<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Retail hiring up from last year, but still well below average]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/retail-hiring-up-from-last-year-but-still-well-below-average/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/retail-hiring-up-from-last-year-but-still-well-below-average/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/retail-hiring-up-from-last-year-but-still-well-below-average/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/black-friday/" rel="tag">Black Friday</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ltd/" rel="tag">Limited Brands (LTD)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/shops.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Sluggish retail sales in November didn't stop retailers from adding bodies. A report by outplacement consulting company <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>, reavealed to BloggingStocks, shows that retail sector payrolls grew to 321,300 in November, an improvement from the previous month's 233,700. This follows 54,200 retail hires in October, bringing the total number of seasonal retail employees up to 375,500. Already, that comes close to the 384,300 hired from October through December in 2008. The analysis is based on data supplied by the <a href="http://www.dol.gov" target="_blank">Department of Labor</a>.<br /><br />High expectations for the holiday season likely contributed to the up-tick in hiring. The estimated 0.5% growth from Black Friday 2008 to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BlackFriday/">Black Friday</a> 2009 was a disappointment, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/retail-sales-fell-in-november-surprising-analysts/" target="_blank">November sales were off 0.3%, surprising analysts</a>, who expected the trend to go in the other direction. Costco (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/costco-wholesale-corporation/cost/nas" target="_blank">COST</a>) and Limited Brands (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/limited-brands-inc/ltd/nys" target="_blank">LTD</a>) came out ahead, but most retailers, including Target (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/limited-brands-inc/ltd/nys" target="_blank">TGT</a>) and Macy's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys" target="_blank">M</a>) struggled. Saks (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/saks-incorporated/sks/nys" target="_blank">SKS</a>) is also suffering from an anemic luxury goods market.<br /><br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/retail-hiring-up-from-last-year-but-still-well-below-average/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail hiring up from last year, but still well below average</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/retail-hiring-up-from-last-year-but-still-well-below-average/">Retail hiring up from last year, but still well below average</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/retail-hiring-up-from-last-year-but-still-well-below-average/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19271121/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/retail-hiring-up-from-last-year-but-still-well-below-average/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Black Friday</category><category>Black Friday 2009</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>cost</category><category>costco</category><category>Department of Labor</category><category>DepartmentOfLabor</category><category>inthenews</category><category>limited brands</category><category>ltd</category><category>luxury retail</category><category>macys</category><category>saks</category><category>Saks Fifth Avenue</category><category>SaksFifthAve</category><category>SaksFifthAvenue</category><category>sks</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Employee productivity up close to 10%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />Work smarter not harder. Do more with less. Increase your output. Become more productive. </p>
<p>You've heard all this before, right? What it all means is that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> are coming, and the survivors are going to have to take on a hell of a lot more work, with no increase in support, resources or compensation. As cuts come, the survivors fight to survive, and succeeding means that a new benchmark is set. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33651961/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/">If you can survive without the help you used to have, it's easier to defer hiring for a while</a>. </p>
<br />
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Employee productivity up close to 10%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/">Employee productivity up close to 10%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33651961/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19226210/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of labor</category><category>DepartmentOfLabor</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>layoffs</category><category>productivity</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[First-time jobless claims fall faster than expected]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/first-time-jobless-claims-fall-faster-than-expected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/first-time-jobless-claims-fall-faster-than-expected/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/first-time-jobless-claims-fall-faster-than-expected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/cash-wad.jpg" />First-time claims for <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/joblessbenefits/">jobless benefits</a> fell last week, hitting the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/business/economy/09econ.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">lowest level we've seen since January</a>. The U.S. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofLabor/">Department of Labor</a> pegged the number at 521,000. This is down from the previous week's 554,000 (which had been revised upward). Wall Street economists anticipated 540,000. Claims of this type have fallen four times in five weeks, and the four-week average reached 539,750 - its lowest level since January 17, 2009. </p>
<p>In general, first-time claims for <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemploymentbenefits/">unemployment benefits</a> have been declining since the spring, though slowly. Unfortunately, they still remain well above the 325,000 that economists claim to be indicative of a healthy economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/first-time-jobless-claims-fall-faster-than-expected/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>First-time jobless claims fall faster than expected</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/first-time-jobless-claims-fall-faster-than-expected/">First-time jobless claims fall faster than expected</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/first-time-jobless-claims-fall-faster-than-expected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19190726/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/first-time-jobless-claims-fall-faster-than-expected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>congress</category><category>department of labor</category><category>DepartmentOfLabor</category><category>featured</category><category>jobless</category><category>jobless benefits</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>JoblessBenefits</category><category>JoblessClaims</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment benefits</category><category>unemployment claims</category><category>UnemploymentBenefits</category><category>UnemploymentClaims</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment rate hits 9.8%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/labor.jpg" /> Unemployment is at its <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI">highest level since 1983, hitting 9.8% last month</a>. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofLabor/">Department of Labor</a> announced that 263,000 jobs were lost. This follows a revised loss of 201,000 jobs in August (lower than first reported). Nobody expected the August unemployment reprieve to last, and the increase suggests that the forecasted 10.3% unemployment rate for early next year will be realized. </p>
<p>Originally, the forecasted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemployment/">unemployment</a> drop for September was 175,000, according to <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI">Bloomberg News</a></em>, with individual economists surveyed reporting in a range of 100,000 to 260,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment rate hits 9.8%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/">Unemployment rate hits 9.8%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19182223/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of labor</category><category>DepartmentOfLabor</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job loss</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>JobLoss</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
