<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="laborers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/09/springhill1.jpg" />According to the ADP Employer Services Report, the private sector <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/30/us-usa-economy-idUSN3027570820110330">added 201,000 new jobs</a> in March, basically in-line with 203,000 new jobs that analysts had been expecting to see.</p>
<p>February's figures were revised downwards to 208,000 from a previously estimated 216,000 new jobs.</p>
<p>March's employment gains bring the four-month average of new jobs to 211,000, more than enough to keep the labor track on path. Analysts estimate that the economy needs to add 125,000 new jobs each month in order to keep up with population growth, so any jobs over that figure result in a lower unemployment figures.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/">Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19897221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP Employer Services Report</category><category>consumer prices</category><category>economy</category><category>employees</category><category>gas prices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobs</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: Aftershocks of the Disaster in Japan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/19/comfort-zone-investing-disaster-in-japan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/19/comfort-zone-investing-disaster-in-japan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/19/comfort-zone-investing-disaster-in-japan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/afl/" rel="tag">AFLAC Inc (AFL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/09/japaneseflag.jpg" alt="Japanese flag" />The Japanese devastation is almost incomprehensible. First there was the earthquake, followed by the tsunami, followed by radiation. It seems the disaster has no end. The people are suffering beyond imagination. It will be a long time for the country to heal. In the north, it will take decades.</p>
<p>Investors are trying to understand what the economic aftershocks will be. Which industries will be hurt and which ones will benefit? Because the crises change from day to day, it's extremely difficult to ascertain. But there are a few themes that seem to be emerging. Some of these will be short lived, such as the closing of the Japanese auto manufacturers. While they will lose days of production, the long-term effect will be minor, unless supplies are interrupted, causing further delays.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/19/comfort-zone-investing-disaster-in-japan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: Aftershocks of the Disaster in Japan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/19/comfort-zone-investing-disaster-in-japan/">Comfort Zone Investing: Aftershocks of the Disaster in Japan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/19/comfort-zone-investing-disaster-in-japan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19880641/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/19/comfort-zone-investing-disaster-in-japan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AFL</category><category>Aflac</category><category>AIG</category><category>Cat</category><category>Caterpillar</category><category>Comfort Zone Investing</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>Japan</category><category>Japan economy</category><category>rebuilding Japan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Holiday Sales Falling Short of Expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="holdiay shopping" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/10/retail240.jpg" />December is not shaping up to have been the retail windfall that many experts predicted, which may be setting up a rather scary situation. Don't worry folks, the experts are going to blame the <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/retailers-report-surprisingly-weak/616715/" target="_blank">poor December revenue</a> on different factors, including strong November sales taking away from December and post-Christmas sales suffering from the Northeast blizzard. <br />
<br />
First things first, not all retailers have reported their results -- a majority of heavy hitters will report today. Nevertheless, the results are being described as "slow and steady" rather than the expected blowout holiday shopping season. For example, Costco (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/costco-wholesale-corporation/cost/nas" target="_blank">COST</a>) reported sales that increased 6%. This is positive data, unfortunately expectations called for an increase of 6.2%. Target (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys" target="_blank">TGT</a>) saw sales increase 0.9%, well short of the expected 4%. Of course sales were better at Macy's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys" target="_blank">M</a>), right? I mean they are adding jobs and all. Wrong, sales did increase (3.9%) but missed expectations (4.5%).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Holiday Sales Falling Short of Expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/">Holiday Sales Falling Short of Expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19789788/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>COST</category><category>Costco</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economy</category><category>holiday sales</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Macys</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Confidence Drops in December]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="consumer confidence" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/12/retailsales-1292337646.jpg" />Just as we are hearing that retailers had a great December, we get news from the Conference Board that U.S. consumer confidence <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/december-consumer-confidence-dips-to-525-2010-12-28" target="_blank">dropped to 52.5 in December</a>. Expectations had been for an increase to 56.9, making for quite a disparity between expectation and reality.</p>
<p>The director of the Conference Board's consumer research center, Lynn Franco, noted that "Consumers' assessment of the current state of the economy and labor market remains tepid, and their outlook remains cautious." Franco added that signs suggest continuing growth for the economy, "but that the pace of growth will remain moderate."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Confidence Drops in December</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/">Consumer Confidence Drops in December</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19779032/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Conference Board</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Lynn Franco</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bleak Prospects for Further Economic Growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/gary-shilling-240-x-160-1289512326.jpg" alt="" />In projecting U.S. GDP growth at about a 2% rate for the remainder of this year and in 2011, I have noted that the two propellants of growth so far in this economic recovery -- the inventory revival and fiscal stimuli -- are largely exhausted. </p>
<p>But are there other sectors of the <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/">economy</a> that might serve as the backbone of any meaningful economic recovery? I don't see any, especially with U.S. consumers continuing their saving spree, repaying debts and remaining hesitant to spend like they did during the boom times of earlier years.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bleak Prospects for Further Economic Growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/">Bleak Prospects for Further Economic Growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19772995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>economy</category><category>exports</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>housing inventory</category><category>productivity</category><category>recovery</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Shilling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[James Altucher: Despite World Worries, Buy Stocks [VIDEO]]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/15/james-altucher-despite-world-worries-buy-stocks-video/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/15/james-altucher-despite-world-worries-buy-stocks-video/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/15/james-altucher-despite-world-worries-buy-stocks-video/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/12/james-altucher-picture-from-video-clip.jpg" />It's often said that the best time to buy stocks is when everyone else is selling -- or sitting on the sidelines. That's when you get the best deals. So does that make stocks a good investment for you today? <br />
<br />
No question, Americans are still wary of the stock market. The S&amp;P 500 has remained within a narrow range for more than a year. Not surprising given the U.S. high unemployment rate and the fall in values of homes. On top of that, the world is jittery over the debt crisis in Europe, the possibility of inflation in China (even though China so far has not raised interest rates), and skirmishes taking place between North and South Korea. And then there are well-known economists such as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/why-there-wont-be-an-economic-recovery-soon/">Gary Shilling</a> and David Rosenberg who are sounding alarm bells that now is not the time to invest in stocks.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/15/james-altucher-despite-world-worries-buy-stocks-video/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>James Altucher: Despite World Worries, Buy Stocks [VIDEO]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/15/james-altucher-despite-world-worries-buy-stocks-video/">James Altucher: Despite World Worries, Buy Stocks [VIDEO]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/15/james-altucher-despite-world-worries-buy-stocks-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19760791/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/15/james-altucher-despite-world-worries-buy-stocks-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>david rosenberg</category><category>debt crisis</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>gary shilling</category><category>investing</category><category>james altucher</category><category>Korea</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikhil Hutheesing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why There Won't Be an Economic Recovery Soon]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/why-there-wont-be-an-economic-recovery-soon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/why-there-wont-be-an-economic-recovery-soon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/why-there-wont-be-an-economic-recovery-soon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/gary-shilling-240-x-160-1289512326.jpg" />I am projecting U.S. GDP growth at about a 2% rate for the remainder of this year and in 2011. The two propellants of growth so far in this economic recovery -- the inventory revival and fiscal stimuli -- are largely exhausted. <br />
<br />
The ending of inventory liquidation and their rebuilding in the past five quarters, starting with the third quarter of 2009, accounted for 58.5% of the overall gain of 3.6% in real GDP. Conversely, real final sales (real GDP ex inventories) grew just 1.4% in the last five quarters and were responsible for less than half the rise in real GDP, 48.2%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/why-there-wont-be-an-economic-recovery-soon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why There Won't Be an Economic Recovery Soon</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/why-there-wont-be-an-economic-recovery-soon/">Why There Won't Be an Economic Recovery Soon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/why-there-wont-be-an-economic-recovery-soon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19759127/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/why-there-wont-be-an-economic-recovery-soon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>Gary Shilling</category><category>GDP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Shilling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Home Values Plunged $1.7 Trillion in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/home-values-fell-1-7-trillion-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/home-values-fell-1-7-trillion-in-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/home-values-fell-1-7-trillion-in-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/realestate.jpg" alt="" />Despite talk all year long that the housing market was stabilizing and that it had reached bottom, home values in the U.S. have fallen $1.7 trillion in 2010, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/09/real_estate/home_value/index.htm">real estate website Zillow</a> announced Thursday. Zillow's 2010 estimate is 63% higher than the $1 trillion drop it estimated in 2009, CNNMoney reported.</p>
<p>The first time home-buyer credit ended up to be just a blip in the overall price declines, demonstrating that market forces are more powerful than temporary fixes.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/home-values-fell-1-7-trillion-in-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Home Values Plunged $1.7 Trillion in 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/home-values-fell-1-7-trillion-in-2010/">Home Values Plunged $1.7 Trillion in 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/09/real_estate/home_value/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/home-values-fell-1-7-trillion-in-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19754545/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/home-values-fell-1-7-trillion-in-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>home prices</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Stan Humphries</category><category>Zillow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More People Are Quitting Their Jobs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/09/shove-it-indicator-turns-up-more-people-say-i-quit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/09/shove-it-indicator-turns-up-more-people-say-i-quit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/09/shove-it-indicator-turns-up-more-people-say-i-quit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/04/youngworker.jpg"  alt="" />The Bureau of Labor Statistics has an indicator that tracks the number of people who simply quit their jobs. <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/40569628">CNBC.com</a> reported that the indicator, which they dubbed "Take This Job and Shove It," climbed in October with 2 million people quitting their jobs, up from 1.7 million in the same month a year ago. The last time this pattern occurred was in 2003 when the economy started a long upward trend.</p>
<p>The "Shove It" indicator tends to turn up when people are confident enough that they will find another job if they quit their present one.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/09/shove-it-indicator-turns-up-more-people-say-i-quit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More People Are Quitting Their Jobs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/09/shove-it-indicator-turns-up-more-people-say-i-quit/">More People Are Quitting Their Jobs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/40569628>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/09/shove-it-indicator-turns-up-more-people-say-i-quit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19752872/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/09/shove-it-indicator-turns-up-more-people-say-i-quit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recovery</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the Diesel Fuel Gauge Pointing to a Slowdown?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/07/is-the-diesel-fuel-gauge-pointing-to-a-slowdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/07/is-the-diesel-fuel-gauge-pointing-to-a-slowdown/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/07/is-the-diesel-fuel-gauge-pointing-to-a-slowdown/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/ups-truck-240.jpg" alt="" />The Ceridian-UCLA Pulse of Commerce Index is a little known index that tracks diesel fuel consumption to use as a proxy for economic activity.<br />
<br />
On Tuesday, the index will show a small 0.4% gain following three months of decline, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703471904576003910342009494.html?KEYWORDS=Ed+Leamer"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> reports. The rolling average has declined for three of the past four months, breaking 13 straight month of gains.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/07/is-the-diesel-fuel-gauge-pointing-to-a-slowdown/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is the Diesel Fuel Gauge Pointing to a Slowdown?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/07/is-the-diesel-fuel-gauge-pointing-to-a-slowdown/">Is the Diesel Fuel Gauge Pointing to a Slowdown?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703471904576003910342009494.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLETopStories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/07/is-the-diesel-fuel-gauge-pointing-to-a-slowdown/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19749243/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/07/is-the-diesel-fuel-gauge-pointing-to-a-slowdown/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ceridian-UCLA Pulse of Commerce Index</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesel consumption</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Producer Prices Increase During October]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/u-s-producer-prices-increase-during-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/u-s-producer-prices-increase-during-october/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/u-s-producer-prices-increase-during-october/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Department of Labor seal" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/dol-logo-1270224022.jpg" />According to the Labor Department, U.S. producer prices <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-producer-prices-rise-04-in-october-2010-11-16" target="_blank">increased a seasonally adjusted 0.4%</a> during October thanks mainly to an increase in energy prices.</p>
<p>Energy prices increased 3.7% during the month, the largest monthly increase since January. This increase was driven (so to speak) by a 9.8% increase in gasoline prices. Food prices dropped 0.1% during the month, with plunge led by a drop of 8.1% in the government's index for fresh and dry vegetables.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/u-s-producer-prices-increase-during-october/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Producer Prices Increase During October</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/u-s-producer-prices-increase-during-october/">U.S. Producer Prices Increase During October</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/u-s-producer-prices-increase-during-october/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19720228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/u-s-producer-prices-increase-during-october/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sales</category><category>economy</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PPI</category><category>producer price index</category><category>truck sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Futures Lower on Cisco, China Inflation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/futures-and-whats-on-tap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/futures-and-whats-on-tap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/futures-and-whats-on-tap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kss/" rel="tag">Kohl's Corp (KSS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/bell-red-240a050806.jpg" alt="" />U.S. stock futures are lower this morning after Cisco Systems (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas" class="inlinked">CSCO</a>) issued a weak revenue forecast last night, and China reported 4.4% surge in its consumer-price index in October. Futures on the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average/%24indu/dji" class="inlinked">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> lost 14 points at 11,288.00, while S&amp;P 500 futures moved down 2.80 points to 1,211.30. Nasdaq 100 futures dropped 12.75 points to 2,161.75.<br />
<br />
However, U.S. markets did gain yesterday, with the Dow Jones industrial average rising 0.1%, the Standard &amp; Poor's 500 Index gaining 0.4% and the Nasdaq Composite Index advancing 0.6%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/futures-and-whats-on-tap/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Futures Lower on Cisco, China Inflation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/futures-and-whats-on-tap/">Futures Lower on Cisco, China Inflation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/futures-and-whats-on-tap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19712311/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/futures-and-whats-on-tap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>csco</category><category>currency</category><category>dis</category><category>dollar</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>gps</category><category>inflation</category><category>kss</category><category>nvda</category><category>oil</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Raznick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Dow 11,000 Sending a False Signal to Investors?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/22/is-dow-11-000-sending-a-false-signal-to-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/22/is-dow-11-000-sending-a-false-signal-to-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/22/is-dow-11-000-sending-a-false-signal-to-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/stockexchange.jpg" />You can't blame investors for being a little perplexed regarding the U.S. stock market right now.</p>
<p>The market's bulls argue the worst financial and economic news is behind us, and that the Dow's recent rise from about the 9,500 level in July to <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average/$indu/dji">above 11,000</a> early this autumn is a signal by institutional investors that better days are ahead.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/22/is-dow-11-000-sending-a-false-signal-to-investors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Dow 11,000 Sending a False Signal to Investors?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/22/is-dow-11-000-sending-a-false-signal-to-investors/">Is Dow 11,000 Sending a False Signal to Investors?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/22/is-dow-11-000-sending-a-false-signal-to-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19685737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/22/is-dow-11-000-sending-a-false-signal-to-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dija</category><category>earnings</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Fiscal Deficit Just Below $1.3 Trillion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/us-dollarnote-240.jpg" />For the 2010 fiscal year ending September 30, the Congressional Budget Office reported that the deficit is just below $1.3 trillion, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704696304575538553221675436.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported. In 2009, the deficit was $1.4 trillion. The deficit in fiscal 2010 is 8.9% of GDP, well above the normal number of 3%.<br />
<br />
With staggering deficits in 2009 and 2010, lawmakers will face a difficult task: how to rein in spending without derailing our fragile economy. Both parties must work together to find ways to keep spending in check.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Fiscal Deficit Just Below $1.3 Trillion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/">U.S. Fiscal Deficit Just Below $1.3 Trillion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704696304575538553221675436.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19665981/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deficit</category><category>economy</category><category>federal reesrve</category><category>fiscal deficit</category><category>inthenews</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Key U.S. Durable Goods Stat Suggests Better Days Ahead for Expansion, Earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/key-u-s-durable-goods-stat-suggests-better-days-ahead-for-expan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/key-u-s-durable-goods-stat-suggests-better-days-ahead-for-expan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/key-u-s-durable-goods-stat-suggests-better-days-ahead-for-expan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/08/manufacturing4.jpg"  alt="durable goods orders" />Institutional investors are sometimes chastised for placing too much emphasis on a given economic statistic.<br />
<br />
And with good reason: one positive or negative data point doesn't make a trend, and equally significant -- the very data point investors claim 'signals' the start of new bullish (or bearish) trend, frequently is revised, sometimes substantially -- making the previous bullish or bearish conclusion look premature, if not irrational.<br />
<br />
That said, there are those 'telling stats' that offer a binocular view -- what may be ahead for the U.S. economy down the road. And one is: <a href="http://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/prel/pdf/s-i-o.pdf">durable goods orders excluding transportation goods</a> [PDF download].<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/key-u-s-durable-goods-stat-suggests-better-days-ahead-for-expan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Key U.S. Durable Goods Stat Suggests Better Days Ahead for Expansion, Earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/key-u-s-durable-goods-stat-suggests-better-days-ahead-for-expan/">Key U.S. Durable Goods Stat Suggests Better Days Ahead for Expansion, Earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/key-u-s-durable-goods-stat-suggests-better-days-ahead-for-expan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19665358/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/key-u-s-durable-goods-stat-suggests-better-days-ahead-for-expan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>durable goods orders</category><category>economy</category><category>growth</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IMF Forecasts a Slowdown in U.S. Growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/imf-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />This is not good news. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) did an assessment of growth for the U.S. economy and forecasts lower growth this year and next, according to a report in <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6952MR20101006">Reuters</a>.</p>
<p>For the year 2010 the IMF reduced U.S. growth estimate from 3.3% down to 2.6%. For 2011 they also lowered growth from 2.9% to 2.3%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IMF Forecasts a Slowdown in U.S. Growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/">IMF Forecasts a Slowdown in U.S. Growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6952MR20101006>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19663231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>government</category><category>IMF Assessment of the US economy</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Doom &amp; Gloom Economy or Rich America?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/doom-and-gloom-or-rich-american/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/doom-and-gloom-or-rich-american/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/doom-and-gloom-or-rich-american/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/us-flag-closeup.jpg" />At times, it can be really hard to remember just how good we have it as Americans. In all the <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-10-05/goldman-says-u-s-economy-will-be-fairly-bad-or-very-bad-.html">doom and gloom</a> talk of the economy, such as Goldman Sachs saying it will be "fairly bad" at best over the coming six to nine months, I think this is we need to be reminded of this sometimes. <br />
<br />
We are one of the richest and freest countries in the world. We have freedom of speech, press and religion. Economically, we are very well off. While with the weak U.S. dollar we may not be the richest country in the world anymore, we are far from poor. <br />
<br />
To put things in perspective, here is a select list of some of the countries in the world and their 2009 gross domestic product based on purchasing-power-parity per capita, according to <a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=24&amp;pr.y=7&amp;sy=2009&amp;ey=2009&amp;scsm=1&amp;ssd=1&amp;sort=country&amp;ds=.&amp;br=1&amp;c=512%2C941%2C914%2C446%2C612%2C666%2C614%2C668%2C311%2C672%2C213%2C946%2C911%2C137%2C193%2C962%2C122%2C674%2C912%2C676%2C313%2C548%2C419%2C556%2C513%2C678%2C316%2C181%2C913%2C682%2C124%2C684%2C339%2C273%2C638%2C921%2C514%2C948%2C218%2C943%2C963%2C686%2C616%2C688%2C223%2C518%2C516%2C728%2C918%2C558%2C748%2C138%2C618%2C196%2C522%2C278%2C622%2C692%2C156%2C694%2C624%2C142%2C626%2C449%2C628%2C564%2C228%2C283%2C924%2C853%2C233%2C288%2C632%2C293%2C636%2C566%2C634%2C964%2C238%2C182%2C662%2C453%2C960%2C968%2C423%2C922%2C935%2C714%2C128%2C862%2C611%2C716%2C321%2C456%2C243%2C722%2C248%2C942%2C469%2C718%2C253%2C724%2C642%2C576%2C643%2C936%2C939%2C961%2C644%2C813%2C819%2C199%2C172%2C184%2C132%2C524%2C646%2C361%2C648%2C362%2C915%2C364%2C134%2C732%2C652%2C366%2C174%2C734%2C328%2C144%2C258%2C146%2C656%2C463%2C654%2C528%2C336%2C923%2C263%2C738%2C268%2C578%2C532%2C537%2C944%2C742%2C176%2C866%2C534%2C369%2C536%2C744%2C429%2C186%2C433%2C925%2C178%2C746%2C436%2C926%2C136%2C466%2C343%2C112%2C158%2C111%2C439%2C298%2C916%2C927%2C664%2C846%2C826%2C299%2C542%2C582%2C967%2C474%2C443%2C754%2C917%2C698%2C544&amp;s=PPPPC&amp;grp=0&amp;a=">IMF data</a>:<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/doom-and-gloom-or-rich-american/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Doom &amp; Gloom Economy or Rich America?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/doom-and-gloom-or-rich-american/">Doom &amp; Gloom Economy or Rich America?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/doom-and-gloom-or-rich-american/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19662540/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/doom-and-gloom-or-rich-american/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>gdp per capita</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Factory Orders Decline in August]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/factory-orders-decline-in-august/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/factory-orders-decline-in-august/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/factory-orders-decline-in-august/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/down-arrow-240x160.jpg" alt="" />The market is roughly a hundred points lower as we head into the final hours of trading, with many factors combining to push investors to the bearish side. </p>
<p>One the mitigating factors is today's data on U.S. factory orders. According to the Commerce Department, factory orders dropped 0.5% in August - <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/august-factory-orders-decline-05-percent/1252302/">marking the third monthly drop in the past four</a>. Perhaps this news is a bit more negative considering orders increased 0.4% in July.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/factory-orders-decline-in-august/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Factory Orders Decline in August</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/factory-orders-decline-in-august/">Factory Orders Decline in August</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/factory-orders-decline-in-august/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19659959/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/factory-orders-decline-in-august/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic data</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economy</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Inflation Comes to Walmart: Prices Are Up from a Year Ago]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/inflation-comes-to-wal-mart-prices-are-up-from-a-year-ago/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/inflation-comes-to-wal-mart-prices-are-up-from-a-year-ago/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/inflation-comes-to-wal-mart-prices-are-up-from-a-year-ago/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/walmart-logo-240.jpg" />The Federal Reserve keeps telling us that inflation is too low. That's true if you use the core index, which excludes food and energy prices. But most of our income is spent on these two sectors. Take Walmart (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>). Prices at the world's largest retailer rose the the highest level in 21 months, JP Morgan found, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-09-30/wal-mart-s-prices-rise-to-highest-in-almost-two-years.html">according to Bloomberg</a>. </p>
<p>A basket of 31 items at Walmart increased 5% so far this year and 2.7% in September. Seven of the items had price increases of 10% or higher since August.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/inflation-comes-to-wal-mart-prices-are-up-from-a-year-ago/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Inflation Comes to Walmart: Prices Are Up from a Year Ago</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/inflation-comes-to-wal-mart-prices-are-up-from-a-year-ago/">Inflation Comes to Walmart: Prices Are Up from a Year Ago</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-09-30/wal-mart-s-prices-highest-in-almost-two-years-analyst-says.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/inflation-comes-to-wal-mart-prices-are-up-from-a-year-ago/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19655806/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/inflation-comes-to-wal-mart-prices-are-up-from-a-year-ago/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does American Petroleum Institute Data Mean Economy Is Improving?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/american-petroleum-institute-data/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/american-petroleum-institute-data/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/american-petroleum-institute-data/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/oilrigs.jpg"  alt="oil production" />Early Wednesday morning, the American Petroleum Institute (API) reported that crude inventories <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/oil-stays-above-76-on-unexpected-us/681986/" target="_blank">dropped 2.4 million barrels during the past week</a>. According to Platt's, inventories were expected to increase by 2.2 million barrels.</p>
<p>The report also showed that there was an increase in gasoline inventories, with distillates dropping. While the Energy Department is going to report its weekly supply data later Wednesday, crude futures inched higher above $76 per barrel.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/american-petroleum-institute-data/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does American Petroleum Institute Data Mean Economy Is Improving?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/american-petroleum-institute-data/">Does American Petroleum Institute Data Mean Economy Is Improving?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/american-petroleum-institute-data/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19653187/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/american-petroleum-institute-data/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crude</category><category>crude futures</category><category>crude inventories</category><category>crude oil</category><category>economic data</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economy</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
