<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Worst 10-year performers: Unisys Corporation punished by raging bullish sentiment]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/31/worst-10-year-performers-unisys-corporation-punished-by-raging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/31/worst-10-year-performers-unisys-corporation-punished-by-raging/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/31/worst-10-year-performers-unisys-corporation-punished-by-raging/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/worst-stocks-unisys-200-cs071808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/25-worst-performing-stocks-of-the-past-decade?icid=100214839x1206443214x1200311100">this series,</a> we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&amp;P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.</em></p>
<p>In my day job, analyzing equities for Schaeffer's Investment Research, I'm always focused on one metric: expectations. They're not always easy to quantify, but investors' and analysts' expectations for a stock more often than not tend to drive its performance. For example, widespread skepticism makes it that much easier for a company's stock to bounce in the event of a positive development. And, on the other side of the coin, we have <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unisys-corporation/uis/nys">Unisys Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unisys-corporation/uis/nys">UIS</a>) as a cautionary tale.</p>
<p><strong>What went wrong?</strong> At number 7 on our list of SPX losers, UIS lost 86% of its value during the 10-year period that ended June 30, 2008. The shares peaked at $49.69 in September 1999, narrowly exceeding their previous high in October 1987. Shortly after tapping this all-time peak, Unisys would learn a harsh lesson about the danger of high hopes.</p>
<p>In the company's third-quarter earnings report, which hit the Street in October 1999, UIS admitted that revenue grew by just 4%, falling well short of analysts' expectations for an increase of 11% to 12%. Disappointed investors sent the shares plunging 37% over the course of one session, a sharp sell-off that surprised more than a few stock-market veterans. But, as Merrill Lynch analyst Steven Milunovich explained to <em>The New York Times</em>, "This company, under Larry Weinbach, has done nothing but meet and beat expectations. So when they disappoint, it makes it that much worse."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/31/worst-10-year-performers-unisys-corporation-punished-by-raging/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Worst 10-year performers: Unisys Corporation punished by raging bullish sentiment</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/31/worst-10-year-performers-unisys-corporation-punished-by-raging/">Worst 10-year performers: Unisys Corporation punished by raging bullish sentiment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/31/worst-10-year-performers-unisys-corporation-punished-by-raging/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262911/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/31/worst-10-year-performers-unisys-corporation-punished-by-raging/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings miss</category><category>expectations</category><category>UIS</category><category>Unisys</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple, Amazon, GE, and Microsoft: the role of expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p>By most accounts, shares in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) should have gone well above $100 this week and held there. Instead, the stock trades little better than it did after its last earnings announcement in January.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) certainly reported a good quarter, but for its shares to be 70% higher than they were a month ago seems extreme. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) did well this earnings season and neither has seen anywhere near this kind of market performance.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has traded down most of the year. Observers would attribute that to comments that CEO Steve Ballmer made about expectations for the company's new Vista OS being too high. As it turned out, the expectations were fine. The market overreacted to Ballmer. The stock moved up on good Vista news.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) is another company with strong earnings, but the stock has moved down over the last three months. That is until a Citigroup analyst raised a very old idea of breaking the company into pieces. In a day, the stock recovered all it had lost in the previous 90 days.</p>
<p>There is a theme in the trading of these four stocks. It's so simple as to be childish. Low expectations can give way to big yields. High expectations are hard to top. The markets expected the world of Apple. Apple delivered. The market saw no benefit in driving the stock much higher. The Mac and iPod did just great. The iPhone is on the way. No news.</p>
<p>Amazon has been pounded by Wall Street and the press for the last two years. The company lacks focus. It's in too many businesses. Jeff Bezos, the founder and CEO, spends too much money on marketing and building out the company's technology platform. That hurts margins. Of course, all of that is true until the day it isn't. That day fell in the middle of last week.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/">Apple, Amazon, GE, and Microsoft: the role of expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/884299/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Apple</category><category>earnings</category><category>ebay</category><category>expectations</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>Vista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings reports: Go head-to-head against the experts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/20/earnings-reports-go-head-to-head-against-the-experts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/20/earnings-reports-go-head-to-head-against-the-experts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/20/earnings-reports-go-head-to-head-against-the-experts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a></p><p>We at Blogging Stocks are covering more earning reports of our favorite stocks than ever before. And you may have noticed the polls that have started popping up in our earnings previews -- yes, you now have the opportunity to show your stuff. </p>
<p>Before the earnings reports of each of the companies listed below, we'll give you a chance to make your prediction whether they will meet, beat, or fall short of expectations. Take a look at the news and the numbers at the links below, and make up your own mind. But the question is, can you and your fellow Blogging Stocks readers do better than the analysts and market experts? You'll never know unless you cast your votes.</p>
<p>Note: We'll update this post frequently, and point you back here from time to time.</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://intc.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Intel</strong> Corp.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) reported 1/16. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/intel-has-nowhere-to-go-but-up-after-a-terrible-2006/">poll</a> is closed -- 52% of you agreed with analysts that INTC would beat expectations, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/17/intel-is-being-squeezed-hard-by-advanced-micro-devices/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://aapl.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Apple</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) reported 1/17. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/16/will-apple-beat-expectations-at-the-upcoming-earnings-call/">poll</a> is closed -- 86% of you agreed with analysts that AAPL would beat expectations, which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/17/apple-incs-q1-2007-earnings-report-liveblog/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://ibm.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>IBM</strong> Corp.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) reported 1/18. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/16/ibm-stock-weathers-sec-investigation-at-least-for-now/">poll</a> is closed -- 75% of you thought IBM would beat analysts' expectations, which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/ibm-beats-expectations-shares-drop-4-5/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://c.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Citigroup</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-inc/c/nys">C</a>) reported 1/19. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/will-citigroup-beat-expectations/">poll</a> is closed -- 45% of you agreed with analysts that Citigroup would only meet expectations, but it came in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/citi-beats-by-three-pennies/">just ahead</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://mot.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Motorola</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">MOT</a>) reported 1/19. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/16/a-preview-of-motorolas-quarterly-results-this-week/">poll</a> is closed -- 46% of you agreed with analysts that MOT would fall short of expectations, when in fact they <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/motorolas-latest-quarterly-results-are-up/">met them</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://ge.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>General Electric</strong> Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) reported 1/19. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/will-ge-announce-a-major-acquisition-in-next-weeks-earnings-rep/">poll</a> is closed -- 59% of you were more optimistic that analysts and though GE would beat expectations, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/general-electric-delivers-the-goods/">but it didn't</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://pfe.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Pfizer</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) reports 1/22. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/16/pfizer-cant-get-it-up/">poll</a> is closed -- 42% of you agreed with analysts that PFE would meet expectations, which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/pfizer-toughs-it-out/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://amd.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Advance Micro Devices</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>) reported 1/23. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/16/amd-revenue-to-disappoint-based-on-price-war-with-intel/">poll</a> is closed -- analysts had low expectations, but 42% thought AMD would miss anyway, which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/amds-latest-quarterly-earnings-no-surprise/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://sunw.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Sun Microsystems</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/sunw/nas">SUNW</a>) reported 1/23. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/sun-microsystems-offer-another-upside-surprise-this-quarter-wal/">poll</a> is closed -- a whopping 72% of you agreed with analysts that SUNW would beat expectations, which, no surprise, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/sun-microsystems-is-back-in-black-with-major-upside-earnings-sur/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://jnj.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Johnson &amp; Johnson</strong></a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) reported 1/23. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/can-johnson-and-johnson-beat-and-raise/">poll</a> is closed -- 59% of you agreed with estimates that JNJ would beat expectations, which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/johnson-and-johnson-beats-by-a-penny-or-two/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://yhoo.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Yahoo</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) reported 1/23. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/a-preview-on-yahoo-s-upcoming-earnings-next-tuesday/">poll</a> is closed -- sorry but 39% of you thought Yahoo would just meet expectations, when in fact it offered an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/liveblogging-yahoo-s-latest-quarterly-earnings-report/">upside surprise</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://mcd.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>McDonald's</strong> Corp.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) reported 1/24. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/will-the-good-times-last-for-mcdonalds/">poll</a> is closed -- 72% of you agreed with analysts and MCD's own forecast that it would beat expectations, which of course <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/24/mcdonalds-plans-1-9-billion-expansion/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>eBay</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) reported 1/24. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/ebays-q4-earnings-preview-is-the-magic-back/">poll</a> is closed -- another strong showing, 70% of you, for eBay to beat expectations, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/ebays-great-q4-but-whats-next/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://t.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>AT&amp;T</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) reported 1/25. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/another-positive-surprise-coming-from-atandt/">poll</a> is closed -- AT&amp;T <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/atandt-dials-up-profits/">beat expectations</a> again, as analysts and 72% of believed would happen. </li>
    <li><a href="http://msft.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Microsoft</strong> Corp.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) reported 1/25. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/microsofts-earnings-wont-be-great/">poll</a> is closed -- a tough call, with 45% of you chosing beat and 40% chosing meet, but <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/liveblogging-microsofts-q2-quarterly-results/">beat expectations</a> MSFT did. </li>
    <li><a href="http://f.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Ford Motor</strong> Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) reported 1/25. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/will-ford-get-in-gear/">poll</a> is closed -- despite low expectations, you were split 35%, 34%, 31% for beat, meet, and miss, respectively, and Ford did <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/ford-feels-the-pain/">fall short</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://ge.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>General Motors</strong> Corp.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) reported 3/14. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/24/quarterly-earnings-preview-for-general-motors/">poll</a> is closed -- 52% of you thought GM will beat expectations, but after weeks of delays it finally came out that GM <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/14/gm-posts-profit-for-latest-quarter-but-its-finance-unit-hurts-r/">missed expectations</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://sne.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Sony</strong> Corp.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) reported 1/30. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/will-the-sony-q3-earnings-report-meet-your-expectations/">poll</a> is closed -- 59% of you agreed with analysts that Sony would miss expectations, and despite some good news, it did <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/30/sony-steps-from-the-shadow-of-playstation/">fall short</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://mrk.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Merck</strong> &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">MRK</a>) reported 1/30. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/merck-investors-faith-is-rewarded/">poll</a> is closed -- 68% of you were more optimistic than analysts and voted for beat, but unfortunately Merck's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/all-hope-isnt-lost-for-merck/">profits fell</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Google</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) reported 1/31. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/google-growth-slows-and-few-notice/">poll</a> is closed -- Google easily <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/google-blows-the-doors-off-again/">beat expectations</a>, as 59% of you predicted. </li>
    <li><a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Starbucks</strong> Corp.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) reported 1/31. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/starbucks-q1-2007-earnings-will-holiday-drinks-lift-the-company/">poll</a> is closed -- 64% of you voted for SBUX to beat expectations, but earnings were <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/starbucks-q1-2007-results-right-on-the-money/">in line</a> with them. </li>
    <li><a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Time Warner</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) reported 1/31. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/earnings-preview-for-time-warner-upbeat-expectations/">poll</a> is closed -- 73% of you were more optimistic than analysts, but they called it -- TWX earnings <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/time-warner-earnings-come-in-line-with-most-expectations/">met expectations</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://ba.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Boeing</strong> Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) reported 1/31. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/boeing-takes-off-but-is-a-bumpy-ride-ahead/">poll</a> is closed -- 80% of you looked for Boeing to beat analysts' expectations, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/boeing-takes-off/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://amzn.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Amazon.com</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) reported 2/1. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/amazon-gets-second-wind/">poll</a> is closed -- 48% of you looked for Amazon to beat expectations, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/amazon-got-a-visit-from-santa/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://xom.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Exxon Mobil</strong> Corp.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) reported 2/1. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/another-barrel-of-profit-for-exxon-mobil/">poll</a> is closed -- only 43% of you thought XOM would beat analysts' expectations, but <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/exxonmobil-does-it-again/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://csco.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Cisco Systems</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>) reported 2/6. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/will-cisco-beat-and-raise/">poll</a> is closed -- 80% of you voted that Cisco would beat expectations, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/07/cisos-results-simply-amazing/">it has</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://dis.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Walt Disney</strong> Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) reported 2/7. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/02/disney-earnings-wont-be-magical/">poll</a> is closed -- 65% of you thought Disney still had the magic, and indeed it did <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/07/walt-disneys-quarter-was-magical-after-all/">beat</a> expectations. </li>
    <li><a href="http://pep.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>PepsiCo</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>) reported 2/8. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/preview-pepsico-earnings-report-should-be-a-quencher/">poll</a> is closed -- the 87% of you who voted for Pepsi to beat expectations were <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/08/pepsico-the-choice-of-an-international-generation/">too optimistic</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://ko.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Coca-Cola</strong> Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) reported 2/14. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/08/coca-cola-earnings-still-the-real-thing/">poll</a> is closed -- two-thirds of you thought Coke would beat expectations again, which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/live-blogging-coca-cola-earnings-call/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://hd.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Home Depot</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) reported 2/20. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/maybe-they-should-call-it-home-shlepo/">poll</a> is closed -- 57% of you expected HD to fall short, but it <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/20/home-depots-earnings-were-as-bad-as-expected/">met</a> analysts expectations. </li>
    <li><a href="http://wmt.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Wal-Mart Stores</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) reported 2/20 -- Wal-Mart comes out <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/20/liveblogging-wal-marts-q4-earnings-results/">ahead</a> of analysts' expectations. </li>
    <li><a href="http://hpq.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Hewlett-Packard</strong> Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) reported 2/20 -- HPQ managed to <a href="http://hpq.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/20/liveblogging-hewlett-packards-q1-financial-results/">beat</a> analysts' expectations. </li>
    <li><a href="http://wfmi.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Whole Foods Market</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whole-foods-market-inc/wfmi/nas">WFMI</a>) reported 2/21. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/09/can-whole-foods-meet-expectations/">poll</a> is closed -- 58% of you expected WFMI to exceed expectations, but it <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/21/earnings-hungry-whole-foods-misses-by-3-cents-devours-wild-oats/">fell short</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://xmsr.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>XM Satellite Radio</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) reported 2/26. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/08/xm-satellite-radio-s-earnings-forecasts-are-all-over-the-map/">poll</a> is closed -- 57% of you thought XM would fall short of the consensus, but it squeaked out <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/26/misgivings-accompany-xm-satellite-q4-report/">ahead</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://siri.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Sirius Satellite Radio</strong> Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI)</a> reported 2/27. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/26/earnings-preview-for-sirius-radios-q4-fy2006-earnings/">poll</a> is closed -- 61% of you predicted Sirius would beat expectations, but results were <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/liveblogging-sirius-radios-q4-and-fy2006-earnings-results/">in line</a> with them. </li>
    <li><a href="http://tgt.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Target</strong> Corp.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>) reported 2/27. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/26/earnings-preview-for-targets-q4-fy2006-results/">poll</a> is closed -- 67% of you voted for Target to beat expectations, which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/timing-is-everything-just-ask-target/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://dell.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Dell Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) reported 3/1. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/28/earnings-preview-for-dells-q4-results/">poll </a>is closed -- you were split on whether Dell would meet or miss expectations, but <a href="http://dell.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/01/dells-q4-earnings-results-not-good/">miss</a> it did. </li>
    <li><a href="http://via.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Viacom</strong> Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-a-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) reported 3/1. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/the-picture-is-getting-clearer-at-viacom/">poll</a> is closed -- 41% of you thought VIA would disappoint, but it <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/viacom-wont-feel-much-like-partying-at-the-upfronts/">beat</a> analysts' expectations. </li>
    <li><strong>Berkshire Hathaway</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-de-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) reported 3/1. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/berkshire-hathaway-earnings-who-knows/">poll</a> is closed -- 62% of you expected BRK to beat expectations, which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/04/warren-buffett-tylenol-and-pepcid-ac/">it easily did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://orcl.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>Oracle</strong> Corp.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) reported 3/20. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/07/crystal-ball-is-murky-on-oracle-s-q3-earnings/">poll</a> is closed -- 58% of you expected Oracle to beat expectations, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/21/oracle-surprises-to-the-upside-return-to-glory-and-growth-day/">it did</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://fdx.bloggingstocks.com/"><strong>FedEx</strong> Corp.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FDX</a>) reported 3/21. This <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/07/a-trivial-look-at-fedex-ahead-of-its-q3-earnings-release/">poll</a> is closed -- 48% of you expected FedEx to beat expectations, but it <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/21/fedexs-decline-isnt-suprising/">fell short</a>. </li>
</ul>
<p><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/20/earnings-reports-go-head-to-head-against-the-experts/">Earnings reports: Go head-to-head against the experts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/20/earnings-reports-go-head-to-head-against-the-experts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/738047/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/20/earnings-reports-go-head-to-head-against-the-experts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMD</category><category>analysts</category><category>Apple</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>Boeing</category><category>Cisco</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>Dell</category><category>Disney</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>eBay</category><category>expectations</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>FedEx</category><category>Ford</category><category>GE</category><category>GM</category><category>Google</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>HP</category><category>IBM</category><category>Intel</category><category>Johnson</category><category>McDonald's</category><category>Merck</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Motorola</category><category>Oracle</category><category>Pepsico</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>polls</category><category>Sirius</category><category>Sony</category><category>Starbucks</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><category>Target</category><category>Viacom</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Whole Foods</category><category>XM</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Another positive surprise coming from AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/another-positive-surprise-coming-from-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/another-positive-surprise-coming-from-atandt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/another-positive-surprise-coming-from-atandt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bls/" rel="tag">BellSouth Corp (BLS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a></p><p>With some analysts souring on tech stocks, the question for investors and watchers of AT&amp;T Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) ahead of its Q4 report on January 25 is whether this telecom chameleon (formerly SBC, formerly Southwestern Bell and others, formerly AT&amp;T) can repeat its <a href="http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&amp;cdvn=news&amp;newsarticleid=22969">strong Q3 results.</a> That showing was based primarily on the strength of AT&amp;T's wireless business. And it's still wireless that provides hope in some quarters, specifically AT&amp;T's piece of the brouhaha over Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s iPhone. Cingular (soon to be known once more as <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/atandt-to-phase-out-cingular-brand/20070112005809990001">AT&amp;T Wireless</a>) will be the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/apple-tied-to-cingular/">exclusive service provider</a> for iPhones, which is bound to bring in boatloads of new customers for AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>Some wonder whether giants AT&amp;T and Apple <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/apple-works-with-atandt-on-iphone/n20070110185809990006">can really get along,</a> however. And the other big AT&amp;T news in these days leading to the Q4 report is its new <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/atandt-offers-unlimited-mobile-to-home/20070119072709990001">Unity service,</a> a bundling of mobile and land-line services that is widely seen as an effort to stem the tide of customers <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/atandts-free-call-plan-wont-save-it-from-cable/">going over to the cable providers.</a></p>
<p><iframe width="175" scrolling="no" height="150" frameborder="0" align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1089&amp;view=100721&amp;pollId=100806&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1" border="0"></iframe>AT&amp;T rates a "buy" recommendation, according the <a href="http://ec.thomsonfn.com/DomesticEarnings/CompanyEarnings?transform=estimates-de&amp;pid=Mzg0UVU5TUxURT1QJFkEQUALSTO&amp;ticker=T">Thomson Financial,</a> with estimated earnings per share at 0.59, compared to 0.63 actual for the previous quarter, and revenue of 21.3 billion. The target price is 37.48 (it closed at 35.07 on Friday). <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/snapshot.asp?symb=t&amp;sid=2156816">MarketWatch</a> and <a href="http://tools.thestreet.com/tsc/quotes.html?pg=analyst&amp;symb=t">TheStreet.com</a> agree on the 0.59 estimate, but place the target price at 38.50, with a fiscal 2007 estimate of 2.27 and an "overweight" rating.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newratings.com/analyst_news/article_1455334.html">Credit Suisse</a> analysts recently raised their target price to $39 and fiscal 2007 earnings estimate to $2.54, as well as maintaining their rating of "outperform," based not only on the iPhone deal, but the completion of the merger with BellSouth as well.</p>
<p>What do you think? Are investors in line for another positive surprise from AT&amp;T?</p>
<p><em>Also check out </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/20/earnings-reports-go-head-to-head-against-the-experts/"><em>some other earnings reports</em></a><em> that we're following, and let us know your thoughts on earnings expectations.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/another-positive-surprise-coming-from-atandt/">Another positive surprise coming from AT&amp;T?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/another-positive-surprise-coming-from-atandt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/739294/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/another-positive-surprise-coming-from-atandt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>analysts' forecast</category><category>Apple</category><category>BellSouth</category><category>Cingular</category><category>earnings report</category><category>expectations</category><category>iPhone</category><category>Q4</category><category>quarterly report</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>Unity</category><category>wireless</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Looking to buy Microsoft]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/looking-to-buy-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/looking-to-buy-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/looking-to-buy-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img width="505" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="58" style="width: 465px; height: 49px;" alt=""src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/ms_masthead_8x6a_ltr[1].jpg" /></p>
<p>Everybody's back to&nbsp;hatingMr. Softie.</p>
<p>But this time the Redmond beast is feeling heat from investors and analysts and not from regulatorslooking to inhibit the bundling of software or consumers cursing security flaws or the <em>bugginess</em> of Windows.</p>
<p>Yep, now it is investors who are expressing their ire over quarterly financial performance and future guidancewhich, for the first time, overtly accounts for the piles of cash that must be spent building&nbsp;<ahref="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoft/2002958192_microsoft28.html?syndication=rss">server&nbsp;farms</a>among other things in order to meet the Google challenge. And such dissatisfaction is coldly evident in<ahref="http://quote-web.aol.com/?syms=MSFT&amp;e=NAS&amp;action=hq&amp;dur=1&amp;type=mountain&amp;hgl=1&amp;vgl=1&amp;vol=1&amp;splits=1&amp;div=0&amp;w=520&amp;gran=d">the recent price decline of 15% in five trading days</a>&nbsp;since the release.</p>
<p>While negative investorsentiment accelerates, it becomes extremely easy to come up with reasons to avoid if you are&nbsp;not long and to sellif you are. Guidance is punk. Google is swarming. Apple circling. The Vista release&nbsp;has been&nbsp;pushedever&nbsp;further out into the future -- so on and so forth&nbsp;ad nauseam.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/looking-to-buy-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Looking to buy Microsoft</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/looking-to-buy-microsoft/">Looking to buy Microsoft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 May 2006 20:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/looking-to-buy-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/614821/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/looking-to-buy-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Expectations</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip Pearlman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 20:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo through the gauntlet; Google up next in the earnings hot seat]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/now-that-yahoo-is-through-the-gauntlet-google-is-next-in-the-ho/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/now-that-yahoo-is-through-the-gauntlet-google-is-next-in-the-ho/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/now-that-yahoo-is-through-the-gauntlet-google-is-next-in-the-ho/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><a href="http://design.weblogsinc.com/2005/11/18/dennis-hwang-the-man-behind-the-google-logos/"><img height="109"src="http://www.google.com/intl/en/logos/lunarnewyear06.gif" width="240" align="right" border="0" alt="" /></a>Yahoo!matched analyst estimates, which typically is call for flat share price movement, and investors rallied around thestock, pushing it up <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/yahoo-s-earnings-report-and-the-potential-benefit-of-low-expect/">6%after hours.</a>&nbsp; Now the onus is on Google to come in with strong <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/performance?exch=USA&amp;sym=GOOG&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1">numbers</a>.</p>
<p>Google rallied about 1% on the news of Yahoo! meeting earnings, but is still about 14% off it's mid-January high of475.11.&nbsp; Google missed estimates last quarter, so investors are likely a bit leery (prior to last quarter's miss,Google consistently trounced analyst estimates).</p>
<p>Google has been active, though, in expanding their offerings, recently bringing online a beta version of a <ahref="http://finance.google.com/finance">Finance</a> site and <ahref="http://www.google.com/googlecalendar/overview.html">Calendar</a> site in competition with Yahoo!'s&nbsp;incumbentofferings (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/">Finance</a> and <a href="http://calendar.yahoo.com">Calendar,</a>respectively).</p>
<p>Yahoo's Finance site is still the dominant player in that sector, but Google retains the lead in Search. GoogleEarth has garnered a cult following and is making <ahref="http://design.weblogsinc.com/2005/09/19/google-earth-used-to-find-roman-ruins/">headlines</a> for its varieduses.&nbsp; Both Yahoo! and Google have been on something of a spending spree of late, gobbling up niche companies inan assortment of fields.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/now-that-yahoo-is-through-the-gauntlet-google-is-next-in-the-ho/">Yahoo through the gauntlet; Google up next in the earnings hot seat</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/now-that-yahoo-is-through-the-gauntlet-google-is-next-in-the-ho/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/609985/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/now-that-yahoo-is-through-the-gauntlet-google-is-next-in-the-ho/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>expectations</category><category>google</category><category>search</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard Tsung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
