<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Uncle Sam has a $4.8 trillion dollar interest payment!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" alt="" />Here's a shocker! <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/19/news/economy/debt_interest/index.htm">Over the next decade the U.S. government is expected to rack up $9 trillion in debt.</a> More than half that amount, $4.8 trillion, will be in interest payments.
<p>To further emphasize the depth of the problem, in 2015 interest due will be $533 billion, equal to 1/3 of the federal income taxes!</p>
<p>Right now, the Treasury is in a sweet spot with regards to interest payments. With interest rates at near zero, we are able to finance trillions of dollars of debt with practically no interest payments. That scenario is about to change. The change could be rather quick. If the economy heats up, interest rates will rise and so too will interest payments. Because the debt is so large, only a small rise in interest payments could increase the interest burden by a large amount.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Uncle Sam has a $4.8 trillion dollar interest payment!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/">Uncle Sam has a $4.8 trillion dollar interest payment!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/19/news/economy/debt_interest/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247879/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/uncle-sam-has-a-4-8-trillion-dollar-interest-payment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal deficit</category><category>FederalDeficit</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is market rising on Obama presidency?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/is-market-rising-on-obama-presidency/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/is-market-rising-on-obama-presidency/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/is-market-rising-on-obama-presidency/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/obamapict..jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Many observers refer to the market as a forecasting mechanism. If so, today's 213 point rise could be a signal that investors anticipate an Obama win. I don't think today's reported 3.3% Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth for the second quarter can explain the rise. Rather I think the market could be happy with the idea of taking a break from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/07/why-tax-cuts-ruin-the-economy/">failed tax cut and spend</a> policies of the last eight years -- which have led to a record <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/490-billion-federal-deficit-to-make-a-record-in-2009/">$490 billion</a> federal deficit, a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/31/part-time-employment-hits-record/">$9.8 trillion</a> national debt, and the loss of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/will-the-real-estate-collapse-cost-america-8-trillion/">$8 trillion</a> in housing-related value.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aMuMosauQxa4&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a></em> reports that GDP grew 3.3% thanks to a rise in exports to Europe -- still GDP growth was anticipated to hit 2.7% so today's figure -- which could be revised after the November election -- looked more favorable. Nevertheless, <em>Bloomberg</em> does not expect the so-called expansion to continue since the European economy is weakening and consumers burdened with falling home values -- the average home is down 16% -- and a tough job market -- will lead cut back their spending, which accounts for 70% of GDP growth. <em>Bloomberg</em> writes that "the number of Americans collecting unemployment benefits reached a five-year high last week."</p>
<p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/is-market-rising-on-obama-presidency/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is market rising on Obama presidency?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/is-market-rising-on-obama-presidency/">Is market rising on Obama presidency?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/is-market-rising-on-obama-presidency/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1298516/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/is-market-rising-on-obama-presidency/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal deficit</category><category>FederalDeficit</category><category>inthenews</category><category>national debt</category><category>NationalDebt</category><category>obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fund roads &amp; bridges NOT mad money stimulus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aa/" rel="tag">Alcoa Inc (AA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bdk/" rel="tag">Black and Decker (BDK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nue/" rel="tag">Nucor Corp (NUE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rs/" rel="tag">Reliance Steel and Aluminum (RS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jci/" rel="tag">Johnson Controls (JCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/de/" rel="tag">Deere and Co (DE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hon/" rel="tag">Honeywell Intl (HON)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/utx/" rel="tag">United Technologies (UTX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bhp/" rel="tag">BHP Billiton Ltd ADR (BHP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtp/" rel="tag">Rio Tinto plc ADS (RIO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fcx/" rel="tag">Freep't McMoRan Copper (FCX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/bridge.jpg" />It is alarming to me that the same people who screw up the economy (or stand by watching) are the ones that are now promoting the remedies. They have proven without a shadow of a doubt that this is not their strong suit. The proposed <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/29/economic.stimulus/">economic stimulus package</a> has bi-partisan support and calls for an estimated $156 billion of tax rebates ranging from $500 to $1,000 (+ $300 for each child) that might show up in May.</p>
<p>If we are going to add on to our already humungous joke of national debt, than I want to invest this capital in something that will bring a higher return on invested capital (ROIC) than the paltry one time <em>mad money</em>. That expenditure should be for national infrastructure projects like roadways, bridges, tunnels, and waterways.</p>
<p>We have all heard about the poor condition of our national infrastructure and the hundreds of billions of dollars of repair work and replacement that is desperately needed.</p>
<p>This alternative would bring visible results that every single person in the country would benefit from and improved linkages always stimulate economic growth. Road improvements even reduce fuel consumption by shortening routes and reducing friction both strategically and physically.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fund roads &amp; bridges NOT mad money stimulus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/">Fund roads &amp; bridges NOT mad money stimulus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1125388/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AA</category><category>BDK</category><category>BHP</category><category>CAT</category><category>CX</category><category>DE</category><category>economic stimulous package</category><category>EconomicStimulousPackage</category><category>FCX</category><category>Federal deficit</category><category>federal spending</category><category>FederalDeficit</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>GE</category><category>HD</category><category>JCI</category><category>JEC</category><category>Liber</category><category>NUE</category><category>Roads and bridges</category><category>RoadsAndBridges</category><category>RS</category><category>RTP</category><category>URS</category><category>UTX</category><category>X</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:43:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
