<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The 2001 Bush Income Tax Cut: A Major Policy Mistake]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/the-2001-bush-income-tax-cut-a-major-policy-mistake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/the-2001-bush-income-tax-cut-a-major-policy-mistake/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/the-2001-bush-income-tax-cut-a-major-policy-mistake/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/bushpic-240.jpg"  alt="George Bush" />The 2001 Bush income tax cut is one of those issues whose fate has been sealed by objective economic conditions.</p>
<p>Simply, if the U.S. economy had registered robust growth during the final two years of the Bush administration, and no other negative economic events occurred, the tax cut, which will increase the deficit by <a href="http:// http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&amp;id=3036">$336 billion</a> this fiscal year, $295 billion in fiscal 2011, and by more than $320 billion per year through fiscal 2019, perhaps would have had a chance of being extended.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/the-2001-bush-income-tax-cut-a-major-policy-mistake/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The 2001 Bush Income Tax Cut: A Major Policy Mistake</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/the-2001-bush-income-tax-cut-a-major-policy-mistake/">The 2001 Bush Income Tax Cut: A Major Policy Mistake</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/the-2001-bush-income-tax-cut-a-major-policy-mistake/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19627681/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/the-2001-bush-income-tax-cut-a-major-policy-mistake/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond market</category><category>budget deficit</category><category>Bush tax cut</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>income taxes</category><category>interest rates</category><category>Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Former Reagan Budget Director Stockman Opposes Extending Bush Tax Cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/former-reagan-budget-director-stockman-opposes-extending-bush-ta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/former-reagan-budget-director-stockman-opposes-extending-bush-ta/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/former-reagan-budget-director-stockman-opposes-extending-bush-ta/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/irs.jpg"  alt="" />A key figure in the Reagan administration's supply side economics policy implementation opposes extending the 2001 Bush income tax cut.<br />
<br />
David Stockman, who served as budget director under President Reagan, in a <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http:// http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/opinion/01stockman.html?pagewanted=1&amp;sq=david%20stockman&amp;st=cse&amp;scp=1">op-ed piece</a>, said a Republican effort "to extend the unaffordable Bush tax cuts would amount to a bankruptcy filing."<br />
<br />
Stockman also called the current Republican stance of wanting to extend the tax breaks as not fiscal responsibility, but "vulgar Keynesianism robed in the ideological vestments of the prosperous classes."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/former-reagan-budget-director-stockman-opposes-extending-bush-ta/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Former Reagan Budget Director Stockman Opposes Extending Bush Tax Cuts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/former-reagan-budget-director-stockman-opposes-extending-bush-ta/">Former Reagan Budget Director Stockman Opposes Extending Bush Tax Cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/former-reagan-budget-director-stockman-opposes-extending-bush-ta/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19579265/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/former-reagan-budget-director-stockman-opposes-extending-bush-ta/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget deficit</category><category>Bush tax cuts</category><category>Democrats</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Republicans</category><category>Stockman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Washington Gridlock: Upside and Downside]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/capitol-senate-240.jpg" />One upside to gridlock in Washington? The U.S. Congress won't likely move forward with its effort to allow the General Accounting Office to audit the <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/">U.S. Federal Reserve</a>.<br />
<br />
One (big) downside? President Obama and Congressional Republicans, particularly Republicans in the Senate may not be able to agree on next year's budget. This could result in a shutdown of the federal government if the two political parties don't agree to pass a continuing resolution in the meantime. Any inability of the parties to agree on new budget or a continuing resolution as a temporary bridge will likely rattle both the bond and stock markets.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Washington Gridlock: Upside and Downside</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/">Washington Gridlock: Upside and Downside</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19370392/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/24/washington-gridlock-upside-and-downside/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>democrats</category><category>obama</category><category>politics</category><category>republicans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[This Is How Washington Works: Most Times, It Doesn't]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/this-is-how-washington-works-most-times-it-doesn-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/this-is-how-washington-works-most-times-it-doesn-t/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/this-is-how-washington-works-most-times-it-doesn-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/whitehouse-getty.jpg" alt="" />In the past year, President Barack Obama has been introduced to Washington's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik">realpolitik</a>. As MarketWatch Washington Bureau Chief <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-wont-quit-on-health-jobs-bipartisanship-2010-01-27">Rex Nutting</a> aptly put it: <em>This is how Washington works. The truth is, most times, it doesn't.</em></p>
<p>In theory, congressional lawmakers and the executive branch should be able to find common ground, aided by that long-standing American habit of compromise, to solve the nation's problems.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/this-is-how-washington-works-most-times-it-doesn-t/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>This Is How Washington Works: Most Times, It Doesn't</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/this-is-how-washington-works-most-times-it-doesn-t/">This Is How Washington Works: Most Times, It Doesn't</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/this-is-how-washington-works-most-times-it-doesn-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19365668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/this-is-how-washington-works-most-times-it-doesn-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Democrats</category><category>gridlock</category><category>Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[For Democrats, the Only Good News Is It's January, Not November]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/for-democrats-the-only-good-news-is-its-january-not-november/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/for-democrats-the-only-good-news-is-its-january-not-november/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/for-democrats-the-only-good-news-is-its-january-not-november/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/capitol-senate-240.jpg"  alt="" />A few points about the public policy impact of Tuesday's stunning Republican victory in the Massachusetts U.S. Senate election:<br />
<br />
You'll hear a great deal of analysis arguing that health care reform, and the bank bail-out, convinced Independents to vote for <a href="http://news.aol.com/article/in-epic-upset-gops-brown-wins-mass/859842?cid=10">Republican Scott Brown.</a> To be sure, those two factors (in political science, they're called <em>variables</em>) played a role, as did Democratic candidate Martha Oakley's listless, clumsy campaign, but the biggest factor affecting vote was the Massachusetts' unemployment rate, which is high, as it is across the United States.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/for-democrats-the-only-good-news-is-its-january-not-november/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>For Democrats, the Only Good News Is It's January, Not November</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/for-democrats-the-only-good-news-is-its-january-not-november/">For Democrats, the Only Good News Is It's January, Not November</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/for-democrats-the-only-good-news-is-its-january-not-november/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19324536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/for-democrats-the-only-good-news-is-its-january-not-november/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Brown</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Oakley</category><category>Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The unemployed are seeking answers: Obama, Democrats must deliver]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/the-unemployed-are-seeking-answers-obama-democrats-must-delive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/the-unemployed-are-seeking-answers-obama-democrats-must-delive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/the-unemployed-are-seeking-answers-obama-democrats-must-delive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/11/unemploymentrate.jpg" alt="" />As most investors know, before President Obama took the oath of office, there were <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/the-bush-economic-legacy-the-u-s-s-decade-of-descent/">a half dozen problems waiting for him</a> and his administration -- problems that no-doubt have discouraged many qualified, future aspirants from even thinking of running for the presidency during what will surely be a decade of repair and correction for the United States.</p>
<p>But if one had to isolate one problem President Obama must fix -- one on which his presidency will likely hinge -- it would be, of course, the U.S. economy, and within that, the issue of jobs.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/the-unemployed-are-seeking-answers-obama-democrats-must-delive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The unemployed are seeking answers: Obama, Democrats must deliver</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/the-unemployed-are-seeking-answers-obama-democrats-must-delive/">The unemployed are seeking answers: Obama, Democrats must deliver</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/the-unemployed-are-seeking-answers-obama-democrats-must-delive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19267528/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/the-unemployed-are-seeking-answers-obama-democrats-must-delive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010 elections</category><category>2012 elections</category><category>Arianna Huffington</category><category>birthers</category><category>congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job creation</category><category>Obama</category><category>populism</category><category>Sarah Palin</category><category>tea party</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fiscal stimulus package's primary flaw: It was too small]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys"><em>New York Times</em></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) columnist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/opinion/02krugman.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion">Paul Krugman</a> argues quite persuasively that the major problem with the fiscal stimulus package was that it was too small, given the financial crisis and the large economic crater the accompanying, pronounced recession created. <br /><br />Further, the fiscal stimulus' many benefits -- including substantial job retention in essential public services such as education -- are harder to see and not likely to translate into too much political gain for President Obama and Congressional Democrats, he said. That's consistent with a political science axiom -- often repeated by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Massachusetts -- that <em>"Congress gets little credit or benefit for averting something."</em> Indeed, retained jobs are hard to see, and the fact that a local public school system is is still operating with as many teachers is an accomplishment, but one that most American voters will take for granted, and not give Democrats credit for.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fiscal stimulus package's primary flaw: It was too small</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/">Fiscal stimulus package's primary flaw: It was too small</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19219381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Democrats</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[On health care reform, Democrats' best strategy may be to 'go it alone']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/on-health-care-reform-democrats-best-strategy-may-be-to-go-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/on-health-care-reform-democrats-best-strategy-may-be-to-go-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/on-health-care-reform-democrats-best-strategy-may-be-to-go-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/barack-obama.jpg" width="220" height="288" alt="" />The best strategy for President Obama and congressional Democrats regarding health care reform may be to "go it alone" -- to pass a bill that has Democratic Party support, with maybe one or two Republicans.</p>
<p>Further, the era of bipartisan cooperation is over, if it ever really began. The U.S. Congress is as polarized as it ever has been in the post-World War II era, with ideologues dominating each party. <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">President Obama</a>'s effort to forge a post-partisan politics was admirable, but it did not get very far, largely due to a Republican Party that's dominated by a conservative base, but also due to a Democratic Party committed to largely liberal goals.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/on-health-care-reform-democrats-best-strategy-may-be-to-go-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>On health care reform, Democrats' best strategy may be to 'go it alone'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/on-health-care-reform-democrats-best-strategy-may-be-to-go-it/">On health care reform, Democrats' best strategy may be to 'go it alone'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/on-health-care-reform-democrats-best-strategy-may-be-to-go-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19153525/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/on-health-care-reform-democrats-best-strategy-may-be-to-go-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>democrats</category><category>healthcare</category><category>healthcare reform</category><category>obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economically, Democrats still don't have a large enough majority in Congress]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><div style="DISPLAY: block" id="imageResults"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>Amid the lamentable health care reform debate, one fact is incontrovertible: despite President Barack Obama's large 2008 presidential election victory, one in which the Democrats gained 21 seats (to 257-178) in the House and eight seats in the Senate (59-40, not counting the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy's seat), the Democratic Party's majority still is not large enough to pass progressive legislation.</p>
<p>The solution to this is obvious enough: win more seats in the 2010 off-year congressional election, and then in the 2012 presidential/congressional election. And how does a majority party accomplish the above? By solving the nation's problems. These days, that means: 1) getting the U.S. economy growing again with robust job growth, 2) keeping the U.S. safe against international terrorism, and 3) ending the Iraq War successfully and making substantial progress toward victory in the Afghanistan War.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economically, Democrats still don't have a large enough majority in Congress</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/">Economically, Democrats still don't have a large enough majority in Congress</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19154669/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Charles Cook</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>elections</category><category>health care reform</category><category>Republicans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Antitrust orgy coming: Airlines, tech and others in sights]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/gavel.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>Christine A. Varney heads up antitrust at the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofJustice/">Department of Justice</a>, and she's going hunting. She is the point person for a group consisting of the presidential administration and some Congressional <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Democrats/">Democrats</a> that is looking to put the breaks on large companies in several industries. </p>
<p>Already, airlines have run into roadblocks when requesting relief from antitrust regulations. Varney &amp; Co. are digging into complaints by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/att/nys" target="_blank">AT&amp;T</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/att/nys" target="_blank">ATT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys" target="_blank">Verizon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys" target="_blank">VZ</a>) that cable competitors - e.g., <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys" target="_blank">Cablevision</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys" target="_blank">CVC</a>) - have locked them out of the market for cable company-produced programming. </p>
<p>(Imagine that, a phone company complaining! Usually, they're the objects of derision.)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Antitrust orgy coming: Airlines, tech and others in sights</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/">Antitrust orgy coming: Airlines, tech and others in sights</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32149153/ns/business-the_new_york_times/page/2/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19109832/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>antitrust law</category><category>AntitrustLaw</category><category>antitrustregulations</category><category>att</category><category>cable television</category><category>CableCompany</category><category>cablevision</category><category>cablevisionsystems</category><category>cox communications</category><category>CoxCommunications</category><category>cvc</category><category>democrats</category><category>department of justice</category><category>DepartmentOfJustice</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>obama administration</category><category>ObamaAdministration</category><category>president barack obama</category><category>PresidentBarackObama</category><category>telecom</category><category>telecommunications</category><category>vz</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If the U.S. economy strengthens, Fiscal Stimulus II may be shelved]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/eliyokley.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />In his column last week, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys"><span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">New York Times</span></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman laid waste to those who argue that he's not critically assessing Obama administration programs. He offered a cogent critique of the U.S. Treasury's tardiness regarding <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/06/opinion/06krugman.html?scp=2&amp;sq=KRUGMAN%20March%201&amp;st=cse">the banking system fix. </a><br /><br />Either temporarily nationalize those banks that are clogging the system, buy the toxic assets at unsubsidized prices, or announce some other market-valued removal plan to unclog the system, but let's put this train in motion, Krugman said, in so many words, to get to the root of the matter: We need to get credit flowing freely to facilitate commerce. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>If the U.S. economy strengthens, Fiscal Stimulus II may be shelved</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/">If the U.S. economy strengthens, Fiscal Stimulus II may be shelved</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1484398/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>New York Times op-ed</category><category>NewYorkTimesOp-ed</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>Republicans</category><category>toxic assets</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will the U.S. economy need a second fiscal stimulus package? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/will-the-u-s-economy-need-a-second-fiscal-stimulus-package/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/will-the-u-s-economy-need-a-second-fiscal-stimulus-package/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/will-the-u-s-economy-need-a-second-fiscal-stimulus-package/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/econpicture.jpg" alt="" />In the landmark, blockbuster film <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaws_(film)">"Jaws"</a> (1975), reluctant sailor, Police Chief Martin Brody (Roy Scheider), while chumming bait, gets his first look at the great white shark that's been terrorizing Amity's shoreline community. Captain Quint (Robert Shaw) and Marine Biologist Matt Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss) are immediately struck by the shark's size. <br /><br />But Chief Brody is struck by another reality. "You're gonna need a bigger boat," Brody said. <br /><br />In today's environment, with the U.S. economy in a pronounced recession and credit markets still constrained, the Keyensians - - which include most Congressional Democrats - - are playing the role of Chief Brody. They know what's needed to go after that shark (the recession). <br /><br />'You're gonna need a bigger stimulus.' (In this case the 'bigger stimulus' means <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/13/AR2009021303319.html?hpid=topnews">a second stimulus package.</a>)<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/will-the-u-s-economy-need-a-second-fiscal-stimulus-package/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will the U.S. economy need a second fiscal stimulus package? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/will-the-u-s-economy-need-a-second-fiscal-stimulus-package/">Will the U.S. economy need a second fiscal stimulus package? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/will-the-u-s-economy-need-a-second-fiscal-stimulus-package/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1472540/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/will-the-u-s-economy-need-a-second-fiscal-stimulus-package/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailout</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>Obama</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Where does the U.S. economy go from here?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/question-mark01.jpg" />The U.S.'s first fiscal stimulus package 'of size' since the recession's start has passed - - albeit in a modified form that decreased spending by about $140 billion over the original outline.<br /><br />Further, the young <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">President Barack Obama,</a> like the young President John F. Kennedy, has learned that presidential honeymoons can be short inside the beltway, particularly if you have to trade policy to obtain votes both inside your party and among the loyal opposition.<br /><br />Meanwhile, investors and the financial community more broader await the specifics pertaining to Obama administration's revised plan to <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/news/index1.html">stabilize the banking system,</a> with <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">the declining Dow</a> discounting that even a successful plan will require months of systemic adjustment, and, of course, more public funds.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Where does the U.S. economy go from here?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/">Where does the U.S. economy go from here?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458393/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>gdp</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fiscal stimulus package is big, but may not be big enough]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/fiscal-stimulus-package-is-big-but-may-not-be-big-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/fiscal-stimulus-package-is-big-but-may-not-be-big-enough/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/fiscal-stimulus-package-is-big-but-may-not-be-big-enough/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" />As the U.S. Senate <a href="http://news.aol.com/article/stimulus-package-faces-senate-procedural/332445">prepares to vote</a> on an $820-$900 billion fiscal stimulus bill and send it to a House / Senate conference committee, a stark reality confronted lawmakers: the stimulus package may not be large enough. <br /><br />A group led by Senate Moderate Republicans and selected Democrats cut roughly $60-80 billion from the bill, in what they believe to be wasteful spending and / or items not directly related to stimulating the economy. <br /><br />Economist Richard Felson said lawmakers may find themselves staring at an economy in six months that needs another stimulus jolt, and given the two options, it's better to provide the stimulus all at once, from a GDP-impact standpoint.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/fiscal-stimulus-package-is-big-but-may-not-be-big-enough/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fiscal stimulus package is big, but may not be big enough</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/fiscal-stimulus-package-is-big-but-may-not-be-big-enough/">Fiscal stimulus package is big, but may not be big enough</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/fiscal-stimulus-package-is-big-but-may-not-be-big-enough/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1454368/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/fiscal-stimulus-package-is-big-but-may-not-be-big-enough/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Now is really the time for Congress to choose correctly ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><span style="font-style: italic;">
<div style="display: block;" id="imageResults"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" /></div>
<p>New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/opinion/06krugman.html">Paul Krugman</a> knows the situation facing the United States is very serious, so he doesn't mince words.</p>
</span> columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist knows the situation facing the United States is very serious, so he doesn't mince words.
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">Krugman outlined</a>: The housing sector has collapsed. Consumers have sharply decreased their spending, due to a declining stock market, home prices, and stagnant wages. Businesses are cutting investment. Exports, the formerly one strength of the economy, are plunging, as the recession grips emerging markets. The Fed has already cut short-term interest rates to zero. And there are signs of deflation. In sum, the U.S. economy is very close to the dreaded negative spiral that tends to feed on itself, and that could continue for a long, long time without fiscal stimulus.</p>
<p>Hence, the nation needs to pass the fiscal stimulus package, and if anything, the current package is too small, he argued.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT's Krugman: Now is really the time for Congress to choose correctly </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/">NYT's Krugman: Now is really the time for Congress to choose correctly </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1453377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>fisal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>Keynes</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ray of Light: U.S. Senate adds $15,000 homebuyer tax credit to stimulus bill ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/ray-of-light-u-s-senate-adds-15-000-homebuyer-tax-credit-to-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/ray-of-light-u-s-senate-adds-15-000-homebuyer-tax-credit-to-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/ray-of-light-u-s-senate-adds-15-000-homebuyer-tax-credit-to-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/house_renovation.jpg" alt="" />Now we're talking fiscal stimulus. In a move to provide stimulus and economic incentives to a sector that, arguably, needs them the most, the U.S. Senate has added to the fiscal stimulus package a tax credit for up to $15,000 for homebuyers,<span style="font-style: italic;"> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/us/politics/05stimulus.html?_r=1&amp;hp">The New York Times </a></span><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1233857678024*/">reported. </a><br /><br />Economists and public policy analysts caution that the Senate has yet to vote on the stimulus bill, and the legislation, if approved, would then have to be reconciled, via a conference committee, with the stimulus package passed by the House. Nevertheless, economist Peter Dawson still likes the direction of the February wind in Washington.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/ray-of-light-u-s-senate-adds-15-000-homebuyer-tax-credit-to-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ray of Light: U.S. Senate adds $15,000 homebuyer tax credit to stimulus bill </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/ray-of-light-u-s-senate-adds-15-000-homebuyer-tax-credit-to-s/">Ray of Light: U.S. Senate adds $15,000 homebuyer tax credit to stimulus bill </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/ray-of-light-u-s-senate-adds-15-000-homebuyer-tax-credit-to-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1451369/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/ray-of-light-u-s-senate-adds-15-000-homebuyer-tax-credit-to-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Democrats</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>homebuyer tax credit</category><category>housing sector</category><category>median home prices</category><category>Obama Administration</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Senate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[President Obama pushes hard for $900 billion stimulus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/president-obama-pushes-hard-for-900-billion-stimulus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/president-obama-pushes-hard-for-900-billion-stimulus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/president-obama-pushes-hard-for-900-billion-stimulus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/obamacell.jpg" />President Obama is starting to flex his leadership muscles and spend his hard-won political capital.<br /><br />In remarks before House Democrats in Virginia Thursday night that sounded more like one of his successful campaign speeches that energized millions, Obama argued that the nation's economic well being requires swift approval of the roughly $900 billion fiscal stimulus package.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/president-obama-pushes-hard-for-900-billion-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>President Obama pushes hard for $900 billion stimulus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/president-obama-pushes-hard-for-900-billion-stimulus/">President Obama pushes hard for $900 billion stimulus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://http//www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aK59AQEawHC8&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/president-obama-pushes-hard-for-900-billion-stimulus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1452033/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/president-obama-pushes-hard-for-900-billion-stimulus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>President Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bailed out bank executives, if smart, will accept Obama's $500k cap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>With the Obama administration's <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/obama-details-plan-to-cap-executive-pay/328073">$500,000 executive pay cap</a> for bailed out companies imposed, the more important and more determining question concerns how the American people respond. <br /><br />Ironically, the public's reaction may hinge on how Wall Street and the broader financial community reacts.<br /><br />Historically, Americans have opposed pay caps and generally looked unfavorably on government -- particularly federal government -- efforts to interfere with market-based valuations of talent / labor. In a nutshell, the public favors a minimum wage but believes "the sky's the limit" regarding compensation; if a board of directors, business partner or negotiated contract says you're worth $10 million a year in salary and bonus, then you deserve $10 million year.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bailed out bank executives, if smart, will accept Obama's $500k cap</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/">Bailed out bank executives, if smart, will accept Obama's $500k cap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1450443/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>Geithner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>pay cap</category><category>public opinion</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economists: Modify fiscal stimulus package, but pass it, pronto]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/economists-modify-fiscal-stimulus-package-but-pass-it-pronto/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/economists-modify-fiscal-stimulus-package-but-pass-it-pronto/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/economists-modify-fiscal-stimulus-package-but-pass-it-pronto/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/econstim.jpg" alt="" />Senate debate resumed Tuesday on the <a href="http://news.aol.com/main/obama-presidency/article/obama-economic-stimulus-bill/324336">fiscal stimulus package,</a> and as it did several economists offered their policy advice for the august members of the world's greatest deliberative body. <br /><br />The biggest change should concern size, so says economist David H. Wang. "It's too small. A $900 billion plan is good, but the stimulus plans that most effectively increase GDP are ones that are large, and the bigger the package, the bigger bang you'll get for your buck, from a GDP standpoint," Wang said. Wang said he would add at least $300 billion in spending to the plan.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/economists-modify-fiscal-stimulus-package-but-pass-it-pronto/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economists: Modify fiscal stimulus package, but pass it, pronto</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/economists-modify-fiscal-stimulus-package-but-pass-it-pronto/">Economists: Modify fiscal stimulus package, but pass it, pronto</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.aol.com/main/obama-presidency/article/obama-economic-stimulus-bill/324336>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/economists-modify-fiscal-stimulus-package-but-pass-it-pronto/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448952/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/economists-modify-fiscal-stimulus-package-but-pass-it-pronto/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Here's a better bank rescue, for the taxpayer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />You have to appreciate the cleverness of this era's financial humor. (Note that I said, <em>appreciate</em> the cleverness, not love, or enjoy. That's because, depending on your perspective, the humor is either on-the-mark, or not that funny. But that is part of the subjective nature of humor.)<br /><br />One joke making the rounds:<br /><em><br />Question: What's the capital of Iceland? </em><br /><em>Answer: $25. </em><br /><br /><em>Another:</em> <em>In the old days, banks lent money to people. These days, people lend money to banks. </em><br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys"><em>New York Times</em></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist <a href="http:// http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/02/opinion/02krugman.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion ">Paul Krugman</a> discusses bank capital and lending in his most recent column, and argues that the apparent likely Obama administration fix for the banking sector -- a combination of U.S. government purchase of toxic assets and guarantees against losses on other assets, each on terms favorable to the banks -- represents a lousy deal for the U.S. taxpayer, who'll end up "footing the bill for rescuing the banks."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT's Krugman: Here's a better bank rescue, for the taxpayer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/">NYT's Krugman: Here's a better bank rescue, for the taxpayer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1449277/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailout</category><category>bank rescue</category><category>banking sector</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>Keynesian</category><category>Obama Administration</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>Republicans</category><category>toxic assets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
