<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Foreigners not spending on U.S. travel, down 22%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/foreigners-not-spending-on-u-s-travel-down-22/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/foreigners-not-spending-on-u-s-travel-down-22/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/foreigners-not-spending-on-u-s-travel-down-22/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/british-airways.jpg" />Despite a net increase of 1.6% in U.S. exports in May 2009, services exports fell 0.4% with travel <a target="_blank" href="http://www.travmedia.com/north-america/pressrelease.php?id=47608&amp;mo=2&amp;referencekey=bbb97410e3dd7308d5c5e75cc6d768c2">and tourism exports off a whopping 3% month-over-month</a>. According to data from the U.S. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofCommerce/">Department of Commerce</a>, spending related to travel from other countries to the United States fell to $9.5 billion for the month - down 22% year-over-year. </p>
<p>The global travel market continues to feel the squeeze from an ongoing recession, as travel discounts and cheaper fares have been insufficient to counteract sluggish consumer spending. Recreational travel just isn't a priority these days, and businesses are curtailing travel budgets as they try to shore up their resources and spend prudently. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/foreigners-not-spending-on-u-s-travel-down-22/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Foreigners not spending on U.S. travel, down 22%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/foreigners-not-spending-on-u-s-travel-down-22/">Foreigners not spending on U.S. travel, down 22%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.travmedia.com/north-america/pressrelease.php?id=47608&amp;mo=2&amp;referencekey=bbb97410e3dd7308d5c5e75cc6d768c2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/foreigners-not-spending-on-u-s-travel-down-22/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19107203/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/foreigners-not-spending-on-u-s-travel-down-22/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of commerce</category><category>DepartmentOfCommerce</category><category>featured</category><category>tourism</category><category>tourism and travel</category><category>tourism industry</category><category>TourismAndTravel</category><category>TourismIndustry</category><category>travel</category><category>travel industry</category><category>TravelIndustry</category><category>traveling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer sentiment down, according to everyone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/not-hiring.jpg" alt="" />There are two competing positions on consumer sentiment right now. One is that it turned south last week, as people worried about their jobs - always a bad sign for spending. The other is that consumer sentiment didn't crap out in July: it fizzled in May. So, it's not a question of whether consumers aren't confident in the U.S. economic machine, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1040347420090710">it's just a matter of when the collective mood changed</a>. </p>
<p>The July camp is set up around the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1040347420090710">Reuters</a>/<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/UniversityofMichiganSurveysofConsumers/">University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers</a>, which makes now the weakest point for consumer sentiment since March. Those who favor May look to domestic demand for foreign goods, which went soft two months ago,  bringing the monthly trade deficit to its narrowest since 1999. The U.S. trade gap unexpectedly tightened to $26 billion in May, with exports up 1.6% and imports down 0.6%, according to the U.S. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofCommerce/">Department of Commerce</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer sentiment down, according to everyone</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/">Consumer sentiment down, according to everyone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1040347420090710>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19094744/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of commerce</category><category>DepartmentOfCommerce</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>economiccrisis</category><category>economics</category><category>EconomicStimulus</category><category>economy</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>reuters</category><category>university of michigan</category><category>university of michigan surveys of consumers</category><category>UniversityOfMichigan</category><category>UniversityOfMichiganSurveysOfConsumers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Housing: If you can't call a bottom, at least use creative language]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/housing-if-you-cant-call-a-bottom-at-least-use-creative-langu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/housing-if-you-cant-call-a-bottom-at-least-use-creative-langu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/housing-if-you-cant-call-a-bottom-at-least-use-creative-langu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img alt="Down" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/down.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />How low can you go?
<p>The new home sale numbers came out today, and to no one's surprise, they were <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119089524605541278.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">uglier than ever.</a> Sales of new single family homes fell by 8.3% last month, according to Commerce Dept. data, the lowest level in seven years. </p>
<p>Year-to-year, new home sales were 21.2% lower than the level in August of 2006, according to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> (subscription required). </p>
<p>Oh dear. So much for bottom calling. The housing sector has dragged on the U.S. economy for six straight quarters now, and shows no signs of getting any lighter. </p>
<p>The WSJ's <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2007/09/27/economists-react-prices-need-to-fall-further/">Economics Blog</a> got the reaction of a handful of economists. The language is grim. </p>
<p><strong>"Hideous" </strong>Ian Shepherdson of High Frequency Economics said. "Housing is nowhere near the bottom; neither is its wider impact."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/housing-if-you-cant-call-a-bottom-at-least-use-creative-langu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Housing: If you can't call a bottom, at least use creative language</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/housing-if-you-cant-call-a-bottom-at-least-use-creative-langu/">Housing: If you can't call a bottom, at least use creative language</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/housing-if-you-cant-call-a-bottom-at-least-use-creative-langu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/999879/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/housing-if-you-cant-call-a-bottom-at-least-use-creative-langu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of commerce</category><category>DepartmentOfCommerce</category><category>featured</category><category>housing</category><category>subprime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Tilsner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
