<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Health Care's costs &amp; the misguided debate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/health-cares-costs-and-the-misguided-debate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/health-cares-costs-and-the-misguided-debate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/health-cares-costs-and-the-misguided-debate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/abt/" rel="tag">Abbott Laboratories (ABT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nvs/" rel="tag">Novartis AG ADS (NVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/red_cross.jpg" alt="" />In recent stories I have highlighted several health care stocks that I think would be strong candidates for small portfolios (<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/serious-money-five-high-yield-safe-diversifed-stocks/">Part 1 </a>and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/serious-money-five-more-high-yield-safe-diversified-stocks/">Part 2</a>) that would be safe and pay high yields. These include: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">Johnson and Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/abbott-laboratories/abt/nys">Abott Laboratories</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/abbott-laboratories/abt/nys"> ABT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/novartis-ag-ads/nvs/nys">Novartis AG ADS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/novartis-ag-ads/nvs/nys">NVS</a>). I have been thinking about these companies and how others will fare in the health care debate.<br /><br />While Washington debates the merits of various health care bills, the health care companies lobby to influence the outcome. Businesses and employees are resistant to taxing current health care benefits but very few people are opposed to taxing those that get big paychecks.<br /><br />I think we are heading down the wrong path regarding health care "reform" once again. There is no question that most people want to improve health care in many respects, including but not limited to, the quality, cost, and delivery, but the devil is in the details and we may end up no better off than we started except of course with more complexity and greater cost.<br /><em><span class="symbol"><em></em></span><em></em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/health-cares-costs-and-the-misguided-debate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Health Care's costs &amp; the misguided debate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/health-cares-costs-and-the-misguided-debate/">Health Care's costs &amp; the misguided debate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/health-cares-costs-and-the-misguided-debate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19104479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/health-cares-costs-and-the-misguided-debate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABT</category><category>deficit spending</category><category>DeficitSpending</category><category>featured</category><category>federal spending</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>Health Care</category><category>Health costs</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>HealthCosts</category><category>JNJ</category><category>medical spending</category><category>MedicalSpending</category><category>NVS</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economic firestorm: Which costs more, stealing or stupidity?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/fire-break.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The economic firestorm that we are in the midst of is yet to be contained, or for that matter, completely understood.<br /><br />Some things are very clear like the fact we spent more than we earned, as individuals and as a nation, for decades on end. That we know for sure, and regardless of who we blame the most for this situation there is no bigger economic mistake one can make.<br /><br />This is something that I harp on often, and I expect I will keep on doing so because I do not have any reason to believe things will change; see: <a title="View Ignore Washington -- keep saving; General Patton makes a point on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/" target="_blank">Ignore Washington -- keep saving; General Patton makes a point</a>.<br /><br /><em><br /></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economic firestorm: Which costs more, stealing or stupidity?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/">Economic firestorm: Which costs more, stealing or stupidity?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1456317/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>balanced budget</category><category>BalancedBudget</category><category>Congress</category><category>Economic Fire Breaks</category><category>Economic Fire Storm</category><category>EconomicFireBreaks</category><category>EconomicFireStorm</category><category>featured</category><category>federal spending</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>Health Care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>national debt</category><category>NationalDebt</category><category>President Bush</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentBush</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stealing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Re-think new stimulus package? Push infrastructure!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/re-think-new-stimulous-package-push-infrastructure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/re-think-new-stimulous-package-push-infrastructure/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/re-think-new-stimulous-package-push-infrastructure/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/cash-wad.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />CNBC is reporting a <a title="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/second-stimulus-may-arrive-by-christmas/239446" href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/second-stimulus-may-arrive-by-christmas/239446" rel="bookmark">Second Stimulus May Arrive by Christmas</a> - I hope it looks different than the last one.<br /><br />It is being reported that <blockquote>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday urged passage of at least $61 billion in new economic stimulus funding this month, but said the future of the legislation requires the cooperation of Republicans in the Senate and President Bush.</blockquote><strong>I am having deja vu all over again</strong>!<em> </em>At least $61 billion but discussions are ranging up to several hundred billion dollars<em>.</em> I hate this idea and stated so numerous times last March,<em> </em>including one of my most important stories of the year<em> (I think) </em><a title="View Fund roads &amp; bridges NOT mad money stimulus on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/" target="_blank">Fund roads &amp; bridges NOT mad money stimulus</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/re-think-new-stimulous-package-push-infrastructure/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Re-think new stimulus package? Push infrastructure!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/re-think-new-stimulous-package-push-infrastructure/">Re-think new stimulus package? Push infrastructure!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/re-think-new-stimulous-package-push-infrastructure/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1364353/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/re-think-new-stimulous-package-push-infrastructure/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Federal Spending</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>Nancy Pelosi</category><category>NancyPelosi</category><category>roads and bridges</category><category>Stimulate infrastructure</category><category>StimulateInfrastructure</category><category>stimulus package</category><category>StimulusPackage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$700 billion is real money! ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/benjamin-franklin.jpg" alt="" />How many billions are Paulson and Bernanke asking for? Seven hundred billion dollars. <span style="font-style: italic;">N</span><em>ow that's real money!</em> And the administration is touting this new program as if they knew what they were talking about.</p>
<p>We have heard folks wondering how and why Treasury Secretary Paulson should be given the power and discretion to do as he sees fit with this bailout money.</p>
<p>We have heard people speaking about the pain and the injustice, along with the doubts and reservations about the concept of giving away so much money. <br /></p>
<p>Actually giving this handout to companies that have demonstrated such corrupt thinking and irresponsibility (see <a title="View SEC opens the gates and the world drowns on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/sec-opens-the-gates-and-the-world-drowns/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b">SEC opens the gates and the world drowns)</font></a> is a supreme injustice given that their decisions led to the collapse of once-mighty financial industry titans. See <a title="View Lehman Bros 158-year sad ending on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/23/lehman-bros-158-year-sad-ending/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b">Lehman Bros 158-year sad ending</font></a> for just one example.</p>
<p>Has anyone asked how the Treasury came up with that number? Can someone explain the difference between $700 billion and <em>a blank check?</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$700 billion is real money! </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/">$700 billion is real money! </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1323031/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bankers</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>Dirksen</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Federal Spending</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LEH</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>LEHMQ</category><category>Paulson</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fund roads &amp; bridges NOT mad money stimulus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aa/" rel="tag">Alcoa Inc (AA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bdk/" rel="tag">Black and Decker (BDK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nue/" rel="tag">Nucor Corp (NUE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rs/" rel="tag">Reliance Steel and Aluminum (RS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jci/" rel="tag">Johnson Controls (JCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/de/" rel="tag">Deere and Co (DE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hon/" rel="tag">Honeywell Intl (HON)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/utx/" rel="tag">United Technologies (UTX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bhp/" rel="tag">BHP Billiton Ltd ADR (BHP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtp/" rel="tag">Rio Tinto plc ADS (RIO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fcx/" rel="tag">Freep't McMoRan Copper (FCX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/bridge.jpg" />It is alarming to me that the same people who screw up the economy (or stand by watching) are the ones that are now promoting the remedies. They have proven without a shadow of a doubt that this is not their strong suit. The proposed <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/29/economic.stimulus/">economic stimulus package</a> has bi-partisan support and calls for an estimated $156 billion of tax rebates ranging from $500 to $1,000 (+ $300 for each child) that might show up in May.</p>
<p>If we are going to add on to our already humungous joke of national debt, than I want to invest this capital in something that will bring a higher return on invested capital (ROIC) than the paltry one time <em>mad money</em>. That expenditure should be for national infrastructure projects like roadways, bridges, tunnels, and waterways.</p>
<p>We have all heard about the poor condition of our national infrastructure and the hundreds of billions of dollars of repair work and replacement that is desperately needed.</p>
<p>This alternative would bring visible results that every single person in the country would benefit from and improved linkages always stimulate economic growth. Road improvements even reduce fuel consumption by shortening routes and reducing friction both strategically and physically.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fund roads &amp; bridges NOT mad money stimulus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/">Fund roads &amp; bridges NOT mad money stimulus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1125388/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/fund-roads-and-bridges-not-mad-money-stimulus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AA</category><category>BDK</category><category>BHP</category><category>CAT</category><category>CX</category><category>DE</category><category>economic stimulous package</category><category>EconomicStimulousPackage</category><category>FCX</category><category>Federal deficit</category><category>federal spending</category><category>FederalDeficit</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>GE</category><category>HD</category><category>JCI</category><category>JEC</category><category>Liber</category><category>NUE</category><category>Roads and bridges</category><category>RoadsAndBridges</category><category>RS</category><category>RTP</category><category>URS</category><category>UTX</category><category>X</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed cuts rates, dollar down, oil and gold up - who would have thunk it?!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/fed-cuts-rates-dollar-down-oil-and-gold-up-who-would-have/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/fed-cuts-rates-dollar-down-oil-and-gold-up-who-would-have/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/fed-cuts-rates-dollar-down-oil-and-gold-up-who-would-have/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/annual-meetings/" rel="tag">Annual Meetings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>Gee whiz what a shock <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/crude-hits-new-record-above/story.aspx?guid=%7BBF4BE17A%2D4051%2D4DA6%2DA1EF%2D8B7900AD3528%7D">Crude hits new record above $95 in after-hours trading</a> and other commodities will not be far behind. Can't wait to see what gold, sugar, and even water will cost as the dollar becomes more worthless. I have written <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/fed-meets-do-more-rate-cuts-equal-100-oil-apc-and-aauk-up-up-an/">many recent pleas to leave the rates alone</a> because it was fairly obvious what would happen if rates were cut yet again. In a 9 to 1 vote the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/fed-cuts-rates-to-45-percent/20071031063909990001">Federal Reserve Board voted to cut rates</a> by a quarter point to 4.5%.</p>
<p>Only Thomas Hoenig, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City opposed the increase. He preferred no change in the funds rate. Let's make him chairman of the board. Better yet, maybe he would make a good write-in candidate for president. I wonder what he thinks of federal spending, the war in Iraq, health care, education -- He has certainly peaked my interest and I do not know him at all, but he has made a good impression so far.</p>
<p>In Europe the Dollar is falling, while gold passes $800. Where will it all end? It cannot end well if nobody wants to "pay the piper". When you consider the reasoning behind the Feds rate cut you have to be concerned. <strong><em>The rationale behind the cuts is that the lower borrowing costs will induce consumers and businesses to boost spending, energizing economic growth.</em></strong></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/fed-cuts-rates-dollar-down-oil-and-gold-up-who-would-have/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed cuts rates, dollar down, oil and gold up - who would have thunk it?!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/fed-cuts-rates-dollar-down-oil-and-gold-up-who-would-have/">Fed cuts rates, dollar down, oil and gold up - who would have thunk it?!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/crude-hits-new-record-above/story.aspx?guid=%7BBF4BE17A%2D4051%2D4DA6%2DA1EF%2D8B7900AD3528%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/fed-cuts-rates-dollar-down-oil-and-gold-up-who-would-have/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1026812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/fed-cuts-rates-dollar-down-oil-and-gold-up-who-would-have/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal reserve</category><category>federal spending</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Alaska abandons infamous 'bridge to nowhere']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/28/sunday-funnies-alaska-abandons-infamous-bridge-to-nowhere/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/28/sunday-funnies-alaska-abandons-infamous-bridge-to-nowhere/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/28/sunday-funnies-alaska-abandons-infamous-bridge-to-nowhere/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p>This one obviously became <em><strong>"A Bridge Too Far" fetched</strong>,</em> as <font color="#2864b4"><a href="http://www.americansforprosperity.org/index.php?id=3908">Alaska Abandons Infamous 'Bridge to Nowhere'</a></font> included in last year's budget as part of the traditional pork-barrel spending that goes on in Washington -- usually following long speeches about trimming the fat.</p>
<p>There is probably nothing more universally consistent in a campaign speech than the promise to cut federal spending. Of course politicians are equally consistent on failing to do so once they are in office. However, in the case of this infamous bridge to an Island of a few hundred residences, the political heat, under the proverbial magnifying glass, was too much.</p>
<p>The public outrage and direct lobbying from various budget watchdog groups and with the support of Senator Tom Coburn, Representative Jeff Flake, and Representative Mark Kirk, the State of Alaska has officially abandoned plans to pursue the infamous Gravina Bridge. Money is still earmarked for the state, but the recently elected new governor decided to drop the project.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/28/sunday-funnies-alaska-abandons-infamous-bridge-to-nowhere/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sunday Funnies: Alaska abandons infamous 'bridge to nowhere'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/28/sunday-funnies-alaska-abandons-infamous-bridge-to-nowhere/">Sunday Funnies: Alaska abandons infamous 'bridge to nowhere'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/28/sunday-funnies-alaska-abandons-infamous-bridge-to-nowhere/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/996144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/28/sunday-funnies-alaska-abandons-infamous-bridge-to-nowhere/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A bridge to far</category><category>ABridgeToFar</category><category>Alaskan bridge to nowhere</category><category>AlaskanBridgeToNowhere</category><category>Federal Spending</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>Gravina Bridge</category><category>GravinaBridge</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Sunday Funnies</category><category>SundayFunnies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FedEx &amp; UPS are not celebrating Bernanke's worried rate cuts - should you?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/fedex-and-ups-are-not-celebrating-bernankes-worried-rate-cuts-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/fedex-and-ups-are-not-celebrating-bernankes-worried-rate-cuts-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/fedex-and-ups-are-not-celebrating-bernankes-worried-rate-cuts-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>Wall Street and its scoreboard stock exchanges are jubilant with the 0.5% cut in the prime rate. But all is not well. As expected, gold and oil hit record highs on the news yesterday and the sky's the limit. The dollar will be losing value and foreign investors will be buying increasing amounts of our equities, including land, buildings, public and private companies. Expect American ownership to decrease. <br /> </p>
<p>The fact that the Federal Reserve sought to pacify investment bankers and individuals who made bad deals in an effort to shore up what was starting to look like big trouble in the "heartland" is not, I think, worthy of celebration. Yes, we should be grateful that Ben Bernanke and crew are keeping a watchful eye on the pulse of the economy and did not wait until we drowned to throw in a lifeline. But for this conservative group to make the cut they had to think things were bad, and that is not exactly heartening news.<br /></p>
<p>Transportation stocks are not doing well this morning, and neither are delivery companies. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FedEx Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FDX</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">United Parcel Service</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">UPS</a>) are showing losses or treading water, even though the overall market is notably up. Why? Fuel costs. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/fedex-and-ups-are-not-celebrating-bernankes-worried-rate-cuts-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FedEx &amp; UPS are not celebrating Bernanke's worried rate cuts - should you?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/fedex-and-ups-are-not-celebrating-bernankes-worried-rate-cuts-s/">FedEx &amp; UPS are not celebrating Bernanke's worried rate cuts - should you?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/fedex-and-ups-are-not-celebrating-bernankes-worried-rate-cuts-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/993366/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/fedex-and-ups-are-not-celebrating-bernankes-worried-rate-cuts-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>energy costs</category><category>EnergyCosts</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>federal spending</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>FedEx Corp (FDX)</category><category>FedexCorp(fdx)</category><category>Interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>prime rate</category><category>PrimeRate</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>transportaion</category><category>United Parcel'B' (UPS)</category><category>UnitedParcel'b'(ups)</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush makes his money speech &amp; so does Frank Deford, who's listening?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/24/bush-makes-his-money-speech-and-so-does-frank-deford-whos-listen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/24/bush-makes-his-money-speech-and-so-does-frank-deford-whos-listen/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/24/bush-makes-his-money-speech-and-so-does-frank-deford-whos-listen/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>We heard a lot of nice sentiment from President Bush Tuesday night but, alas, it is another case of too little, too late. (Or... is it never too late?) It would be great if the $18 billion in "pork barrel" spending he mentioned is really cut by restricting the ease with which our legislature can attach its pet projects to entirely unrelated bills under the cover of darkness. This is the equivalent of about seven weeks of spending on the Iraq war, <em>at current levels.</em></p>
<p>It also begs the question as to what the administration was thinking until now, as we spent perhaps $100 to $120 billion during his watch on an abundance of special projects. If we give the President and his team credit for on-the-job-training the first year, even though every candidate makes cutting government spending a part of his platform, the administration should still have done something earlier, especially <em>with Republicans steering this ship!</em> This is very embarrassing <em>-- and shameful!</em></p>
<p>It makes me think the attitude in Washington was that 'the Democrats got theirs, now we're going to get ours'.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/24/bush-makes-his-money-speech-and-so-does-frank-deford-whos-listen/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush makes his money speech &amp; so does Frank Deford, who's listening?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/24/bush-makes-his-money-speech-and-so-does-frank-deford-whos-listen/">Bush makes his money speech &amp; so does Frank Deford, who's listening?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/24/bush-makes-his-money-speech-and-so-does-frank-deford-whos-listen/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/741603/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/24/bush-makes-his-money-speech-and-so-does-frank-deford-whos-listen/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bush</category><category>Bush Speech</category><category>BushSpeech</category><category>Federal Budgets</category><category>Federal Spending</category><category>FederalBudgets</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>GeorgeW.Bush</category><category>Goverment waste</category><category>GovermentWaste</category><category>Iraq</category><category>President Bush</category><category>PresidentBush</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>state of the union</category><category>StateOfTheUnion</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
