<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[What does the Fed have up its sleeve?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/what-does-the-fed-have-up-its-sleeve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/what-does-the-fed-have-up-its-sleeve/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/what-does-the-fed-have-up-its-sleeve/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e375e3c4-dc38-11dd-b07e-000077b07658.html">minutes of Federal Reserve meetings</a> often give us subtle clues about what the Fed's position is on key issues and what steps they are taking to bolster our economy.</p>
<p>The grand debate being discussed by the Fed is deflation vs. inflation. The Fed's move to lower interest rates to near zero is a clear indication that their primary concern is to stop the deflationary cycle caused by our current recession. The only way to do this is to <strong><u>reinflate our economy.</u></strong> To this end the Fed and lawmakers are creating stimulus packages to jump start the economy and turn it around.</p>
<p>At the moment we are in a downward price cycle with the prices of raw materials falling at the wholesale level and deep discounts at the retail level. To turn this around requires a <strong><u>change in perception.</u></strong> So now the Fed and policy makers will need to convince the public that the deflationary cycle is ending and that a little inflation is a good thing.</p>
<p>Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, prefers "<strong><u>flexible</u></strong>" inflation targeting in which an inflation target is tied to a fixed time horizon. So I guess we can infer from this that we will have inflation for a fixed time, <strong><u>then what? </u></strong>There seems to be no consistency in Fed policy at the moment. They seem to be flying by the seat of their pants.</p>
<p>What do you think about this?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/what-does-the-fed-have-up-its-sleeve/">What does the Fed have up its sleeve?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e375e3c4-dc38-11dd-b07e-000077b07658.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/what-does-the-fed-have-up-its-sleeve/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1421462/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/what-does-the-fed-have-up-its-sleeve/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fed minutes</category><category>FedMinutes</category><category>Feds flexible inflationarey policy</category><category>FedsFlexibleInflationareyPolicy</category><category>inflation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[100 CEOs call for about $500 billion in fiscal stimulus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/100-ceos-call-for-about-500-billion-in-fiscal-stimulus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/100-ceos-call-for-about-500-billion-in-fiscal-stimulus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/100-ceos-call-for-about-500-billion-in-fiscal-stimulus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>The case for a large fiscal stimulus package has received a shot in the arm, but as with so many economic developments during this decade, there's an upside and a downside.<br /><br />A group of about <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D94HJBEO1.htm">100 CEOs has urged</a> President-elect Barack Obama to "quickly implement" a stimulus package of roughly $500 billion. The CEOs said the package should emphasize investment in infrastructure, including roads, bridges and other construction, as well as alternative energy projects. Their second priority: improving education.<br /><br />Economist David H. Wang has extracted positive and negative threads from the CEOs' statement. <br /><br />"On the one hand, the added CEO support will be welcome, I am sure, by the Obama Administration, as it builds the case for its stimulus package," Wang said. <br /><br />"On the other hand, the fact that CEOs are calling for government spending, which is not a traditional CEO stance, tells you about the seriousness of our economic problem," Wang said. "The U.S. economy is in rough shape and there are few signs of improvement."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/100-ceos-call-for-about-500-billion-in-fiscal-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>100 CEOs call for about $500 billion in fiscal stimulus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/100-ceos-call-for-about-500-billion-in-fiscal-stimulus/">100 CEOs call for about $500 billion in fiscal stimulus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/100-ceos-call-for-about-500-billion-in-fiscal-stimulus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1377151/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/100-ceos-call-for-about-500-billion-in-fiscal-stimulus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CEOs</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Fed</category><category>Fed minutes</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>gdp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:53:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
