view_symbol"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nintendo-wii.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a> The <a title="http://links.mkt751.com/ctt?kn=4&amp;m=1986684&amp;r=MTcyMjU3NjkyNgS2&amp;b=0&amp;j=OTYzMDI3NDYS1&amp;mt=1" style="COLOR: rgb(14,77,150); TEXT-DECORATION: underline" href="http://links.mkt751.com/ctt?kn=4&amp;m=1986684&amp;r=MTcyMjU3NjkyNgS2&amp;b=0&amp;j=OTYzMDI3NDYS1&amp;mt=1" name="www_boston_com_business_techno"><u>AP</u></a> (7/20) reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?from=view_symbol">Raytheon</a><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1211904700828*/"> Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?from=view_symbol">RTN</a>) recently unveiled "its new control system for unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs." Raytheon's "Universal Control System,...uses some hardware from the gaming world," and is expected to "shorten training time and help prevent crashes of expensive unmanned drone aircraft by providing a more interactive experience for the pilot." The company focused on "making the system more intuitive -- replacing keystrokes with a game console -- after consulting with experts and discovering that thumbs are the most energy-efficient and accurate way to control an aircraft."</p>
<p>Given Iran's recent missile tests and all the saber rattling that goes on around the world, it should be no surprise that governments have been seeking Raytheon's Patriot Missile technology for years, but RTN is also a leader in a wide range of radar systems, guidance systems, airport monitoring and control systems, and of course the latest in UAV technology.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/chasing-value-raytheon-says-game-on/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Raytheon says 'Game on'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/chasing-value-raytheon-says-game-on/">Chasing Value: Raytheon says 'Game on'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/chasing-value-raytheon-says-game-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262522/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/chasing-value-raytheon-says-game-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chasing value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Raytheon</category><category>RTN</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>video game technology</category><category>VideoGameTechnology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Boeing win the $35 billion tanker competition?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/will-boeing-win-the-35-billion-tanker-competition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/will-boeing-win-the-35-billion-tanker-competition/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/will-boeing-win-the-35-billion-tanker-competition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/noc/" rel="tag">Northrop Grumman (NOC)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/hot-products-2007-200-787-dreamliner--cs111207.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jul2008/db2008078_152126.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_news+%2B+analysis">BusinessWeek</a></em> reports that Defense Secretary Robert Gates is expected to make an announcement today about whether the Air Force will reopen the bidding for the $35 billion tanker program. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"><strong><font color="#0072bc">Boeing Inc.</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"><font color="#0072bc">BA</font></a>) thought it had a lock on it but earlier in the year, the Air Force awarded the contract to EADS, parent of Airbus, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northrop-grumman-corporation/noc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><strong><font color="#0072bc">Northrop Grumman</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northrop-grumman-corporation/noc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><font color="#0072bc">NOC</font></a>). Boeing protested and <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/ee5e4d00c8793bd8aec434e4cba2227f.htm">last month</a>, the General Accounting Office (GAO) reported that the award process was flawed.</p>
<p>That should come as no surprise. After all, Senator John McCain (R-AZ) was pushing for the European company to win the competition -- possibly since his then <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/john-mccains-finance-staff-helps-french-win-100-billion-air-fo/">national finance chairman</a> lobbied for that company. One of the sources I spoke with said that people suspect McCain arranged for a change in Tanker specifications to tilt the playing field in favor of EADS. This source also said that the Air Force neglected to notify Boeing of the change. Evidently, the GAO agreed that something was fishy here. It would be at least the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/how-to-buy-john-mccain/">fifth time</a> that McCain had been influenced by lobbyists.</p>
<p>Now attention turns to Gates and Congress which hosts a battle between Senators from Washington, where Boeing has operations, and Alabama, where Northrop employs workers. <em>BusinessWeek</em> quotes Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.), who introduced a Senate resolution on July 8, calling on the Pentagon to rebid the flawed tanker contract, as saying: "The GAO's decision was clear, and today we are reiterating that message so that the Pentagon knows there is no wiggle room. It's time to go back and hold a truly transparent competition that does our war fighters and taxpayers justice." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/will-boeing-win-the-35-billion-tanker-competition/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Boeing win the $35 billion tanker competition?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/will-boeing-win-the-35-billion-tanker-competition/">Will Boeing win the $35 billion tanker competition?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/will-boeing-win-the-35-billion-tanker-competition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1249988/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/will-boeing-win-the-35-billion-tanker-competition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aerospace</category><category>BA</category><category>boeing tanker protest</category><category>BoeingTankerProtest</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>NOC</category><category>pentagon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama &amp; McCain may go non-defensible]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/obama-and-mccain-may-go-non-defensible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/obama-and-mccain-may-go-non-defensible/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/obama-and-mccain-may-go-non-defensible/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/pentagon.jpg" alt="" />It was only last week that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) caused havoc in the stock market (or at least lead the charge) downgrading <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) among others, but now they have started to express concern that some of the defense sector stocks may be vulnerable to the next president's ax.<br /><br />Bloomberg is reporting that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=adXiGrYSU5PA&amp;refer=home">last month Goldman Sachs was issuing warnings</a> to their clients about the fact that Barack Obama and John McCain both may seek to reduce or end big ticket defense purchases such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/financials/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys/key-ratios">Lockheed Martin</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/financials/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys/key-ratios">LMT</a>) <a onmouseover="return escape( popwOpenWebSite( this ))" target="_blank" href="http://www.f22fighter.com/">F-22 fighter</a> and the Army's $159 billion <a onmouseover="return escape( popwOpenWebSite( this ))" target="_blank" href="https://www.fcs.army.mil/">Future Combat Systems</a>, a modernization plan jointly managed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) and <a onmouseover="return escape( popwQuoteShort( this, 'SAI:US' ))" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=SAI%3AUS">SAIC Inc.</a><br /><br />It was only a few weeks ago I posted <a target="_blank" title="View Chasing Value: General Dynamics &amp; Raytheon: The defense does not rest on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/chasing-value-general-dynamics-and-raytheon-the-defense-does-not/">Chasing Value: General Dynamics &amp; Raytheon: The defense does not rest</a> and things continued to look bright until a few days later, perhaps after the GS behind the scenes warning started to have an impact on the market that the sector took a mysterious swoon -- now I know why.<br /><br />If Goldman Sachs, one of the few investment houses with any credibility left, makes a move everyone else seems to want to get out of the way.<br /><br />I have viewed the defense sector favorably this year and will not abandon ship because GS is getting cold feet. They have been rather negative on everything lately and I do not think the (stock) world is coming to an end.<br /><br />The Bloomberg article notes that while some programs will be cut others will be added. It is all a guessing game as either presidential candidate will want to review the entirety of defense expenditures in a new administration.<br /><br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>Sheldon Liber</em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. He writes the columns <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a>. Disclosure: I own shares of GD.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/obama-and-mccain-may-go-non-defensible/">Obama &amp; McCain may go non-defensible</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/obama-and-mccain-may-go-non-defensible/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1241126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/obama-and-mccain-may-go-non-defensible/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BA</category><category>Bloomberg</category><category>Boeing Co</category><category>BoeingCo</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>defense sector</category><category>Defense stocks</category><category>DefenseSector</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>LMT</category><category>Lockheed Martin</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Flir Systems (FLIR): Technician zooms in on thermal imaging]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/flir-systems-flir-technician-zooms-in-on-thermal-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/flir-systems-flir-technician-zooms-in-on-thermal-imaging/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/flir-systems-flir-technician-zooms-in-on-thermal-imaging/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>"<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/flir-systems-inc/flir/nas">Flir Systems Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/flir-systems-inc/flir/nas">FLIR</a>) provides thermal-imaging and infrared camera equipment for military, law enforcement, and commercial applications," notes <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2052">Leo Fasciocco</a>. </p>
<p>In his <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2052">Ticker Tape Digest</a>, which focuses on stocks showing technical breakouts, he explains, "FLIR has convincingly broken out from a five-week base; the move was boosted by the win of a $359 million contract from the Army."</p>
<p>"FLIR, with annual revenues of $855 million, has been a sensational winner since 2001. It is a beneficiary of the war on terror and the need for equipment to combat it via military and security needs. </p>
<p>"Short-term, the daily chart shows the stock crossing its resistance line at 35.54. The move sends the stock over not only near-term resistance but also over the peak made back in early November. The action indicated very astute institutional buying. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/flir-systems-flir-technician-zooms-in-on-thermal-imaging/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Flir Systems (FLIR): Technician zooms in on thermal imaging</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/flir-systems-flir-technician-zooms-in-on-thermal-imaging/">Flir Systems (FLIR): Technician zooms in on thermal imaging</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/flir-systems-flir-technician-zooms-in-on-thermal-imaging/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1212895/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/flir-systems-flir-technician-zooms-in-on-thermal-imaging/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breakout stocks</category><category>BreakoutStocks</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>flir</category><category>flir systems</category><category>leo fasciocco</category><category>LeoFasciocco</category><category>military stocks</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>technical stocks</category><category>thermal imaging stocks</category><category>ThermalImagingStocks</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>ticker tape digest</category><category>TickerTapeDigest</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Raytheon (RTN): Ready for Recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/raytheon-rtn-ready-for-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/raytheon-rtn-ready-for-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/raytheon-rtn-ready-for-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>"The recent fits and spasms of the stock market predict tough times ahead; and ironically, that's good news for Raytheon (NYSE: RTN)," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=1818">Louis Basenese</a>, Oxford Club Associate Investment Director.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=1818">The Oxford Insight</a>, he notes, "When stocks are anticipating a recession, the best offense is often defense stocks -- and there's plenty of reason to expect this defense contractor to shine, even if a recession is confirmed."</p>
<p>"Defense will likely remain one of the largest budget items for the United States, regardless of which political party wins the fall election. And, according to JP Morgan Securities, the defense outlays of the United States actually increase, by an average of 6.5% during recession years since 1945. </p>
<p>"So in the end, recession or not, as the world's fifth largest defense contractor, Raytheon's sure to enjoy steady demand.</p>
<p>"I'm sure you've recently read, all about the large spy satellite that became disabled and was poised to re-enter earth's atmosphere with a dangerous load of toxic fuel. What few know is that Raytheon's Standard Missile-3 was specially modified to intercept the target 153 miles over the Pacific Ocean. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/raytheon-rtn-ready-for-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Raytheon (RTN): Ready for Recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/raytheon-rtn-ready-for-recession/">Raytheon (RTN): Ready for Recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/raytheon-rtn-ready-for-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1144959/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/raytheon-rtn-ready-for-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>defensive stocks</category><category>louis basenese</category><category>military stocks</category><category>MilitaryStocks</category><category>oxford club</category><category>oxford insight</category><category>OxfordInsight</category><category>raytheon</category><category>rtn</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Iraq, Inc.: How much will it cost us if we never leave?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/iraq-inc-how-much-will-it-cost-us-if-we-never-leave/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/iraq-inc-how-much-will-it-cost-us-if-we-never-leave/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/iraq-inc-how-much-will-it-cost-us-if-we-never-leave/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hal/" rel="tag">Halliburton (HAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img alt="A U.S. soldier from Bravo Company, 1st Battalion, 38 Regiment Infantry, patrols in West Baquba on Dec. 10." hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/us-soldier-iraq.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />My fellow Americans...hmm, that's overused....and I am not running for anything. HEY PEOPLE... too rude... To my fellow investors, read carefully: <em><strong>WE ARE NEVER LEAVING IRAQ!</strong></em> There, I said it, it's done.</p>
<p>Don't you wish some of our elected officials could tell it to us straight? We are not going to pull out of Iraq this year, next year, in 10 years or perhaps 100 years. Not unless we are chased out (although some locals are trying). It is true that we may reduce our forces over the next four or five years to a third of what we have there now, but we are not leaving. Since we are not leaving, I would like to see the business plan. Everyone has wanted to see the administration's strategic plan for some time, but a business plan will do.</p>
<p>The United States military never left Korea, Japan, Germany, Italy, and has advisors on every continent, just about every place we have ever gone. The only time we've left is when we were kicked out. The Iraqis will not be kicking us out. They need us to prevent an escalation of the civil war. They need our help rebuilding their infrastructure, (which we bombed), <em>and we want to do that!</em></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/iraq-inc-how-much-will-it-cost-us-if-we-never-leave/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Iraq, Inc.: How much will it cost us if we never leave?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/iraq-inc-how-much-will-it-cost-us-if-we-never-leave/">Iraq, Inc.: How much will it cost us if we never leave?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/iraq-inc-how-much-will-it-cost-us-if-we-never-leave/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1060693/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/iraq-inc-how-much-will-it-cost-us-if-we-never-leave/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defense spending</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseSpending</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>Halliburton (HAL)</category><category>Halliburton(hal)</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Iraq Inc.</category><category>IraqInc.</category><category>Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson(jnj)</category><category>medical supply stocks</category><category>MedicalSupplyStocks</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top Picks 2007: Dow Theory plays defense with Lockheed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/01/top-picks-2007-dow-theory-plays-defense-with-lockheed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/01/top-picks-2007-dow-theory-plays-defense-with-lockheed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/01/top-picks-2007-dow-theory-plays-defense-with-lockheed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a></p><p><em>Each year <strong>Steven Halpern</strong>, editor of </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em>, surveys the leading financial newsletter advisors asking for their favorite stocks for the coming year. This article is part of his 24th annual <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/stock_picks_2007_full_list">Top Picks Report</a>.</em></p>
<p><strong>Lockheed Martin</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">LMT</a>), the world's largest military weapons manufacturer, is the favorite conservative stock of <strong>Rich Moroney</strong>, editor of <a href="http://www.dowtheory.com">Dow Theory Forecasts</a>. The advisor notes,"Lockheed generates about 80% of sales to the U.S. government. Lockheed is the prime contractor for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, a large and well-funded defense program -- and one of the company's most significant development projects. </p>
<p>"Lockheed has been working to diversify its defense and intelligence work, as well as non-defense government work. Its information-systems and technology-services businesses have been growing nicely, as the government is increasingly outsourcing. </p>
<p>"In August, Lockheed was chosen as the prime contractor for NASA's successor to the space shuttle -- an award with an initial contract value of $4.2 billion. </p>
<p>"At 16 times estimated year-ahead earnings of $5.55 per share, the stock trades at a discount to its five-year average forward P/E of 17 and its peer-group average of 21. Lockheed is a Focus List Buy and a Long-Term Buy."</p>
<p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/richard_moroney.jpg" align="left" vspace="4" border="1" />To see Rich's favorite speculative idea for 2007, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/22/top-picks-2007-rich-moroney-gets-insured-in-philly/">click here</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/01/top-picks-2007-dow-theory-plays-defense-with-lockheed/">Top Picks 2007: Dow Theory plays defense with Lockheed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Jan 2007 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/01/top-picks-2007-dow-theory-plays-defense-with-lockheed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/719577/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/01/top-picks-2007-dow-theory-plays-defense-with-lockheed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aerospace stocks</category><category>AerospaceStocks</category><category>best financial newsletters</category><category>best newsletter advisors</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>dow theory forecasts</category><category>DowTheoryForecasts</category><category>favorite stocks for 2007</category><category>LMT</category><category>Lockheed</category><category>military stocks</category><category>MilitaryStocks</category><category>rich moroney</category><category>RichMoroney</category><category>top picks for 2007</category><category>top stocks for 2007</category><category>TopPicksFor2007</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top Picks 2007:  TechValue indentifies security ID play]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a></p><p><em>Each year <strong>Steven Halpern</strong>, editor of </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em>, surveys the leading financial newsletter advisors asking for their favorite stocks for the coming year. This article is part of his 24th annual </em><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/stock_picks_2007_full_list"><em>Top Picks Report</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><strong><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/mark_mowrey.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Cogent</strong> <strong>Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cogent-inc/cogt/nas">COGT</a>) is a top speculative idea from <strong>Mark Mowrey</strong>, editor of the <a href="http://www.newsletters.forbes.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&amp;Locale=en_US&amp;id=ProductDetailsPage&amp;SiteID=es_764&amp;productID=35427600&amp;pgm=6117300">Prudent Speculator TechValue Report</a>. He explains, "Cogent's identification technology emphasizes the uniqueness of the human fingerprint as the best method for identifying its owner. </p>
<p>"Other potentially more reliable technologies exist, such as retinal, facial, voice, and vascular identification, but none has proved as long-term successful in the field as fingerprint matching. Applications include the obvious, like law enforcement and access restriction, and the not so obvious, such as laptop security and fingerprint-based payment systems. </p>
<p>"Revenue peaked in 2005, the bulk coming from two primary customers: the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the National Electoral Council of Venezuela. Work continues with both agencies, but orders have become less predictable. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top Picks 2007:  TechValue indentifies security ID play</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/">Top Picks 2007:  TechValue indentifies security ID play</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/721592/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>al frank</category><category>AlFrank</category><category>best financial newsletters</category><category>best newsletter advisors</category><category>cogent</category><category>cogt</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>favorite stocks for 2007</category><category>fingerprint ID</category><category>FingerprintId</category><category>homeland security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>john buckingham</category><category>JohnBuckingham</category><category>mark mowrey</category><category>MarkMowrey</category><category>prudent speculator techvalue</category><category>PrudentSpeculatorTechvalue</category><category>security stocks</category><category>SecurityStocks</category><category>top picks for 2007</category><category>top stocks for 2007</category><category>TopPicksFor2007</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Raytheon sells aircraft business for $3.3 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/raytheon-sells-aircraft-business-for-3-3-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/raytheon-sells-aircraft-business-for-3-3-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/raytheon-sells-aircraft-business-for-3-3-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/fly-logo-live.gif" /></a>Defense giant Ratheon Company (NYSE:RTN), the world's largest manufacturer of missiles, sold its business jet unit Thursday to <a href="http://www.onex.com/">Onex Corporation</a> (TSE:OCX) and <a href="http:// http://www2.goldmansachs.com/">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE:GS) for $3.3 billion. <br /><br />Raytheon said the deal completes an effort to focus its business on defense contracts and government work. <br /><br />Raytheon, which is perhaps best known for the Tomahawk cruise missile, also cut its earnings per share guidance for the year to <a href="http:// http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=149999&amp;TICK=RTN&amp;STORY=/www/story/12-21-2006/0004495251&amp;EDATE=Dec+21,+2006 ">$2.75-2.90,</a> down from <a href="http:// http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=149999&amp;TICK=RTN&amp;STORY=/www/story/12-21-2006/0004495251&amp;EDATE=Dec+21,+2006 ">$2.90-$3.05.</a> Raytheon's shares were virtually unchanged Thursday at mid-day, up just 2 cents to $53.88. <br /><strong><br /></strong>Raytheon is a moderate-risk stock not suitable for conservative investors. If one's portfolio can tolerate moderate risk and someone does not already own a defense-industry stock, they could consider buying RTN on a pull-back to $53. They should then dollar-cost-average-in their position by buying 25% of their position for 4 weeks. They could buy 25 shares each time, if they typically buy a 100 shares; 100 shares each time if they buy 400. That could provide some protection against potential short-term dips.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/raytheon-sells-aircraft-business-for-3-3-billion/">Raytheon sells aircraft business for $3.3 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/raytheon-sells-aircraft-business-for-3-3-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/722991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/raytheon-sells-aircraft-business-for-3-3-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>Raytheon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
