<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Are Microsoft and Dell dinosaurs in the making?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/are-microsoft-and-dell-dinosaurs-in-the-making/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/are-microsoft-and-dell-dinosaurs-in-the-making/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/are-microsoft-and-dell-dinosaurs-in-the-making/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/computerstore67.jpg" alt="" />Hypothesis: Our current computing environment sucks. We buy our own incomprehensively complex and undependable hardware, install a grab-bag of software that conflicts and/or craps out, and spend hours figuring out how to transfer and backup our work. Don't despair though, a better world is just around the corner. That world could be bad news for companies such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Dell</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">DELL</a>), but great news for the likes of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AT&amp;T</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">T</a>).</p>
<p>What am I talking about? I'm referring to a world in which we would only need to <a href="http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/hardware/0,39042972,62019276,00.htm">buy a dumb terminal and subscribe to the necessary computing services</a>. The company we choose -- perhaps AT&amp;T or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Comcast</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CMCSA</a>) -- would provide us with broadband wireless connectivity to its servers. From those servers, we could run any software we want, work with others on group projects and store our files remotely. No more data lost to hard drive crashes, no more struggling through software upgrades, no more lugging seven-pound laptops through airports, no more afternoons lost to recalcitrant home networks. No more need for a separate computer, xBox, Tivo, and cable box, either.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/are-microsoft-and-dell-dinosaurs-in-the-making/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are Microsoft and Dell dinosaurs in the making?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/are-microsoft-and-dell-dinosaurs-in-the-making/">Are Microsoft and Dell dinosaurs in the making?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/hardware/0,39042972,62019276,00.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/are-microsoft-and-dell-dinosaurs-in-the-making/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/912700/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/are-microsoft-and-dell-dinosaurs-in-the-making/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blade technology</category><category>BladeTechnology</category><category>cmcsa</category><category>computing technology</category><category>ComputingTechnology</category><category>dell</category><category>digital divide</category><category>DigitalDivide</category><category>dumb terminals</category><category>DumbTerminals</category><category>future of computing</category><category>FutureOfComputing</category><category>msft</category><category>online computing</category><category>OnlineComputing</category><category>t</category><category>twc</category><category>vz</category><category>web computing</category><category>WebComputing</category><category>wireless networks</category><category>WirelessNetworks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The resurgence of 'dumb terminals' a threat to Microsoft?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/the-resurgence-of-dumb-terminals-a-threat-to-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/the-resurgence-of-dumb-terminals-a-threat-to-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/the-resurgence-of-dumb-terminals-a-threat-to-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/rev-xpmce2005-desktoplg.jpg" />"Dumb terminals" are merely screens and keyboards that retrieve and send information to and from a central server. Are employers racing all over the place to get rid of those three year-old Microsoft Corp.'s (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Windows desktops that sit atop almost every employee's desk and workstation in order to install "<a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117011971274291861-oJ6FWrnA8NMPfMXw3vBILth1EiE_20080129.html">dumb terminals</a>?" Don't count on it for most.<br /><br />This issue has risen as a competitive threat to Microsoft before (Sun Microsystems Inc. (NASDAQ:SUNW) has particularly been a huge advocate of "light desktops"), but I don't see this going anywhere soon for the majority of companies. The costs to switch out thousands of Microsoft-powered PCs to data-entry systems that don't have local storage devices (like hard drives) and local desktops (for playing solitaire, <em>heh</em>) may -- over time -- enable customers to save money by not having to "refresh" Windows machines every three years or so.<br /><br />Here's my question -- why do Windows machines need to be "refreshed" every two or three years? I'm pretty sure that the Windows XP machines from 2001 are quite capable of running most software in 2007 (sure, with perhaps some memory upgrades and such), so why are companies so quick to replace perfectly good machines? Somebody's sales pitch is working.<br /><br />[Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 1-31-07]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/the-resurgence-of-dumb-terminals-a-threat-to-microsoft/">The resurgence of 'dumb terminals' a threat to Microsoft?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117011971274291861-oJ6FWrnA8NMPfMXw3vBILth1EiE_20080129.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/the-resurgence-of-dumb-terminals-a-threat-to-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/744988/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/the-resurgence-of-dumb-terminals-a-threat-to-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dumb Terminals</category><category>DumbTerminals</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>sunw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:28:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
