<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke Call: As globe quakes, will Fed cut again?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-markets-global.html?ref=business">Reuters</a> reports that like last week, the global markets are cratering. The question is whether the Fed will come in with the same <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/feds-75-basis-point-emergency-rate-cut-smacks-of-desperation/">emergency 75-basis-point</a> rate cut it used last Tuesday when U.S. markets opened to damp the downturn. Here's the damage:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>The pan-European FTSEurofirst 300 was down 1.3%, taking January's losses close to 13%</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Nikkei dropping nearly 4%</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>In addition to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/what-the-stimulus-package-means-to-you/">$150 billion stimulus package</a>, the Fed is already expected to cut interest rates again this week; interest rate futures show the market is betting on another 25 or 50 basis points in cuts, possibly taking rates as low as 3.0%. </p>
<p>But with Dow futures down <a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2008/01/28/afx4579912.html">57</a> at 7:15 a.m., it looks this morning like it's not enough -- the <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/with-dow-futures-lower-the-bernanke-call-lives-on/">Bernanke Call</a></strong> -- investor's expectation that his rate cuts mark a ceiling below which the market will tumble -- appears alive and well. I wonder whether Bernanke will try another emergency rate cut this morning.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of <a href="http://petercohan.com/">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</a>. He also <a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236">teaches management at Babson College</a> and edits <a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html">The Cohan Letter</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/">Bernanke Call: As globe quakes, will Fed cut again?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1098996/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke Call</category><category>BernankeCall</category><category>Fed</category><category>Federal funds rate</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Fed's decision: Not quite as expected!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-feds-decision-not-quite-as-expected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-feds-decision-not-quite-as-expected/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-feds-decision-not-quite-as-expected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Traders look on minutes before the Federal Reserve cut interest rates Tuesday "  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/fed-reaction.jpg" /> The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) reduced the target Federal Funds Rate and the Discount Rate by 0.25%. The quarter-point cut in the Fed Funds Rate was predicted, although many (myself included) expected the Fed to be much more aggressive in cutting the discount rate, reducing or possibly eliminating the discount window penalty. </p>
<p>The FOMC deleted the reference to a balance between inflation and economic deterioration, although it mentioned that inflationary pressures were still a concern. However, the language describing the recent economic turmoil was relatively restrained.</p>
<p>The Fed gave no assurance that it considers the economic deterioration more serious than inflation, stating that it "will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth." It also gave no indications of its course for the future, saying "Today's action, combined with the policy actions taken earlier, should help promote moderate growth over time."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-feds-decision-not-quite-as-expected/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Fed's decision: Not quite as expected!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-feds-decision-not-quite-as-expected/">The Fed's decision: Not quite as expected!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-feds-decision-not-quite-as-expected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1060412/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-feds-decision-not-quite-as-expected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Federal Funds Rate</category><category>Federal Open Market Committee</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalOpenMarketCommittee</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>FOMC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The problem with the Fed's rate cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-problem-with-the-feds-rate-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-problem-with-the-feds-rate-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-problem-with-the-feds-rate-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/ben-bernanke.jpg" />What is the right number for interest rates? 4%? 3%? 2%? No one knows for sure, and that's the problem. Investors are becoming like Pavlov's dogs, frothing at the mouth at the mere thought of an interest rate cut. Once the Fed accedes to their wishes, they are satisfied for a while but wind up wanting more and more cuts.<br /><br />As today's market action shows, these people are never going to be satisfied. The Federal Reserve lowered short-term interest rates by one-quarter point to 4.25%, the third cut since September. It reduced the discount rate -- the rate the Fed charges banks to borrow money -- by the same amount to 4.75%. "A large minority of economists had projected a half-point cut in the federal funds rate," according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119739876442121375.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><span style="font-style: italic;">Wall Street Journal.</span></a><br /><br /> The Federal Open Market Committee also remains as worried as ever about the economy.<br /><br />"Recent developments, including the deterioration in financial market conditions, have increased the uncertainty surrounding the outlook for economic growth and inflation," according to the<a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20071211a.htm"> statement</a> from the FOMC. "The Committee will continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-problem-with-the-feds-rate-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The problem with the Fed's rate cuts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-problem-with-the-feds-rate-cuts/">The problem with the Fed's rate cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20071211a.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-problem-with-the-feds-rate-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1060407/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/the-problem-with-the-feds-rate-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>discount rate</category><category>DiscountRate</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>federal funds rate</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>Martin Feldstein</category><category>MartinFeldstein</category><category>the Fed</category><category>TheFed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow drops 200 as market expected cut of 50 basis points]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/dow-drops-200-as-market-expected-cut-of-50-basis-points/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/dow-drops-200-as-market-expected-cut-of-50-basis-points/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/dow-drops-200-as-market-expected-cut-of-50-basis-points/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Down arrow " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_down_down_240.jpg" />Investors were disappointed this afternoon after the Federal Reserve cut interest rates 25 basis points. As of now, the Dow is down 212 since the cut was announced.<br /> <br />I think the drop means that investors were expecting a 50-basis-point cut. Furthermore, the statement reflecting ongoing concerns about inflation could mean that the Fed's cutting could be over for now.<br /> <br />But that's what the Fed implied the last time it cut. If the Dow falls another 500 points in the next few days, Bernanke will ride to the rescue -- announcing that it was "flexible." Unfortunately, with rates at 4.25%, there's not that much further to go before it hits bottom.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/dow-drops-200-as-market-expected-cut-of-50-basis-points/">Dow drops 200 as market expected cut of 50 basis points</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/dow-drops-200-as-market-expected-cut-of-50-basis-points/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1060381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/dow-drops-200-as-market-expected-cut-of-50-basis-points/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dow</category><category>Fed</category><category>Federal Funds Rate</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why is the Fed cutting rates?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/why-is-the-fed-cutting-rates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/why-is-the-fed-cutting-rates/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/why-is-the-fed-cutting-rates/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/question-mark.jpg" alt="Question mark " />The Fed is scheduled to announce the results of its latest rate-setting meeting at 2:15 this afternoon. Most analysts expect it to cut rates -- at least 25 basis points (100 basis points = 1%). I'm just not sure I understand why the Fed keeps cutting.</p>
<p>There are two reasons that come to mind as possibilities. First, the stock market seems to love hints that the Fed will cut interest rates. Since the summer, whenever the stock market fell a few hundred points, Ben Bernanke or another Fed governor would give a speech using key words such as "flexibility" and the stock market would rally. That's what happened a few weeks ago when the Dow dropped below 13,000 and it magically rallied 750 points.</p>
<p>A second reason is that the Fed thinks that a recession is in the forecast due to a freeze up in the credit markets, and that it's better off cutting rates to ease the pain. If a doctor had only one kind of medicine -- say, aspirin -- then the doctor would prescribe it to all patients, because it was better to give the patient something than nothing at all. This approach would work if the patient had a headache -- but it would be less effective if the patient had cancer.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/why-is-the-fed-cutting-rates/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why is the Fed cutting rates?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/why-is-the-fed-cutting-rates/">Why is the Fed cutting rates?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/why-is-the-fed-cutting-rates/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1059841/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/11/why-is-the-fed-cutting-rates/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economics</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Funds Rate</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>interest rate cuts</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRateCuts</category><category>InterestRates</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Most crucial outcome from Fed meeting is trust]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/most-crucial-outcome-from-fed-meeting-is-trust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/most-crucial-outcome-from-fed-meeting-is-trust/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/most-crucial-outcome-from-fed-meeting-is-trust/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) meets tomorrow to decide what to do with interest rates. Based upon speeches by Chairman Ben Bernanke and other Fed officials, it is widely expected that the target Fed Funds Rate will be reduced by 0.25%, with an outside possibility that it will be reduced by 0.50%.</p>
<p>However, the most important outcome from the meeting is the perception that the Federal Reserve is going to stay ahead of the curve to prevent the economy from slipping into a recession. This is the biggest concern of the market. After the last meeting, the statement implying that the Fed was done lowering rates sent the market into a tailspin, despite a 0.25% reduction in the Federal Funds Rate.</p>
<p>The Fed will probably not make the same mistake this time. Here are a few things to look for in the FOMC statement Tuesday:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/most-crucial-outcome-from-fed-meeting-is-trust/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Most crucial outcome from Fed meeting is trust</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/most-crucial-outcome-from-fed-meeting-is-trust/">Most crucial outcome from Fed meeting is trust</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/most-crucial-outcome-from-fed-meeting-is-trust/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1059326/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/most-crucial-outcome-from-fed-meeting-is-trust/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Federal Funds Rate</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Has the Federal Reserve lost its independence?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/has-the-federal-reserve-lost-its-independence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/has-the-federal-reserve-lost-its-independence/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/has-the-federal-reserve-lost-its-independence/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>It's beginning to look like the Federal Reserve has lost its independence. However, rather than taking dictation from the White House, it appears to be under Wall Street's control.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aEnZejdWUzMk&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a><em> </em>reports that the Fed is likely to cut interest rates when it meets this week. Traders in federal funds futures initially gave a 75% chance of a rate cut on October 31, but scaled back those odds to 50% after the October 5 revision of August payroll numbers to show a gain instead of a decline.</p>
<p>The reason the Fed stated for its September 18 50-basis-point cut made little sense to me -- some words about market turbulence. The market turbulence is real enough -- related to the subprime mortgage mess -- about which I posted <a href="http://xrx.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/will-subprime-meldtown-cost-4-trillion-400-billion-or-103-b/">here</a>. But the Fed's job is to keep inflation in check -- and with oil prices hitting a record <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/10/29/business/EU-FIN-MKT-Oil-Prices.php">$93</a> a barrel and labor rates <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/prod2.nr0.htm">rising at a 4.9% annual rate</a> -- it is surely failing at that job. (Save me the blather about core inflation -- and excluding energy and food prices.)</p>
<p>However, Bernanke is responding dutifully to his Wall Street masters -- using the interest rate cuts to ladle a heaping dollop of corporate welfare onto the gilt-edged plates of billionaire bankers and hedge fund grandees. </p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/has-the-federal-reserve-lost-its-independence/">Has the Federal Reserve lost its independence?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/has-the-federal-reserve-lost-its-independence/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1024309/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/has-the-federal-reserve-lost-its-independence/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>Fed</category><category>Federal Funds Rate</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>MonetaryPolicy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economists growing more optimistic, CEOs pessimistic]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/economists-growing-more-optimistic-ceos-pessimistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/economists-growing-more-optimistic-ceos-pessimistic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/economists-growing-more-optimistic-ceos-pessimistic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>Economists and CEOs have vastly different views on the economy.<br /><br />A <em>Wall Street Journal</em> (registration required) poll of economists surveyed between Oct. 5 and Oct. 9 showed that on average <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119206965800055649.html">they put the chance of a recession at 34%</a>, down from 37% in September. <br /><br />Is it a big deal that economists are 3% more optimistic than they used to be? Well, that depends. Though the dismal scientists expect the federal funds rate to be reduced one more time this year by one-quarter percentage point, they are pretty downbeat on the housing market. <br /><br />Many, though, apparently see the glass as half full.<br /><br />"Some of the uncertainties have faded, partly due to the fact that the Fed moved more aggressively," Lou Crandall, chief economist at Wrightson ICAP, told the <span style="font-style: italic;">Journal</span>. "The Fed's willingness to pull out all the stops played a role in bolstering the economy."<br /><br />
<div align="left">Now contrast that with the views of CEOs, such as <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN1135778320071011">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN1135778320071011">MER</a>)'s Stan O'Neill, who <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN1135778320071011">according to  Reuters</a> said in the preface to a poll by the Business Council and Conference Board that, "Results ... show markedly more pessimism about current U.S. business conditions, compared to other parts of the world."<br /></div>
<br />In fact, 44.3% of the 61 top CEOs expect economic conditions in their industries to get worse, up from 24.4% in February. Almost 60% of those surveyed expect the U.S. economy to get worse, up from 24.4% a year earlier.<br /><br />So who are you going to believe?<br /><br /><br />
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/economists-growing-more-optimistic-ceos-pessimistic/">Economists growing more optimistic, CEOs pessimistic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119206965800055649.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/economists-growing-more-optimistic-ceos-pessimistic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1011090/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/economists-growing-more-optimistic-ceos-pessimistic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceos</category><category>conference board</category><category>ConferenceBoard</category><category>economists</category><category>economy</category><category>federal funds rate</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>The Fed</category><category>TheFed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Federal Open Market Committee minutes: A glass half full!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/the-federal-open-market-committee-minutes-a-glass-half-full/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/the-federal-open-market-committee-minutes-a-glass-half-full/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/the-federal-open-market-committee-minutes-a-glass-half-full/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>The Minutes of the September 18 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting were released today at 2 PM ET. Because of the 50 basis point reduction in the Federal Funds rate that many on Wall Street (myself included) did not expect at the time, there was more anxiety than usual surrounding the release of this report.</p>
<p>Yesterday, the market ended the day for most indexes on the downside, although only mildly so and on low volume because of the Monday holiday. The markets were also off slightly, prior to the release of the minutes. A rally began shortly after the release of the report. The big question is why?</p>
<p>On one side of the equation, the Fed gave no indication that this was only the first in a series of rate cuts. It actually appeared that the cut was more a form of insurance to "forestall" the potential effects of the housing crisis on the broader economy. This indicates that there may not be any additional rate cuts in the near future.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/the-federal-open-market-committee-minutes-a-glass-half-full/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Federal Open Market Committee minutes: A glass half full!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/the-federal-open-market-committee-minutes-a-glass-half-full/">The Federal Open Market Committee minutes: A glass half full!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/the-federal-open-market-committee-minutes-a-glass-half-full/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1009313/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/the-federal-open-market-committee-minutes-a-glass-half-full/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>don kohn</category><category>DonKohn</category><category>federal funds rate</category><category>federal open markets committee</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalOpenMarketsCommittee</category><category>fomc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:09:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
