Earlier this week, Hank Paulson forced the nine top banks to take $125 billion in taxpayer money in exchange for perpetual preferred stock that pays a 5% yield, which rises to 9% after five years plus warrants to buy 15% of the banks' stock. Does this mean that the banks will now start lending out that money to get the economy off its back? Absolutely not. It could go to paying banker's bonuses instead.

And why not? After all, the write-offs of sour investments have more than wiped out all the "profits" these banks reported over the last three years -- during those boom years they reported $305 billion in profits and have recently taken $323 billion in write-offs. And with more losses looming, the top nine banks need to raise $275 billion more.

How much of these reported bank profits were faked to boost banker's bonuses? Why are the bankers who booked these lousy deals keeping the multimillion bonuses they got during those years? And why did Paulson decide to inject taxpayer money into these banks if they're not going to use it to boost the economy?

The weekend is fast approaching. And with global markets in a tailspin --- the Nikkei fell 11%, the Hang Seng tumbled 7.1%, and the FTSE 100 declined 3% -- that can only mean one thing: Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke will spend the weekend putting together another massive cash dump to announce by Sunday night. But I have a different idea -- for one weekend, how about a massive information campaign instead.

What if, instead of trying to fight fear and restore confidence with money, they decided to educate the world instead? If Bernanke is such a good teacher, perhaps he can put together an explanation for what is going on, why it happened, and how he plans to fix it. I think that a patient and honest explanation of what is really going on -- similar to FDR's fireside chats -- would go a long way to pushing away the fear.

By uttering meaningless platitudes about how "we have the tools" and "the economy will come back better than ever", the Administration is sending an unhelpful message. It is telling us a combination of things: it does not understand what is going on, it does not trust the American people to handle reality, and/or it believes that discussing the truth would make matters worse. Throwing more money at the problem without providing leadership does not seem to be working. Here are a few questions I think Paulson and Bernanke should answer for starters: