<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[FCC Grants Access to Unused TV Airwaves]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/fcc-grants-access-to-unused-tv-airwaves/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/fcc-grants-access-to-unused-tv-airwaves/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/fcc-grants-access-to-unused-tv-airwaves/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/laptopbakerybar2-1285333516.jpg" alt="wifi" />In a breakthrough for tech firms, the Federal Communication Commission (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Federal%20Communications%20Commission,FCC" class="inlinked">FCC</a>) approved a plan to open unused TV channels for wireless broadband. FCC chairman, Julius Genachowski said the move would offer "unique opportunities for innovators and entrepreneurs."</p>
<p>Companies like Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), Microsoft (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and Dell (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) have been pushing the FCC for this decision. The unused TV channels are called "white spaces" because signals can carry long distances and through buildings.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/fcc-grants-access-to-unused-tv-airwaves/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FCC Grants Access to Unused TV Airwaves</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/fcc-grants-access-to-unused-tv-airwaves/">FCC Grants Access to Unused TV Airwaves</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703384204575509881468343558.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_tech>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/fcc-grants-access-to-unused-tv-airwaves/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19646756/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/24/fcc-grants-access-to-unused-tv-airwaves/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>DELL</category><category>FCC</category><category>Federal Communication Commission</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>Michael Dell</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>white spaces</category><category>wi-fi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Communication Firms Take On the FCC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/communication-firms-takes-on-the-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/communication-firms-takes-on-the-fcc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/communication-firms-takes-on-the-fcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/verizon-logo-black-240.jpg" />Verizon Wireless (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys" target="_blank">VZ</a>) on Wednesday asked the Federal Communications Commission to not "<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/24/AR2010032403106.html" target="_blank">assert its authority over Internet services</a>." VZ believes that the FCC's power is ineffective and gave Congress some recommendations that could shift the balance of power away from the FCC. VZ's top lobbyist, Tom Tauke, asked Congress to reconsider the way the FCC oversees broadband Internet. VZ would like the FCC to become more of an enforcer, much like the Federal Trade Commission. <br />
<br />
The FCC is trying to reclassify broadband Internet access as a "common carrier service." Such classification would allow the government agency to regulate Internet service providers the same way it regulates phone companies. According to <em>The Washington Post</em>, the FCC's chairman said that the agency will continue to argue its point but may consider reclassification if a federal appeals court finds that the FCC doesn't have jurisdiction over broadband.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/communication-firms-takes-on-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Communication Firms Take On the FCC</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/communication-firms-takes-on-the-fcc/">Communication Firms Take On the FCC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/communication-firms-takes-on-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19413884/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/communication-firms-takes-on-the-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>communications</category><category>FCC</category><category>Federal Communications Commission</category><category>Internet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>telecom</category><category>telecommunications</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Telecom companies to have their day in front of the FCC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/telecom-companies-to-have-their-day-in-front-of-the-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/telecom-companies-to-have-their-day-in-front-of-the-fcc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/telecom-companies-to-have-their-day-in-front-of-the-fcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/apple.jpg" />According to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2009-08-20-google-internet-calls-apple_N.htm?csp=34"><em>USA Today</em></a>, Apple (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and AT&amp;T (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) are expected to saunter up to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and explain why they will not allow Google's (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) free Google Voice application on the iPhone. <br /><br />The problem is that Google is throwing stones while it lives in a glass house. Let me explain here -- Google has done the same thing to Skype when it blocked it from use with Google Android. This is truly the pot calling the kettle black, as Google is getting a taste of its own medicine. The question is, why can't these kids get together and play nice?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/telecom-companies-to-have-their-day-in-front-of-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Telecom companies to have their day in front of the FCC</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/telecom-companies-to-have-their-day-in-front-of-the-fcc/">Telecom companies to have their day in front of the FCC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/telecom-companies-to-have-their-day-in-front-of-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19136091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/telecom-companies-to-have-their-day-in-front-of-the-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>at and t</category><category>AtAndT</category><category>cellular communications</category><category>cellular phones</category><category>CellularCommunications</category><category>CellularPhones</category><category>fcc</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Communications Commission</category><category>FederalCommunicationsCommission</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>t</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's new bandwidth plan threatens Comcast]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/googles-goog-new-bandwidth-plan-threatens-comcast-cmcsa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/googles-goog-new-bandwidth-plan-threatens-comcast-cmcsa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/googles-goog-new-bandwidth-plan-threatens-comcast-cmcsa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/google.jpg" />Google </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is setting up a new tool to allow people online to measure whether their broadband provider is cutting down the speed of their access to the internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.itpro.co.uk/609683/google-to-let-users-search-for-net-blockers">According to</a> <em>Reuters, "</em>Google is looking to encourage network neutrality and prevent Internet service providers from blocking bandwidth-heavy sites." That is probably good news for consumers, but it is bad news for broadband providers like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">Comcast</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>) who have limited capacity in their network infrastructures.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/googles-goog-new-bandwidth-plan-threatens-comcast-cmcsa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google's new bandwidth plan threatens Comcast</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/googles-goog-new-bandwidth-plan-threatens-comcast-cmcsa/">Google's new bandwidth plan threatens Comcast</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/googles-goog-new-bandwidth-plan-threatens-comcast-cmcsa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1444215/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/googles-goog-new-bandwidth-plan-threatens-comcast-cmcsa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>FCC</category><category>GOOG</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC may deliver a free wireless web]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/fcc-may-deliver-a-free-wireless-web/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/fcc-may-deliver-a-free-wireless-web/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/fcc-may-deliver-a-free-wireless-web/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/laptop_bakerybar.jpg" alt="" />It is the dream of almost every mobile PC users that at some point the broadband airwaves will be free. No more connecting to one expensive WiFi service at one airport only to have to pay for another at the next stop. No more expensive 3G service.
<p> </p>
<p>The day may be coming. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385228422827027.html">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, </em>a new FCC "report clears the way for the FCC to move forward with a plan to auction off airwaves to a bidder who agrees to offer free, national wireless Internet service."</p>
<p>Although the study indicates that most wireless carriers will not be hurt by the program, that is almost certainly not true. By many estimates the free service will be available to 50% of the US population in four years. </p>
<p>The new plan may well do some significant damage to major cellular and WiFi providers. Free is free, and $59 a month can be expensive. How many people will opt to pay for service when they don't need to?</p>
<p>The other industries that could experience some level of harm are the cable companies and telecoms, which offer wired broadband to the home. A good wireless alternative may allow some people to cancel those services.</p>
<p>The FCC regulates the wireless and wired communications companies. Now it means to undermine them.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/fcc-may-deliver-a-free-wireless-web/">FCC may deliver a free wireless web</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385228422827027.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/fcc-may-deliver-a-free-wireless-web/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1340335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/fcc-may-deliver-a-free-wireless-web/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3G</category><category>FCC</category><category>free wifi</category><category>FreeWifi</category><category>inthenews</category><category>WiFi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comcast (CMCSA): Still shutting down the heavy internet user]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/comcast-cmcsa-still-shutting-down-the-heavy-internet-user/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/comcast-cmcsa-still-shutting-down-the-heavy-internet-user/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/comcast-cmcsa-still-shutting-down-the-heavy-internet-user/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p>First <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">Comcast</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>) tried to cut off customers using peer-to-peer file sharing services. They ate up too much bandwidth and slowed down the cable company's network. At least that is what Comcast said.</p>
<p>The FCC did not like the Comcast approach and asked it to fix the matter. Comcast still says it has congestion problems and wants to handle them using a new method. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/21/technology/21comcast.html?ref=business">According to</a> <em>Bloomberg, </em>the cable guys "plans to slow service to its heaviest Internet users during periods of congestion after regulators ordered the company to devise a new method for managing its Web traffic."</p>
<p>If the traffic load in one area of the network becomes too great, big users could see their service dialed back to slower speeds for as long as 20 minutes.</p>
<p>Consumers will get bent out of shape because they reason that everyone should have unlimited access to the Internet, especially if they are paying $30 a month for broadband. But, that avoids an acknowledgment of the practical parts of the system. Internet "pipes" are only so big. If they become clogged, none of the users win.</p>
<p>The Comcast plan is fair and reasonable. If people want super-fast speeds all the time, they should pay for it. That is the only way for the cable company to undertake the work of upgrading its network without hurting its shareholders.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/comcast-cmcsa-still-shutting-down-the-heavy-internet-user/">Comcast (CMCSA): Still shutting down the heavy internet user</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/21/technology/21comcast.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/comcast-cmcsa-still-shutting-down-the-heavy-internet-user/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1290816/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/comcast-cmcsa-still-shutting-down-the-heavy-internet-user/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>FCC</category><category>high-speed internet</category><category>High-speedInternet</category><category>Inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google and Motorola to supply Wi-Fi for the masses?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/google-and-motorola-to-supply-wi-fi-for-the-masses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/google-and-motorola-to-supply-wi-fi-for-the-masses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/google-and-motorola-to-supply-wi-fi-for-the-masses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mot/" rel="tag">Motorola (MOT)</a></p><p>The FCC is looking at using part of the TV signal spectrum to provide wireless high-speed internet. It is a brilliant idea that is being opposed by a large part of the television industry.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121902086259648443.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "The Federal Communications Commission will have the final say in the battle between the broadcasters -- which fear interference on the airwaves they'll still be using -- and the companies including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">Motorola Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">MOT</a>) that want to share the television airwaves."</p>
<p>The fight is a classic example of old media not wanting to give up something that it has "owned" for years because it may help new competition. </p>
<p>Tough luck. Broadband adoption in the U.S. is behind several countries in Europe and Asia, and if the FCC can offer an inexpensive solution to that, it should. The new over-the-air system would have many of the benefits of Wi-Fi, but would be more broadly available. </p>
<p>TV broadcasters say that the new technology could interfere with their signals, but testing can demonstrate whether that is true or not. The FCC has the chance to move broadband adoption forward with one spectacular decision. It should not balk at the chance.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/google-and-motorola-to-supply-wi-fi-for-the-masses/">Google and Motorola to supply Wi-Fi for the masses?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121902086259648443.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/google-and-motorola-to-supply-wi-fi-for-the-masses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1287214/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/google-and-motorola-to-supply-wi-fi-for-the-masses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>broadcasters</category><category>fcc</category><category>GOOG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MOT</category><category>wi-fi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sirius deal with XM could still be killed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-xmsr-could-still-be-killed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-xmsr-could-still-be-killed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-xmsr-could-still-be-killed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p>Three of the commissioners of the FCC have voted on the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) merger with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>). Two have voted in favor, and one has voted against. That leaves two other votes. In other words, the deal could still be killed.</p>
<p>One of the remaining commissioners has indicated that he would vote for the merger if the companies would agree to a six-year price cap on their services. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121674651820674047.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "The offer was viewed as an attempt to start negotiations, but the companies so far are showing little interest in haggling."</p>
<p>Is it any wonder? The most recent earnings reports from the two companies indicate that, while their losses are getting smaller, their subscription growth rates are slowing. Each firm has more than $1 billion in debt and neither has ever had an operating profit. In other words, if the companies cannot raise their rates the chances of them becoming profitable are significantly curtailed.</p>
<p>The FCC may be putting Sirius and XM in an almost impossible position. If they are willing to make moves which could hurt their earnings longterm, they may get the votes they need for approval. If not, the merger could be scuttled.</p>
<p>The future of satellite radio is now based on two bad outcomes.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-xmsr-could-still-be-killed/">Sirius deal with XM could still be killed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121674651820674047.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-xmsr-could-still-be-killed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1264536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-xmsr-could-still-be-killed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FCC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>satelliteradio</category><category>SIRI</category><category>XMSR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Despite FCC Nod, Merger between Sirius and XM is far from complete ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-despite-fcc-nod-merger-between-sirius/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-despite-fcc-nod-merger-between-sirius/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-despite-fcc-nod-merger-between-sirius/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ccu/" rel="tag">Clear Channel Commun (CCU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/james_cramer_original-%28wince%29.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">Too many parties have too much to lose to let this one go through without a fight,  TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says.  </span><br /><br /> No, it is not over. If there is one thing we have learned about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=SIRI" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>)-<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=XMSR" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>), it is that at every step of the way, people have to try to block it or at least hold it up to the point that someone goes out of business. This is a deal, now much longer in passing than Exxon and Mobil, that still has congressional meddling even right now, still has rearguard activists who might fight the merger on the commission itself even though the FCC's staff has said yes.  <br /><br />  Lots of people are confusing the issue of the merger benefits with the merger itself. The benefits will be helpful down the road on both the revenue and the costs, and the caps won't mean that much. What matters, plain and simple, is refinancing. Both companies are always in danger of running out of money.  <br /><br />  However, if you know that three years hence -- after the frozen period during which service fees cannot be increased -- the two companies can begin to offer extreme cable pricing, you can go hat in hand to the Street with a good bond deal that people will no longer feel could default. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-despite-fcc-nod-merger-between-sirius/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Despite FCC Nod, Merger between Sirius and XM is far from complete </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-despite-fcc-nod-merger-between-sirius/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Despite FCC Nod, Merger between Sirius and XM is far from complete </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-despite-fcc-nod-merger-between-sirius/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1226501/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-despite-fcc-nod-merger-between-sirius/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbs</category><category>ccu</category><category>FCC</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>siri</category><category>sirius</category><category>xm</category><category>xmsr</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sirius (SIRI) deal with XM Satellite (XMSR) may finally be approved]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-satellite-xmsr-may-finally-be-appro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-satellite-xmsr-may-finally-be-appro/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-satellite-xmsr-may-finally-be-appro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><p>After months of being "almost" approved, it looks like the FCC may give the merger of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) its green light. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121357587939276011.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>The staff of the Federal Communications Commission has proposed that the agency approve the merger."</p>
<p>The two companies may have to negotiate with the agency on pricing before a final approval is issued. The FCC may put caps on what the newly formed company can charge consumers for the service and satellite receivers may be part of that process.</p>
<p>The real question is whether the approval will come too late to save the companies. Because they operate on different technology platforms, it could take over a year for the merger to gain real cost savings. Worse, each company has over $1 billion in debt. Neither has ever made an operating profit.</p>
<p>Satellite radio is also up against new competition for HD radio and portable media players and multimedia cell handsets. Many of the satellite radios are sold in new cars, but auto sales are down sharply.</p>
<p>Getting an "OK" may be better than the months of waiting had been, but the firms may already be in too much trouble for it to matter. .</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-satellite-xmsr-may-finally-be-appro/">Sirius (SIRI) deal with XM Satellite (XMSR) may finally be approved</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121357587939276011.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-satellite-xmsr-may-finally-be-appro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1226386/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/sirius-siri-deal-with-xm-satellite-xmsr-may-finally-be-appro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fcc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SIRI</category><category>XMSR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC plan to lower cellphone termination fees may not be fair]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/fcc-plan-to-lower-cellphone-termination-fees-may-not-be-fair/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/fcc-plan-to-lower-cellphone-termination-fees-may-not-be-fair/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/fcc-plan-to-lower-cellphone-termination-fees-may-not-be-fair/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a></p><p>Kevin Martin, the chairman of the FCC, has made it his business to try to cut the costs that customers are charged when they cancel their service before the end of a contract. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/technology/13fcc.html?ref=business">According to</a> <em>The New York Times</em>, "Mr. Martin's plan would require that fees be related to the actual cost of the phones. A fee for a $50 phone would be higher than for a $5 phone." It would also take into account how many months a customer had left on a contract. </p>
<p>The cellular companies, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">Sprint</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">S</a>), spend a lot of money on their poor customer service. They ought to have a chance to get some of that back when a customer walks. It probably also costs the firms money to reconnect all of those dropped calls.</p>
<p>The cellular companies do have initial costs to set-up service and billing when a new customer comes on board. The Martin plan does not appear to take that into account. </p>
<p>Just because the service is no good does not mean that the cellular provider is not out a lot of money to provide it. </p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/fcc-plan-to-lower-cellphone-termination-fees-may-not-be-fair/">FCC plan to lower cellphone termination fees may not be fair</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/technology/13fcc.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/fcc-plan-to-lower-cellphone-termination-fees-may-not-be-fair/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1224449/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/fcc-plan-to-lower-cellphone-termination-fees-may-not-be-fair/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FCC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kevin martin</category><category>KevinMartin</category><category>S</category><category>sprint</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Worried about the satellite radio merger ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worried-about-the-satellite-radio-merg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worried-about-the-satellite-radio-merg/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worried-about-the-satellite-radio-merg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/james_cramer_original-%28wince%29.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the longer Sirius and XM Satellite have to wait for the FCC to rule, the worse things get for these stocks.</span> <br /><br />  Worried. <br /><br />  Worried about the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=SIRI" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) -<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=XMSR" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) deal. <br /><br />  This is a deal that should have happened when the Justice Department gave the nod to it. That non-political judgment should have been enough to make it work. But it's been stalled on the FCC's desk since then, and the comments I have heard are incredibly contradictory about when it might be approved, and if it will be approved at all. <br /><br />  FCC chairman Kevin Martin first indicated to people that he didn't even know if the deal would come up any time soon. Then yesterday he said it might come up this month, and they are working hard on it. <br /><br />  What's to work on? <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worried-about-the-satellite-radio-merg/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Worried about the satellite radio merger </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worried-about-the-satellite-radio-merg/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Worried about the satellite radio merger </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worried-about-the-satellite-radio-merg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1222257/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worried-about-the-satellite-radio-merg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FCC</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Kevin Martin</category><category>KevinMartin</category><category>siri</category><category>sirius</category><category>xm satellite</category><category>XmSatellite</category><category>xmsr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market highlights for next week: Texas Instruments mid-quarter update]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/07/market-highlights-for-next-week-texas-instruments-mid-quarter-u/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/07/market-highlights-for-next-week-texas-instruments-mid-quarter-u/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/07/market-highlights-for-next-week-texas-instruments-mid-quarter-u/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bmy/" rel="tag">Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/txn/" rel="tag">Texas Instruments (TXN)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>Monday, June 9 </p>
<ul>
    <li>The Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of the Pediatric Advisory Committee will meet at 8:30 am to discuss the application of 21 CFR 50.52 (Clinical investigations involving greater than minimal risk but presenting the prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects) to FDA-regulated research. The discussion will be illustrated with hypothetical case examples of research involving HIV vaccines in adolescents and controlled trials of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/texas-instruments-incorporated/txn/nys">Texas Instruments</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/texas-instruments-incorporated/txn/nys">TXN</a>) to give mid-quarter update at 5:00 pm. </li>
</ul>
<p>Tuesday, June 10 </p>
<ul>
    <li>The Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee will meet at 8:00 am to discuss the application of 21 CFR 50.52 to FDA-regulated research illustrated with a hypothetical case example of research using stem cells for treating periventricular white matter injury in children. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco Systems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>) to hold conference call at 11:00 am to discuss business video innovation. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/varian-medical-systems-inc/var/nys">Varian Medical Systems</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/varian-medical-systems-inc/var/nys">VAR</a>) to hold mid-year review meeting at 12:00 pm. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/07/market-highlights-for-next-week-texas-instruments-mid-quarter-u/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Market highlights for next week: Texas Instruments mid-quarter update</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/07/market-highlights-for-next-week-texas-instruments-mid-quarter-u/">Market highlights for next week: Texas Instruments mid-quarter update</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/07/market-highlights-for-next-week-texas-instruments-mid-quarter-u/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1218105/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/07/market-highlights-for-next-week-texas-instruments-mid-quarter-u/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>21 CFR 50.52</category><category>BMY</category><category>Bristol Myers</category><category>Cisco</category><category>CSCO</category><category>FCC</category><category>Grainger</category><category>GWW</category><category>Herley</category><category>HRLY</category><category>inthenews</category><category>RECN</category><category>Resources Connection</category><category>School Specialty</category><category>SCHS</category><category>Texas Instruments</category><category>TXN</category><category>VAR</category><category>Varian</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[With industry on the ropes, XM Satellite deal with Sirius may not matter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/with-industry-on-the-ropes-xm-satellite-xmsr-deal-with-sirius/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/with-industry-on-the-ropes-xm-satellite-xmsr-deal-with-sirius/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/with-industry-on-the-ropes-xm-satellite-xmsr-deal-with-sirius/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><p>The satellite radio business could be in such sad shape that a merger between <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) may not do either much good. Neither has ever made a net profit. Their subscription growth rates are slowing. And, each has well over $1 billion in long-term debt.</p>
<p>Goldman Sachs recently said the combined company might need to raise $500 million to $1 billion to fund operations.</p>
<p>The editors at <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>figured this all out, perhaps a bit later than most. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121245023695739647.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">According to</a> the paper, "The nation's only two satellite services are growing slower than previously while the broader economy is in a slowdown. Fewer people have been buying new cars, which is where the companies derive the bulk of new subscribers."</p>
<p>While the data may be obvious, the conclusions may not be. Companies with over $1 billion in debt and huge operating losses often do not make it, at least not in their current form. If the FCC does not approve the deal or puts a number of restrictions on it, one or both of the companies may have to seek the protection of Chapter 11. Huge debt service against no profits can do that.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com and author of the <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/10_stocks_under_10_dollars_newsletter.html">Ten Stocks Under $10 letter.</a> </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/with-industry-on-the-ropes-xm-satellite-xmsr-deal-with-sirius/">With industry on the ropes, XM Satellite deal with Sirius may not matter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121245023695739647.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/with-industry-on-the-ropes-xm-satellite-xmsr-deal-with-sirius/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1213601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/with-industry-on-the-ropes-xm-satellite-xmsr-deal-with-sirius/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FCC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SIRI</category><category>XMSR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best Buy challenges FCC on analog TV labeling requirement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/best-buy-challenges-fcc-on-analog-tv-labeling-requirement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/best-buy-challenges-fcc-on-analog-tv-labeling-requirement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/best-buy-challenges-fcc-on-analog-tv-labeling-requirement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/bby.jpg" alt="" />Consumer electronics retailer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/best-buy-incorporated/bby/nys">Best Buy, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/best-buy-incorporated/bby/nys">BBY</a>) didn't really like the FCC's idea that it label all analog TV sets with a warning label -- something <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/best-buy-others-fined-by-fcc-for-tv-box-labeling/">I posted on a month ago</a>. In fact, the retailer is now challenging the FCC's authority to require retailers to slap those "Warning: Analog TV" stickers on those retail shelf boxes. <br /><br />The FCC seems to believe it will be Y2K all over again when the analog television frequencies are vacated next February for all those who receive TV signals via antenna. Standard issue for the federal government, I suppose. Best Buy not only doesn't want to have even more labels and customer communication littering up its stores, but it argues that the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/best-buy-others-fined-by-fcc-for-tv-box-labeling/">fines levied by the FCC</a> for the non-use of these stickers are invalid as well.<br /><br />Best Buy was fined $280,000 and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) was fined $992,000 for failing to include these analog TV stickers on the appropriate products. Wal-Mart had not decided what its plans were yet, but my guess if that it will unite with Best Buy to present a huge challenge to the FCC's authority. Best Buy's biggest argument was that retailers are not commission licensees by the FCC --- so how can the FCC impose fines? There are quite <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6561130.html?industryid=47170">a few more arguments</a> being made by Best Buy that should hold up in a court of law easily if it gets to that.<br /><br />One would think that the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/20/fcc-announces-bidders-for-january-radio-spectrum-auction/">recent FCC auctions</a> of the about-to-be-abandoned analog TV airwaves would give enough cash back to the FCC's coffers than stupid fines like this. Apparently not.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/best-buy-challenges-fcc-on-analog-tv-labeling-requirement/">Best Buy challenges FCC on analog TV labeling requirement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 13:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6561130.html?industryid=47170>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/best-buy-challenges-fcc-on-analog-tv-labeling-requirement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1195978/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/best-buy-challenges-fcc-on-analog-tv-labeling-requirement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Analog television</category><category>AnalogTelevision</category><category>BBY</category><category>Best Buy</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>digital transition</category><category>DigitalTransition</category><category>DTV</category><category>FCC</category><category>Inc.</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market highlights for next week: Wal-Mart and Hewlett-Packard reporting]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/market-highlights-for-next-week-wal-mart-and-hewlett-packard-re/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/market-highlights-for-next-week-wal-mart-and-hewlett-packard-re/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/market-highlights-for-next-week-wal-mart-and-hewlett-packard-re/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/annual-meetings/" rel="tag">Annual Meetings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/a/" rel="tag">Agilent Technologies (A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amat/" rel="tag">Applied Materials (AMAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tol/" rel="tag">Toll Brothers (TOL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>Monday, May 12<br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">Sprint Nextel Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">S</a>) to report Q1 earnings; conference call at 8:00am.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gww/nys">W.W. Grainger, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gww/nys">GWW</a>) to hold sales conference call at 8:00am.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xmsr/nys">XM Satellite Radio Holdings, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xmsr/nys">XMSR</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/SIRI/nys">Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/SIRI/nys">SIRI</a>) to report quarterly earnings; the conference call is at 10:00am for XM and at 4:30pm for Sirius.</li>
</ul>
Tuesday, May 13<br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) to report Q1 earnings; conference call at 7:30am.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/TOL/nys">Toll Brothers, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tol/nys">TOL</a>) to report preliminary Q2 results and outlook at 2pm.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/applied-materials-inc/amat/nas">Applied Materials, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/applied-materials-inc/amat/nas">AMAT</a>) to report Q2 earnings; conference call at 4:30pm.</li>
</ul>
Wednesday, May 14<br />
<ul>
    <li>FCC Open Commission Meeting at 9:30am.</li>
    <li>SEC Open Commission Meeting at 10:00am.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">Macy's, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">M</a>) to report Q1 earnings; conference call at 10:30am.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/agilent-technologies-inc/a/nys">Agilent Technologies, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/agilent-technologies-inc/a/nys">A</a>) to report Q2 earnings; conference call at 4:30pm.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/market-highlights-for-next-week-wal-mart-and-hewlett-packard-re/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Market highlights for next week: Wal-Mart and Hewlett-Packard reporting</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/market-highlights-for-next-week-wal-mart-and-hewlett-packard-re/">Market highlights for next week: Wal-Mart and Hewlett-Packard reporting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 May 2008 16:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/market-highlights-for-next-week-wal-mart-and-hewlett-packard-re/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1191337/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/market-highlights-for-next-week-wal-mart-and-hewlett-packard-re/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>a</category><category>agilent</category><category>amat</category><category>applied materials</category><category>AppliedMaterials</category><category>conference</category><category>earnings</category><category>fcc</category><category>ferc</category><category>gww</category><category>hewlett packard</category><category>HewlettPackard</category><category>highlight</category><category>hpq</category><category>landstar</category><category>look ahead</category><category>LookAhead</category><category>lstr</category><category>m</category><category>macys</category><category>meeting</category><category>pdufa</category><category>preview</category><category>s</category><category>salix</category><category>sec</category><category>siri</category><category>sirius</category><category>slxp</category><category>sprint</category><category>tol</category><category>toll brothers</category><category>TollBrothers</category><category>wal mart</category><category>WalMart</category><category>wmt</category><category>ww grainger</category><category>WwGrainger</category><category>xm</category><category>xmsr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Murdoch more powerful than the FCC?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/is-murdoch-more-powerful-than-the-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/is-murdoch-more-powerful-than-the-fcc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/is-murdoch-more-powerful-than-the-fcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" alt="" />Rupert Murdoch is facing off against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as he seeks to take control of two TV stations and three newspapers in New York -- including Newsday -- The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/business/media/23ownership.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">New York Times</a></em> reports. A December 2007 FCC rule allows a company to own just one paper and one television station in the same city in the top 20 markets so long as there are at least eight other independent sources of news and the station is not in the top four. (The stations that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys"><strong><font color="#888888">News Corp.</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys"><font color="#888888">NWS</font></a>) controls are the fourth- and sixth-largest in the New York market).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I am fascinated by the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120887959358334849.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">Wall Street Journal's</a></em> [subscription required] coverage of the departure of its own managing editor, Marcus Brauchli, yesterday. The punch line was that everything is fine because Brauchli was simply doing what the boss wanted. Brauchli's new role? Providing "guidance to senior management in a wide range of areas," including whether Murdoch's Star-TV service in Asia should launch a business-news channel. Sounds like a good fit. </p>
<p>In contrast to the <em>Journal</em>'s corporate press release on its page one, The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/business/media/23paper.html?hp">New York Times</a></em> reported that Brauchli was fired. It noted that a few weeks prior to his departure, Murdoch's henchmen indicated they were unhappy with the pace of change at the <em>Journal</em>. The <em>Times</em> wrote: "At some point, They told him, 'We don't think this is working,' and Brauchli replied that in that case, he should consider leaving."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/is-murdoch-more-powerful-than-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Murdoch more powerful than the FCC?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/is-murdoch-more-powerful-than-the-fcc/">Is Murdoch more powerful than the FCC?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/is-murdoch-more-powerful-than-the-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1175254/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/is-murdoch-more-powerful-than-the-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FCC</category><category>Newsday</category><category>NWS</category><category>NYT</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>WSJ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sears Holdings (SHLD) slapped with fines by FCC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/sears-holdings-shld-slapped-with-fines-by-fcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/sears-holdings-shld-slapped-with-fines-by-fcc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/sears-holdings-shld-slapped-with-fines-by-fcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.searsholdings.com/invest/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="SHLD logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/shld-sears-holdings-logo1.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">Sears Holdings Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>) shares are falling today after on news that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?rssFeed=news;id=28943&amp;seenIt=1">the Federal Communications has fined the retailer for failing to properly label analog-only televisions</a> in its stores. The televisions were supposed to include a sticker warning customers that the sets would require a special converter when broadcasters switch to digital TV next year. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on SHLD.<br /><br />After hitting a one-year high of $195.18 last April, the stock hit a one-year low of $84.72 in January. This morning, SHLD opened at $102.95. So far today the stock has hit a low of $101.81 and a high of $104.03. As of 11:45, SHLD is trading at $103.74, down $1.42 (-1.3%). The chart for SHLD looks bullish and steady, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a negative 2 STARS (out of 5) sell rating.<br /><br />For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a May <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bear-call credit</a> spread above the $120 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 9.9% return in five weeks as long as SHLD is below $120 at May expiration. Sears would have to rise by more than 16% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">here</a>.<br /><br />SHLD hasn't been above $120 since November and has shown resistance around $110 recently. This trade could be risky if earnings from other retail companies are a positive surprise, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by resistance SHLD might find at its 200 day moving average, which is currently around $120 and falling. <br /><br /><em>Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba">Investors Observer</a>. <br /><br />DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in SHLD.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/sears-holdings-shld-slapped-with-fines-by-fcc/">Sears Holdings (SHLD) slapped with fines by FCC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/sears-holdings-shld-slapped-with-fines-by-fcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1164827/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/sears-holdings-shld-slapped-with-fines-by-fcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FCC</category><category>fines</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>Sears Holdings</category><category>SearsHoldings</category><category>SHLD</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[United Airlines (UAUA) pasengers brace themselves for travel delays]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/united-airlines-uaua-pasengers-brace-themselves-for-travel-del/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/united-airlines-uaua-pasengers-brace-themselves-for-travel-del/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/united-airlines-uaua-pasengers-brace-themselves-for-travel-del/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/inkiboo/107825532/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/united.jpg" /></a>If you have a trip planned on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas">United Air Lines, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas">UAUA</a>) over the next couple of days, you may want to call ahead and verify that your flight is still on schedule. According to <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/united-airlines-inspects-777s/n20080402082009990035">news reports</a> today, the airline is going to be performing comprehensive inspections of 52 of its 777 aircraft.
<p>Air travelers have been dealing with delays for the past week as all the major airlines are working to get all their planes inspected and given the "all clear" by the FCC. Last week, we saw <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/more-cancellations-for-american-amr-and-delta-dal-passengers/">major cancellations and delays</a> for travelers flying <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">American Airlines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">AMR</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">Delta</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">DAL</a>) as those two carriers were having scores of planes inspected for potential problems with their wiring bundles.</p>
<p>The United inspections are looking at the fire suppression system in the cargo bays. The company wants to make sure that this system is working correctly, and notified authorities when it discovered that one of the five bottles in the suppression system was skipped over during the last inspection of the system.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/united-airlines-uaua-pasengers-brace-themselves-for-travel-del/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>United Airlines (UAUA) pasengers brace themselves for travel delays</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/united-airlines-uaua-pasengers-brace-themselves-for-travel-del/">United Airlines (UAUA) pasengers brace themselves for travel delays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/united-airlines-uaua-pasengers-brace-themselves-for-travel-del/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1155653/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/united-airlines-uaua-pasengers-brace-themselves-for-travel-del/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Airlines</category><category>AmericanAirlines</category><category>AMR</category><category>DAL</category><category>Delta</category><category>FCC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>UAL Corp</category><category>UalCorp</category><category>UAUA</category><category>UNited Airlines</category><category>UnitedAirlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC now decides if satellite radio lives or dies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/sirius-siri-logo.gif" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) $5 billion acquisition of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) was cleared by the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/tech-news/_a/justice-department-clears-xm-sirius-deal/20080324151509990001">U.S. Department of Justice</a>. Now, all eyes turn to Federal Communications Commission to determine if satellite radio lives or dies.<br /><br />The acquisition -- not a merger -- has been held up for eons by phony arguments that combining these two floundering companies would limit choice. Terrestrial radio and consumer groups have been lobbying hard against the deal, arguing that anything that benefits Howard Stern can't be good for America.<br /><br />I can't see how the FCC can block a deal that the DOJ approved after examining the deal under and electron microscope. The medium won't survive if the companies stay separate. Even fans of satellite radio admit that it is a niche medium. Then again, so is cable TV.<br /><br />For me satellite radio is a godsend, particularly on long road trips. I enjoy listening to Sirius while tapping out my blog posts. I particularly like the commercial-free music channels. Regular radio has annoyed music fans by piling on commercial after commercial between tiny slivers of music. <br /><br />Satellite radio can avoid the fate of BetaMax by continuing to produce high-quality content that people want to buy. It's that simple and that complicated.<br /><em><br />Freelance writer Jonathan Berr edits the blog <a href="http://ketchupandeggs.wordpress.com">Ketchup and Eggs</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/">FCC now decides if satellite radio lives or dies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/tech-news/_a/justice-department-clears-xm-sirius-deal/20080324151509990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1147856/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>doj</category><category>fcc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>satelliteradio</category><category>siri</category><category>xmsr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
