<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Energy, auto sales push consumer prices higher in October]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/05/gas_types.jpg" alt="" />The price at the cash register ticked higher in October, though <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34012335/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/" target="_blank">it was driven by the cost at the pump and on the lot</a>. </p>
<p>Energy prices and new car sales (the highest in 28 years) pushed consumer prices upward in October, they're still cheaper than they were a year earlier. The Labor Department reports that consumer prices edged up 0.3% last month, a tad higher than the 0.2% anticipated. Take food and energy out of the equation, and inflation rose 0.2%, again ahead of the 0.1% that analysts expected.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Energy, auto sales push consumer prices higher in October</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/">Energy, auto sales push consumer prices higher in October</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19246140/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>christmas shopping</category><category>consumer prices</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>cost</category><category>costco</category><category>energy prices</category><category>holiday sales</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>retailers</category><category>Target Corp.</category><category>TGT</category><category>unemployment</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>walmart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil stock #5: Chesapeake Energy (CHK)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/28/oil-stock-5-chesapeake-energy-chk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/28/oil-stock-5-chesapeake-energy-chk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/28/oil-stock-5-chesapeake-energy-chk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chk/" rel="tag">Chesapeake Energy (CHK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="stocks to sell chesapeake energy" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/chesapeakeenergy.jpg" width="150" height="200" />The interest in using natural gas as an alternative to crude has helped natural gas-based companies appreciate in value. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chesapeake-energy-corporation/chk/nys" target="_blank">Chesapeake Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chesapeake-energy-corporation/chk/nys" target="_blank">CHK</a>) has benefited from that interest, with a gain of more than 20% this year.</p>
<p>CHK is an interesting story in that during the craze in energy prices in 2008, the CEO of the company was forced to liquidate his entire position. That forced selling created an opportunity to buy the stock at an incredibly cheap price, even beyond the artificially low energy prices reached earlier this year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/28/oil-stock-5-chesapeake-energy-chk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil stock #5: Chesapeake Energy (CHK)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/28/oil-stock-5-chesapeake-energy-chk/">Oil stock #5: Chesapeake Energy (CHK)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/28/oil-stock-5-chesapeake-energy-chk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19079671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/28/oil-stock-5-chesapeake-energy-chk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chesapeake Energy</category><category>CHK</category><category>energy prices</category><category>Jamie Dlugosch</category><category>natural gas</category><category>oil</category><category>oil alternatives</category><category>oil stocks</category><category>stocks to sell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ETF Funds: Hedge your home heating bills with UNG]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/etf-funds-hedge-your-home-heating-bills-with-ung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/etf-funds-hedge-your-home-heating-bills-with-ung/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/etf-funds-hedge-your-home-heating-bills-with-ung/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img hspace="4" height="94" border="1" align="right" width="220" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.unitedstatesnaturalgasfund.com/images/UNG-logo.gif" />Here's an idea if you are worried about your heating bills this winter. The price of natural gas is crashing. The price decreases last week continued a down trend that's gone on for six months. Why? The economic downturn slows demand for gas and many companies are announcing layoffs and closing plants around the country. Reduced prices for natural gas are also a result of growing capacity in the U.S. because of increases in production at new fields. Natural gas prices are at multi-year lows falling from 65% from more than $13.31 per MMBtu (the way gas is measured) in July 2008 to under $5 -- the lowest since October 13, 2006.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ishares-dj-us-mdif/ung/nys"></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ishares-dj-us-mdif/ung/nys"><strong>United States Natural Gas</strong></a><strong> </strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ishares-dj-us-mdif/ung/nys">(NYSE: </a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ishares-dj-us-mdif/ung/nys">UNG</a>) is an exchange-traded fund (<a href="http:// www.marketriders.com/etf-exchange-traded-funds">ETF</a>) that reflects the price of natural gas in the United States. UNG attempts to mirror the performance, net expenses, of natural gas at the Henry Hub, Louisiana.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/etf-funds-hedge-your-home-heating-bills-with-ung/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ETF Funds: Hedge your home heating bills with UNG</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/etf-funds-hedge-your-home-heating-bills-with-ung/">ETF Funds: Hedge your home heating bills with UNG</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/etf-funds-hedge-your-home-heating-bills-with-ung/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1443574/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/etf-funds-hedge-your-home-heating-bills-with-ung/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>etf</category><category>heating</category><category>natural gas</category><category>NaturalGas</category><category>oil</category><category>UNG</category><category>United States Natural Gas</category><category>UnitedStatesNaturalGas</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch Tuchman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If oil is down, why is gasoline up?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/if-oil-is-down-why-is-gasoline-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/if-oil-is-down-why-is-gasoline-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/if-oil-is-down-why-is-gasoline-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a></p><p>This morning my wife asked me this question and I had no idea how to answer it. But it's true that oil is down -- it trades at <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5goX7Nd0oGv9uD4siwnQ2r6iMamVA">$34.39</a> a barrel; while gasoline prices have been rising between 10 and 20 cents a gallon from the low. I paid $1.66 a gallon for mid-grade three weeks ago and $1.79 for mid-grade last week. So what's the answer? Less supply because refiners shut down for regular maintenance during this time of year.</p>
<p>While this may not be true throughout the country, it appears to be so in California. In late December, <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/traffic/ci_11491258">The MercuryNews</a> predicted that gasoline prices would rise 10 to 20 cents a gallon. Why? California refiners including <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">Exxon-Mobil</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) and <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">Chevron</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">CVX</a>) cut back on production for their usual maintenance needs in January. Moreover, a <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a></strong> plc (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a>) plant in Carson, CA , had mechanical problems that affected production. </p>
<p>Overall this means lower supply with demand remaining relatively constant. California's Energy Commission reports that production of CA's gas blend fell 11% in January from the previous month. In the short run, prices should fall back as these refineries go back to normal production. But experts predict that gasoline prices nationwide could hit $2.50 a gallon nationally this summer.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><font color="#0072bc"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></font></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><font color="#0072bc"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></font></a>.<em> Portfolio recently published his eighth book,</em> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/You-Cant-Order-Change-Turnaround/dp/1591842395/ref=sr_1_2/002-0707230-7400838?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1220097046&amp;sr=1-2"><font color="#888888">You Can't Order Change: Lessons From Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing</font></a><em>.</em> <em>He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/if-oil-is-down-why-is-gasoline-up/">If oil is down, why is gasoline up?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/if-oil-is-down-why-is-gasoline-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1434740/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/if-oil-is-down-why-is-gasoline-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>gas</category><category>gas prices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil below $90 as dollar strengthens]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/06/oil-below-90-as-dollar-strengthens/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/06/oil-below-90-as-dollar-strengthens/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/06/oil-below-90-as-dollar-strengthens/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>One of the great things about a global financial collapse is that economic activity slows down so much that people use less oil. And one of the more interesting aspects of this collapse is that despite the terrible problems we face in the U.S., investors are flocking to the dollar as a symbol of permanence in a turbulent world. Since oil is traded in dollars, the combination of a stronger dollar and weaker demand leads to a lower price. </p>
<p>For example, today oil went as low as <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hhHd-_U2BqskSR2cTWHexRyaB7ZA">$86.36</a> -- which is 41% below its July peak of $147. Meanwhile, the dollar hit a 13-month high of <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/10/06/business/EU-Euro-Dollar.php">$1.36</a> to the Euro -- that's 15% stronger than the $1.60 it traded at this summer. That may be because the U.S. passed its $810 billion bailout plan and Europe has not yet figured out what it will do to deal with its financial crisis. Not to worry, oil is still 260% higher than the $24 it traded at in January 2001 and the dollar has lost 48% of its value of $0.92 to the Euro at which it traded back then.</p>
<p>Where do we go from here? That depends on two variables: how much oil-producing nations cut back on production and how the dollar performs relative to other currencies as this global financial crisis unfolds. If oil-producing nations cut back on production, prices will rise as long as the supply contraction matches the decline in demand. And as long as the world perceives that the U.S. is the world's financial safe haven -- the dollar could strengthen. And that would push oil prices lower.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, oil prices will keep dropping unless oil producing nations drastically slash production and the dollar plunges. </p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of </em><a href="http://petercohan.com/"><font color="#0072bc"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></font></a><em>. He also </em><a><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College and edits </font><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/06/oil-below-90-as-dollar-strengthens/">Oil below $90 as dollar strengthens</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hhHd-_U2BqskSR2cTWHexRyaB7ZA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/06/oil-below-90-as-dollar-strengthens/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1334000/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/06/oil-below-90-as-dollar-strengthens/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dollar</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will $6 billion in losses sink an airline or two?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/will-6-billion-in-losses-sink-an-airline-or-two/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/will-6-billion-in-losses-sink-an-airline-or-two/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/will-6-billion-in-losses-sink-an-airline-or-two/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p>Even with some modest recovery in airline stocks, it may be too early to celebrate. The worst may not be over for the industry.</p>
<p>The International Air Transport Association says that global losses for airlines could top $6.1 billion this year. <em>The Wall Street Journal quotes </em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121925889148657493.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">ATA Chief Executive and Managing Director Giovanni Bisignani</a> as saying, "We are bracing for more situations of airlines collapsing" amid higher fuel prices and lower revenue.</p>
<p>The slowdown is apparently moving to Asia, a major destination for many large US and EU airlines.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas">United</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas">UAUA</a>) is a good example of a US airline that many thought would be on the rebound. New fear of rising oil prices has spoiled that a bit. After falling from a 52-week high of $51.60, shares crashed to $2.80. They have recently made a minor recovery to $12.40. But, in the last two days, UAUA shares have been off sharply.</p>
<p>Oil is still just below $120. Even at that level, down from $143, airlines face huge increases in fuel prices over last year. A modest disruption in oil supply could send prices back up again.</p>
<p>The market sees US airline stocks as having potential for big returns. But, with the price of oil making a potential bottom, the carriers are still in too much trouble to have a real recovery. Buying shares in the companies still offers more risk than reward. The industry may still have operators that have valuations heading toward zero.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/will-6-billion-in-losses-sink-an-airline-or-two/">Will $6 billion in losses sink an airline or two?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121925889148657493.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/will-6-billion-in-losses-sink-an-airline-or-two/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1290799/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/will-6-billion-in-losses-sink-an-airline-or-two/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline stocks</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineStocks</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>UAUA</category><category>United Airlines</category><category>UnitedAirlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Europe's economy contracts -- bad news for the global economy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/14/europes-economy-contracts-bad-news-for-the-global-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/14/europes-economy-contracts-bad-news-for-the-global-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/14/europes-economy-contracts-bad-news-for-the-global-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/eu.jpg" />Europe's economy contracted in Q2 for the first time since the euro was launched more than 10 years ago, as exports underperformed and energy costs cut into consumers' disposable income, Eurostat, the European Union's statistics office <a href="http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/PGP_PRD_CAT_PREREL/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2008/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2008_MONTH_08/2-14082008-EN-AP.PDF">announced</a> (PDF) Thursday.<br /><br />Euro-zone Q2 GDP fell 0.2% and EU27 Q2 GDP -- which includes nations in the European Union but not formally a part of the euro currency system -- fell 0.1%, Eurostat said. In Q1, Euro-zone GDP rose 0.7%. <br /><br />Further, on a year-over-year basis, euro-zone GDP increased 1.5%, with inflation running at about 4.0%, well above the European Central Bank's 2.0% annual limit. <br /><br /><strong>Economist: 'Bad news for global economy'</strong><br /><br />Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Thursday Europe's slowing economy "is bad news for the global economy."<br /><br />"This is bad news because we need European growth to prevent a global economic slowing. But the economies in two major European economies are clearly slowing. Germany's GDP fell 0.5% in the first quarter, and France's fell 0.3% in the second quarter, so given their make-up in the euro-zone, Europe has experienced a pronounced slowing," Wang said.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/14/europes-economy-contracts-bad-news-for-the-global-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Europe's economy contracts -- bad news for the global economy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/14/europes-economy-contracts-bad-news-for-the-global-economy/">Europe's economy contracts -- bad news for the global economy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/14/europes-economy-contracts-bad-news-for-the-global-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1284398/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/14/europes-economy-contracts-bad-news-for-the-global-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ECB</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EU</category><category>EU27</category><category>euro zone</category><category>Europe</category><category>European Central Bank</category><category>European Union</category><category>Eurostat</category><category>exports</category><category>food prices</category><category>France</category><category>gdp</category><category>Germany</category><category>global economy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seven ways that companies cope with high gas prices]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/seven-ways-that-companies-cope-with-high-gas-prices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/seven-ways-that-companies-cope-with-high-gas-prices/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/seven-ways-that-companies-cope-with-high-gas-prices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/filling_the_tank.jpg" />High gasoline prices are putting the squeeze on companies and their workers. People are leaving their jobs due to the high commuting costs. The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/07/fashion/07Work.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all">New York Times</a></em> reports that a resume service received "14 calls last week and 9 of those named high gas prices as their No. 1 reason for leaving their job." </p>
<p>And by my count, the <em>Times</em> presents seven ways that companies are changing to relieve the pressure:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Encourage more telecommuting.</strong> The <em>Times</em> describes how "Citigate Cunningham, a public relations company, now encourages workers to stay home whenever possible, providing laptop computers and BlackBerrys to enable telecommuting, and reimbursing them $40 a month for high-speed Internet connections in their homes."</li>
    <li><strong>Give employees money to pay for gas.</strong> Since June, OperationsInc., a human resource consulting firm, gave employees up to $100 a month on an <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) card "to offset rising gas prices."</li>
    <li><strong>Rent offices closer to workers' homes. </strong> <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) recently "leased three large office complexes far from its headquarters" to cut 7,000 employees' commutes.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/seven-ways-that-companies-cope-with-high-gas-prices/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Seven ways that companies cope with high gas prices</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/seven-ways-that-companies-cope-with-high-gas-prices/">Seven ways that companies cope with high gas prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/seven-ways-that-companies-cope-with-high-gas-prices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1277954/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/seven-ways-that-companies-cope-with-high-gas-prices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>axp</category><category>commuting</category><category>commutingbybike</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GasolinePrices</category><category>greenhouse gas</category><category>GreenhouseGas</category><category>inthenews</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analysts say $4 per gallon may be a gasoline use game-changer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/analysts-say-4-per-gallon-may-be-a-gasoline-use-game-changer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/analysts-say-4-per-gallon-may-be-a-gasoline-use-game-changer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/analysts-say-4-per-gallon-may-be-a-gasoline-use-game-changer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/tankerpic.jpg" />Amid the cascade of data flowing from the financial world, every once in a while there's a data point with not only macroeconomic significance, but also potentially with trend-indicator characteristics, as well.<br /><br />One such data point may have occurred Wednesday when <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MasterCard</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MA</a>) released data indicating that U.S. consumers purchased an average of 9.45 million barrels of gasoline per day in the week ended June 20, 2008, down 2.7% from the 9.71 million gallons per day purchased a year earlier, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aFLaTvJDg5ps">Bloomberg News reported</a>. <br /><br />The consumption decrease occurs after a roughly 30-40% increase in gasoline prices compared to a year ago, and if the decline continues, it would represent the 'demand destruction' level that's essential to slowing gasoline price increases. <br /><br />Further, a key oil analyst holds that view. Daniel Yergin, chairman of Cambridge Energy Research Associates, told a U.S. Congressional panel that "...2007 may well have been the top, the break point, in terms of gasoline demand," <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aq2vPIIzcpZ8&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Wednesday</a>. He added that <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$WTIC">the price of oil</a> has hit a break point where the United States will begin to seek alternatives.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/analysts-say-4-per-gallon-may-be-a-gasoline-use-game-changer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Analysts say $4 per gallon may be a gasoline use game-changer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/analysts-say-4-per-gallon-may-be-a-gasoline-use-game-changer/">Analysts say $4 per gallon may be a gasoline use game-changer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aFLaTvJDg5ps>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/analysts-say-4-per-gallon-may-be-a-gasoline-use-game-changer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1237013/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/analysts-say-4-per-gallon-may-be-a-gasoline-use-game-changer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>disposable income</category><category>economy</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Producer prices rocket 1.4% higher in May on surging energy costs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/producer-prices-rocket-1-4-higher-in-may-on-surging-energy-cost/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/producer-prices-rocket-1-4-higher-in-may-on-surging-energy-cost/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/producer-prices-rocket-1-4-higher-in-may-on-surging-energy-cost/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>U.S. producer prices rocketed a seasonally-adjusted 1.4% in May, <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm">the U.S Labor Department announced Tuesday</a>, as energy and food prices continued to increase wholesale costs at an alarming rate. <br /> <br />Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had expected the April 2008 PPI rate to increase by 1.0%. <br /><br />The core rate, which excludes food and energy costs, increased 0.2%, the Labor Department said, inline with the Bloomberg News estimate. <br /><br />For the past 12 months, producer prices have increased 7.2% and the core rate has risen 3.0%. Also, the core intermediate PPI - a benchmark, leading indicator of inflation and one the U.S. Federal Reserve monitors closely, increased 2.0% in May 2008 -- its biggest increase since 1980.<br /><br />Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Tuesday "PPI inflation is now way too high. The Fed's period of interest rate accommodation ends with this report."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/producer-prices-rocket-1-4-higher-in-may-on-surging-energy-cost/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Producer prices rocket 1.4% higher in May on surging energy costs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/producer-prices-rocket-1-4-higher-in-may-on-surging-energy-cost/">Producer prices rocket 1.4% higher in May on surging energy costs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/producer-prices-rocket-1-4-higher-in-may-on-surging-energy-cost/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1227743/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/producer-prices-rocket-1-4-higher-in-may-on-surging-energy-cost/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy prices</category><category>Fed</category><category>food prices</category><category>inflation</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>producer price index</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As gas crosses $4, the economy sweats]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-gas-crosses-4-the-economy-sweats/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-gas-crosses-4-the-economy-sweats/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-gas-crosses-4-the-economy-sweats/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/abt/" rel="tag">Abbott Laboratories (ABT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/gaspic.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The average price of gas finally crossed $4 last week, perhaps on its way to $5. </p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121296872433855777.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>The record nationwide average for regular-gasoline prices, announced by auto club AAA, follows Friday's near-$11 surge in oil prices to a record $138.54 a barrel."</p>
<p>While it makes a good headline, it is really no more important than when gas went above $3.95 or if and when it moves above $.4.05. What is important is that, at the current level, gas on its own could break the back of the consumer, and of many businesses.</p>
<p>It is not unusual for drivers to use 20 gallons of gas a week. For that consumer, the difference between $2 gas and $4 gas is $2,100 a year. A family making $40,000 is probably keeping $30,000 after taxes. So, 7% or 8% of their net income now goes to gasoline. That does not leave much for the rising cost of food and a mortgage.</p>
<p>The news is obviously just as bad for industries like farming and the airlines.</p>
<p>If investors want to see where the economy and markets are going, watch gas prices. They are probably a better proxy for how bad things are for the consumer than any other single measure. Gas at $5 would be a catastrophe.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com and author of the Ten Stocks Under $10 letter. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-gas-crosses-4-the-economy-sweats/">As gas crosses $4, the economy sweats</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121296872433855777.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-gas-crosses-4-the-economy-sweats/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1219513/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-gas-crosses-4-the-economy-sweats/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>gas prices</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer sentiment falls to 28-year low on economy, inflation concerns ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/u-s-consumer-sentiment-falls-to-28-year-low-on-concern-about-ec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/u-s-consumer-sentiment-falls-to-28-year-low-on-concern-about-ec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/u-s-consumer-sentiment-falls-to-28-year-low-on-concern-about-ec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/shopping_carts_240.jpg" alt="" />U.S. consumer confidence in May 2008 plunged to its lowest level in almost 28 years, an indication American adults remain very concerned about the near-term health of the U.S. economy as it moves closer to its first recession in six years. <br /><br />The <a href="https://customers.reuters.com/community/university/default.aspx?">Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers</a> said its final reading of consumer confidence for May 2008 fell to 59.8. <br /><br />It was the index's lowest reading since June 1980 - - a period also characterized by high oil/gasoline prices and a sluggish U.S. economy. <br /><br />Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had predicted that the May 2008 index would fall to 59.5. The index stood at 62.6 in April 2008 and 69.5 in March 2008. <br /><br /><strong>Family finance, inflation concerns</strong><br /><br />In the May 2008 survey, half of all families reported that their finances have recently worsened. Also, inflation expectations rose in May 2008 to their highest levels in more than two decades.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/u-s-consumer-sentiment-falls-to-28-year-low-on-concern-about-ec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer sentiment falls to 28-year low on economy, inflation concerns </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/u-s-consumer-sentiment-falls-to-28-year-low-on-concern-about-ec/">Consumer sentiment falls to 28-year low on economy, inflation concerns </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 May 2008 12:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/u-s-consumer-sentiment-falls-to-28-year-low-on-concern-about-ec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1210355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/u-s-consumer-sentiment-falls-to-28-year-low-on-concern-about-ec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer confidence</category><category>energy prices</category><category>featured</category><category>food prices</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>ReutersUniversity of Michigan Surveys of Consumers</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 12:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The news on oil gets worse]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/the-news-on-oil-gets-worse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/the-news-on-oil-gets-worse/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/the-news-on-oil-gets-worse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p>Crude at $130 a barrel is bad enough. Who needs more negative news about oil prices? It appears that additional data supporting further increases keeps coming, no matter what.</p>
<p>Recent research shows that oil supply out of countries which are net exporters of oil is not keeping up with demand from consuming nations. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121200725158327151.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>Fresh data from the U.S. Department of Energy show the amount of petroleum products shipped by the world's top oil exporters fell 2.5% last year, despite a 57% increase in prices." If those nations could have shipped more crude, wouldn't they have done so to make more money?</p>
<p>There is a great deal of data which shows that oil-producing nations are keeping more of their product to build their own infrastructure and fuel their own cars and trucks.</p>
<p>But, the answer to lower shipments may be more sinister than that. Oil-producing countries might make more money releasing extra crude this year, but that could push prices down. If they are more liberal in sending oil abroad over the next several years, they might get more cash from volume but less from higher prices. Oil supplies may be being "managed" by OPEC and its friends to keep prices high for the next decade.</p>
<p>There is a conspiracy theory for everything else. Why not for oil supply?</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com and author of the <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/10_stocks_under_10_dollars_newsletter.html">Ten Stocks Under $10 newsletter.</a></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/the-news-on-oil-gets-worse/">The news on oil gets worse</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 May 2008 08:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121200725158327151.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/the-news-on-oil-gets-worse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1208948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/the-news-on-oil-gets-worse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>OPEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 08:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let's shed a tear for Bush and the oil companies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/lets-shed-a-tear-for-bush-and-the-oil-companies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/lets-shed-a-tear-for-bush-and-the-oil-companies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/lets-shed-a-tear-for-bush-and-the-oil-companies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/bushpic.jpg" alt="" />Like, his paymasters, the oil companies -- who contributed <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/05/mccains-green-speech-takes-on.html">$2.7 million</a> to his 2004 campaign -- George W. Bush is feeling sorry for himself. Perhaps his <a href="http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/052008/opi_280609948.shtml">record low poll ratings</a> are hurting his feelings. He went to Saudi Arabia and <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-325-Global-Warming-Examiner~y2008m5d19-George-Bush-is-Asking-the-Wrong-People-For-Help-To-Lower-Oil-Prices">asked it to increase production</a>. He went to the Middle East and asked them to <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0520/p03s02-usfp.html">make peace</a> -- it's a nice sentiment but will results follow? But that's not why Bush is whining. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D90PC1MO2.htm"><em>BusinessWeek </em></a>reports that Bush's complaint is that he thinks <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys"><strong>General Electric Company</strong></a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">GE</a>) <em>NBC News</em> was unfair in the way it edited an interview. In the Israeli parliament, Bush gave a speech which none-too subtly implied that Barack Obama was like Nazi appeaser, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/15/bush-compares-obama-to-na_n_101859.html">Neville Chamberlain</a>, because Obama has said he would meet with Iranian leaders. Bush thought he was being clever in his non-denial denial. Now he is complaining that NBC is being "deceitful."</p>
<p>That's rich coming from the person who got the U.S. into a war with Iraq based on false claims of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and ties to Al Qaeda. Is it the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/05/01/bush.carrier.landing/">"Mission Accomplished"</a> Bush or the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/09/20050902-2.html">"Heck-of-a-job-Brownie"</a> Bush who's complaining about <em>NBC News's</em> "deceit?" Meanwhile -- as I posted <a href="http://bstocksdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/05/14/lets-have-a-good-cry-for-the-poor-oil-refiners/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxons-bitter-earnings-disappointment/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/valeros-earnings-plunge-77-gas-prices-to-rise-faster/">here</a> -- the oil companies have been whining because their earnings are down -- the price of oil has doubled and they have only been able to increase wholesale prices by 39%. Boo hoo!</p>
<p>So as you stand at the pump filling up your tank with $4 a gallon -- a <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004250068_bush29.html?referrer=digg">surprise</a> to Bush -- shed a tear for Bush and those poor, suffering oil companies.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He owns GE shares.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/lets-shed-a-tear-for-bush-and-the-oil-companies/">Let's shed a tear for Bush and the oil companies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 May 2008 11:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D90PC1MO2.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/lets-shed-a-tear-for-bush-and-the-oil-companies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1200505/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/lets-shed-a-tear-for-bush-and-the-oil-companies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bush</category><category>economy</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>featured</category><category>NBC News</category><category>NbcNews</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>politics</category><category>Presidenit Bush</category><category>PresidenitBush</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[April U.S. producer prices rise just 0.2%, but core rate jumps]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/april-u-s-producer-prices-rise-just-0-2-but-core-rate-jumps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/april-u-s-producer-prices-rise-just-0-2-but-core-rate-jumps/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/april-u-s-producer-prices-rise-just-0-2-but-core-rate-jumps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>U.S. producer prices increased a scant 0.2% in April 2008, as auto and furniture costs offset substantial rises in food and energy prices, <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm">the U.S Labor Department announced Tuesday</a>. <br /> <br />However, the core rate, which excludes food and energy costs, increased 0.4% -- a pace well above consensus expectations. Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had expected the April 2008 PPI index and core rate to increase by 0.4% and 0.2% respectively. <br /><br />So far in 2008, producer prices are increasing at an alarming annual rate, 8.5%, compared to 8.4% for the same period a year ago. The core rate is increasing at a 5.2% annual pace, compared to 2.1% for a year ago.<br /><br /><strong>12-month PPI accelerates </strong><br /><br />For the past 12 months, producer prices have increased 6.5%, and the core rate has risen 3.0%. The core rate's advance is the largest year-over-year core rate increase since 1991. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/april-u-s-producer-prices-rise-just-0-2-but-core-rate-jumps/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>April U.S. producer prices rise just 0.2%, but core rate jumps</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/april-u-s-producer-prices-rise-just-0-2-but-core-rate-jumps/">April U.S. producer prices rise just 0.2%, but core rate jumps</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 May 2008 09:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/april-u-s-producer-prices-rise-just-0-2-but-core-rate-jumps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1200447/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/april-u-s-producer-prices-rise-just-0-2-but-core-rate-jumps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy prices</category><category>food prices</category><category>inflation</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>PPI</category><category>producer price index</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[April U.S. CPI rises 0.2%, lower than expected]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/april-u-s-cpi-rises-0-2-lower-than-expected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/april-u-s-cpi-rises-0-2-lower-than-expected/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/april-u-s-cpi-rises-0-2-lower-than-expected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>Consumer prices rose 0.2% in April 2008, <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm">the U.S. Labor Department announced Wednesday</a>, a statistic below the consensus estimate as oil prices moderated during month, offsetting rising food prices. <br /><br />Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had expected April 2008 consumer prices to increase 0.3%. Consumer prices increased 0.3% in March 2008.<br /><br />Also, the core rate, which excludes the frequently-volatile food and energy component, rose just 0.2% in April 2008, inline with the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">Bloomberg News survey</a> 0.2% consensus estimate. <br /><br />On a year-over-year basis, consumer prices have risen 3.9% and the core rate has risen 2.3%. The core rate remains slightly above U.S. Federal Reserve's 'comfort zone' for inflation. The Fed uses the core CPI rate as one of its primary gauges of consumer-based inflation. <br /><br /><strong>April 2008 CPI: 'Surprisingly tame'</strong><br /><br />Economist David H. Wang said the April 2008 CPI report was a bit of a surprise -- one that may help the U.S. economy. "The report was surprisingly tame. We do see rising food costs, but the energy component was not as bad as expected," Wang said. "Also, core year-over-year inflation is not too bad, and the Fed [U.S. Federal Reserve] will look favorably upon this, if it remains moderate." <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/april-u-s-cpi-rises-0-2-lower-than-expected/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>April U.S. CPI rises 0.2%, lower than expected</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/april-u-s-cpi-rises-0-2-lower-than-expected/">April U.S. CPI rises 0.2%, lower than expected</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 May 2008 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/april-u-s-cpi-rises-0-2-lower-than-expected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1195074/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/april-u-s-cpi-rises-0-2-lower-than-expected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clothing</category><category>consumer price index</category><category>ConsumerPriceIndex</category><category>CPI</category><category>energy prices</category><category>Fed</category><category>food prices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>health care</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><category>U.s.LaborDepartment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Washington can cut gas prices fast -- and why it won't]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/how-washington-can-cut-gas-prices-fast-and-why-it-wont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/how-washington-can-cut-gas-prices-fast-and-why-it-wont/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/how-washington-can-cut-gas-prices-fast-and-why-it-wont/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/oilprices.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />One oft-repeated phrase from Washington is that there is "no magic wand" that can lower oil prices. This has proven to be <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=167525&amp;title=oliver-magic-wand">comedic gold</a> for some. But for people who find themselves paying nearly $4 a gallon to fill up their tanks, the joke is not so funny. After all, with an "oilman" in the White House, it should come as no shock that the price of a barrel of the gooey stuff has risen <strong><em><u>5-fold</u> since January 2001</em></strong> -- hitting a record <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-markets-oil.html">$126</a> today.</p>
<p>I noticed that every time the Fed cut interest rates, the dollar dropped in value and the price of oil rose. As I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/how-the-fed-costs-you-more-at-the-pump/">posted</a>, this dynamic is as sure of a bet as you can get in the real world. That's why traders are shorting the dollar and going long oil. And they're betting enough on that trade to drive up the price of oil consistently. As I discussed <a href="http://www.necn.com/Boston/Business/Market-Analysis-Walmart-sales-up/1210289794.html">last night</a> on New England Cable News (NECN), the European Union decided yesterday to keep its interest rate at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/ecb-boe-keep-key-short-term-interest-rates-the-same/">4%</a> to fight inflation. Ours is a mere 2% so investors are selling dollars and buying Euros.</p>
<p>This brings us to how Washington can cut gas prices fast. All it has to do is to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/will-the-fed-raise-rates/">raise interest rates</a>. This little move requires no Congressional approval and the oval office occupant doesn't have to sign a bill. If our Fed got serious about fighting the rampant inflation it has unleashed, it would raise the Fed funds rate, the dollar would strengthen, the price of oil would drop, and you would pay less at the pump. It's as simple as that.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/how-washington-can-cut-gas-prices-fast-and-why-it-wont/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How Washington can cut gas prices fast -- and why it won't</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/how-washington-can-cut-gas-prices-fast-and-why-it-wont/">How Washington can cut gas prices fast -- and why it won't</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 May 2008 11:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=167525&amp;title=oliver-magic-wand>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/how-washington-can-cut-gas-prices-fast-and-why-it-wont/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1190989/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/how-washington-can-cut-gas-prices-fast-and-why-it-wont/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>featured</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer confidence falls to 5-year low on energy, food price concerns]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/consumer-confidence-falls-to-5-year-low-on-energy-food-price-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/consumer-confidence-falls-to-5-year-low-on-energy-food-price-co/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/consumer-confidence-falls-to-5-year-low-on-energy-food-price-co/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/retailsales.jpg" alt="" />U.S. <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/april-consumer-confidence-falls-outlook/story.aspx?guid=%7B83CAC8CF%2DEE6E%2D4814%2D9583%2D560146A7B2A1%7D">consumer confidence declined</a> in April 2008, as consumers continued to express concern over rising food and energy costs, which are boosting retail inflation and lowering disposable income.<br /><br />U.S. consumer confidence fell in April 2008 to 62.3 from a revised 65.9 in March 2008, the Conference Board announced Tuesday. It was the index's lowest reading since 2003.<br /><br />Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had expected the index to drop to 62.0 in April 2008. In February 2008, the index stood at 76.4. <br /><br />The board said consumers' evaluation of present-day conditions weakened further in April 2008. Those claiming business conditions are "bad" increased to 26.7% from 25.5%, while those claiming business conditions are "good" dipped slightly, to 15.3 from 15.6%.<br /> <br />Consumers' assessment of the job market was considerably more pessimistic than last month. Those saying jobs are "hard to get" rose to 27.9% from 24.65, while those claiming jobs are "plentiful" decreased to 16.6% from 19.2%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/consumer-confidence-falls-to-5-year-low-on-energy-food-price-co/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer confidence falls to 5-year low on energy, food price concerns</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/consumer-confidence-falls-to-5-year-low-on-energy-food-price-co/">Consumer confidence falls to 5-year low on energy, food price concerns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/consumer-confidence-falls-to-5-year-low-on-energy-food-price-co/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1180539/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/consumer-confidence-falls-to-5-year-low-on-energy-food-price-co/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer confidence</category><category>energy prices</category><category>featured</category><category>food prices</category><category>housing</category><category>inflation</category><category>The Conference Board</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: PDS up 75% in Q1, announces distribution]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/chasing-value-pds-up-75-in-q1-announces-distribution/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/chasing-value-pds-up-75-in-q1-announces-distribution/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/chasing-value-pds-up-75-in-q1-announces-distribution/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2008/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2008</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pds/" rel="tag">Precision Drilling TR (PDS)</a></p><p>Last Friday, April 18, <img alt="Precision Drilling " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/precision-drilling.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/precision-drilling-trust/pds/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Precision Drilling Services TR</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/precision-drilling-trust/pds/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PDS</a>), the Canadian Trust, announced that the Board of Trustees has approved a <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/precision-drilling-trust-announces-april/rfid94101199">cash distribution for the month of April 2008 of $0.13</a> per trust unit of Precision. The distribution will be payable on May 15, 2008 to unit holders of record on April 30, 2008.</p>
<p>The current dividend yield of 5.8% remains very generous and far above most other stocks in the sector. After some of my high dividend stock recommendations either under performed or simply cut their distribution, it is reassuring to see that PDS not only is maintaining its dividend, but in this particular case continues to pay out monthly, allowing for better compounding of the yield.</p>
<p>The stock closed today at $27.15, up 75.5% from $15.47 when I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/chasing-value-precision-drilling-for-10-yield/">recommended the stock three months ago</a>. If you got into the stock back then you would still be receiving over a 10% yield. Last year I had several high flyers but not all of them stayed up so I am watching Precision closely for signs of weakness or changes in the business.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/chasing-value-pds-up-75-in-q1-announces-distribution/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: PDS up 75% in Q1, announces distribution</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/chasing-value-pds-up-75-in-q1-announces-distribution/">Chasing Value: PDS up 75% in Q1, announces distribution</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/chasing-value-pds-up-75-in-q1-announces-distribution/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1173630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/chasing-value-pds-up-75-in-q1-announces-distribution/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chasing VAlue</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>Liber</category><category>natural gas</category><category>NaturalGas</category><category>PDS</category><category>precision drilling</category><category>PrecisionDrilling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Natural gas prices take huge spike]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/18/natural-gas-prices-take-huge-spike/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/18/natural-gas-prices-take-huge-spike/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/18/natural-gas-prices-take-huge-spike/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/gaspipeline.jpg" alt="" />Imagine a large recession in which one of the key energy components almost doubles in price. The tab for natural gas is up by almost double since last summer. That is the same natural gas which most people use to heat their homes. Being cold is not a lot of fun.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120847521878424735.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>Prices in the U.S. have risen 93% since late August as power-hungry nations like South Korea and Japan compete in a global natural-gas market."</p>
<p>Who says inflation is not a major threat to the US economy? Add to the natural gas spike the rising cost of oil which has pushed gasoline to all-time highs. Add to that increasing food prices due to the bump up in the price of grains such as wheat and corn. Those commodities are being used to product the alternate energy source ethanol.</p>
<p>The picture complicates the job that the Fed and Treasury have to do. Lowering interest rates often increases the ability of businesses and consumers to spend. That, in turn, pushes inflation higher. Not lowering rates could exacerbate the credit crisis and lead to more home and credit card defaults.</p>
<p>There is one silver lining to the cloud. Banks are not passing lower rates on to customers. They are hording the cash that they get from the Fed. It is an ugly reality, but consumers and small businesses do not have access to the capital which they would need to start spending money again.</p>
<p>None of that solves the natural gas problem per se, but it could mean that people will cut back a bit on how warm they keep their homes. That, at least, would be a start.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/18/natural-gas-prices-take-huge-spike/">Natural gas prices take huge spike</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120847521878424735.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/18/natural-gas-prices-take-huge-spike/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1171132/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/18/natural-gas-prices-take-huge-spike/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy</category><category>energy prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>featured</category><category>natural gas</category><category>NaturalGas</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
