<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Greek Bonds Faltering -- Back to the EU Drawing Board]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/greek-bonds-faltering-back-to-the-eu-drawing-board/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/greek-bonds-faltering-back-to-the-eu-drawing-board/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/greek-bonds-faltering-back-to-the-eu-drawing-board/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a></p><em><em><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/ecb-200-eu.jpg" alt="" /></em></em>Just last week I questioned why anyone would be interested in acquiring 10 year Greek bonds (<a target="_blank" title="View Serious Money: Greek Bonds or High Yield Stocks? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/serious-money-greek-bonds-or-high-yield-stocks/">Serious Money: Greek Bonds or High Yield Stocks</a>) when there were so many alternatives. The answer is that not enough are, and that means to find a sufficient number of investors the yields are rising with <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aEVYerHIOZCc&amp;pos=3">continued upward pressure.</a><br /> <br /> The pretend economic support of Greece by the European Union members and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which is smoke and mirrors absent any guarantees or required concrete action, gives investors no confidence. If Greece's European partners are so concerned that Greece has the potential to falter in meeting its obligations, then why would anyone else have confidence?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/greek-bonds-faltering-back-to-the-eu-drawing-board/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Greek Bonds Faltering -- Back to the EU Drawing Board</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/greek-bonds-faltering-back-to-the-eu-drawing-board/">Greek Bonds Faltering -- Back to the EU Drawing Board</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/greek-bonds-faltering-back-to-the-eu-drawing-board/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19422094/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/greek-bonds-faltering-back-to-the-eu-drawing-board/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>EU</category><category>EU cooperation</category><category>EuCooperation</category><category>europe</category><category>european union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>Greece</category><category>Greek Bonds</category><category>GreekBonds</category><category>IMF</category><category>international monetary fund</category><category>InternationalMonetaryFund</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Yield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eurozone Leaders Hammer Out a Lame Plan to Back Greece]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/eurozone-leaders-hammer-out-a-lame-plan-to-back-greece/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/eurozone-leaders-hammer-out-a-lame-plan-to-back-greece/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/eurozone-leaders-hammer-out-a-lame-plan-to-back-greece/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/eu-flag-240.jpg" />Eurozone leaders met in Brussels and hammered out a tentative <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/226231f0-16fd-11df-afcf-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1">plan to back Greece's debt problems</a>. The agreement is lame, as it is placing all of the responsibility on Greece to make drastic changes in its budget. The goal is for Greece to bring down its deficit by 2012.</p>
<p>The plan sets up a liaison between Greece and the European Commission which would monitor the implementation of Greek reforms. It should be made clear that Greece has not asked for aid.</p>
<p>"All euro area members must conduct sound national policies in line with the agreed rules," Herman Van Rompuy, the EU's permanent president said. The rules were not spelled out. They will be finalized on Monday.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/eurozone-leaders-hammer-out-a-lame-plan-to-back-greece/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eurozone Leaders Hammer Out a Lame Plan to Back Greece</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/eurozone-leaders-hammer-out-a-lame-plan-to-back-greece/">Eurozone Leaders Hammer Out a Lame Plan to Back Greece</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/226231f0-16fd-11df-afcf-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/eurozone-leaders-hammer-out-a-lame-plan-to-back-greece/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19353854/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/eurozone-leaders-hammer-out-a-lame-plan-to-back-greece/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eu</category><category>europe</category><category>european union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>eurozone</category><category>greece</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Some Intel (INTC) sales tactics exposed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/intc-intel-logo.jpg" alt="Intel Anti Trust" />Chip maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) had some embarrassing emails published today by the European Union that show the company may have been <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/eu-gives-details-of-intels-sales-tactics/479694">strong arming its customers</a> into buying its products over competing chip makers.<br /><br />The emails were part of the evidence that led to a record EU fine set against the company last May of $1.45 billion, when it was determined that the company had used strong-arm sales tactics in its competition with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">Advanced Micro Designs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Some Intel (INTC) sales tactics exposed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/">Some Intel (INTC) sales tactics exposed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19168471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>chip maker</category><category>ChipMaker</category><category>chips</category><category>Dell</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>HPQ</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>scandals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EU investigating Oracle's bid to buy Sun]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/orcl-oracle-logo.jpg" alt="" />On Thursday morning, European Union regulators announced the <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/eu-probes-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/653913">launch of an antitrust probe</a> into U.S. software maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) takeover of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a>. The regulatory group believes that the deal could lead to higher prices and limited choice for database software. Approval from this group is considered the main stumbling block for the deal, which has cleared the Department of Justice in the United States.</p>
<p>The final decision has a deadline of 90 days, or January 19, 2009. By this date, the European Commission can decide to clear or to block the deal. More often than not, the Commission will force companies to make changes that would eliminate any concerns over antitrust regulations.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>EU investigating Oracle's bid to buy Sun</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/">EU investigating Oracle's bid to buy Sun</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19149698/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>european commission</category><category>european union</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>featured</category><category>regulations</category><category>regulatory</category><category>takeover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: Intel volatility near eight-month lows into EU fine of $1.45 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/options-update-intel-volatility-near-eight-month-lows-into-eu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/options-update-intel-volatility-near-eight-month-lows-into-eu-f/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/options-update-intel-volatility-near-eight-month-lows-into-eu-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas/option-chains"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" />Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas/option-chains">INTC</a>) is recently up 17 cents to $15.38 in pre-open trading. INTC was fined $1.45 billion by the European Union for using rebates to impede competition. INTC said orders and billing so far in the June quarters have been better than INTC originally expected. INTC May 15 straddle is priced at 63 cents, June 15 is priced at $1.65. INTC option implied volatility of 44 is below its 26-week average of 52, according to Track Data suggesting decreasing price movement.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arcelormittal-sa-luxembourg/mt/nys/option-chains">Arcelor Mittal</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arcelormittal-sa-luxembourg/mt/nys/option-chains">MT</a>) closed at $26.23. MT has recently announced it would make layoffs and idle iron-producing operations. MT June option implied volatility of 80 is below its 26-week average of 93, according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price movement.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/options-update-intel-volatility-near-eight-month-lows-into-eu-f/">Options Update: Intel volatility near eight-month lows into EU fine of $1.45 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 May 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/options-update-intel-volatility-near-eight-month-lows-into-eu-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1544680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/options-update-intel-volatility-near-eight-month-lows-into-eu-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Arcelor Mittal</category><category>ArcelorMittal</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>inthenews</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EU finally brings antitrust charges against Intel]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/eu-finally-brings-antitrust-charges-against-intel-intc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/eu-finally-brings-antitrust-charges-against-intel-intc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/eu-finally-brings-antitrust-charges-against-intel-intc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a></p><p>It has been widely anticipated that the EU would bring new antitrust charges against <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>). The FTC and other US authorities are chasing the largest chip company in the world for similar reasons. South Korea has already fined Intel for anti-competitive behavior.</p>
<p>The theory behind the charges is that Intel induced PC companies and their retailers to use its chips and not those from rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>). <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121632333455962823.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology">According </a><em><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1216368304542*/">to</a> The Wall Street Journal</em>, "The European Union launched new antitrust charges against Intel Corp., saying the chip giant paid rebates to a major retailer to encourage it not to carry computers using chips from smaller rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc ."</p>
<p>If the charges are true, it shows the extent to which a company of real size, like Intel, can be its own worst enemy. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) ran into similar problems a decade ago for being too aggressive killing off competition in the browser and media player markets.</p>
<p>The irony of Intel's legal bind is that it almost certainly did not need to pressure or give incentives to keep AMD in a distant second place. It had the balance sheet to keep margin pressure on AMD and the engineering prowess to offer better chips.</p>
<p>Arrogance and carelessness often go with being in first place. This time it appears that it has caught up to Intel.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/eu-finally-brings-antitrust-charges-against-intel-intc/">EU finally brings antitrust charges against Intel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121632333455962823.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/eu-finally-brings-antitrust-charges-against-intel-intc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1259986/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/eu-finally-brings-antitrust-charges-against-intel-intc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMD</category><category>antistrust</category><category>chipmakers</category><category>eu</category><category>european union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>ftc</category><category>INTC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>south korea</category><category>SouthKorea</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: InBev says its bid for Anheuser Busch will turn hostile]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121453486987809815.html?mod=wsjcrmain"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported that is is not yet certain whether <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch &amp; Co Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) will need to raise money. If it does, selling common stock could be expensive due to a 12-month protection the bank offered the investors that bought $12B in common and preferred shares earlier this year and selling assets like its interest in Bloomberg may present a different problem.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121450442776707845.html?mod=2_1566_leftbox"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> also reported that investigators from the European Union are probing deeper into the pharmaceutical industry in an effort to determine whether drug companies have used unfair tactics to increase prices and block competition. Investigators have reportedly ask for views on direct-to-pharmacy distribution channels, which <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/astrazeneca-plc/azn/nys">AstraZeneca Plc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/astrazeneca-plc/azn/nys">AZN</a>) recently established in Britain.</li>
    <li>After <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) said it would reject InBev's $46B bid as "financially inadequate," InBev said it would launch a hostile bid. According to court documents, the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2409d0a4-43c2-11dd-842e-0000779fd2ac.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported that InBev is preparing to launch a proxy battle seeking the removal of Anheuser's entire board.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/35a7da52-43e7-11dd-842e-0000779fd2ac.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> also reported that soaring energy prices are forcing U.S. consumer goods company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">The Procter &amp; Gamble Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) to rethink how it distributes products. The company may consider shifting manufacturing sites closer to consumers in order to lower its transport bill.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/">Newspaper wrap-up: InBev says its bid for Anheuser Busch will turn hostile</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1238452/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser</category><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>AstraZeneca</category><category>AZN</category><category>BUD</category><category>EU probe</category><category>EuProbe</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>hostile takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>InBev</category><category>MER</category><category>Merill Lynch</category><category>MerillLynch</category><category>PFE</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>PG</category><category>Procter Gamble</category><category>ProcterGamble</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD falls on lack of EU action against Intel (INTC)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/amd-falls-on-lack-of-eu-action-against-intel-intc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/amd-falls-on-lack-of-eu-action-against-intel-intc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/amd-falls-on-lack-of-eu-action-against-intel-intc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><a href="http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/InvestorRelations/0,,51_306,00.html" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/amd-advanced-micro-devices-logo.jpg" alt="AMD logo" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">Advanced Micro Devices</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>) shares opened in the green this morning but have dropped as the day moved on after rumors surfaced that the EU was planning to take action against competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>). AMD headed back down after the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=adQs5POyRj9g&amp;refer=technology" target="_blank">EU denied that it has yet reached a decision in the matter</a>. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on AMD.</p>
<p>After hitting a one-year high of $16.19 in July, the stock hit a one-year low of $5.31 in January. This morning, AMD opened at 7.01. So far today the stock has hit a low of $6.77 and a high of $7.07. As of 12:45, AMD is trading at $6.80, down $0.12 (-1.7%). The chart for AMD looks bullish and steady, while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.  </p>
<p>For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">bear-call credit spread</a> above the $9 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make an 11.1% return in five months as long as AMD is below $9 at October expiration. AMD would have to rise by more than 32% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/amd-falls-on-lack-of-eu-action-against-intel-intc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMD falls on lack of EU action against Intel (INTC)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/amd-falls-on-lack-of-eu-action-against-intel-intc/">AMD falls on lack of EU action against Intel (INTC)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 May 2008 14:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/amd-falls-on-lack-of-eu-action-against-intel-intc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1208184/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/amd-falls-on-lack-of-eu-action-against-intel-intc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advancedmicrodevices</category><category>AMD</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel (INTC) makes its case to Europe authorities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/intc-intel-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Intel </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) is finally making its case to European Union authorities, saying its practices in the region were not anti-competitive. It may be a hard sell.</p>
<p>The extent to which Intel has beaten rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>) does not look good on paper. Intel has nearly 80% of the global chip market for PCs and servers. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120527847302528435.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal: "</em>The EU filed preliminary charges against Intel in July, alleging the company offered rebates to customers only if they didn't use AMD products; paid customers to delay the launch of AMD-based products; and sold its chips below cost to undercut AMD."</p>
<p>If Intel loses the case, it could face major fines and sanctions just as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) did recently when the EU ruled that its activity violated anti-trust laws.</p>
<p>There may be more riding on the outcome of the hearing for AMD than for Intel. The larger company can afford fines and probably live with some restrictions in the region. AMD may need chain on Intel to turn itself around. The company has over $5 billion in debt and recently took a huge write-off for the falling value of its purchase of graphic chip company ATI. The company's shares are down from over $36 less than two years ago to just above $6.</p>
<p>AMD may not be able to compete in an open marketplace. The courts may be its only refuge.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em><em> </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/">Intel (INTC) makes its case to Europe authorities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120527847302528435.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1137940/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amd</category><category>antitrust</category><category>european union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>intc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Crocs (CROX) finds trouble with EU patent]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/crocs-crox-finds-trouble-with-eu-patent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/crocs-crox-finds-trouble-with-eu-patent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/crocs-crox-finds-trouble-with-eu-patent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/crox/" rel="tag">Crocs Inc (CROX)</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.crocs.com/company/investor/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="CROX logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/crox-crocs-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/crocs-inc/crox/nas">Crocs Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/crocs-inc/crox/nas">CROX</a>) shares are plummeting again this morning after news came out on Friday that <a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/2008/01/04/crocs-patent-eu-markets-equity-cx_ml_0104markets38.html?partner=aoltix">the company's attempt to patent its uniquely-styled shoes in Europe may be unsuccessful</a>. The European Union's Office for Harmonization in the International Market ruled in December that CROX's Beach model shoes "lack individual character" compared with other similar brands, according to a Forbes.com article published Friday evening. The ruling struck a blow, as CROX now faces more difficulty in pushing out its competitors in Europe. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on CROX.<br /><br />After hitting a one-year low of $21.675 in March, the stock hit a one-year high of $75.21 in October. This morning, CROX opened at $32.76. So far today the stock has hit a low of $27.64 and a high of $32.96. As of 10:50, CROX is trading at $28.41, down $4.34 (-13.2%). The chart for CROX looks bearish and steady.
<p>For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a March <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bear-call credit spread</a> above the $45 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 7.5% return in 11 weeks as long as CROX is below $45 at March expiration. Crocs would have to rise by more than 56% before we would start to lose money.   </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/crocs-crox-finds-trouble-with-eu-patent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Crocs (CROX) finds trouble with EU patent</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/crocs-crox-finds-trouble-with-eu-patent/">Crocs (CROX) finds trouble with EU patent</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/crocs-crox-finds-trouble-with-eu-patent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1079737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/crocs-crox-finds-trouble-with-eu-patent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Crocs</category><category>CROX</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>patent</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MasterCard (MA) lower on delayed EU ruling]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mastercard-ma-lower-on-delayed-eu-ruling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mastercard-ma-lower-on-delayed-eu-ruling/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mastercard-ma-lower-on-delayed-eu-ruling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><a href="http://investorrelations.mastercardintl.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=148835&amp;p=irol-IRHome" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/ma-mastercard-logo.jpg" alt="MA logo" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">Mastercard Incorporated</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MA</a>) stock is lower this morning on news that <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-11-15T161909Z_01_L15917931_RTRIDST_0_MASTERCARD-EU-UPDATE-1.XML">a European Union ruling on fees levied by MA has been delayed</a> until at least the end of this year. The delay may also put the January launch of the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) on hold as well, a plan which would allow consumers to authorize payments and use their debit and credit cards anywhere in the 27 EU member states. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on MA.<br /><br />MA hit a one-year high of $203.00 last week, after hitting a one-year low of $90.50 in February. This morning, MA opened at $185.00. So far today the stock has hit a low of $182.10 and a high of $188.47. As of 12:15, MA is trading at $184.27, down $2.50 (-1.4%). The chart for MA looks bullish and steady, while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mastercard-ma-lower-on-delayed-eu-ruling/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MasterCard (MA) lower on delayed EU ruling</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mastercard-ma-lower-on-delayed-eu-ruling/">MasterCard (MA) lower on delayed EU ruling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-11-15T161909Z_01_L15917931_RTRIDST_0_MASTERCARD-EU-UPDATE-1.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mastercard-ma-lower-on-delayed-eu-ruling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1040758/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/mastercard-ma-lower-on-delayed-eu-ruling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>EU</category><category>European union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MA</category><category>Mastercard</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reining in capitalism seems appropriate for the EU, especially when it comes to Microsoft (MSFT)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/reigning-in-capitalism-seems-appropriate-for-the-eu-especially/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/reigning-in-capitalism-seems-appropriate-for-the-eu-especially/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/reigning-in-capitalism-seems-appropriate-for-the-eu-especially/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has overcome some legal hurdles in the U.S. in recent years (and has been slammed as well), but the world's largest software maker continues to see complete opposition from its European Union buddies (heh), as evidenced by <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/flash-microsoft-loses-eu-antitrust-appeal-must-pay-631-millio/">last week's ruling</a>. It's tough these days for regulatory governments and agencies not to have a say in the role of high-tech now that the sector is one of the world's largest. The largest kid on the block is always (always) the biggest target. Think about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-in-com-usd0-10/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-in-com-usd0-10/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) for another example.<br /><br />In many cases, in the name of "protecting consumers" the stepped-up efforts to curb certain practices end up hurting future innovation, a fact proved over and over in history but shunned by lawmaking bodies consumed with a play for power and the banishment of a main tenet of capitalism -- staying the heck out of the way and letting market forces define equilibrium. But, the equilibrium can be tilted with corporate abuse and monopolistic practices, and so government and private enterprise enter into a grudge match. It's very accusatory, and generally a very expensive process for both sides.<br /><br />Should the EU examine Microsoft, it would see that the software giant is under attack now more than ever, even as it continues raking in growth and profits every quarter. There are so many alternatives to many of Microsoft's products it could boggle anyone's mind. Who legislates this kind of sea-change as it happens? Customers and market forces, of course. Microsoft was found guilty of anti-competitive practices, which is a fact. It's still vulnerable from being popped off its perch. <br /><br />Everything from open-source web server software to free operating system and office productivity packages will challenge (oops, is challenging) Microsoft like never before, and the company up for the fight of its life. That's what capitalism is: creating competition by taking power away from government and letting the principles of economics take over. In Microsoft's case, it's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/flash-microsoft-loses-eu-antitrust-appeal-must-pay-631-millio/">unfortunately not that easy</a> when it comes to the EU.<br /><br />[Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 9-24-07]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/reigning-in-capitalism-seems-appropriate-for-the-eu-especially/">Reining in capitalism seems appropriate for the EU, especially when it comes to Microsoft (MSFT)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/Why-restraining-Microsoft-no-longer-matters/2010-1014_3-6209284.html?tag=nefd.pulse>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/reigning-in-capitalism-seems-appropriate-for-the-eu-especially/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/995808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/reigning-in-capitalism-seems-appropriate-for-the-eu-especially/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>fine</category><category>judgment</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>litigation</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EU questioning Google's stranglehold on search]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/29/eu-questioning-googles-stranglehold-on-search/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/29/eu-questioning-googles-stranglehold-on-search/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/29/eu-questioning-googles-stranglehold-on-search/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p>In the latest salvo of bitterness from the European Union's front lines, the commission has advised Google that it wants a full explanation of the search giant's privacy policies -- and now! Seriously, if the folks in the EU would stop <a href="http://alwayson.goingon.com/permalink/post/14252">demanding everything from private companies</a> and <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3500821">suing others</a>, maybe there would be nothing to do over there. There's the difference between socialist-controlled unions fearing for, well, anything and free trade and customer serving companies. Oh, EU -- <a href="http://www.google.com/privacy.html">Google's full privacy policy is here</a>.</p>
<p>Apparently the EU does not want Google to retain customer-trackable data for the two years currently explained in its full privacy policy. I guess Europeans are more special than other Google global customers? Google, which is probably getting into the habit of biting its lips as detractors come out of the woodwork attacking it, will comply to the request (i.e., provide an answer) sometime in June, according to the company. Meanwhile, Microsoft is having a laugh as one of its main nemesis companies is now undergoing the EU insanity treatment.</p>
<p>Now, to a point I can realize a concern over the data retention policies that Google has on its "information customers," and I'll still be interested to see what the EU wants from this besides some publicity and public reassurance. Google is not even 10 years old and it's grown to have power most companies would die for. Maybe that was the impetus behind why the EU "demands" so much so soon from it.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/29/eu-questioning-googles-stranglehold-on-search/">EU questioning Google's stranglehold on search</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 May 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://alwayson.goingon.com/permalink/post/14252>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/29/eu-questioning-googles-stranglehold-on-search/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/905912/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/29/eu-questioning-googles-stranglehold-on-search/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>data retention</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>privacy policies</category><category>PrivacyPolicies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft puts up its dukes for EU fight]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/microsoft-puts-up-its-dukes-for-eu-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/microsoft-puts-up-its-dukes-for-eu-fight/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/microsoft-puts-up-its-dukes-for-eu-fight/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p>While some analysts believe it's time for Microsoft to play nice with the EU and settle its differences in order tosmooth the release of Vista, Microsoft certainly doesn't appear to be taking their advice.&nbsp;David Harfst, aBrussels, Belgium-based lawyer at Covington &amp; Burling who represents Microsoft,&nbsp;blasted the European UnionThursday for issuing policy guidelines on trade secrets and the abuse of dominant positions.</p>
<p>Harfst told Bloomberg News,&nbsp;"The guidelines reflect the anti-intellectual property viewpoint" of theEuropean Commission and they should not have been released while Microsoft's antitrust appeal is pending.&nbsp;Microsoft believes these guidelines degrade intellectual property rights.</p>
<p>Microsoft faces five days of hearings on its appeal of the 2004 antitrust ruling&nbsp;in front of the secondhighest court in Europe, the European Court of First Instance in Luxembourg, beginning on Monday.&nbsp; Slamming the EUjust before that hearing does not seem, at least to me, a good way to enter the courtroom, if finding a means forsettlement is on the table.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/microsoft-puts-up-its-dukes-for-eu-fight/">Microsoft puts up its dukes for EU fight</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 04:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/267525_msfteu21.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/microsoft-puts-up-its-dukes-for-eu-fight/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/610545/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/microsoft-puts-up-its-dukes-for-eu-fight/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>david harfst</category><category>DavidHarfst</category><category>EU</category><category>European Comission</category><category>European Court of First Instance</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanComission</category><category>EuropeanCourtOfFirstInstance</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>Microsoft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 04:28:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
