<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Off-Platform Key to Social Media Survival and Success]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/robeputer240.jpg"  alt="Twitter and Facebook going off-platform" />Twitter has struggled to bring more users onto its website. Approximately <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/twitter-gets-a-step-closer-to-corporate-accounts/">70% of end-user interaction</a> with the microblogging service takes place away from <a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter.com</a>. As the company moves toward its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/twitter-unveils-google-ad-model-despite-hype/">search-based ad model</a>, expected to be released later this quarter, website traffic is becoming increasingly important. Yet, it's this gap between use and on-site action that might protect the company going forward ... at least if <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> can be used as an indicator.<br />
<br />
With Facebook Connect, members of the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialnetworking/">social networking</a> site can interact with their profiles "remotely." If you want to share this blog post on Facebook, for example, you can do it without opening a new browser, plucking www.facebook.com on the keyboard and pasting the URL into the status field. This connection, even though it costs Facebook a pageview or two, reinforces the user's relationship with the site, increasing the likelihood that he or she will remain active overall. It also provides fodder for other members, fueling more clicks, comments and likes ... and ultimately cash in the Facebook till.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Off-Platform Key to Social Media Survival and Success</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/">Off-Platform Key to Social Media Survival and Success</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19431000/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook apps</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>hootsuite</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>news corp</category><category>News CorpB NWS</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NWS</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>tweetdeck</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Wants Gmail to Take Social Media Market Share]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/google-wants-gmail-to-take-social-media-market-share/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/google-wants-gmail-to-take-social-media-market-share/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/google-wants-gmail-to-take-social-media-market-share/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/gmail-logo.jpg" alt="" />Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) is accustomed to being in the top spot. It leads search and virtually owns the online ad space. Its Google News portal is among the top sites for directing traffic to media outlets. But, the behemoth is starting to feel the feet from social media sensation <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a>.</p>
<p>Not only is the rather young platform <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/" target="_blank">stealing market share from Google News</a>, it's now encroaching on its e-mail turf ... a situation that Google isn't taking lightly. To compete more effectively with Facebook, Google is <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2010-02-09-gmail09_ST_N.htm" target="_blank">upgrading its Gmail capabilities</a> to include more social media tools reminiscent of those found on its competitor.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/google-wants-gmail-to-take-social-media-market-share/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Wants Gmail to Take Social Media Market Share</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/google-wants-gmail-to-take-social-media-market-share/">Google Wants Gmail to Take Social Media Market Share</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2010-02-09-gmail09_ST_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/google-wants-gmail-to-take-social-media-market-share/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19350321/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/google-wants-gmail-to-take-social-media-market-share/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adwords</category><category>comscore</category><category>ComscoreNetworks</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media metrix</category><category>MediaMetrix</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>SCOR</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Social Media Marketing Continues: Facebook Launches Preferred Developer Program]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/social-media-marketing-continues-facebook-launches-preferred-de/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/social-media-marketing-continues-facebook-launches-preferred-de/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/social-media-marketing-continues-facebook-launches-preferred-de/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/facebook-logo.jpg" />It was only a matter of time. This week, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/this-week-social-media-sold-out-and-became-social-marketing/19283182/">social media platforms Twitter and LinkedIn</a> announced new features that will undoubtedly appeal to corporate marketing departments, so  <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/facebook">Facebook</a> hopped on the bandwagon. Its new preferred developer program is a step toward structuring the Facebook application development and services space, by endorsing providers known to the company.</p>
<p>The program is still in its infancy, which means there isn't much structure around it. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2009/12/facebook-announces-preferred-developer-consultant-program/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+allfacebook+%28Facebook+Blog%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher">According to <em>AllFacebook</em></a>, "[T]here's really no way to apply to be in <a target="_blank" href="http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Preferred_Developer_Consultant_Program">the directory</a> aside from being connected with the people over at Facebook." Fourteen vendors are already listed in the directory.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/social-media-marketing-continues-facebook-launches-preferred-de/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Social Media Marketing Continues: Facebook Launches Preferred Developer Program</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/social-media-marketing-continues-facebook-launches-preferred-de/">Social Media Marketing Continues: Facebook Launches Preferred Developer Program</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/social-media-marketing-continues-facebook-launches-preferred-de/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19285112/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/social-media-marketing-continues-facebook-launches-preferred-de/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>facebook apps</category><category>facebook-apps</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>FacebookApps</category><category>inthenews</category><category>linkedin</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>social media</category><category>social media marketing</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialMediaMarketing</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job hunting in a social media world: 95% LinkedIn, 59% Facebook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="143" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/linkedin_profile.jpg" />An <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemploymentrate/">unemployment rate</a> of 10.2% means that serious jobseekers are using every tool they can find. So, it's not at all shocking that social networking tools top the list, with <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/LinkedIn/">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> leading the charge. Openings are being tweeted, hints of a new position are being monitored and hot candidates are being hit up directly, even if they aren't saying they're on the prowl for a new gig. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Socialmedia/">Social media</a> is a tool to use in a job hunt but not necessarily the only one, according to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>. Instead, it makes sense to balance a search with many tools.</p>
<p>John Challenger, CEO, says, "The job search has changed radically over the last two decades with the advent of electronic mail, the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/internet/">internet</a>, social networking, smart phones, etc. However, it is important to remember that all of these technologies simply enhance the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/jobsearch/">job search</a>; they will never replace the face-to-face connections that are critical to a successful search." But, he continues that "we feel that these new networking tools are essential and now advise all of the job seekers going through our program to open LinkedIn accounts and to consider other services such as Facebook and Twitter.<br /> <br /> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job hunting in a social media world: 95% LinkedIn, 59% Facebook</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/">Job hunting in a social media world: 95% LinkedIn, 59% Facebook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19243198/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>featured</category><category>Forrester</category><category>Forrester Research</category><category>ForresterResearch</category><category>hiring</category><category>jobsearch</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>pew internet and american life project</category><category>PewInternetAndAmericanLifeProject</category><category>recruiting</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>SocialNetworkingSites</category><category>twitter</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Digital Sky to put another $100 million into Facebook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/digital-sky-to-put-another-100-million-into-facebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/digital-sky-to-put-another-100-million-into-facebook/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/digital-sky-to-put-another-100-million-into-facebook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/facebooklogo.jpg" alt="" />Privately held social network <a target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> just saw its prices go higher. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DigitalSkyTechnologies/">Digital Sky Technologies</a> has announced <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE56C4TH20090714">it will pay $14.77 a share for an additional stake in the social network</a>, bumping its total position in the company to up to 3.5%. If this deal is completed, it would imply a total value of $6.5 billion - down about one-third from Digital Sky's last investment in Facebook. </p>
<p>Even the $6.5 billion a share value is optimistic. Investors have pushed the value to below $5 billion in private secondary market transactions over the past few weeks. Nonetheless, the relatively new company is still valued well above major technology and media heavyweights, including <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) with a $4.06 billion market cap and <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/salesforce-com-inc/crm/nys">SalesForce.com</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/salesforce-com-inc/crm/nys">CRM</a>) at a $4.72 billion market cap. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/digital-sky-to-put-another-100-million-into-facebook/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Digital Sky to put another $100 million into Facebook</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/digital-sky-to-put-another-100-million-into-facebook/">Digital Sky to put another $100 million into Facebook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE56C4TH20090714>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/digital-sky-to-put-another-100-million-into-facebook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19097108/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/digital-sky-to-put-another-100-million-into-facebook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbs</category><category>crm</category><category>digital sky technologies</category><category>DigitalSkyTechnologies</category><category>facebok</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>FB</category><category>goog</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dear New Media Executive: I am not your friend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/friends_facebook.jpg" />Given my position as a long-time denizen of the dot-com world, with dozens of contacts in new media and venture capital and all of the numbered Webs (1.0, 2.0 and maybe even 3.0), I'm quite frequently invited to things. Some are valuable networking tools, like <a href="http://www.linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a>; others are fun and a bit useful for keeping track of my virtual colleagues, like <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>. Still others, like <a href="http://aim.com">AIM</a>, are vital for day-to-day working life.<br /><br />And then there are the sites where my so-called "friends" hang out. It seems quite ironic that many of the former colleagues and distant contacts who invite me to "keep up with what he and your other friends are doing" were never what I would categorize as "friends." Vexing rivals? Quixotic bosses? Difficult customers? Unhappy underlings? Probably more like it. While I understand that social networking sites like Facebook.com and StumbleUpon and, to a lesser extent, MySpace and del.icio.us and the rest of them, are the rage right now -- and are used by many legitimate corporate types for actual work purposes -- well, I'm highly uncomfortable with the rampant use of the word "friend."<br /><br />Let's <em>face</em> it: even if I'm pleased because Brian in Legal delivered that contract to me quickly, he's not actually my "buddy"; nor is the receptionist you just hired ready to be asked to join your "circle of friends." Plenty of people with whom I could happily carry on pre-conference-call banter, while I'm sure they're quite lovely, just aren't friends. Flickr gives us a break and lets us designate lots of "contacts," while Twitter has recently changed its nomenclature to count those you are following, and those that follow you. This makes sense to me! This is not presumptuous or uncomfortable.<br /><br />Just because my name is in your contact list, Mr. and Ms. New Media Executive, it does not mean that you are my friend.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/">Dear New Media Executive: I am not your friend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/978039/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aim</category><category>contact</category><category>contacts</category><category>del.icio.us</category><category>delicious</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>friend</category><category>friends</category><category>friendster</category><category>linkedin</category><category>myspace</category><category>new media</category><category>NewMedia</category><category>stumbleupon</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Social networking sites are growing and growing up]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/social-networking-sites-are-growing-and-growing-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/social-networking-sites-are-growing-and-growing-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/social-networking-sites-are-growing-and-growing-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/logodotcom.gif" align="right" vspace="4" />Social networking sites are all the rage and growing fast. A little over a year ago on July 19, 2006, Rupert Murdoch's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NewsCorp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) paid $580 million for <a href="http://www.myspace.com/">MySpace.com</a>. It has continued to grow and establish business partnerships, bringing comments that this was the biggest deal of the new millennium, and garnering staggering valuations that it is worth upward of $10 billion.</p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/welcome_3.gif" align="right" vspace="4" />Early on, my teenage daughter was spending countless hours on the site (and probably yours, too) with her friends and it has grown to be a real community. But that success was bound to be copied, and now it appears that <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook.com</a> is stealing some of MySpace's thunder. <br /></p>
<p>According to reports, Facebook is growing faster than MySpace, and having started on college campuses, caters to a better educated and more affluent customer base. My daughter, now in college is making the switch. This does not mean that there is not room for both of them, but it does indicate the market is still wide open and that there is plenty of opportunity. It is rumored that Facebook has already turned down multi-billion dollar offers to be acquired and is gearing up for a grand IPO some day in the foreseeable future. Based on all the hype and the growth of the site I do not think I would be going out on a limb to suggest an IPO would be the hottest thing since <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), and they know it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/social-networking-sites-are-growing-and-growing-up/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Social networking sites are growing and growing up</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/social-networking-sites-are-growing-and-growing-up/">Social networking sites are growing and growing up</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/fear-and-greed-cb-stealth-5-its-live/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/social-networking-sites-are-growing-and-growing-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/975768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/social-networking-sites-are-growing-and-growing-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CircleBuilder</category><category>CircleBuilder.com</category><category>community building</category><category>CommunityBuilding</category><category>Facebook</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>Faith based social networking</category><category>Internet Start-ups</category><category>leverage software</category><category>LeverageSoftware</category><category>MySpace</category><category>NWS</category><category>popteen.com</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Social Networking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top 20 advisors: Mark Mowrey goes 'net-centric' for UNTD]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/top-20-advisors-mark-mowrey-goes-net-centric-for-untd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/top-20-advisors-mark-mowrey-goes-net-centric-for-untd/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/top-20-advisors-mark-mowrey-goes-net-centric-for-untd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a></p><p><em>Last December, over 100 stocks were featured in our <strong>Top Picks for 2007</strong> report. Now, at mid-year, we turn to the 20 advisors whose picks showed the strongest gains to get an update on their previous picks, as well as a new favorite stock for the second half of the year.</em></p>
<p><strong><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/mark_mowrey.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Mark Mowrey</strong>, editor of the <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=964">Prudent Speculator TechValue Report</a>, chose <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cogent-inc/cogt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Cogent Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cogent-inc/cogt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">COGT</a>), which rose 41% as of June 1, 2007. Although he maintains a $24 price target for those who own the stock, he no longer is recommending purchase.</p>
<p>For his new top idea, Mark looks at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-online-inc/untd/nas?from=lookup">United Online Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-online-inc/untd/nas?from=lookup">UNTD</a>). The advisor explains, "For as many reasons to be wary of the company, we find more to like about this net-centric company.</p>
<p>"Founded as Juno Online Services in May 1995, and formed via the merger of that company with fellow dial-up Internet services provider NetZero in June 2001, United Online is one of a select few surviving early Net access players. </p>
<p>"As UNTD milks the dial-up business for cash flow, management hopes to transition as many of those paying customers as they can to a new broadband offering. Still, revenue from the communications segment is declining at a rapid clip, falling 13 percent in 2006 to $375.9 million. </p>
<p>"So what is there to like about a company with declining revenue in its core business, the only savior for which is entry into an even more competitive space? The general answer is the provision of services folks utilize once they're already on the Net. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/top-20-advisors-mark-mowrey-goes-net-centric-for-untd/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top 20 advisors: Mark Mowrey goes 'net-centric' for UNTD</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/top-20-advisors-mark-mowrey-goes-net-centric-for-untd/">Top 20 advisors: Mark Mowrey goes 'net-centric' for UNTD</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/top-20-advisors-mark-mowrey-goes-net-centric-for-untd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/918259/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/top-20-advisors-mark-mowrey-goes-net-centric-for-untd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Classmates.com</category><category>Cogent</category><category>COGT</category><category>Facebook.com</category><category>favorite stocks</category><category>financial newsletter advisors</category><category>Juno</category><category>Mark Mowrey</category><category>MarkMowrey</category><category>MyPoints.com</category><category>net access</category><category>NetAccess</category><category>NetZero</category><category>Prudent Speculator TechValue Report</category><category>PrudentSpeculatorTechvalueReport</category><category>share buyback</category><category>ShareBuyback</category><category>social networking</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>Top Picks 2007</category><category>top stock picks</category><category>TopPicks2007</category><category>TopStockPicks</category><category>United Online</category><category>UnitedOnline</category><category>UNTD</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Internet deals a plenty, but Yahoo-Facebook talks stalled]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/internet-deals-a-plenty-but-yahoo-facebook-talks-stalled/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/internet-deals-a-plenty-but-yahoo-facebook-talks-stalled/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/internet-deals-a-plenty-but-yahoo-facebook-talks-stalled/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/handshake.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />With Google Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG) and Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) seeming to be in the midst now of a war for acquisitions, there are reports that the possible linkage of Yahoo! and Facebook is now stalled. This is after talks between the two already became very close to reaching a deal back in July. So, what's the holdup? <br /><br />Is it the asking price Facebook wants, or is Yahoo! a little hesitant to make an acquisition of questionable value? Well heck, almost every <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/12/technology/yahoo_facebook/index.htm?source=aol_quote">high-profile acquisition</a> recently has been of questionable value -- like the Google-YouTube marriage. Although, News Corp.'s purchase of MySpace.com has been hailed as genius from every angle. <br /><br />Perhaps Yahoo! is not that intent on expanding like has been reported. Or, maybe it's focused on trying to get its next-generation search technology, Project Panama, <em>finally</em> out the door so that the market will have something to talk about -- anything -- that could prove a challenge to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/12/technology/yahoo_facebook/index.htm?source=aol_quote">Google's search business dominance</a>.<br /><br />I'm all about first-mover advantage and brand equity; Google may not have the absolute best search engine on the planet for all needs, but it was there first with advertising that worked for customers and results that made information research results uncannily like what a searcher was actually looking for. Yahoo! and Ask.com have made great strides, but unseating Google from its first-mover perch is going to be a tough one. So, MySpace has been bought, Youtube has been bought, but Facebook is sitting pretty. For now.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/internet-deals-a-plenty-but-yahoo-facebook-talks-stalled/">Internet deals a plenty, but Yahoo-Facebook talks stalled</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/12/technology/yahoo_facebook/index.htm?source=aol_quote>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/internet-deals-a-plenty-but-yahoo-facebook-talks-stalled/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/683742/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/internet-deals-a-plenty-but-yahoo-facebook-talks-stalled/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Facebook</category><category>Facebook.com</category><category>Yahoo Facebook</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YahooFacebook</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Facebook.com really worth its asking price?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/22/is-facebook-com-really-worth-its-asking-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/22/is-facebook-com-really-worth-its-asking-price/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/22/is-facebook-com-really-worth-its-asking-price/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/facebook-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />With the rumors swirling that <a href="http://yhoo.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/21/can-yahoo-justify-a-1-billion-price-for-facebook/">Yahoo! may buy Facebook.com</a>, I have to pause and wonder if that could be the biggest kick in the rear to Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) investors, or will it end up being a stroke of genius? When eBay bought Skype for over $3 billion not too long ago, I wondered how in the world eBay could ever justify that kind of price. Skype is, after all, a VoIP service that is a great offering to customers, but was not at the time generating the cash flow that would justify the price. Skype makes a pretty good killing these days -- but I still wonder if it was really worth the price that eBay paid?<br /><br />When News Corp. paid $580 million for MySpace.com, that was a relative bargain in almost every respect. MySpace.com has over 100 million registered users and to make that initial investment back seems like a cakewalk -- and Rupert Murdoch knew that. Google has already partnered with MySpace for a newer $900 million investment. Shrewd, and a good move on the part of Murdoch. But can Facebook.com really generate the $100 million in annual ad revenues that the <em>WSJ</em> predicts? I'd love to see a fact-filled breakdown of this figure along with industry projections and live data. At this time, color me unconvinced.<br /><br />Facebook.com, with less than 15 million registered users, would have a hard time convincing me that it's worth $1 billion. Sure there is probably ample opportunity to make ad revenue, and Yahoo! could stand to continue upping its advertising streams with newer, flashier web properties. But while Google has the lion's share of the Internet search market and Yahoo! is a distant second, there must be some pretty strong faith in the halls of Yahoo's Sunnyvale headquarters these days. As a Yahoo! shareholder, do you think Facebook.com is worth $1 billion?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/22/is-facebook-com-really-worth-its-asking-price/">Is Facebook.com really worth its asking price?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://internet.seekingalpha.com/article/17371>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/22/is-facebook-com-really-worth-its-asking-price/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/673204/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/22/is-facebook-com-really-worth-its-asking-price/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Facebook.com</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>Yahoo! Facebook</category><category>Yahoo!Facebook</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
