<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Has Staples hit a bottom?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/spls/" rel="tag">Staples Inc (SPLS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/staples2.jpg" alt="" />Shares of office products retailer, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/staples-inc/spls/nas">Staples Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/staples-inc/spls/nas">SPLS</a>), recovered today after opening much lower following the company's announcement of a 14% fall in quarterly profit, which missed analysts estimates by 6 cents per share. </p>
<p>For the quarter ending Jan. 31, 2009, Staples said it earned 36 cents per share, excluding one-time items, on revenue of $6.17 billion. This compared to analyst estimates of earnings of 42 cents per share, before one-time items, on revenue of $6.79 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Has Staples hit a bottom?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/">Has Staples hit a bottom?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1485509/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>portfolio grader</category><category>PortfolioGrader</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Beware biotech]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/beware-biotech/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/beware-biotech/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/beware-biotech/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dna/" rel="tag">Genentech Inc (DNA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/pills.jpg" alt="" />News events of the day are providing a dramatic illustration that not all biotech companies are the same.
<p>Just as President Obama lifted the executive order banning the use of embryonic stem cells for research, Roche and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genentech-inc/dna/nys">Genentech</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genentech-inc/dna/nys">DNA</a>) appear to have reached an agreement on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/dont-sell-your-genentech-dna-stock-just-yet/">Roche's bid</a> to acquire the 44% of DNA that Roche does not currently own. </p>
<p>Shares of biotech companies engaged in stem cell protocols rallied after the Obama announcement. While most of these companies are small in size with stock prices below $2 per share, the announcement gave impetus to price increases of 17% to 100%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/beware-biotech/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Beware biotech</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/beware-biotech/">Beware biotech</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/beware-biotech/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1483988/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/beware-biotech/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biotech</category><category>biotech stocks</category><category>biotechnology</category><category>BiotechStocks</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>dna</category><category>hgsi</category><category>human genome sciences</category><category>HumanGenomeSciences</category><category>inthenews</category><category>stem cell research</category><category>stem cells</category><category>StemCellResearch</category><category>StemCells</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Recession stock: Big Lots]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/big-lots-big-logo.gif" />Discount retailer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/big-lots-inc/big/nys">Big Lots Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/big-lots-inc/big/nys">BIG</a>) saw its shares surge higher in Wednesday trading after it posted a fourth-quarter profit from continuing operations that came in ahead of analysts expectations and offered a better-than-expected outlook.</p>
<p>Clearly, investors view BIG as a <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/richard_young/gallery/winning-stocks.html">recession stock</a> to own.<br /><br />Earnings from continuing operations totaled a dollar per share, ahead of the 93 cents per share analysts were expecting, and 3 cents higher than the year-ago quarter. Revenue fell to $1.37 billion from $1.41 billion last year, but beat expectations of $1.36 billion. Same-store sales fell a mild 3.2%, as sales of discretionary items, such as furniture and toys, were challenging.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Recession stock: Big Lots</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/">Recession stock: Big Lots</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1479990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>big</category><category>big lots</category><category>BigLots</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>louis navellier</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>portfolio grader</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><category>PortfolioGrader</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><category>recession stock</category><category>recession stocks</category><category>RecessionStock</category><category>RecessionStocks</category><category>retail</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>retailers</category><category>RetailStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chico and the woman]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.noworrycurry.com/elijahclub/wp-content/chicos_logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Shares of women's specialty retailer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chico-s-fas-inc/chs/nys">Chico's FAS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chico-s-fas-inc/chs/nys">CHS</a>) rose slightly yesterday despite the company posting another quarterly loss. </p>
<p>The operator of 1,074 Chico's, White House/Black Market and Soma Intimates stores said its fourth-quarter loss widened on store impairment charges and severance costs, but absent those charges results exceeded Wall Street's expectations. </p>
<p>The loss for the quarter was $40.5 million, or 23 cents per share including the charges, and 14 cents per share without. Last year's fourth-quarter loss was $20.5 million, or 12 cents per share. Sales fell 9% from a year ago to $373.4 million, while same-store sales were off 13% overall (17% at Chico's and 5% at White House/Black Market). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chico and the woman</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/">Chico and the woman</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1479042/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/chico-and-the-woman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chicos</category><category>CHS</category><category>clothes</category><category>clothing</category><category>clothing stores</category><category>ClothingStores</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>retail</category><category>retailers</category><category>soma intimates</category><category>SomaIntimates</category><category>white label black market</category><category>WhiteLabelBlackMarket</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell no longer best of breed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/dell.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />There was a time when <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) was the cream of the crop in the PC business. Its college dorm beginnings and customization model allowed the company to separate itself from a host of other competitors.</p>
<p>It is hard to say what exact magic it was that allowed the DELL story to unfold, but suffice it to say the company was the best in the business at selling computers to individuals and small businesses. But I'm not so sure that is the case any longer. The heady days of the dot-com boom were when this company reached its prime. It has been a slow death ever since.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dell no longer best of breed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/">Dell no longer best of breed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1474144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>louis navellier</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>PCs</category><category>portfolio grader</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><category>PortfolioGrader</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft still yearns for Yahoo]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/microsoft-still-yearns-for-yahoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/microsoft-still-yearns-for-yahoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/microsoft-still-yearns-for-yahoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/microsoft-yahoo.jpg" />With only a day of trading remaining in February, stocks are poised to post another monthly loss. There have been very few stocks going higher in this very persistent bear market.</p>
<p>One exception to the rule has been <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). Can you believe it? </p>
<p>Get rid of that nitwit Jerry Yang, and this stock is finally catching some tailwind.</p>
<p>Shares have gained more than $1 in value in February, as investors unwound short positions tied to the ineptitude of Chief Yahoo. In addition to short covering, shares caught a bid as buyers look to acquire shares at a discount in case a new deal for the company emerges.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/microsoft-still-yearns-for-yahoo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft still yearns for Yahoo</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/microsoft-still-yearns-for-yahoo/">Microsoft still yearns for Yahoo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/microsoft-still-yearns-for-yahoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1473228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/microsoft-still-yearns-for-yahoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>featured</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>msft</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Target not on target]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/target-not-on-target/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/target-not-on-target/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/target-not-on-target/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/targetcart.jpg" />One of the few companies not participating in <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trader-alerts/daily-market-outlook/feb-09/2-25-09-nationalization-talks-could-douse-dow.html">yesterday's broad-based rally</a> was retail giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">Target Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys ">TGT</a>). Target said its fourth-quarter profit fell 41% in the quarter ended Jan. 31, 2009.
<p> </p>
<p>The Minneapolis-based company said earnings fell to $609 million, or 81 cents per share, compared to earnings of $1.03 billion, or $1.23 per share, in the year ago period. According to Thomson Reuters, analysts were expecting earnings of 83 cents per share.<em> </em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/target-not-on-target/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Target not on target</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/target-not-on-target/">Target not on target</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/target-not-on-target/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471733/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/target-not-on-target/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>retailers</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>RetailStocks</category><category>target</category><category>tgt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Single-serving coffee not the answer for Starbucks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/starbucks_latte.jpg" />Is it realistic to expect <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) to deliver double-digit earnings growth in this environment?
<p>Seriously, can retail customers afford premium coffee when budgets are severely strained and debts are high?</p>
<p>No way. Premium coffee is a luxury item, and though many are addicted to java, cutting back is relatively easy to do. In that dynamic, sales are likely to slow.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Single-serving coffee not the answer for Starbucks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/">Single-serving coffee not the answer for Starbucks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>gmcr</category><category>green mountain coffee roasters</category><category>GreenMountainCoffeeRoasters</category><category>inthenews</category><category>louis navellier</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>portfolio grader</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><category>PortfolioGrader</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><category>sbux</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Lowe down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/the-lowe-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/the-lowe-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/the-lowe-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/lowes.jpg" />Home improvement retailer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">Lowe's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">LOW</a>) said Friday its fourth-quarter profit fell 60% from a year ago, as consumers continued to shy away from big-ticket items, such as appliances and cabinetry.</p>
<p>Lowe's said it earned $162 million, or 11 cents per share, in the quarter ended Jan. 30 -- down from earnings of $408 million, or 28 cents per share, last year. Revenue fell 4% to $9.98 billion as same-store sales, a key measure of performance since it tracks growth at existing stores rather than newly opened ones, dropped 9.9%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/the-lowe-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Lowe down</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/the-lowe-down/">The Lowe down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/the-lowe-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1469049/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/the-lowe-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>home improvement</category><category>home improvement stocks</category><category>home improvement stores</category><category>home repair</category><category>home repairs</category><category>HomeImprovement</category><category>HomeImprovementStocks</category><category>HomeImprovementStores</category><category>HomeRepair</category><category>HomeRepairs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whole Foods takes off]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/whole-foods-takes-off/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/whole-foods-takes-off/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/whole-foods-takes-off/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfmi/" rel="tag">Whole Foods Market (WFMI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/whole_foods_signs.jpg" alt="" />Is it really possible to make money in this market? </p>
<p>Surprisingly, the answer is yes. Despite the market being down more than 10% at the start of this year, there have been a number of winners that have done quite well.</p>
<p>As I have said many times, the current environment is very unique. Nobody has ever seen anything like this. To survive, one must throw out the old playbook and adapt to the new reality.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/whole-foods-takes-off/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whole Foods takes off</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/whole-foods-takes-off/">Whole Foods takes off</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/whole-foods-takes-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1467035/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/whole-foods-takes-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>grocery stores</category><category>GroceryStores</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Heinz can't shake the pickle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/heinz-cant-shake-the-pickle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/heinz-cant-shake-the-pickle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/heinz-cant-shake-the-pickle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cpb/" rel="tag">Campbell Soup (CPB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cag/" rel="tag">ConAgra Foods (CAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gis/" rel="tag">General Mills (GIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/h-j-heinz-company/hnz/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/ketchup.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />HJ Heinz Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/h-j-heinz-company/hnz/nys">HNZ</a>) recently learned inadvertently how strong its brand was with consumers. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/h-j-heinz-company/hnz/nys"></a></p>
<p>The company had announced that it was going to change the label on its flagship brand of ketchup. It seemed entirely reasonable and appropriate to drop the pickle from the label and replace it with a tomato.</p>
<p>Little did the company expect to encounter outrage from consumers, who launched a "Save the Pickle" campaign, complete with a blog, and an organized letter and e-mail avalanche.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/heinz-cant-shake-the-pickle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Heinz can't shake the pickle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/heinz-cant-shake-the-pickle/">Heinz can't shake the pickle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/heinz-cant-shake-the-pickle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1466103/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/heinz-cant-shake-the-pickle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>food stocks</category><category>FoodStocks</category><category>heinz</category><category>heinz ketchup</category><category>HeinzKetchup</category><category>hj heinz</category><category>HjHeinz</category><category>ketchup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS continues its slide]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/cbs-continues-its-slide/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/cbs-continues-its-slide/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/cbs-continues-its-slide/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.cbs.com/" target="_blank"></a><img hspace="4" src="http://www.fattoskinny.com/cbs_logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />After reaching a historic high in the mid-$30s in June 2007, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys ">CBS Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys ">CBS</a>) has seen its fortunes fall in a continuous slide. It's now trading for less than $5 per share.</p>
<p>After reporting reduced revenues for the fourth quarter of 2008, CBS is taking significant steps to conserve capital and strengthen its balance sheet.</p>
<p>The company reported a drop in revenue of 6%, which would have been even greater but for the contribution of recent acquisitions. </p>
<p>Television and radio ad sales were weak, and the Outdoor advertising unit had a 15% drop in revenue. While Outdoor was negatively impacted by <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/forex-futures.html">foreign exchange rate changes</a> as the U.S. dollar strengthened, excluding currency, revenues for this unit were still down a disappointing 8%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/cbs-continues-its-slide/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CBS continues its slide</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/cbs-continues-its-slide/">CBS continues its slide</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/cbs-continues-its-slide/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1466731/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/cbs-continues-its-slide/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>dividend</category><category>dividend cut</category><category>DividendCut</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP disappoints on future uncertainty]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/hp-disappoints-on-future-uncertainty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/hp-disappoints-on-future-uncertainty/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/hp-disappoints-on-future-uncertainty/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/hewlett-packard-hp-hpq-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) were last seen headed south after the world's largest technology company reported fiscal first-quarter results and cut its full-year 2009 guidance. </p>
<p>HP said it earned 93 cents per share, excluding one-time costs, on revenue of $28.8 billion for the quarter.</p>
<p>While the bottom-line number matched analyst estimates, the top-line figure fell well short of expectations by more than $3 billion. </p>
<p>Part of the revenue shortfall was a result of <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/forex-futures.html">currency fluctuations</a>, but the <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2009/02/how-vulnerable-is-apple.html">pullback in technology spending</a> was broad-based, as all but one of the company's major business lines posted a decrease in revenue.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/hp-disappoints-on-future-uncertainty/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HP disappoints on future uncertainty</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/hp-disappoints-on-future-uncertainty/">HP disappoints on future uncertainty</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/hp-disappoints-on-future-uncertainty/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1466127/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/hp-disappoints-on-future-uncertainty/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>Louis Navellier</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>pc sales</category><category>PcSales</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Medtronic: A great play on an aging population]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/medtronic-a-great-play-on-an-aging-population/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/medtronic-a-great-play-on-an-aging-population/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/medtronic-a-great-play-on-an-aging-population/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><a title="return to the home page" accesskey="1" href="http://www.medtronic.com/"><img height="40" alt="Medtronic" hspace="4" src="http://www.medtronic.com/wcm/groups/mdtcom_sg/@shared/documents/images/mdt-logo.png" width="206" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>Shares of medical device maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys">Medtronic Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys">MDT</a>) surged on Tuesday in an otherwise <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/stock-market-nightmare.html">lousy market</a> after the company said tighter cost controls and new demand for spinal implants helped it exceed Wall Street's expectations. Shares have been slipping, however, since Tuesday, from a high of $35.39 to $34.44 mid-morning Thursday.</p>
<p>For the quarter Medtronic earned $723 million, or 65 cents per share, on revenue of $3.49 billion.</p>
<p>After adjusting for in-process research and development charges of $72 million, or 6 cents per share, non-GAAP net earnings came in at $795 million, or 71 cents per share, an increase of 12% and 13%, respectively, from a year ago, and one penny ahead of Street estimates.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/medtronic-a-great-play-on-an-aging-population/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Medtronic: A great play on an aging population</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/medtronic-a-great-play-on-an-aging-population/">Medtronic: A great play on an aging population</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/medtronic-a-great-play-on-an-aging-population/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1464977/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/medtronic-a-great-play-on-an-aging-population/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mdt</category><category>medtronic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart: One retail stock you can feel good about owning]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/wal-mart-one-retail-stock-you-can-feel-good-about-owning/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/wal-mart-one-retail-stock-you-can-feel-good-about-owning/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/wal-mart-one-retail-stock-you-can-feel-good-about-owning/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/walmart_forless_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />On a day when stocks were down more than 3%, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/super-bowl-trades-part2.html">moved to the upside</a> yesterday by more than 4%. The reason for the big gain was the company's fourth-quarter operating performance.</p>
<p>The company reported that it had earned $1.03 per share, excluding items. This compares favorably to analyst expectations of 99 cents per share. In the year prior, WMT made $1.02 per share.</p>
<p>The company said it is seeing customer traffic increase as it draws sales away from <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/presidents-day-stocks-part6.html">competitors</a>. The intense focus on price savings is paying dividends during this economic slowdown.</p>
<p>WMT said earnings were hurt by a strong U.S. dollar that weakened the impact of overseas sales. Looking forward, WMT expects the global slowdown to negatively impact performance and that a strong dollar would hurt earnings over the next few quarters.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/wal-mart-one-retail-stock-you-can-feel-good-about-owning/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wal-Mart: One retail stock you can feel good about owning</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/wal-mart-one-retail-stock-you-can-feel-good-about-owning/">Wal-Mart: One retail stock you can feel good about owning</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/wal-mart-one-retail-stock-you-can-feel-good-about-owning/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1463633/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/wal-mart-one-retail-stock-you-can-feel-good-about-owning/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>retailers</category><category>RetailStocks</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chipotle earnings sizzle, but stock may fizzle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/chipotle-earnings-sizzle-but-stock-may-fizzle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/chipotle-earnings-sizzle-but-stock-may-fizzle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/chipotle-earnings-sizzle-but-stock-may-fizzle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmg/" rel="tag">Chipotle Mexican Grill'A' (CMG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/chipotle-mexican-grill-cmg-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Investors were sufficiently impressed with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chipotle-mexican-grill-inc/cmg/nys">Chipotle Mexican Grill</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chipotle-mexican-grill-inc/cmg/nys">CMG</a>) <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Chipotle-Mexican-Grill-Inc-bw-14328541.html">fourth-quarter earnings</a>.</p>
<p>The operator of more than 830 quick service Mexican restaurants said it earned $17 million, or 52 cents per share, in the quarter. That is compared to earnings of $17.5 million, or 53 cents per share, in the year-ago period.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/chipotle-earnings-sizzle-but-stock-may-fizzle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chipotle earnings sizzle, but stock may fizzle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/chipotle-earnings-sizzle-but-stock-may-fizzle/">Chipotle earnings sizzle, but stock may fizzle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/chipotle-earnings-sizzle-but-stock-may-fizzle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1459870/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/chipotle-earnings-sizzle-but-stock-may-fizzle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chipotle</category><category>CMG</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>earnings</category><category>louis navellier</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><category>restaurant stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Buffalo Wild Wings flying again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/buffalo-wild-wings-flying-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/buffalo-wild-wings-flying-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/buffalo-wild-wings-flying-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/chicken-wings.gif" />When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/buffalo-wild-wings-inc/bwld/nas">Buffalo Wild Wings</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/buffalo-wild-wings-inc/bwld/nas">BWLD</a>) reported a sharp drop in earnings for the third quarter last November, the stock plummeted to a 52-week low of $14.50 during the succeeding two months. </p>
<p>At the time, I suggested that the fundamentals at the company were so strong that the analysts downplaying the stock and the investors driving the price down were mistaken.</p>
<p>BWLD recovered in early December and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/04/buffalo-wild-wings-is-a-hot-deal/">held on to those gains</a> for the first part of 2009. With the release of the fourth-quarter earnings report yesterday, the stock has added another 30%-plus to its price.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/buffalo-wild-wings-flying-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Buffalo Wild Wings flying again</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/buffalo-wild-wings-flying-again/">Buffalo Wild Wings flying again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/buffalo-wild-wings-flying-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1459788/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/buffalo-wild-wings-flying-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buffalo wild wings</category><category>BuffaloWings</category><category>bwld</category><category>chicken wings</category><category>ChickenWings</category><category>cmg</category><category>din</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>louis navellier</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>pfcb</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blame Uncle Sam for the demise of Sirius]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/blame-uncle-sam-for-the-demise-of-sirius/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/blame-uncle-sam-for-the-demise-of-sirius/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/blame-uncle-sam-for-the-demise-of-sirius/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/sirius-xm.jpg" />The stock market is tough enough to navigate without having to deal with roadblocks that have nothing to do with corporate execution of a business plan or normal supply-and-demand dynamics for equity securities.</p>
<p>We make an investment on reasonable assumptions and take the risk that such assumptions pan out. What we can't do is foresee events that are totally outside of the control of the company, economy, or ourselves. For example, if we buy a stock of a company that utilizes acquisitions as part of its strategy, we can safely assume from past examples that the government will approve or disapprove such acquisitions in a reasonable amount of time.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/blame-uncle-sam-for-the-demise-of-sirius/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Blame Uncle Sam for the demise of Sirius</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/blame-uncle-sam-for-the-demise-of-sirius/">Blame Uncle Sam for the demise of Sirius</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/blame-uncle-sam-for-the-demise-of-sirius/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458881/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/blame-uncle-sam-for-the-demise-of-sirius/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>ftc</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>SatelliteRadio</category><category>sirius</category><category>xm radio</category><category>XmRadio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coke is 'the real thing']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/coke-is-the-real-thing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/coke-is-the-real-thing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/coke-is-the-real-thing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/soda.gif" />You wouldn't know it by listening to the media, but there is money to be made on the long side of the market. We all know the economy is horrible, but <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/richard_young/gallery/winning-stocks.html">certain companies are doing well</a> in this environment no matter how tough it is for everyone else.</p>
<p>Case in point is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">The Coca-Cola Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>). The world's largest soft drink maker released earnings today that beat expectations, and shares were up more than 7% today.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/coke-is-the-real-thing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Coke is 'the real thing'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/coke-is-the-real-thing/">Coke is 'the real thing'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/coke-is-the-real-thing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458767/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/coke-is-the-real-thing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coke</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>ko</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time to get long Whole Foods (WFMI)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/time-to-get-long-whole-foods-wfmi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/time-to-get-long-whole-foods-wfmi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/time-to-get-long-whole-foods-wfmi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfmi/" rel="tag">Whole Foods Market (WFMI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wholefoodslogo.jpg" />This whole investing game is quite easy and predictable. </p>
<p>A hot new company goes public, attracts investors and its stock goes through the roof. Everyone wants all-in until the price reaches an <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/articles/gallery/stocks-to-avoid-in-2009.html">unsustainable level</a>, and then the selling begins.</p>
<p>Eventually either the hot company crashes and burns, or recovers to provide more <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/articles/gallery/five-corporate-giants-at-wholesale-prices.html">rational returns</a> in the future.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whole-foods-market-inc/wfmi/nas">Whole Foods Market</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whole-foods-market-inc/wfmi/nas">WFMI</a>) is a great example of this evolution. </p>
<p>Five years ago, this alternative grocery store was all the rage. The stock appreciated as investors believed that shoppers would be more than willing to part with more dollars in order to get food that was naturally raised without chemicals and pesticides.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/time-to-get-long-whole-foods-wfmi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time to get long Whole Foods (WFMI)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/time-to-get-long-whole-foods-wfmi/">Time to get long Whole Foods (WFMI)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/time-to-get-long-whole-foods-wfmi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1455056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/time-to-get-long-whole-foods-wfmi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>groceries</category><category>grocery</category><category>grocery shopping</category><category>grocery store</category><category>GroceryShopping</category><category>GroceryStore</category><category>momentum stocks</category><category>MomentumStocks</category><category>wfmi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
