Still, if the merger goes through, Furukawa estimates it could produce up to $7.2 billion in cost savings and further, this estimate might be conservative as it does not include capex savings. In addition, the merged company could drive higher ad revenues and move away from the subscriber-based model into the ad-revenue one that seems to be where many believe the money is, especially as the early subscriber growth both companies experienced has cooled.
If the merger indeed succeeds and the cost savings are achieved, there may be a chance the combined company could rediscover the earlier growth it once witnessed. As Dana Cimilluca of the WSJ Deal Journal notes, this cost savings is bigger than XM's market cap of $4.67 billion, so no wonder both companies and their shareholders pushed the merger forward so passionately. They know what might happen if the merger doesn't go through.
One last comment on this. Contrary to Furukawa, Jonathan Jacoby of Banc of America Securities thinks that the stocks' recent prices actually imply that investors think there is an 85% chance of the merger succeeding. I'm not sure what could explain such a big difference in the two opinions, but I do know what mine has been all along and why I'm in trouble with many satellite fans. I do believe these to be too risky for their potential upside and I'm staying out.
Tuesday, SIRI shares closed up 3.77% to $3.5799 and XMSR shares up 6.87% to $15.24. Today, XM shares are cooling a bit, down over 1% to $15.08, while Sirius shares are continuing to climb, up more than 3% to $3.69 by midday.
The Richest Woman in the World: How Gina Rinehart Earns her Billions
Why Dell Will Never Be Great Again
The release date of XM Satellite Radio Inc.'s (NASDAQ:

