<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Republicans sink bailout bill, Dow down 500]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/republicans-sink-bailout-bill-dow-down-500/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/republicans-sink-bailout-bill-dow-down-500/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/republicans-sink-bailout-bill-dow-down-500/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>In a shock to Wall Street, by a vote of <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26884523/">228 against and 205 for</a>, the House just failed to approve the latest version of the $700 billion bailout bill. Why? Not enough Republicans backed it -- only <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll674.xml">65</a> Republicans ended up voting for; they were running 2-to-1 against Democrats. Why not? Angry communications from their constituents saying they did not like it and a philosophical bent against bailouts. With the election weeks away, is this the Republicans last stand?</p>
<p>Who knows? But the outcome of the vote means that it's back to the drawing board for the bailout bill. Count me among those who believe that a better bill is possible -- that is, a bill that actually defines the problem(s) we face and offers a truly workable solution. I've posted about such a plan <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/asian-markets-give-bronx-cheer-to-700-billion-bailout/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Fed has injected <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ahwz_k5JvuB8&amp;refer=worldwide">$630 billion</a> into global markets in the wake of the cratering of three financial institutions (FIs) in Europe. These include Belgian/Dutch insurer <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&amp;sid=aQSDnRiYuJAk&amp;refer=germany">Fortis</a> which received a $16 billion government capital injection; the nationalization of British mortgage lender <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&amp;sid=aQSDnRiYuJAk&amp;refer=germany">Bradford &amp; Bingley</a> and $50 billion worth of guarantees for <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&amp;sid=aQSDnRiYuJAk&amp;refer=germany">Hypo Real Estate Holding</a>. And the Fed is adding <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ahwz_k5JvuB8&amp;refer=worldwide">$330 billion</a> to its $290 billion currency swap program with global banks and <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ahwz_k5JvuB8&amp;refer=worldwide">$300 billion</a> to its $150 billion Term Auction Facility (TAF) emergency loan program.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/republicans-sink-bailout-bill-dow-down-500/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Republicans sink bailout bill, Dow down 500</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/republicans-sink-bailout-bill-dow-down-500/">Republicans sink bailout bill, Dow down 500</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/republicans-sink-bailout-bill-dow-down-500/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1327834/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/republicans-sink-bailout-bill-dow-down-500/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>bradford and bingley</category><category>BradfordAndBingley</category><category>financial institutions</category><category>FinancialInstitutions</category><category>hypo real estate</category><category>HypoRealEstate</category><category>term auction facility</category><category>TermAuctionFacility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[100 Year Crash: How did our system get to this point?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/27/100-year-crash-how-did-our-system-get-to-this-point/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/27/100-year-crash-how-did-our-system-get-to-this-point/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/27/100-year-crash-how-did-our-system-get-to-this-point/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>It seems that there is a problem with our financial system. That could be why Bear Stearns collapsed, the government took over <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Fannie Mae</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">FNM</font></a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#888888">Freddie Mac</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#888888">FRE</font></a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><font color="#0072bc">American International Group</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><font color="#0072bc">AIG</font></a>). This problem could also explain why Merrill Lynch sold out to Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), why Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, and why <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys"><font color="#888888">JPMorgan Chase</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys"><font color="#888888">JPM</font></a>) bought <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys"><font color="#888888">Washington Mutual</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys"><font color="#888888">WM</font></a>). Problems with our financial system could also explain why the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/21/why-is-paulson-so-desperate-to-spend-700-billion-of-our-money/">Commercial Paper</a> market is freezing up -- making it harder for companies to come up with the short-term cash to pay employees and buy inventory.</p>
<p>But how did our system get to this point? There are five key principles of our current financial architecture that brought us here:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div><strong>Securitization.</strong> Up until about 30 years ago, people took out mortgages from an S&amp;L and paid their loan officer every month until they owned their house. In the 1980s, Wall Street invented securitization -- the process of buying up, say, 1,000 mortgages from mortgage companies, creating a security based on those mortgages, paying for a AAA rating, and selling the securities to investors worldwide. Securitization is a problem for reasons I'll describe below.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><strong>Too much borrowing. </strong>Over the last several years, Financial Institutions (FI) have made some $2 trillion in fees from securitization, according to <em><a href="http://dealbreaker.com/2008/09/follow-the-money.php">DealBreaker</a></em>. One reason for this is that they have been able to buy these securities -- of which there are <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/fdic-needs-to-triple-its-fund-to-cover-future-bank-failures/print/">$13 trillion</a> on the market between Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBSs) and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) -- with a sliver of capital, roughly <a href="http://bstocksdev.weblogsinc.com/2008/09/25/businessweeks-brilliant-solution-to-the-financial-mess/">$340 billion</a>. The typical FI had a ratio of assets to capital of 30:1. This meant that a mere 3% decline in the value of these securities would wipe out all the capital.</div>
    </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/27/100-year-crash-how-did-our-system-get-to-this-point/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>100 Year Crash: How did our system get to this point?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/27/100-year-crash-how-did-our-system-get-to-this-point/">100 Year Crash: How did our system get to this point?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/27/100-year-crash-how-did-our-system-get-to-this-point/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1325799/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/27/100-year-crash-how-did-our-system-get-to-this-point/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>collateralized debt obligations</category><category>CollateralizedDebtObligations</category><category>financial institutions</category><category>FinancialInstitutions</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>MortgageBackedSecurities</category><category>securitization</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:16:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
