<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Dubai Vaporizes $48 Trillion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="183" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="257" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/dubai_tower.jpg" alt="" />Best wishes to all and, next to world peace among people, we should hope for the same among world markets.</p>
<p>I have let some time pass before commenting on a recent example <font size="+0"><font size="2" face="Arial" color="#000000" id="role_document">of</font></font> how fragile a world we live in. This past year through a time of greater economic danger, fear and volatility than most of us has experienced in a life time, many people cannot fathom how close we came to the edge of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hades">Hades</a>.</p>
<p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Dubai Vaporizes $48 Trillion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/">Serious Money: Dubai Vaporizes $48 Trillion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19281056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>BankingSector</category><category>burj dubai</category><category>BurjDubai</category><category>dubai world</category><category>DubaiWorld</category><category>econmic valuation</category><category>EconmicValuation</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>EconomicStimulus</category><category>Global Stock Markets</category><category>GlobalStockMarkets</category><category>inthenewas</category><category>serious money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Citi preparing to repay TARP?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/citigroup-logo-200x150.gif" />Reports are surfacing that Citigroup (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) may be gearing up to pay back some for the $45 billion it received from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). According to CNBC, Citi is going to <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/34350090">raise as much as $20 billion</a> through a stock offering as part of these plans. The report notes that Citi's CEO Vikram Pandit has changes his travel plans so he can announce an equity offering today. <br /><br />Furthermore, Citi chairman Dick Parsons indicated to CNBC that the bank "is in a position to repay the TARP money, but there is an active discussion we have to have with regulators." An earlier report hinted that Citi and government regulators disagreed over how much C should raise to taxpayers.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Citi preparing to repay TARP?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/">Is Citi preparing to repay TARP?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19273168/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>featured</category><category>TARP</category><category>TARP repayment</category><category>TarpRepayment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment falls during November -- stocks to rally]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" height="200" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/labor.jpg" alt="" />It looks like we may have a bit of a rally on this final trading day of the first week of December thanks to the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jobless-rate-falls-to-10-as-job-losses-shrink-2009-12-04">nonfarm payroll report</a>. During November, 11,000 jobs were shed, far fewer than the expected 100,000 and the fewest lost jobs since December 2007. And the unemployment rate dropped to 10%.<br /><br />There is a word of caution, as some economists believe that November's payroll figures could appear better because of the way the government adjusts the data for seasonal factors. That's the only wet blanket I will throw on this news, as the "seasonal factor issue" does not impact the jobless rate.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment falls during November -- stocks to rally</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/">Unemployment falls during November -- stocks to rally</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19265395/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>jobs</category><category>nonfarm payrolls</category><category>NonfarmPayrolls</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dollar Tree posts strong third-quarter earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/dollartreelogo.jpg" />Discount retailer Dollar Tree (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dollar-tree-inc/dltr/nas">DLTR</a>), which sells everything for a dollar or less, reported third-quarter earnings Tuesday morning. The company earned <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/dollar-tree-inc-reports-record-third-quarter-results/rfid273928162?channel=pf">76 cents per share during the quarter</a>, nearly 62% higher than last year's same-quarter earnings. Sales for the quarter increased by more than 12% to $1.25 billion from $1.11 billion in sales from last year. <br /><br />Dollar Tree beat the <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Earnings/Dollar+Tree+%28DLTR%29+Posts+Q3+EPS+of+%24.76%2C+Beats+Views+by+10c/5136273.html">Street's earnings expectation</a> of 66 cents per share by a dime and topped and revenue expectations of $1.24 billion. "I am pleased with our third quarter performance," said CEO Bob Sasser in a statment. "Sales and earnings were above plan."  Solid earnings from a company specializing in cheap prices during a recession -- is anyone really surprised?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dollar Tree posts strong third-quarter earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/">Dollar Tree posts strong third-quarter earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19252174/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>discount retailers</category><category>DiscountRetailers</category><category>DLTR</category><category>Dollar Tree</category><category>DollarTree</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are you ready for a 'slow and painful' recovery?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/are-you-ready-for-a-slow-and-painful-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/are-you-ready-for-a-slow-and-painful-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/are-you-ready-for-a-slow-and-painful-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/factory.jpg" />On Monday, the National Association of Business Economics (NABE) announced that it believes the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/12/news/economy/recession_nabe/index.htm?postversion=2009101210">recession is over</a>, but many of the economists it surveyed don't believe there will be a "meaningful improvement in jobs, credit or housing for months to come." <br /><br />NABE asked a group of 43 top economists if they believe the U.S. economy has pulled out of the recession. Of those responding, 81% believe the recovery has started recovering, and 9% (four of those responding) thinking we are still in a recession. Four others were unsure. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/are-you-ready-for-a-slow-and-painful-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are you ready for a 'slow and painful' recovery?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/are-you-ready-for-a-slow-and-painful-recovery/">Are you ready for a 'slow and painful' recovery?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/are-you-ready-for-a-slow-and-painful-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19193855/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/are-you-ready-for-a-slow-and-painful-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic downturn</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>EconomicDownturn</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>featured</category><category>NABE</category><category>National Association of Business Economics</category><category>NationalAssociationOfBusinessEconomics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eight ways to define the recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/receessionpicutre.jpg" alt="" />We've watched <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/stockmarket/">stock market</a> numbers bounce around for two years. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Unemployment/">Unemployment</a> stats have served as unpleasant reminders that, for some, leading indicators haven't translated to reality. We look for so many ways to understand the brutal economic environment with which we've had to contend, and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33266915/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/">all the choices can make your head spin</a>. So, let's make it simple. Here are eight ways to tack a label onto the financial world in which we live. </p>
<p><strong>1. Lost market value</strong><br />Total stock market losses from October 2007's top to March 2009's bottom: $11.2 trillion<br />Total gains in the stock market since the bottom: $4.6 trillion<br />Lost ground: $6.6 trillion</p>
<p><strong>2. Bad days<br /></strong>Percentage of the 10 worst days in history for the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DowJonesIndustrialAverage/">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> that happened in 2008, by point drops: 60%<br />Percentage of the 10 worst days in history for the DJIA that happened in 2008, by percentage drops: 30%</p>
<p><strong>3. Mutual funds<br /></strong>Value of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mutualfund/">mutual fund</a> assets at the end of 2007: $6.5 trillion<br />... and a year later: $3.7 million<br />Lost value: $2.8 trillion</p>
<p>But, it got a little better at the end of August 2009: $4.5 trillion (value of assets)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eight ways to define the recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/">Eight ways to define the recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33266915/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19192550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>djia</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>gold</category><category>home sales</category><category>HomeSales</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job cuts slow in August, more not-so-bad news]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />The Automatic Data Processing (ADP) employment report was released before the opening bell Wednesday morning, showing that the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-aug-adp-employment-down-298000-2009-09-02-822460">private sector lost 298,000 jobs during August</a>. Expectations called for a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/01/news/economy/job_cuts/index.htm?postversion=2009090208">loss of 255,000 jobs</a>, but the loss was better than the revised 360,000 jobs lost during July. <br /><br />A spokesperson for ADP noted a "gradual improvement in labor markets" because "monthly losses are diminishing." That said, the group did note that job losses are likely to continue for "several more months." <br /><br />In addition to this news, Challenger Gray &amp; Christmas reported that layoffs planned by major U.S. corporations <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/job-cut-announcements-off-in-july-challenger-gray-2009-09-02">fell 21%</a> from July to August. The 76,456 layoffs in August were the second-lowest amount cut in 2009. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job cuts slow in August, more not-so-bad news</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/">Job cuts slow in August, more not-so-bad news</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19148394/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adp</category><category>adp jobs data</category><category>AdpJobsData</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>featured</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sears reports a surprise loss; could be in for a long day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/sears-reports-a-surprise-loss-could-be-in-for-a-long-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/sears-reports-a-surprise-loss-could-be-in-for-a-long-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/sears-reports-a-surprise-loss-could-be-in-for-a-long-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/shld-sears-holdings-logo1.jpg" alt="" />Slumping sales did in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">Sears Holdings</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>) in the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/sears-holdings-reports-second-quarter-results/rfid243403532?channel=pf">second quarter</a>, as the company posted a surprise loss of 17 cents per share (excluding items). The <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/sears-moves-to-2q-loss-on-store-closings/631350">Street expected</a> the company to report earnings of 38 cents per share. Why the staggering disparity? <br /><br />One reason is that comparable-store sales dropped 8.6% (12.5% at Sears stores and 3.9% at Kmart). Another reason is what the company called "significant items," which include costs associated with store closings and severance (32 cents per share), domestic pension plan expenses (22 cents per share), mark-to-market losses on Sears Canada hedge transactions (8 cents per share), and a positive impact of a reversal of a $62-million reserve (29 cents per share). The store closings include charges that related to the decision to close 28 underperforming stores.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/sears-reports-a-surprise-loss-could-be-in-for-a-long-day/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sears reports a surprise loss; could be in for a long day</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/sears-reports-a-surprise-loss-could-be-in-for-a-long-day/">Sears reports a surprise loss; could be in for a long day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/sears-reports-a-surprise-loss-could-be-in-for-a-long-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19135083/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/sears-reports-a-surprise-loss-could-be-in-for-a-long-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>featured</category><category>kmart</category><category>retail</category><category>retail earnings</category><category>RetailEarnings</category><category>sears</category><category>sears holdings</category><category>SearsHoldings</category><category>shld</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[John Deere reports quarterly earnings that top expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/john-deere-reports-quarterly-earnings-that-top-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/john-deere-reports-quarterly-earnings-that-top-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/john-deere-reports-quarterly-earnings-that-top-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/de/" rel="tag">Deere and Co (DE)</a></p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/john-deere-de-logo.jpg" />Earlier this morning, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deere-and-company/de/nys">Deere &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deere-and-company/de/nys">DE</a>) reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/deere-and-co-beats-despite-falling/492781">third-quarter earnings that dropped 27%</a> as a result of falling sales during the past quarter. The farming equipment firm reported quarterly earnings of 99 cents per share, easily topping the consensus estimate of 57 cents per share. <br /><br />While the results crushed the Street's estimate, it fell short of DE's year-ago performance. Quarterly revenue fell 24% compared to a year ago to $5.89 billion -- which again easily bested the consensus estimate for $5.25 billion.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/john-deere-reports-quarterly-earnings-that-top-expectations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>John Deere reports quarterly earnings that top expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/john-deere-reports-quarterly-earnings-that-top-expectations/">John Deere reports quarterly earnings that top expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/john-deere-reports-quarterly-earnings-that-top-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19133805/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/john-deere-reports-quarterly-earnings-that-top-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>de</category><category>deere</category><category>earnings report</category><category>EarningsReport</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>farm equipment</category><category>FarmEquipment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>quarterly earnings</category><category>QuarterlyEarnings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Old folks leaning on credit cards to get by]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/rsz_elderly.jpg" />With all the focus on unemployment, the usual recession victims have been overlooked a bit. The over-65 crowd, living on fixed incomes, has seen portfolios decimated and those consistent dividends from blue chippers evaporate. At the same time, medical costs are headed in the other direction. Expenses up and income down, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2009-07-27-credit-card-debt-seniors_N.htm">seniors have found only one solution: credit cards</a>. </p>
<p>Low- and middle-income consumers who've reached or passed age 65 had $10,235 in credit card debt, on average, last year, up a disturbing 26% from 2005. Meanwhile, credit card debt climbed only 3% across all age groups - to $9,827. From the fourth quarter of last year to the first this year, total revolving debt fell a modest 2.3% to $939.6 billion. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Old folks leaning on credit cards to get by</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/">Old folks leaning on credit cards to get by</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2009-07-27-credit-card-debt-seniors_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19111707/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>elderly</category><category>financialcrisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>senior citizen</category><category>senior citizens</category><category>SeniorCitizen</category><category>SeniorCitizens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street pay is higher than pre-crisis levels]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />Who is ready for their morning dose of anger? That is what I thought this morning when I found out about the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/22/AR2009072203687.html?hpid=topnews">higher pay at some investment banks</a> following the recent bailouts. Well, let me qualify that -- it isn't necessarily higher pay, but some execs will receive the same amount as they did before the bailouts. Some Wall Street firms, enjoying improving profits are on track to "pay employees as much as, or even more than, it did in the pre-crisis days." The top six U.S. banks have set aside $74 billion to pay employees, up from $60 billion last year, according to the <em>Washington Post</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street pay is higher than pre-crisis levels</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/">Wall Street pay is higher than pre-crisis levels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19107293/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AK Steel earnings preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/ak-steel-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/ak-steel-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/ak-steel-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="AK Steel Earnings Preview" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/aks-ak-steel-logo.jpg" />AK Steel Holding Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys">AKS</a>) is due to report earnings tomorrow before the market opens, and the company is expected to post <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/ap/ak-steel-seen-posting-another-quarterly-loss/rfid233654770?channel=pf">another quarterly loss</a>.<br /><br />The current recession has been tough on steel makers, and Ohio based AK Steel is no exception. The company has been forced to lower prices and lay off workers in the wake of slumping demand for its steel products.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/ak-steel-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AK Steel earnings preview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/ak-steel-earnings-preview/">AK Steel earnings preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/ak-steel-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19104202/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/ak-steel-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AK Steel</category><category>AKS</category><category>AkSteel</category><category>auto demand</category><category>AutoDemand</category><category>automakers</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>ConsumerConfidence</category><category>Detroit</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>Ohio</category><category>recession</category><category>steel</category><category>steel makers</category><category>SteelMakers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer sentiment down, according to everyone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/not-hiring.jpg" alt="" />There are two competing positions on consumer sentiment right now. One is that it turned south last week, as people worried about their jobs - always a bad sign for spending. The other is that consumer sentiment didn't crap out in July: it fizzled in May. So, it's not a question of whether consumers aren't confident in the U.S. economic machine, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1040347420090710">it's just a matter of when the collective mood changed</a>. </p>
<p>The July camp is set up around the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1040347420090710">Reuters</a>/<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/UniversityofMichiganSurveysofConsumers/">University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers</a>, which makes now the weakest point for consumer sentiment since March. Those who favor May look to domestic demand for foreign goods, which went soft two months ago,  bringing the monthly trade deficit to its narrowest since 1999. The U.S. trade gap unexpectedly tightened to $26 billion in May, with exports up 1.6% and imports down 0.6%, according to the U.S. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofCommerce/">Department of Commerce</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer sentiment down, according to everyone</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/">Consumer sentiment down, according to everyone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1040347420090710>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19094744/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of commerce</category><category>DepartmentOfCommerce</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>economiccrisis</category><category>economics</category><category>EconomicStimulus</category><category>economy</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>reuters</category><category>university of michigan</category><category>university of michigan surveys of consumers</category><category>UniversityOfMichigan</category><category>UniversityOfMichiganSurveysOfConsumers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Banks putting pressure on UK retail sales]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/banks-putting-pressure-on-uk-retail-sales/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/banks-putting-pressure-on-uk-retail-sales/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/banks-putting-pressure-on-uk-retail-sales/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/decretailsales.jpg" />Retail sales took an <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a6sN9iQCNdZE" target="_blank">unexpected downward turn in May</a> in the United Kingdom -- for first time in three months. Cautious banks appear to be the problem, as their rationing of credit is impeding broader <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/economicrecovery/">economic recovery</a>. Retail sales fell 0.6% from the previous month, while economists had predicted a 0.3% change in the other direction. </p>
<p>Year-over-year, retail sales were off 1.6%. Sales for the year are down 1.1%, the greatest decline since score-keeping began in 1988. Of course, there's plenty of fodder for rationalizing the results. The annual change was affected by an "unusually large" retail sales estimate for May 2008. Clothing, textile, and footwear retailers and department stores led the plunge, with nonfood store sales off 1.4%, compared to a 0.3% increase in food retail sales.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/banks-putting-pressure-on-uk-retail-sales/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Banks putting pressure on UK retail sales</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/banks-putting-pressure-on-uk-retail-sales/">Banks putting pressure on UK retail sales</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/banks-putting-pressure-on-uk-retail-sales/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19070917/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/banks-putting-pressure-on-uk-retail-sales/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economiccrisis</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>england</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>great britain</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lending</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>united kingdom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mixed economic signs push oil prices lower]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/mixed-economic-signs-push-oil-prices-lower/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/mixed-economic-signs-push-oil-prices-lower/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/mixed-economic-signs-push-oil-prices-lower/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p>Oil prices have dropped a bit this morning, challenging support at the $70 level, due mainly to what some call <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/oil-falls-to-around-70-on-mixed-us/527029">"mixed signals" about the U.S. economy</a>. The black gold has backed off as data pointed to the fact that the U.S. economy is still weak, even if it is emerging from the recession. <br /><br />On Tuesday, the Federal Reserve announced that industrial production dropped more than expected during May, which has triggered the new weakness in the oil patch. Crude prices have also felt the sting of the market's early week weakness as the Dow Jones Industrial Average has backed off from its recent rally. In addition, the dollar has played an important part in crude prices. A weak dollar leads to higher oil prices as commodities are considered a safe-haven investment against a weak dollar.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/mixed-economic-signs-push-oil-prices-lower/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mixed economic signs push oil prices lower</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/mixed-economic-signs-push-oil-prices-lower/">Mixed economic signs push oil prices lower</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/mixed-economic-signs-push-oil-prices-lower/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19069745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/mixed-economic-signs-push-oil-prices-lower/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crude oil</category><category>CrudeOil</category><category>Dow Jones</category><category>DowJones</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil inventories</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilInventories</category><category>OilPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund warns of a double dip]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/international-monetary-fund-warns-of-a-double-dip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/international-monetary-fund-warns-of-a-double-dip/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/international-monetary-fund-warns-of-a-double-dip/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/imf.jpg" />While most headlines in the financial media recently reported economists and institutions projecting the end of the recession in the second half of the year, the IMF said Monday the <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/31364629">worst of crisis may be yet to come</a>. <br /><br />While those who think we are out of the woods believe this recession will have just one dip, the IMF seems to advocate what is known as a <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/06/15/another-vote-for-a-vicious-double-dip/">"double dip" recession</a>. They believe that the expected upward swing in Gross Domestic Product for developed nations will just precede yet another economic collapse in the first half of next year.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/international-monetary-fund-warns-of-a-double-dip/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>International Monetary Fund warns of a double dip</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/international-monetary-fund-warns-of-a-double-dip/">International Monetary Fund warns of a double dip</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/international-monetary-fund-warns-of-a-double-dip/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19067276/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/international-monetary-fund-warns-of-a-double-dip/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>double dip</category><category>DoubleDip</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>GDP</category><category>gross domestic product</category><category>GrossDomesticProduct</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Video game sales drop again; recovery still far away]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/video-game-sales-drop-as-recovery-is-still-far-away/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/video-game-sales-drop-as-recovery-is-still-far-away/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/video-game-sales-drop-as-recovery-is-still-far-away/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/wal-mart-mario.jpg" alt="" />May marked the third-straight month that video game software sales dropped, a sign that the economic downturn continues to weigh on the gaming sector. NPD Group released its video game sales data yesterday afternoon, reflecting sales that <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/video-game-sales-fall-for-third-straight-month">fell to $448.9 million during May</a>. These monthly results are 17% lower than the same period last year. The drop in software sales was somewhat expected, as the Street called for a drop between 15% and 20%. Hardware sales dropped 30% during May, totaling $302.5 million. <br /><br />But the comparisons are difficult as major hits were released during spring 2008, including <em>Grand Theft Auto IV</em>, <em>Mario Kart</em>, and <em>Super Smash Bros. Brawl</em>. There were no such major hits released this year.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/video-game-sales-drop-as-recovery-is-still-far-away/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Video game sales drop again; recovery still far away</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/video-game-sales-drop-as-recovery-is-still-far-away/">Video game sales drop again; recovery still far away</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/video-game-sales-drop-as-recovery-is-still-far-away/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19065379/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/video-game-sales-drop-as-recovery-is-still-far-away/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic downturn</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>EconomicDownturn</category><category>erts</category><category>gaming sector</category><category>GamingSector</category><category>inthenews</category><category>luxury items</category><category>LuxuryItems</category><category>msft</category><category>ntdoy</category><category>sne</category><category>video game sales</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><category>VideoGameSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More bank stress tests needed?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" alt="" />The Congressional Oversight Panel announced in a report this morning that it feels <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/more-bank-stress-tests-may-be-needed/519576">more bank stress tests are needed</a>, especially if unemployment rates continue to rise. The group believes that the stress tests should be repeated periodically as long as banks continue to hold toxic assets. <br /><br />The panel used a risk-modeling approach that is described as "reasonable and conservative," but added that it is impossible for an outside party to mirror the loss projections that form the core of the stress tests. The group noted that the "more adverse scenario" assumption for the U.S. unemployment rate in the tests has nearly been met in 2009. The yearly average for the unemployment rate stands at 8.5%, which isn't far from the 8.9% assumed in the first round of stress tests. The group recommended that the "Treasury publicly track the status of its stress test macro-economic assumptions (unemployment, GDP, and housing prices) and repeat the stress test if the adverse scenario assumptions have been exceeded."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More bank stress tests needed?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/">More bank stress tests needed?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19061840/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank stress tests</category><category>BankStressTests</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>GDP</category><category>housing prices</category><category>HousingPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>TARP</category><category>tarp repayment</category><category>TarpRepayment</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gap's first-quarter earnings top expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gaps-first-quarter-earnings-top-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gaps-first-quarter-earnings-top-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gaps-first-quarter-earnings-top-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gps-gap-logo.jpg" alt="" />Trendy retailer <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">Gap Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">GPS</a>) announced Thursday that its <a href="http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=957567&amp;Category=Top%20story">first-quarter earnings declined compared to a year ago</a>. The khaki king's earnings were pulled lower by poor sales due to the economic crisis. That said, the company's quarterly earnings topped the consensus estimate. <br /><br />For the quarter, Gap earned 31 cents per share, down from 34 cents a year ago, but a penny better than analyst projections. Sales for the quarter dropped to $3.13 billion, matching the Street's expected $3.14 billion. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gaps-first-quarter-earnings-top-expectations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gap's first-quarter earnings top expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gaps-first-quarter-earnings-top-expectations/">Gap's first-quarter earnings top expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gaps-first-quarter-earnings-top-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1553752/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gaps-first-quarter-earnings-top-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>gps</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>same-store sales</category><category>Same-storeSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retail sales fall, will stocks?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/retail-sales-fall-will-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/retail-sales-fall-will-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/retail-sales-fall-will-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/mall-stores-200a060308.jpg" />Perhaps we were simply letting two months of gains cloud our thinking, or perhaps the situation was simply not as good as hoped. No matter what the reason, experts had believed that retail sales would increase by 0.2% in March. WRONG! <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={716055E7-5AB4-40F9-BD4F-164079839EC8}">Sales dropped</a> to a seasonally adjusted 1.1% during March according to the Commerce Department. <br /><br />The fall in consumer spending is more disappointing given the fact that the economy had shown some signs of life. Furthermore, first-quarter retail sales fell 1.2% from last year's fourth quarter sales, indicating that real consumer spending may have slipped again in the first quarter of 2009 following the 4% plunge in the last half of 2008.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/retail-sales-fall-will-stocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail sales fall, will stocks?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/retail-sales-fall-will-stocks/">Retail sales fall, will stocks?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/retail-sales-fall-will-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1516520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/retail-sales-fall-will-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>sale numbers</category><category>SaleNumbers</category><category>struggling sales</category><category>StrugglingSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
