<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner's Dick Parsons expected to join today's CEO exodus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/time-warners-dick-parsons-ready-to-join-todays-ceo-exodus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/time-warners-dick-parsons-ready-to-join-todays-ceo-exodus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/time-warners-dick-parsons-ready-to-join-todays-ceo-exodus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><p>Earlier today, CNBC's David Faber announced that he has word that Dick Parsons would be stepping down as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.'s</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CEO effective December 31, 2007. Jeff Bewkes is the likely heir apparent, according to Faber, although it seems Parsons may remain as Chairman. </p>
<p>This change at the top may portend unit sales, roll-ups, spin-offs, and even may lead a change in the ownership of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">Time Warner Cable Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">TWC</a>).<br /><br />Management change is becoming almost the norm today. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup's</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) Chuck Prince is out, finally, although having Bob Rubin involved for <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/11/open-letter-to-.html">anything more than an interim basis</a> will be a mistake.<br /><br />Larry Fink has been <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/11/merrill-lynch-1.html">named as a potential replacement-head</a> for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) and some even have noted that he could be offered top billing at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>).<br /><br />You could <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/11/diller-breaks-u.html">almost view the break-up announcement</a> of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/Interactive</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) as a CEO exit because the five individual units already have the heads named and, at least as of now, Barry Diller is going to stay with the IAC/Interactive parent. He said he'd maintain some role in one or two of the spin-offs but not all of them.<br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg produces the 24/7 Wall St. </em><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/special_situation_newsletter.html"><em>Special Situation Investing Newsletter</em></a><em> and he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/time-warners-dick-parsons-ready-to-join-todays-ceo-exodus/">Time Warner's Dick Parsons expected to join today's CEO exodus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/time-warners-dick-parsons-ready-to-join-todays-ceo-exodus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1030638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/time-warners-dick-parsons-ready-to-join-todays-ceo-exodus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNBC</category><category>David Faber</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeff Bewkes</category><category>Time Warner CEO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Parsons leaving? Time Warner (TWX) shares launching on possible regime change]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/parsons-leaving-time-warner-twx-shares-launching-on-possible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/parsons-leaving-time-warner-twx-shares-launching-on-possible/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/parsons-leaving-time-warner-twx-shares-launching-on-possible/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p>Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) are launching up over 2.5% mid-day on a report <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article2747310.ece">out of the Times Of London</a> that Chairman &amp; CEO Richard Parsons is set to announce his exit from the company.<br /><br />"In the most dramatic shift of power for more than five years, Jeff Bewkes is poised to head one of the world's largest media groups ..."<br /><br />This names Jeff Bewkes as successor, and if this is true will end up being the end of what many have already suspected. Parsons earlier this year even hinted at it himself.<br /><br />You will want to watch  <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">Time Warner Cable</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">TWC</a>) on this as well. As we were sending this, CNBC just noted this as well.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/parsons-leaving-time-warner-twx-shares-launching-on-possible/">Parsons leaving? Time Warner (TWX) shares launching on possible regime change</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article2747310.ece>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/parsons-leaving-time-warner-twx-shares-launching-on-possible/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1022862/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/parsons-leaving-time-warner-twx-shares-launching-on-possible/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Dick parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>parsons stepping down</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[92nd Street Y Talk: Lazard's (LAZ) Wasserstein cashes in, disses Time Warner (TWX)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/92nd-street-y-talk-lazards-ceo-cashes-in-disses-time-warner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/92nd-street-y-talk-lazards-ceo-cashes-in-disses-time-warner/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/92nd-street-y-talk-lazards-ceo-cashes-in-disses-time-warner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>At a talk on <a href="http://www.92y.org/shop/event_detail.asp?productid=T%2DLC5IN01">September 20th at New York's 92nd Street Y</a>, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lazard-ltd/laz/nys">Lazard Ltd.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lazard-ltd/laz/nys">LAZ</a>) CEO Bruce Wasserstein took a swipe at <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Inc.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>), BloggingStocks' parent, for its moribund stock price. At the same time, Wasserstein patted himself on the back for taking all his chips off the table when the stock levitated above $18 following the publication of a Lazard report on Time Warner.</p>
<p>Lazard, which was hired by corporate raider Carl Icahn in <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/02/07/news/companies/timewarner_icahn/index.htm">February 2006</a>, authored a 343 page report that argued for a breakup of Time Warner and a big stock buyback. Beyond its $5 million fee, Lazard's reward from Icahn was a bonus based on how far above $18 Time Warner stock went. Lazard's report estimated that Time Warner's breakup value ranged between $23.30 and $26.57. Following the report, Time Warner stock rose -- peaking at $22.73 on January 12, 2007 -- before declining to its current $18.99 -- about 50 cents a share above its price in February 2006.</p>
<p>While he claimed to like Time Warner management -- he called CEO Dick Parsons "a lovely, well-liked guy" and president Jeff Bewkes, "a highly regarded management kind of guy" -- Wasserstein blamed Time Warner's moribund stock price on their decision not to follow the recommendations in his report. Wasserstein thought Time Warner took one of his ideas -- a $20 billion stock buyback (Time Warner bought back $12 billion) -- but ignored his other suggestions -- to do more spin-offs and to run AOL more effectively.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/92nd-street-y-talk-lazards-ceo-cashes-in-disses-time-warner/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>92nd Street Y Talk: Lazard's (LAZ) Wasserstein cashes in, disses Time Warner (TWX)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/92nd-street-y-talk-lazards-ceo-cashes-in-disses-time-warner/">92nd Street Y Talk: Lazard's (LAZ) Wasserstein cashes in, disses Time Warner (TWX)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/92nd-street-y-talk-lazards-ceo-cashes-in-disses-time-warner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1006057/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/92nd-street-y-talk-lazards-ceo-cashes-in-disses-time-warner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bruce Wasserstein</category><category>BruceWasserstein</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>Jeff Bewkes</category><category>JeffBewkes</category><category>LAZ</category><category>Lazard</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Energy companies under investigation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>On January 1, 2008 Jeffrey L. Bewkes may be the new CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118998454924929173.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. The current president and COO, is expected to take over from Richard Parsons.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/paetec-holding-corp/paet/nas">Paetec Holding Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/paetec-holding-corp/paet/nas">PAET</a>) has paid $492M for McleodUSA, creating a tough rival to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">AT&amp;T</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">Verizon Communications</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) for business telephone sales, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118998913931729276.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) is focusing its business on consumer electronics, and may sell its advanced chip production facility, with possible buyers including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toshiba-corporation/tosbf/nao">Toshiba Corporation</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toshiba-corporation/tosbf/nao">TOSBF</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>), reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118982504239228518.html"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/16/nyregion/16greenhouse.html?ex=1347595200&amp;en=f8258946c5bd70b0&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss"><em>New York Times</em></a> reported that New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is investigating five large energy companies, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-aes-corporation/aes/nys">AES Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-aes-corporation/aes/nys">AES</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dominion-resource-inc-va/d/nys">Dominion</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dominion-resource-inc-va/d/nys">D</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dynegy-inc-cl-a-new/dyn/nys">Dynegy Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dynegy-inc-cl-a-new/dyn/nys">DYN</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/peabody-energy-corporation/btu/nys">Peabody Energy Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/peabody-energy-corporation/btu/nys">BTU</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xcel-energy-inc/xel/nys">Xcel Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xcel-energy-inc/xel/nys">XEL</a>), in order to determine whether their plans to build coal-fired power plants pose undisclosed financial risks that their investors should know about.<br /></li>
</ul>
<strong>WEBSITES:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to sources, BuddyTV, a TV community site, is being acquired by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">Comcast Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>) reported <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/"><em>PaidContent.org</em></a>.</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?rfp=dta"><em>TheInquirer.net</em></a> reported, citing sources, that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) will launch a "famous new platform" this Tuesday.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/">Newspaper wrap-up: Energy companies under investigation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/991190/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dick parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>ibm</category><category>new york times</category><category>newspaper</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>ny times</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>paet</category><category>paetec</category><category>paidcontent.org</category><category>paper</category><category>periodical</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>theinquirer.net</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>tosbf</category><category>toshiba</category><category>twx</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LIVE BLOGGING: Time Warner earnings conference call]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/01/live-blogging-time-warner-earnings-conference-call/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/01/live-blogging-time-warner-earnings-conference-call/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/01/live-blogging-time-warner-earnings-conference-call/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/live-coverage/" rel="tag">Live Coverage</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p>As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/01/time-warner-inc-earnings-slightly-ahead-of-estimates-with-a-bu/">previously noted</a> this morning, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) did post gains on an EPS that were slightly ahead of expectations on revenues that were a tad under the estimates from First Call. The new $5 billion share buyback plan was to replace the recently completed $20 Billion share buyback plan. The company also reaffirmed $1.07 as its EPS target for the conglomerate. Going into the conference call, shares are down about 3.2% to $18.64.<br /><br />At the start of the conference call, CEO &amp; Chairman Dick Parsons reaffirmed 2007 OIBDA guidance and is maintaining growth at projections AOL and is maintaining its leverage. It reaffirmed $1.07 EPS for 2007, or $0.95 outside of items. Parsons also stated the following:<br /><em><br />Time Warner Cable (NYSE:TWC) is on track for objectives with more upside to come. The legacy footprint has growth and the Adelphia adds should grow. Cable will continue to be a growth generation for years to come.<br /><br />Harry Potter has generated nearly $700 MILLION in worldwide sales already.<br /><br />AOL is continuing to make progress for OIBDA growth, it also expects page view growth at AOL this year. This was the first quarter where page views grew, but there was a slowdown in ad growth as certain deals were winding down from the subscriber days. Email and search changes are building and increasing monetization. The team is satisfied with the results so far. Advertising is also seeing some shift to third party advertisers, but its advertising.com is seeing gains. The total AOL expectations are being stepped back from original projections that it will grow above the market rates </em>[that is the first time this has been stated]<em>. It has relaunched the AOL homepage in a new format and is in the process of new finance and other pages. It has spent over $500 million in acquisitions over the last 16 (or 18) months to build the AOL franchise.<em></em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/01/live-blogging-time-warner-earnings-conference-call/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>LIVE BLOGGING: Time Warner earnings conference call</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/01/live-blogging-time-warner-earnings-conference-call/">LIVE BLOGGING: Time Warner earnings conference call</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/01/live-blogging-time-warner-earnings-conference-call/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/955319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/01/live-blogging-time-warner-earnings-conference-call/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>Insight Communications</category><category>InsightCommunications</category><category>Richard Parsons</category><category>RichardParsons</category><category>Time Warner Cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>TWX</category><category>TWX conference call</category><category>TWX earnings</category><category>TwxConferenceCall</category><category>TwxEarnings</category><category>Wayne Pace</category><category>WaynePace</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner is not integrated yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/time-warner-is-not-integrated-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/time-warner-is-not-integrated-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/time-warner-is-not-integrated-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p>When I look at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) and I think back to the merger with AOL I cannot help but think about all the value that evaporated rather quickly. Since that time billions of dollars in write-downs and write-offs have occurred, AOL was dropped from the name, and Time Warner has emerged slowly but surely from the kinds of challenges that business schools will be doing case studies on for many years to come.</p>
<p>I was a shareholder of AOL and stayed with it, so I am a TWX shareholder now. I anticipated the rise in the stock over the last year and made it one of my seven picks for 2007, optimistically believing it was set for more of the same growth. So far it has been dead money in 2007, not moving much in either direction. Carl Icahn made a big move on the stock last year and has since left with a tidy profit. He stirred things up a little but in the end did not have the backing to accomplish the changes he envisioned. Dick Parsons, CEO, made just enough changes to speed up the Time Warner train but not enough to alter its course.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/time-warner-is-not-integrated-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner is not integrated yet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/time-warner-is-not-integrated-yet/">Time Warner is not integrated yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/time-warner-is-not-integrated-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/928252/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/time-warner-is-not-integrated-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Time Inc.</category><category>Time Warner (TWX)</category><category>Time Warner CAble</category><category>TimeInc.</category><category>TimeWarner(twx)</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>TWX</category><category>Warner Bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Parsons also hints at the fate of AOL and Cable]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/parsons-also-hints-at-the-fate-of-aol-and-cable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/parsons-also-hints-at-the-fate-of-aol-and-cable/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/parsons-also-hints-at-the-fate-of-aol-and-cable/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> Inc.'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) Dick Parsons commented earlier today about not getting out of publishing. Reuters is also reporting that the company is <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/time-warner-making-decision-on-aol-by/n20070607130009990001">weighing its stakes</a> in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys">Time Warner Cable</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys">TWC</a>) and in its AOL unit. A timeline has even been given for a potentially complete spin-off of Time Warner Cable, although that was indicated as a down the road decision, but none has yet been made.<br /><br />In the past, Parsons had been leaning more to a "Keep AOL in the family" stance, but today's article is indicating that a consideration of a sale may come by the end of the year. Speculation has been more than abundant on this, especially given <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2005/12/26/google-for-aol-ipo-date">the impending "cash out" date</a> at which Google has the option to essentially force Time Warner to either spin-off AOL or pay cash at the company's then-market value. <br /><br />If the transition of AOL from a paid access service into a free content service has been as successful as the company claims, why then would it be reviewed for a potential sale? Follow the money. The $1 billion investment from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) for a 5% stake put in a $20 billion implied price tag on the unit. Is the unit worth more than that, or less? That's what the review will determine. <br /><br />Instead of making a full sale, Time Warner may consider a partial spin-off of AOL back into a public company. This would give the online media company its own currency that is less dogged by the currently-unpopular conglomerate model so that it could make non-cash acquisitions. Time Warner should consider this route long before any outright sale, particularly considering that there would have to be additional goodwill write-downs for the added losses sustained. AOL now has many online ad operations that can openly compete with the other major companies in the field and the company has been making acquisitions.<br /><br />This is a heated topic, that is for sure. It comes down to one's stance and opinion of the world. Wall Street has been force feeding the idea of separations to conglomerates (somewhat jokingly, just for the investment banking fees) to 'focus on core operations.' If companies divest too much they may end up just being smaller and more vulnerable without their old safety nets. No pun intended, but time and the markets will determine the outcome here.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/parsons-also-hints-at-the-fate-of-aol-and-cable/">Parsons also hints at the fate of AOL and Cable</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/time-warner-making-decision-on-aol-by/n20070607130009990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/parsons-also-hints-at-the-fate-of-aol-and-cable/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/912989/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/parsons-also-hints-at-the-fate-of-aol-and-cable/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>richard parsons</category><category>RichardParsons</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>timw warner</category><category>TimwWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner's Parsons: 'We're not leaving publishing']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/time-warners-parsons-were-not-leaving-publishing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/time-warners-parsons-were-not-leaving-publishing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/time-warners-parsons-were-not-leaving-publishing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUSWEN864720070607">a Reuters article</a>, Dick Parsons of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) has noted that there are no plans for the media conglomerate to sell off its publishing division. There is still room for the company to reduce its overall portfolio holdings in the publishing division, even after it already made one large magazine-group sale.<br /><br />It is interesting to note that Parsons is quoted in the article saying that a successful transition from print to digital could keep the publishing division in an 8%, 9%, or 10% growth business 'for a long time.'<br /><br />It sure feels like Wall Street, in combination with competing media interests, is doing too much speculating and trying to force issues too much. The constant ploys for companies to be bullied into selling off assets and selling off units is daunting in many cases. Parsons has said before that he did not have plans to unload the entire publishing arm, and if you are a member of the media trying to force a story or force a change, you might as well just take Parsons at his word. <br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/time-warners-parsons-were-not-leaving-publishing/">Time Warner's Parsons: 'We're not leaving publishing'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUSWEN864720070607>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/time-warners-parsons-were-not-leaving-publishing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/912852/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/time-warners-parsons-were-not-leaving-publishing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dick parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>publishing</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Parsons' options pay day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/parsons-options-pay-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/parsons-options-pay-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/parsons-options-pay-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.'s </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CEO Dick Parsons had an extra payday last week thanks to options. But before you go out and panic, this is part of a planned share trading plan, so it will not be interpreted as a major exodus by management. The SEC filings show the <a href="http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?FilingID=5173757&amp;Type=HTML">exercise prices</a> and even show the <a href="http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?FilingID=5173758&amp;Type=HTML">sale prices</a>.<br /><br />Parsons exercised 225,000 shares out of an options plan with a $15.72 strike price and exercised another 112,500 shares with a $19.66 strike price. These were subsequently sold in smaller blocks with an average sale being under 20,000 shares at any one time. That keeps any block volume selling from showing up and spooking any traders who keep their eyes on such sales. <br /><br />If you add up all the sales it looks like the average stock sale execution came in at $21.45. With an average purchase price of $17.03 on 337,500 shares, it looks like Parsons took home an extra $1.49 million before figuring these block sales down to the exact penny.<br /><br />That's not a bad pay day, but it shouldn't be a selling indication from the top.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/parsons-options-pay-day/">Parsons' options pay day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 May 2007 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/parsons-options-pay-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/895880/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/parsons-options-pay-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>Options</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner had no choice but to oust Albrecht]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/time-warner-had-no-choice-but-to-oust-albrecht/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/time-warner-had-no-choice-but-to-oust-albrecht/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/time-warner-had-no-choice-but-to-oust-albrecht/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Inc</a>. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> TWX</a>) had no choice but to ask HBO head Chris Albrecht to resign following his arrest over the weekend for domestic violence.</p>
<p>If the world's largest media company had done nothing to Albrecht, it would have sent the message that what he was accused of doing wasn't a big deal when clearly it was quite serious. This isn't like the celebrities who get busted for drunk driving. They could have theoretically hurt someone. He actually is accused of hurting his girlfriend.</p>
<p>To be sure, Albrecht is a gifted executive who helped bring classic shows such as "The Sopranos," "Sex in the City" and "Deadwood" to the pay TV channel. HBO will not be the same without him, particularly as it looks for its next hit after the end of "The Sopranos."</p>
<p>Albrecht ran a business that was very important for Time Warner's bottom line. He is close to both Chief Executive Richard Parsons and President Jeffrey Bewkes. </p>
<p>But media reports indicate that he's got a volatile temper.</p>
<p>"His resignation comes on the same day that the<em> Los Angeles Times</em> reported that in 1991, HBO paid a settlement of at least $400,000 to a subordinate of Mr. Albrecht's, who contended that he tried to choke her during a confrontation in her office," according to the<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/10/arts/television/10hbo-web.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin"><em> New York Times</em></a>, which also confirmed the report. The woman involved in the incident had directly reported to Albrecht.</p>
<p>Let's hope that Albrecht gets his life straightened out and that his girlfriend gets the support she needs. </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/time-warner-had-no-choice-but-to-oust-albrecht/">Time Warner had no choice but to oust Albrecht</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 May 2007 12:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://%20http//www.nytimes.com/2007/05/10/arts/television/10hbo-web.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin.>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/time-warner-had-no-choice-but-to-oust-albrecht/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/892624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/time-warner-had-no-choice-but-to-oust-albrecht/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chris Albrecht</category><category>ChrisAlbrecht</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>HBO</category><category>HBO Arrest</category><category>HBO Resignation</category><category>HboArrest</category><category>HboResignation</category><category>Jeffrey Bewkes</category><category>JeffreyBewkes</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up 2-1-07: MO, TWX, JNY all discuss spinoffs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/newspaper-wrap-up-2-1-07-mo-twx-jny-all-discuss-spinoffs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/newspaper-wrap-up-2-1-07-mo-twx-jny-all-discuss-spinoffs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/newspaper-wrap-up-2-1-07-mo-twx-jny-all-discuss-spinoffs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li> Highlights from today's <em>Wall Street Journal</em> (subscription required):</li>
    <ul>
        <li>Wal-Mart Stores Inc (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) saves itself hundreds of millions in taxes <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117027500505994065.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">through a complex structure</a> that allows it to pay rent to itself.</li>
        <li>Altria Group (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altria-group-inc/mo/nys">MO</a>) is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117018566209792673.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">expected to decide later this year</a> on its next spinoff, splitting its U.S. business from its International business.</li>
        <li>Nissan Motor Co ADR's (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nissan-motor-co-ltd-american-depositary-shares-exempt-pursuant-to-12g3-2-b/nsany/nas">NSANY</a>) new models may help it catch up to rival automakers, writes the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117027139931693984.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">"Heard in Asia"</a> column.</li>
    </ul>
    <li>The <em>Financial Times</em> (subscription required) reported that Dick Parsons said that s<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/76030dd2-b127-11db-b901-0000779e2340.html">pinning off Time Warner Cable is a top priority</a> for Time Warner Inc (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) this year.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to the <em>Associated Press</em>, BP plc (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c-ads/bp/nys">BP</a>) will <a href="http://www.forbes.com/afxnewslimited/feeds/afx/2007/02/01/afx3383585.html">sell its U.K. refinery</a> to Petroplus for $1.4B. </li>
    <li>The <em>New York Post</em> reported that Jones Apparel Group (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jones-apparel-group-inc/jny/nys">JNY</a>) is <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/02012007/business/jones_mulls_ipo_for_barneys_business_suzanne_kapner_and_zachery_kouwe.htm">contemplating breaking up the company</a>, including a possible IPO for its Barney's chain.</li>
    <li><em>The Business</em> wrote that ExxonMobil (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) has <a href="http://www.thebusinessonline.com/Document.aspx?id=161C5B33-A0AD-424C-A55E-BAB02776F454">begun talks to sell a part or all of its French oil business</a>, valued at about $2.6B.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/newspaper-wrap-up-2-1-07-mo-twx-jny-all-discuss-spinoffs/">Newspaper wrap-up 2-1-07: MO, TWX, JNY all discuss spinoffs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/newspaper-wrap-up-2-1-07-mo-twx-jny-all-discuss-spinoffs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/746381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/newspaper-wrap-up-2-1-07-mo-twx-jny-all-discuss-spinoffs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>altria</category><category>ap</category><category>associated press</category><category>AssociatedPress</category><category>bp</category><category>bp plc</category><category>BpPlc</category><category>dick parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>exxon</category><category>exxonmobil</category><category>financial times</category><category>FinancialTimes</category><category>ft</category><category>jny</category><category>jones</category><category>jones apparel</category><category>JonesApparel</category><category>kraft</category><category>mo</category><category>new york post</category><category>newspaper</category><category>NewYorkPost</category><category>nissan</category><category>nsany</category><category>ny post</category><category>NyPost</category><category>paper</category><category>periodical</category><category>the business</category><category>TheBusiness</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>walmart</category><category>wmt</category><category>wsj</category><category>xom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Maybe Time Warner is keeping most UK print operations after all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/29/maybe-time-warner-is-keeping-most-uk-print-operations-after-all/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/29/maybe-time-warner-is-keeping-most-uk-print-operations-after-all/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/29/maybe-time-warner-is-keeping-most-uk-print-operations-after-all/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>Time Warner's CEO Dick Parsons <a href="http://today.reuters.com/summit/summitarticle.aspx?type=summitNews&amp;storyID=2006-11-28T183535Z_01_N28259310_RTRUKOC_0_US-MEDIA-SUMMIT-TIMEWARNER-EUROPE.xml&amp;WTmodLoc=SumArt-C2-NextArticle-1">spoke at the Reuters Media Summit </a>and gave some added insight on the current acquisitions and divestiture landscape. He played down speculative reports out of the U.K. that TWX wants to sell its U.K. publishing arm, and essentially ruled out that it would bid for European broadcasters (noted ITV, ProSiebenSat and Enedmol). Time Warner, Inc. (NYSE: TWX) has said it will look at deals in Europe in the past, but this article is saying that a big expansion in Europe isn't currently on the table.<br /><br />Parsons noted that private equity firms may leverage up on these deals or that there may be a strategic buyer looking at consolidating, but Time Warner is neither. Parsons also said there are other assets to look at. He still wants to add in smaller tool box pieces for the new AOL Europe after selling the access parts (that would be content, ad and technology services).<br /><br />Parsons is signaling that Time Warner plans to stay heavy in the magazine business, but it is transitioning from print-only into more of a print AND digital model as the world is changing. As IPC, its British publishing arm, is what Parsons called the Time of the U.K., he wants to keep this strong asset.<br /><br />This doesn't rule out any smaller transactions where the company could spin off some of its slower operations here and there. And we all know there is still the ongoing potential for a sale in some of its magazine and print operations it deems as non-core.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/29/maybe-time-warner-is-keeping-most-uk-print-operations-after-all/">Maybe Time Warner is keeping most UK print operations after all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/29/maybe-time-warner-is-keeping-most-uk-print-operations-after-all/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/709470/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/29/maybe-time-warner-is-keeping-most-uk-print-operations-after-all/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner sells AOL UK to Carphone Warehouse for about $488 million]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/time-warner-sells-aol-uk-to-carphone-warehouse-for-about-488-mi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/time-warner-sells-aol-uk-to-carphone-warehouse-for-about-488-mi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/time-warner-sells-aol-uk-to-carphone-warehouse-for-about-488-mi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) has finalized its plan to sell AOL UK, the last of the three AOL Europe assets that the company has been shedding. The price tag: 370 million British Pounds, or about $687-688 million US on currency conversions. <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/carphone-warehouse-to-acquire-time/n20061011071909990019">The buyer: Carphone Warehouse</a>, which despite the unlikely name, is a player in the UK residential telecom market.<br /><br />AOL will continue to provide co-branded audience services and will manage the online ad sales for the combined customer base in a revenue sharing plan. AOL will also provide the co-branded portals and content. This will cover all of AOL's approximately 2.1 million access accounts, which is about 1.5 million broadband and 600,000 dial-up accounts.<br /><br />GBP 250 million will be paid on completion and the balance paid in three installments over the following 18 months through an extension of existing Carphone Warehouse bank facilities. The transaction is due to complete by 31 December 2006 and is subject to EU competition authority clearance, although this is expected to go through and there are no known major hurdles to any such deal approval.<br /><br />Charles Dunstone, CEO of Carphone Warehouse, said: "The acquisition of AOL's UK Internet access business is transformational for our broadband business. This deal gives us significant scale to complement the rapid organic growth of our free broadband proposition."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/time-warner-sells-aol-uk-to-carphone-warehouse-for-about-488-mi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner sells AOL UK to Carphone Warehouse for about $488 million</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/time-warner-sells-aol-uk-to-carphone-warehouse-for-about-488-mi/">Time Warner sells AOL UK to Carphone Warehouse for about $488 million</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/carphone-warehouse-to-acquire-time/n20061011071909990019>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/time-warner-sells-aol-uk-to-carphone-warehouse-for-about-488-mi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/683033/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/11/time-warner-sells-aol-uk-to-carphone-warehouse-for-about-488-mi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>Carphone warehouse</category><category>CarphoneWarehouse</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>neuf cegetel</category><category>NeufCegetel</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner (TWX) jumped 2.8% this week.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/30/time-warner-twx-jumped-2-8-this-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/30/time-warner-twx-jumped-2-8-this-week/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/30/time-warner-twx-jumped-2-8-this-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img alt="" src="http://quote-web.aol.com/?syms=TWX&amp;e=NYS&amp;action=hq&amp;dur=1&amp;type=mountain&amp;hgl=1&amp;vgl=1&amp;vol=1&amp;splits=1&amp;div=0&amp;w=520&amp;gran=d" /><br /><em>1 month chart, courtesy of AOL.</em><br /><br />Time Warner Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">NYSE:TWX</a>) had a good week, all things considered. The average volume was up quite a bit, although not on Friday. TWX closed up 2.8%, or $0.50 on the week, at $18.23.<br /><br />Sept. 29: $18.23; +$0.03; 20,964,700<br />Sept. 28: $18.20; -$0.39; 49,173,500 <br />Sept. 27: $18.59; -$0.01; 59,779,100 <br />Sept. 26: $18.60; +$0.47; 65,881,700 <br />Sept. 25: $18.13; +$0.40; 56,246,200<br />Sept. 22: $17.73: +$0.24; 21,309,900<br /><br />We even had some large stock options volume on Monday and Tuesday.<br /><br />TWX was upgraded by two firms on Monday morning. Morgan Stanley raised the stock rating from Equal Weight to Overweight and Sanford Bernstein raised its Market Perform to an Outperform rating. On the same night Jim Cramer helped nudge the stock up more by saying he thought it was a straight shot to $26. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/30/time-warner-twx-jumped-2-8-this-week/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner (TWX) jumped 2.8% this week.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/30/time-warner-twx-jumped-2-8-this-week/">Time Warner (TWX) jumped 2.8% this week.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/30/time-warner-twx-jumped-2-8-this-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/677198/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/30/time-warner-twx-jumped-2-8-this-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dick Parsons discusses business on CNBC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/28/dick-parsons-discusses-business-on-cnbc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/28/dick-parsons-discusses-business-on-cnbc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/28/dick-parsons-discusses-business-on-cnbc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/live-coverage/" rel="tag">Live Coverage</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img src="http://img.timeinc.net/corp/images/bio/thumb_parsons_richard.gif" align="right" alt="" />Dick Parsons, Chairman and CEO of Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX), was on CNBC today for the <em>Power Lunch</em> segment. CNBC was featuring the heavy hitters of NYC business at various personal interviews at the Four Seasons. Some of the other guests were Mark Cuban, Martha Stewart, Donny Deutsche, and others. <br /><br />Please pardon the lack of quotes as this was typed live and it is hard to get every word in for formal quotes.<br /><br />Dick Parson noted that business overall in the economy is good. He noted strong numbers for their products for several years and is feeling pretty good about business. He also noted the difference between big ticket items and small ticket items, and he said small ticket items are still doing well -- like basic spending and TV's and the like. He noted that big ticket items like houses and cars, and said that housing particularly had to cool.<br /><br />Parsons said TWX has been doing well in cable, and he noted that the cable platform is the most robust platform out there. To be able to bundle in a triple play phone, cable, and high speed Internet access is the best mix out there.<br /><br />Ad revenues fell in newspaper and magazines; but Internet and cable and cable networking has been taking that up and the company is big in those. The comment about that side of the business being essentially called a hedge has made the TWX portfolio look better than some of the pure-plays out there. He noted the Street is starting recognize the value of the TWX model.<br /><br />There were not any specifics given or any details into the units and current initiatives or spin-off plans. But it is good to get some public comments from the head of the company.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/28/dick-parsons-discusses-business-on-cnbc/">Dick Parsons discusses business on CNBC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/28/dick-parsons-discusses-business-on-cnbc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/676497/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/28/dick-parsons-discusses-business-on-cnbc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNBC</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dick Parsons for NY mayor -- would you vote for him?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>Dick Parsons for New York City mayor? A few weeks ago, I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/should-dick-parsons-be-fired-or-steve-ballmer-or-jeff-immelt-o/">picked out an interesting tidbit in a story on why Parsons should be fired</a>: Gramercy Capital Management's Joan Lappin dribbled the tantalizing rumor that the Time Warner CEO was considering a run for mayor when Michael Bloomberg's term is up in 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nymag.com/news/intelligencer/19141/index.html">Today's <em>New York Magazine</em> says</a> "it's all but official." Parsons will run, with some insiders even saying he'll hand over the CEO position to Bewkes (Lappin said this, too) before his current contract ends in 2008. Naturally Parsons has said he'll fulfill his contract, but not opined on the mayoral run.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7B40B8C4A4-5587-49FE-AF63-00285A070F73%7D&amp;keyword=">Frank Barnako of MarketWatch says this must be why Carl Icahn</a> is buying up shares of Time Warner, while <a href="http://www.dealbreaker.com/2006/08/parsons_aiming_for_city_hall.html">DealBreaker.com says Parsons entrance</a> into the race "is not entirely unwelcome" and hints that the I-banking elite might vote for him. Would you?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/">Dick Parsons for NY mayor -- would you vote for him?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/654637/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dick</category><category>dick parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>fire dick parsons</category><category>FireDickParsons</category><category>mayor</category><category>mayor of new york</category><category>MayorOfNewYork</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york city mayor</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NewYorkCityMayor</category><category>ny</category><category>ny mayor</category><category>nyc</category><category>nyc mayor</category><category>NycMayor</category><category>NyMayor</category><category>parsons</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Dick Parsons be fired? (or Steve Ballmer or Jeff Immelt or ...)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/should-dick-parsons-be-fired-or-steve-ballmer-or-jeff-immelt-o/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/should-dick-parsons-be-fired-or-steve-ballmer-or-jeff-immelt-o/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/should-dick-parsons-be-fired-or-steve-ballmer-or-jeff-immelt-o/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="parsons is pathetic" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/parsons_pathetic.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Every time we write a critical post about Time Warner or Microsoft, or expose a negative fact, rumor or analysis, the refrain renews: fire the CEO! <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=parsons">Dick Parsons</a>, that lucky guy, gets the brunt of our readers' anger. He's screwing up Time Warner, you've told us time and time again, he should go. So say you of Microsoft's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=ballmer">Steve Ballmer</a>, he of the explosive personality, sweaty armpits, and billions in inexplicable operating expenses. Sometimes it's Jeff Immelt of GE, or even well-loved figures like Meg Whitman of eBay.</p>
<p>But usually, it's Dick. Today is no different. With <a href="http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,1208122,00.html">2nd quarter earnings coming out next Wednesday</a>, and <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/aol-giving-away-the-milk-will-anyone-pay-for-the-cow/">everyone wondering about the company's plans with its AOL unit</a>, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/home/investmentnewsletters/2006/07/20/time-warner-parsons-in_jl_0719soapbox_inl.html">Joan Lappin from Gramercy Capital Management demands in the pages of <em>Fortune</em>, "Save Time Warner, Fire Parsons."</a></p>
<p><img id="vimage_2" alt="parsons deserves a drubbing" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/parsons_drubbing.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />It's nothing new, but it's worth evaluating her reasons for the radical battle cry. She argues that Parsons is all about politics (in fact, he's rumored to be angling for a 2009 run for New York City mayor), a skill that helped him avoid perishing in the "shark tank" that has been Time Warner's boardroom for the past decade and earned him credit as being a "Teflon Don," but has failed miserably to maintain Time Warner's legacy as a creative, entrepreneurial culture where good managers were rewarded "generous financial incentives for producing solid earnings growth." Fire Parsons, she says, and maybe that creative culture can be revived.</p>
<p>I honor her passion, and agree that the creative, entrepreneurial company always wins over the political shark tank. But who, Joan, is positioned to take the helm from him? That question must be answered before anyone brings out a block and starts chopping.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/should-dick-parsons-be-fired-or-steve-ballmer-or-jeff-immelt-o/">Should Dick Parsons be fired? (or Steve Ballmer or Jeff Immelt or ...)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/home/investmentnewsletters/2006/07/20/time-warner-parsons-in_jl_0719soapbox_inl.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/should-dick-parsons-be-fired-or-steve-ballmer-or-jeff-immelt-o/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/646962/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/should-dick-parsons-be-fired-or-steve-ballmer-or-jeff-immelt-o/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ballmer</category><category>ceo</category><category>chief executive officer</category><category>ChiefExecutiveOfficer</category><category>dick parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>executive</category><category>fire</category><category>fire ballmer</category><category>fire dick parsons</category><category>fire parsons</category><category>fire steve ballmer</category><category>fire the ceo</category><category>FireBallmer</category><category>fired</category><category>FireDickParsons</category><category>FireParsons</category><category>FireSteveBallmer</category><category>FireTheCeo</category><category>immelt</category><category>jeff immelt</category><category>JeffImmelt</category><category>microsoft ceo</category><category>MicrosoftCeo</category><category>msft ceo</category><category>MsftCeo</category><category>parsons</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner ceo</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCeo</category><category>twx</category><category>twx ceo</category><category>TwxCeo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HEY Time Warner 2: Parsons should become Welch!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/08/hey-time-warner-2-parsons-should-become-welch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/08/hey-time-warner-2-parsons-should-become-welch/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/08/hey-time-warner-2-parsons-should-become-welch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>When Jack Welch arrived at General Electric (GE) he examined what was working and what was not; what was profitable and what was not; and where&nbsp;the future would prosper. He established priorities based on his findings <em>and took action!</em>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Transistor radios had to go! Jet engines and finance gad to grow!</p>
<p>I think Dick Parsons started on that path and then&nbsp;allowed inertia to set in, becoming more passive as he consolidated his power base. Now he seems overly methodical plodding. When Carl Icahn came along and&nbsp;tried to prod&nbsp;him into&nbsp;becoming more like&nbsp;Welch, he resisted and then took some steps to hold off the tides of change.</p>
<p><em>Hey Dick!</em> <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/07/hey-time-warner-icahn-knows-of-what-he-speaks/">Take a look at your price-to-book (1.25)</a> and then take action!&nbsp; (That link goes to my first "<a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/07/hey-time-warner-icahn-knows-of-what-he-speaks/">Hey Time Warner</a>" post from yesterday).</p>
<p><em>You can read more about me and my investment philosophy </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>here</em></a><em>. </em><em>Also for for value check out my </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/"><em>my post on dividends</em></a><em>! or another equally important&nbsp;</em><u><font color="#800080"> <span id="pt621765"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/magic-words-return-on-invested-capital-roic/" rel="bookmark"><span id="pt621891"><em>Magic words: return on invested capital. Which stocks perform best?</em></span></a></span></font></u></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/08/hey-time-warner-2-parsons-should-become-welch/">HEY Time Warner 2: Parsons should become Welch!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/07/hey-time-warner-icahn-knows-of-what-he-speaks/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/08/hey-time-warner-2-parsons-should-become-welch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/631063/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/08/hey-time-warner-2-parsons-should-become-welch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>action</category><category>Dick Parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>Enigines</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>Money</category><category>Prioitites</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Value</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What do TWX and Eminem have in common?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/what-do-twx-and-eminem-have-in-common/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/what-do-twx-and-eminem-have-in-common/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/what-do-twx-and-eminem-have-in-common/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>"The FCC won't let me be" opines <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminem">Eminem</a> in his 2001 hit "Without Me," and these days Time Warner is feeling Eminem's pain.<br /><br />Recently, the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/intelligentinfrastructure/2006/05/22/fcc-wireless-auction_cx_df_0522fcc.html?partner=aoltix">Federal Communications Company (FCC) pushed back an announced June 29 auction for wireless spectrum</a>. The new auction date will be August 9.<br /><br />Why does this matter to TWX? Well, according to some, by getting in on this wireless auction, Time Warner Cable wants to get in on some wireless action. Given <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/">Richard Parsons's optimism</a> at last week's shareholders meeting, one can't help but wonder: is this part of Parsons' plan to right the good ship TWX?<br /><br />Whatever the future holds, I think we can be certain of one thing: unlike Eminem, TWX will never <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminem#Controversy">do a duet with Elton John</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/what-do-twx-and-eminem-have-in-common/">What do TWX and Eminem have in common?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 May 2006 13:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/what-do-twx-and-eminem-have-in-common/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/621540/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/what-do-twx-and-eminem-have-in-common/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auction</category><category>cable</category><category>ceo</category><category>dick parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>eninem</category><category>fcc</category><category>fcc auction</category><category>FccAuction</category><category>june 28</category><category>june 29</category><category>june 29 auction</category><category>June28</category><category>June29</category><category>June29Auction</category><category>parsons</category><category>richard parsons</category><category>RichardParsons</category><category>spectrum</category><category>spectrum auction</category><category>SpectrumAuction</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twx</category><category>wireless spectrum</category><category>wireless spectrum auction</category><category>WirelessSpectrum</category><category>WirelessSpectrumAuction</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 13:59:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
