<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Men's Wearhouse reports first-quarter earnings that top expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/mens-wearhouse-reports-first-quarter-earnings-that-top-expectat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/mens-wearhouse-reports-first-quarter-earnings-that-top-expectat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/mens-wearhouse-reports-first-quarter-earnings-that-top-expectat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/mw.jpg" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/men-s-wearhouse-inc-the/mw/nys">Men's Wearhouse</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/men-s-wearhouse-inc-the/mw/nys">MW</a>) reported first-quarter results after the close Monday. Earnings <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/ap/men-s-wearhouse-1q-profit-tops-expectations/rfid221124513?channel=pf">dropped 47% compared to a year ago</a>. Although earnings contracted due to fewer customers, cost-cutting measures helped the company top the consensus estimate and forecast solid second-quarter earnings. <br /><br />First-quarter earnings checked in at 10 cents per share for the quarter, down from 19 cents per share a year ago but far better than the Street's forecast loss of a penny per share. Quarterly sales dropped 6% to $464.1 million from $491.1 million a year ago, as clothing product sales dropped 7.6%. Nevertheless, sales topped the consensus estimate of $459.3 million. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/mens-wearhouse-reports-first-quarter-earnings-that-top-expectat/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Men's Wearhouse reports first-quarter earnings that top expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/mens-wearhouse-reports-first-quarter-earnings-that-top-expectat/">Men's Wearhouse reports first-quarter earnings that top expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/mens-wearhouse-reports-first-quarter-earnings-that-top-expectat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19061806/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/mens-wearhouse-reports-first-quarter-earnings-that-top-expectat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings announcement</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>EarningsAnnouncement</category><category>EarningsReports</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mens Wearhouse</category><category>MensWearhouse</category><category>MW</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner: 1 plus 1 = 1]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>Today's <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-down-on-better-than-expected-profit/">TimeWarner earnings announcement</a> shows the disappointment that results when shareholders expect a corporate strategyand instead get a conglomerate. With TWX down 1.72% in the earnings announcement's&nbsp;wake, the Chinese water torturecontinues.&nbsp; How so?</p>
<p>When a <strong>corporate strategy</strong> is well-conceived and well-executed, there isa strong economic reason for businesses to be under the same corporate umbrella. Simply put, corporate strategy is aboutcreating value by sharing important capabilities across business units. For example, Wal-Mart gets big volume discountsby purchasing in big quantities from its suppliers. Wal-Mart is also good at measuring what items sell in its storesand which ones don't and stocking the shelves of each store accordingly. Wal-Mart's sustained financial&nbsp;excellenceresults from its ability to share these capabilities across its discount retailing, grocery, and pharmacy businesses.This sharing gives Wal-Mart a sustainable competitive advantage, keeping its costs below its competitors.</p>
<p>Bycontrast, a <strong>conglomerate</strong> holds a diverse collection of businesses&nbsp;among which there is verylittle sharing.&nbsp;The ostensible reason for the businesses being under the same corporate umbrella is that thedifferent businesses can predictably offset each other's earnings cycles.&nbsp;When one business is down, another oneis up and vice versa. The net effect is to smooth earnings.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner: 1 plus 1 = 1</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/">Time Warner: 1 plus 1 = 1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 May 2006 15:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/614562/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/time-warner-1-plus-1-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conglomerate</category><category>earnings annoucnement</category><category>earnings announcement</category><category>EarningsAnnoucnement</category><category>EarningsAnnouncement</category><category>economics</category><category>economies of scale</category><category>EconomiesOfScale</category><category>market</category><category>market reaction</category><category>MarketReaction</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner earnings</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerEarnings</category><category>twx</category><category>twx earnings</category><category>TwxEarnings</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 15:29:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
