<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Consumer Prices Unexpectedly Fall]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/u-s-consumer-prices-unexpectedly-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/u-s-consumer-prices-unexpectedly-fall/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/u-s-consumer-prices-unexpectedly-fall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p>The Labor Department Friday morning injected data that some see as a ray of hope. U.S. core <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/core-inflation-drops-on-falling-housing-costs-2010-02-19">consumer prices dropped</a> 0.1% in January. This figure takes food and energy out of the equation, so a full-on bear run may be quelled by the fact that adding food and energy into the equation results in a 0.2% gain. <br />
<br />
The core CPI was dragged lower by costs for new vehicles, shelter and airline fares. Last January, core inflation increased 1.6%. But this drop may be just what the market needed after Dell's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/dell-sells-off-despite-topping-analyst-estimates/">lackluster results</a> and the Federal Reserve's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/fed-raises-bank-emergency-interest-rates/">surprise rate hike</a> late Thursday. The lack of inflationary pressures shown as seen by the decline in core CPI could quell some concerns about a possible broader Fed rate hike.<br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/u-s-consumer-prices-unexpectedly-fall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Consumer Prices Unexpectedly Fall</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/u-s-consumer-prices-unexpectedly-fall/">U.S. Consumer Prices Unexpectedly Fall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/u-s-consumer-prices-unexpectedly-fall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19365215/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/u-s-consumer-prices-unexpectedly-fall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CPI</category><category>economic data</category><category>EconomicData</category><category>energy costs</category><category>EnergyCosts</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bermuda Stock Exchange Tries to Forget 2009]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/bermuda-stock-exchange-tries-to-forget-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/bermuda-stock-exchange-tries-to-forget-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/bermuda-stock-exchange-tries-to-forget-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/nysepicture.jpg" />The Bermuda Stock Exchange is looking for a comeback this year. For 2009, <a href="http://riskmarketnews.com/files/After_a_Difficult_2009_Bermuda_Looks_Towards_New_Year_and_ILS.html" target="_blank">the shares traded on the BSX were off close to 40%</a>, reflecting the brutality of the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/financialcrisis/">financial crisis</a> on the island known primarily for its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/insurance/">insurance</a> business (oh, and people go on vacation there, too ... and not just insurance people). In 2010, the BSX sees <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/cat-bond-market-pushes-past-3-billion/19289171/" target="_blank">catastrophe bonds and other insurance-linked securities</a> as fundamental to a strong year. A BSX statement reads, "The BSX's listing business has remained buoyant and the BSX has made continued progress in entering and supporting the insurance linked security space." With the 2009 Insurance Amendment Act approved last October, Bermuda hopes to lure cat bond listings away from the Cayman Islands Stock Exchange.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/bermuda-stock-exchange-tries-to-forget-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bermuda Stock Exchange Tries to Forget 2009</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/bermuda-stock-exchange-tries-to-forget-2009/">Bermuda Stock Exchange Tries to Forget 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://riskmarketnews.com/files/After_a_Difficult_2009_Bermuda_Looks_Towards_New_Year_and_ILS.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/bermuda-stock-exchange-tries-to-forget-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19320716/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/bermuda-stock-exchange-tries-to-forget-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bermuda</category><category>bond market</category><category>BondMarket</category><category>bonds</category><category>catastrophe</category><category>catastrophes</category><category>catastrophic insurance</category><category>CatastrophicInsurance</category><category>cayman islands</category><category>CaymanIslands</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>InsuranceCompanies</category><category>InsuranceIndustry</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deutsche's Ackermann says Germany offers banks a 'comparative advantage']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/db-deutsche-bank-logo.jpg" alt="" />Is another round of continent-hopping banks (and bank services) up ahead? Perhaps, if the analysis of Josef Ackermann, CEO of Germany-based Deutsche Bank (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-bank-ag-germany/db/nys">DB</a>) is accurate. <br /><br />Ackermann said Germany has a "comparative advantage" over other financial hubs because it is not expected to tax bonuses as Britain and France have done, Bloomberg News <a href="http:// http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aLP_cZ3zUNw4">reported Sunday. </a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Deutsche's Ackermann says Germany offers banks a 'comparative advantage'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/">Deutsche's Ackermann says Germany offers banks a 'comparative advantage'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19280826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank consolidations</category><category>BankConsolidations</category><category>bonuses</category><category>deutsche bank</category><category>DeutscheBank</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>josef ackermann</category><category>JosefAckermann</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Concerning system risk, connections, practices matter almost as much as size]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/concerning-system-risk-connections-practices-matter-almost-as/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/concerning-system-risk-connections-practices-matter-almost-as/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/concerning-system-risk-connections-practices-matter-almost-as/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/barney_frank_160.jpg" alt="" />Upcoming financial service reforms led by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Massachusetts and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, are likely to address, among other concerns, one longstanding flaw in the U.S. financial system -- the <a href="http://www.house.gov/frank/pressreleases/2009/11-20-09-too-big-to-fail.html">'too big to fail'</a> condition. <br /><br />Further, while it is appropriate to empower federal monetary officials, such as the U.S. Federal Reserve, and other federal regulators, to set limits on firms -- Citigroup, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) or the Bank of America Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>), for example -- which are so big or whose situation is so uncertain/unstable that their collapse would jeopardize the U.S. financial system, lawmakers should also write into the legislation the power to modify the business model of other firms: namely, those 'too interconnected to fail.'<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/concerning-system-risk-connections-practices-matter-almost-as/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Concerning system risk, connections, practices matter almost as much as size</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/concerning-system-risk-connections-practices-matter-almost-as/">Concerning system risk, connections, practices matter almost as much as size</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/concerning-system-risk-connections-practices-matter-almost-as/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19270718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/concerning-system-risk-connections-practices-matter-almost-as/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>finance reform</category><category>FinanceReform</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>recession</category><category>too big to fail</category><category>TooBigToFail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Foreclosures fall, but are still higher than a year ago]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img height="NaN" align="right" width="200" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosure.jpg" />According to RealtyTrac, the number of homeowners facing foreclosure <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-for-third-straight-month-but-still-up-19-perc/">dropped during October</a>, thanks in part to foreclosure prevention programs that helped borrowers. RealtyTrac stated that more than 332,000 households (one in every 385 homes) were recipients of either a notice of default or a trustee's sale. This number is 3% lower than September, making October the third-straight month with a drop in the number of homeowners facing foreclosure. As for homes actually repossessed, the number dropped to 77,000 in October from 88,000 in September. <br /><br />RealtyTrac noted that one reason for the lower number of foreclosures is new state programs that require a bank to try and work with the homeowner before seizing property. In addition, some lenders are staving off foreclosures by evaluating which of their close-to-default borrowers may qualify for the new federal loan modification program.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Foreclosures fall, but are still higher than a year ago</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/">Foreclosures fall, but are still higher than a year ago</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234452/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/foreclosures-fall-but-are-still-higher-than-a-year-ago/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank foreclosures</category><category>BankForeclosures</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>home payments</category><category>HomePayments</category><category>house payments</category><category>HousePayments</category><category>RealtyTrac</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eight ways to define the recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/receessionpicutre.jpg" alt="" />We've watched <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/stockmarket/">stock market</a> numbers bounce around for two years. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Unemployment/">Unemployment</a> stats have served as unpleasant reminders that, for some, leading indicators haven't translated to reality. We look for so many ways to understand the brutal economic environment with which we've had to contend, and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33266915/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/">all the choices can make your head spin</a>. So, let's make it simple. Here are eight ways to tack a label onto the financial world in which we live. </p>
<p><strong>1. Lost market value</strong><br />Total stock market losses from October 2007's top to March 2009's bottom: $11.2 trillion<br />Total gains in the stock market since the bottom: $4.6 trillion<br />Lost ground: $6.6 trillion</p>
<p><strong>2. Bad days<br /></strong>Percentage of the 10 worst days in history for the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DowJonesIndustrialAverage/">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> that happened in 2008, by point drops: 60%<br />Percentage of the 10 worst days in history for the DJIA that happened in 2008, by percentage drops: 30%</p>
<p><strong>3. Mutual funds<br /></strong>Value of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mutualfund/">mutual fund</a> assets at the end of 2007: $6.5 trillion<br />... and a year later: $3.7 million<br />Lost value: $2.8 trillion</p>
<p>But, it got a little better at the end of August 2009: $4.5 trillion (value of assets)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eight ways to define the recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/">Eight ways to define the recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33266915/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19192550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>djia</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>gold</category><category>home sales</category><category>HomeSales</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers wants money back from Barclays]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/lehman-brothers-logo.jpg" />Late Tuesday -- on the one-year anniversary of its bankruptcy filing -- Lehman Brothers accused <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">Barclays Capital</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">BCS</a>) of taking <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/lehman-wants-82b-back-from-barclays/671863">$8.2 billion more than it should have</a> when it purchased some of its key assets a year ago. Less than a week after Lehman filed for bankruptcy, the court approved of the sale to Barclays. Now Lehman is asking a judge to force Barclays to return some of the money taken as part of the deal,  including $5 billion it says was given as extra collateral, which was not disclosed to the court.<br /><br />Interesting timing and an interesting claim, don't you think? The timing is interesting because it is a year after the bankruptcy filing, which sounds like  more than just a coincidence. But what is truly interesting is the fact that Lehman is trying to get quite a bit of money back by making a claim that <strong>was not disclosed to the court</strong>. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lehman Brothers wants money back from Barclays</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/">Lehman Brothers wants money back from Barclays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19163246/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barclays</category><category>bcs</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>financial meltdown</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>FinancialMeltdown</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>money grabbing</category><category>MoneyGrabbing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Old folks leaning on credit cards to get by]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/rsz_elderly.jpg" />With all the focus on unemployment, the usual recession victims have been overlooked a bit. The over-65 crowd, living on fixed incomes, has seen portfolios decimated and those consistent dividends from blue chippers evaporate. At the same time, medical costs are headed in the other direction. Expenses up and income down, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2009-07-27-credit-card-debt-seniors_N.htm">seniors have found only one solution: credit cards</a>. </p>
<p>Low- and middle-income consumers who've reached or passed age 65 had $10,235 in credit card debt, on average, last year, up a disturbing 26% from 2005. Meanwhile, credit card debt climbed only 3% across all age groups - to $9,827. From the fourth quarter of last year to the first this year, total revolving debt fell a modest 2.3% to $939.6 billion. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Old folks leaning on credit cards to get by</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/">Old folks leaning on credit cards to get by</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2009-07-27-credit-card-debt-seniors_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19111707/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/28/old-folks-leaning-on-credit-cards-to-get-by/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>elderly</category><category>financialcrisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>senior citizen</category><category>senior citizens</category><category>SeniorCitizen</category><category>SeniorCitizens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Capital One reports a smaller-than-expected loss -- still a loss]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/capital-one-reports-a-smaller-than-expected-loss-still-a-loss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/capital-one-reports-a-smaller-than-expected-loss-still-a-loss/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/capital-one-reports-a-smaller-than-expected-loss-still-a-loss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/cof-capital-one-logo.jpg" />After yesterday's closing bell, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capital-one-financial-corporation/cof/nys">Capital One Financial</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capital-one-financial-corporation/cof/nys">COF</a>) reported a <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/capital-one-reports-quarterly-loss-of-276-mln-2009-07-23">second-quarter loss of 65 cents per share</a>. The quarterly loss included $461.7 million COF repaid to TARP and a $38 million dividend payment. Excluding these payments, COF saw a quarterly profit of 53 cents per share. The Street expected COF to lose 73 cents per share, so the company managed to top expectations. Nevertheless, the company noted that its results were pulled lower by credit card losses along with the repayment of the government funds. <br /><br />COF managed to make money excluding items, but a loss is still a loss. While the company noted that people have been a bit more defensive in their spending, I'm guessing that this may change. Remember that unemployment is at record highs, which may lead to more people to depend on credit cards (if they have them) to pay for necessities.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/capital-one-reports-a-smaller-than-expected-loss-still-a-loss/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Capital One reports a smaller-than-expected loss -- still a loss</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/capital-one-reports-a-smaller-than-expected-loss-still-a-loss/">Capital One reports a smaller-than-expected loss -- still a loss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/capital-one-reports-a-smaller-than-expected-loss-still-a-loss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19108556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/capital-one-reports-a-smaller-than-expected-loss-still-a-loss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>Capital One</category><category>Capital One Financial</category><category>CapitalOne</category><category>CapitalOneFinancial</category><category>COF</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>financials</category><category>inthenews</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMR loses in Q2, however you measure it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-18-200cm101608.jpg" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">AMR Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">AMR</a>) got spanked in the second quarter, as frequent fliers kept their feet on the ground. The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-15-amr-loss_N.htm">American Airlines parent posted a $390 million loss</a> in a quarter that historically has been kind to travel companies. AMR rationalizes the results with the thought that the loss would have been only $319 million ($1.14 per share) if charges related to selling and grounding planes were excluded. This would have put the airline ahead of analyst expectations of a $1.28 per share loss. AMR's Q2 revenue fell 21% to $4.89 billion.</p>
<p>And, it's far better than the airline's performance in the second quarter of 2008.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMR loses in Q2, however you measure it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/">AMR loses in Q2, however you measure it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-15-amr-loss_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099162/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineFees</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AmericanAirlines</category><category>amr</category><category>amr corp.</category><category>amrcorp</category><category>AmrCorp.</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>global recession</category><category>GlobalRecession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Back-to-school sales expected to be weak]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/back-to-school-sales-expected-to-be-weak/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/back-to-school-sales-expected-to-be-weak/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/back-to-school-sales-expected-to-be-weak/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/editor-b.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />According to the National Retail Federation (NRF), the back-to-school shopping period <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story//even-teens-may-not-save-back-to-school-retailing">isn't expected to be strong enough to help retailers</a>. During the past five years, this shopping period has increased; but the NRF has forecast a drop of 7.5% to $47.5 billion this year. </p>
<p>This isn't just a slight drop, a 7.5% drop in sales is rather staggering. In fact, roughly half of the shoppers questioned plan on spending less this year when searching for goodies to take back to school. Ken Perkins of Retail Metrics notes that this isn't just a problem for retailers during the upcoming shopping season, weak back-to-school sales is "likely a harbinger of another difficult holiday shopping season." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/back-to-school-sales-expected-to-be-weak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Back-to-school sales expected to be weak</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/back-to-school-sales-expected-to-be-weak/">Back-to-school sales expected to be weak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/back-to-school-sales-expected-to-be-weak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19097070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/back-to-school-sales-expected-to-be-weak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>back to school</category><category>BackToSchool</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>Kohls</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>shopping</category><category>Target</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Geithner eliminate speculation in financial derivatives?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/geithner_speaking_160.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />First of all, let's look at what hedging really is. Take, for example, a farmer who grows corn. He knows that his cost for growing corn is, say, $3.00 per bushel. But he doesn't know what price the price of bushel of corn will be come harvest time. He looks at the September futures contract for corn and sees that the price is $3.30 per bushel. <br /></p>
<p>To guarantee that he will get $3.30 at harvest time, he sells September corn contracts equal to his crop (each corn contract equals 5,000 bushels). When harvest time comes he delivers his corn to the appropriate delivery point designated by the Chicago Board of Trade exchange (CBOT) where the contracts are traded. It should be noted that if the price of the futures contract goes above $3.30 per bushel, the farmer may be called for margin money until he makes delivery, at which time his account is settled out.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should Geithner eliminate speculation in financial derivatives?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/">Should Geithner eliminate speculation in financial derivatives?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124723988236723897.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19095122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/should-mr-geithner-eliminate-speculation-in-financial-derivativ/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbot</category><category>derivatives</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>futures</category><category>geithner</category><category>hedging</category><category>inthenews</category><category>speculation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer sentiment down, according to everyone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/not-hiring.jpg" alt="" />There are two competing positions on consumer sentiment right now. One is that it turned south last week, as people worried about their jobs - always a bad sign for spending. The other is that consumer sentiment didn't crap out in July: it fizzled in May. So, it's not a question of whether consumers aren't confident in the U.S. economic machine, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1040347420090710">it's just a matter of when the collective mood changed</a>. </p>
<p>The July camp is set up around the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1040347420090710">Reuters</a>/<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/UniversityofMichiganSurveysofConsumers/">University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers</a>, which makes now the weakest point for consumer sentiment since March. Those who favor May look to domestic demand for foreign goods, which went soft two months ago,  bringing the monthly trade deficit to its narrowest since 1999. The U.S. trade gap unexpectedly tightened to $26 billion in May, with exports up 1.6% and imports down 0.6%, according to the U.S. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofCommerce/">Department of Commerce</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer sentiment down, according to everyone</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/">Consumer sentiment down, according to everyone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1040347420090710>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19094744/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/consumer-sentiment-down-according-to-everyone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of commerce</category><category>DepartmentOfCommerce</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>economiccrisis</category><category>economics</category><category>EconomicStimulus</category><category>economy</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>reuters</category><category>university of michigan</category><category>university of michigan surveys of consumers</category><category>UniversityOfMichigan</category><category>UniversityOfMichiganSurveysOfConsumers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup starts its stock swap ... finally]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/citigrouppic.jpg" />This morning, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/citi-begins-58-billion-stock-swap/521538">began its $58-billion stock swap</a>, a move that could leave the government with a 34% stake in the bank. The country's third-largest bank plans to swap common stock for (up to) $33 billion in preferred shares and convert as much as $25 billion of preferred shares held by the U.S. Treasury into common stock. <br /><br />The bank believes that the swap could (emphasis on could here) make Citigroup one of the world's best-capitalized banks. The action could add up to $61 billion of tangible common equity and $64 billion of Tier-1 common equity. Citigroup had planned to take this action back in April.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup starts its stock swap ... finally</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/">Citigroup starts its stock swap ... finally</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19063099/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>government</category><category>government bailout</category><category>GovernmentBailout</category><category>inthenews</category><category>stock swap</category><category>StockSwap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Hey banks -- stop your bellyaching ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hey-banks-stop-your-bellyaching/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hey-banks-stop-your-bellyaching/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hey-banks-stop-your-bellyaching/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10508266/1/jpmorgan-seeks-freedom-from-tarp-trap.html?puc=aoljjc">JPMorgan Seeks Freedom from TARP Trap </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10508367/1/homebuilder-stocks-stoked-over-data.html?puc=aoljjc">Homebuilder Stocks Stoked Over Data </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says it's not too much to ask that banks have enough money to loan to customers and to pay back TARP.  </span><br /> <br />  Bankers who complain about having to raise more money to pay back the Troubled Asset Relief Program ought to be real careful here about their insistence that the rules have been changed.  <br /><br />  Never did Treasury say, "If you raise this money, you can pay TARP back." What it did say was, "If you raise this money, you can stay in business."  <br /><br />  Given that most of the banks that raised the $85 billion probably could have gone by the wayside, I don't think there's all that much to be said about the government demanding that the banks have enough money on hand to loan to customers and to pay back TARP. Is that really too high a price to pay? <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hey-banks-stop-your-bellyaching/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Hey banks -- stop your bellyaching </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hey-banks-stop-your-bellyaching/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Hey banks -- stop your bellyaching </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hey-banks-stop-your-bellyaching/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19056222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hey-banks-stop-your-bellyaching/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cramer</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>gs</category><category>jpm</category><category>tarp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$12.8 trillion -- 90% of GDP! -- to bail out bad bets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/12-8-trillion-90-of-gdp-to-bail-out-bad-bets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/12-8-trillion-90-of-gdp-to-bail-out-bad-bets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/12-8-trillion-90-of-gdp-to-bail-out-bad-bets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/moneyflying.jpg" /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=armOzfkwtCA4&amp;refer=home">$12.8 trillion</a> of our money is going to bail out the bad bets of bankers, auto execs, and ordinary folks who took on mortgages they couldn't repay over the last 20 months. If you're among the 90% of the country that's been playing by the rules all these years, you may be wondering why that $12.8 trillion should come out of your pocket. After all, doesn't <em>free markets</em> mean that bettors get the pot when they win and pay the piper when they lose?</p>
<p>The "good" news is that of that $12.8 trillion, only a third -- or $4.2 trillion -- has actually been committed to a total of 34 distinct programs. The remaining $8.6 trillion is the limit of how much has been approved. And of that $12.8 trillion, 61% is under the control of the Fed in 20 programs, 16% is in the hands of the FDIC in 5 programs, another 21% will be spent by the Treasury in eight programs and the remaining two percent is being doled out by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in one program.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/12-8-trillion-90-of-gdp-to-bail-out-bad-bets/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$12.8 trillion -- 90% of GDP! -- to bail out bad bets</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/12-8-trillion-90-of-gdp-to-bail-out-bad-bets/">$12.8 trillion -- 90% of GDP! -- to bail out bad bets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/12-8-trillion-90-of-gdp-to-bail-out-bad-bets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1503516/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/12-8-trillion-90-of-gdp-to-bail-out-bad-bets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>bac</category><category>bailout</category><category>c</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>fnm</category><category>ge</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[For a quick-read on U.S. global economic conditions keep an eye on oil]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/for-a-quick-read-on-u-s-global-economic-conditions-keep-an-eye/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/for-a-quick-read-on-u-s-global-economic-conditions-keep-an-eye/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/for-a-quick-read-on-u-s-global-economic-conditions-keep-an-eye/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/tanker.jpg" alt="" />These days, investors are bombarded by variety of stimuli about the financial crisis and the state of the U.S. economy, and not all of it is useful. In fact, some of it can be downright harmful -- leading to imprudent decisions, needless shifts in asset classes, and other financial mistakes. <br /><br />Hence, perhaps more than ever these days, investors need to be able to separate 'the wheat from the chaff.'<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/for-a-quick-read-on-u-s-global-economic-conditions-keep-an-eye/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>For a quick-read on U.S. global economic conditions keep an eye on oil</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/for-a-quick-read-on-u-s-global-economic-conditions-keep-an-eye/">For a quick-read on U.S. global economic conditions keep an eye on oil</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/for-a-quick-read-on-u-s-global-economic-conditions-keep-an-eye/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1480098/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/for-a-quick-read-on-u-s-global-economic-conditions-keep-an-eye/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>oil prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: If we 'let it happen,' the center cannot hold ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-if-we-let-it-happen-the-center-cann/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-if-we-let-it-happen-the-center-cann/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-if-we-let-it-happen-the-center-cann/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10466285/1/banks-to-get-250b-more-in-obama-budget.html?puc=aoljjc">Banks to Get $250B More in Obama Budget </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_rms/s/opinion-a-plan-to-resolve-the-banking-crisis/comment/opinion/10465911.html?puc=aoljjc">Opinion: A Plan to Resolve the Banking Crisis </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says everything depends upon these financial programs. </span><br /> <br />Maybe Sheila Bair doesn't matter at all. Maybe nothing matters. The chatter behind the scenes everywhere is, "Just let it happen, it can't be any worse than this."  <br /><br />  I say, are you kidding me? Do you know that our whole country would simply stop if we didn't have these programs and these government promises?  <br /><br />  Think of it like this: If you have models that show 10% unemployment and you offer credit cards, your model says don't offer them. But if the government didn't guilt-trip these companies into offering them, you couldn't get one. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-if-we-let-it-happen-the-center-cann/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: If we 'let it happen,' the center cannot hold </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-if-we-let-it-happen-the-center-cann/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: If we 'let it happen,' the center cannot hold </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-if-we-let-it-happen-the-center-cann/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1472411/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-if-we-let-it-happen-the-center-cann/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>bair</category><category>bbx</category><category>bkuna</category><category>cors</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>wfc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Italian bank accepts cheese as loan collateral; U.S. banks should watch and learn]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/italian-bank-accepts-cheese-as-collateral-for-its-loans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/italian-bank-accepts-cheese-as-collateral-for-its-loans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/italian-bank-accepts-cheese-as-collateral-for-its-loans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/elisabislet/123179592/"><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/parmesan.jpg" /></a>Imagine this: You live in Castelfranco Emilia, a small town in northern Italy, and you want a loan for $9,000. So you walk into the bank and the manager says: "OK, how many wheels of Parmesan cheese do you have for collateral?" You answer, "I have three wheels." (Each wheel is worth $3,000.) "Fine, we'll take your three wheels as collateral for your loan," he says and draws up the contract.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, you take your three wheels to the warehouse for inspection. All cheese must be aged for at least one year. Cheese that does not meet the strict standards at the warehouse is downgraded and the price reduced. After the inspection is completed, the bank manager gives you a check for $9,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/italian-bank-accepts-cheese-as-collateral-for-its-loans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Italian bank accepts cheese as loan collateral; U.S. banks should watch and learn</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/italian-bank-accepts-cheese-as-collateral-for-its-loans/">Italian bank accepts cheese as loan collateral; U.S. banks should watch and learn</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/02/23/pm_parmesan_collaterals/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/italian-bank-accepts-cheese-as-collateral-for-its-loans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1469485/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/italian-bank-accepts-cheese-as-collateral-for-its-loans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cheese collateral</category><category>CheeseCollateral</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>Italian banking</category><category>ItalianBanking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is this the 'Great Recession' and how will we get out of it?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/is-this-the-great-recession-and-how-will-we-get-out-of-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/is-this-the-great-recession-and-how-will-we-get-out-of-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/is-this-the-great-recession-and-how-will-we-get-out-of-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wstreet.jpg" alt="" />Found an interesting <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE51B45820090212">article from Reuters</a>, noting that investors specializing in distressed debt and bankruptcy believe that our current recession will "last at least three years and possibly longer absent a revival in credit markets." Michael Psaros, managing partner at KPS Capital Partners told Reuters, "This is going to be a three- to four-year disaster," and used the term "Great Recession" when discussing the current crisis.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/is-this-the-great-recession-and-how-will-we-get-out-of-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is this the 'Great Recession' and how will we get out of it?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/is-this-the-great-recession-and-how-will-we-get-out-of-it/">Is this the 'Great Recession' and how will we get out of it?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/is-this-the-great-recession-and-how-will-we-get-out-of-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458483/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/is-this-the-great-recession-and-how-will-we-get-out-of-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>featured</category><category>Financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>recession</category><category>sectors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
