BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com BloggingStocks http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/feedlogo.gif BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[At last, a fine for options back-dating]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/at-last-a-fine-for-options-back-dating/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/at-last-a-fine-for-options-back-dating/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/at-last-a-fine-for-options-back-dating/#commentsFiled under: , ,

Brocade (NASDAQ: BRCD) has agreed to settle its options back-dating issues with the SEC by paying a fine of $7 million. With over a hundred companies still working out accounting problems and, in some cases, SEC problems with back-dating, the settlement may open the door to these issues to move toward resolution.

As The Wall Street Journal pointed out [subscription required], the SEC had to debate several tough questions before coming to an initial decision about how to handle all of the companies involved in the practice: "Were shareholders actually hurt by the backdating of options, by the revelation of potential wrongdoing or by being deceived about how executives were compensated??

Investors were hurt. For one, when executives exercise options, the company is paid the amount of the strike price. If that price has been lowered, the company receives less money. Public companies are also supposed to account for options as an expense. Changing options grant dates can lead to restatements of financial reports, which does not inspire investor confidence.

And, perhaps most important, there is the matter of the time and cost to board for examining options issues. It is not only a distraction, it is a cost. So, it is not simply a question of deception. There is a very real cost to options back-dating.

Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.

At last, a fine for options back-dating originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 31 May 2007 10:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>brcdBrocadecompany finesCompanyFinesfinancial reportsFinancialReportsoptiions back-datingOptiionsBack-datingSECThu, 31 May 2007 10:10:00 EST<![CDATA[Apple after the bell 08/14/06: going strong despite SEC worries]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/14/apple-after-the-bell-08-14-06-going-strong-despite-sec-worries/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/14/apple-after-the-bell-08-14-06-going-strong-despite-sec-worries/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/14/apple-after-the-bell-08-14-06-going-strong-despite-sec-worries/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

Apple ended the day up 29 cents to finish at $63.94, despite widespread worries about Apple's worries with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Due to its investigation on share options, Apple is trying to figure out how to restate its third quarter financial report, and the Nasdaq threatened to delist Apple if doesn't adhere to reporting guidelines.

While no one expects Apple to get delisted, people are watching carefully. Those less in the loop are worried for Apple, but many are realizing that Apple will probably be just the first of many companies that will be going through painful periods like this as stock option readjustments hit the other 80+ companies that were fingered by the SEC besides Apple.

Apple after the bell 08/14/06: going strong despite SEC worries originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:42:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>applebackdated optionsBackdatedOptionsdelistingfinancial reportsFinancialReportssecMon, 14 Aug 2006 17:42:00 EST<![CDATA[Google reports soon -- STILL A GAMBLE]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/20/google-reports-soon-still-a-gamble/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/20/google-reports-soon-still-a-gamble/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/20/google-reports-soon-still-a-gamble/#commentsFiled under: , , , , ,

Stories about Google have dominated the news and our BloggingStocks site. My own take has been that the company is great for the fine products and services it offers, but that the stock is volatile, over-priced and a risk not worth taking. This theme has been the prevailing sentiment here, however, the general opinion in the market has been more mixed. We have seen analysts projections that the stock will reach $500, and even $600 within 12 months.

This week, when Yahoo! reported earnings, Google dropped with Yahoo! after the close of the market and is still down. Why did Google drop because Yahoo! did? Toyota did not drop on GM & Ford reports. The answer is simple -- uncertainty and the perception of risk.

The question is, why take the risk? Here we all sit wondering whether Google will report strong earnings and top line growth, simply meet expectations or disappoint. Equally intriguing is that no matter what they report, who knows what spin the market will put on the outcome, and will the stock price flash upward or downward? Does anybody think they can possibly report news that will not move the stock at all in one way or the other? The pattern on the first few reports was that it moved up. The last report even though positive sent the stock price down significantly and then it gradually settled in to a level between its high and the short term fade.

Continue reading Google reports soon -- STILL A GAMBLE

Google reports soon -- STILL A GAMBLE originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:48:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>Core holdingsCoreHoldingsDividendsFinancial reportsFinancialReportsGoogGoogleP/EValue InvestingValueInvestingThu, 20 Jul 2006 13:48:00 EST