<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The Five Best Small Business Software Applications]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/14/the-five-best-small-business-software-applications/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/14/the-five-best-small-business-software-applications/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/14/the-five-best-small-business-software-applications/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/openofficelogo1.jpg" />People who have the entrepreneurial spirit are familiar with the unique adrenaline rush that comes from the live-or-die risk of <a href="http://smallbusiness.aol.com/category/starting-a-business/">starting a business</a>. For many, <a href="http://smallbusiness.aol.com/">small business</a> is a way of life that represents long hours and near-obsessive passion. With all the pressure and time constraints riding on a small business, what are the five best software applications that can greatly help these start-ups or modest operations? There are definitely some critical software choices that make a small business more efficient and more effective. And better yet, three of them are free.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/14/the-five-best-small-business-software-applications/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Five Best Small Business Software Applications</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/14/the-five-best-small-business-software-applications/">The Five Best Small Business Software Applications</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/14/the-five-best-small-business-software-applications/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19392861/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/14/the-five-best-small-business-software-applications/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADBE</category><category>Adobe</category><category>Firefox</category><category>INTU</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>OpenOffice</category><category>Quickbooks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest blogger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft and the Browser Wars]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/ie8-logo.jpg" />Instigated by an agreement negotiated between the European   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/microsoft/Microsoft_and_the_browser_wars'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  Commission (EC) and Microsoft Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), a new browser selection utility has just become available. Although the browser choice software is intended mainly to be distributed through the Windows update system familiar to Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE) users, it is also available online for anyone to access.</p>
<p>It is reported that Microsoft IE currently holds approximately 62% of browser market share. That is a powerful position for the company to be in when considering that web browsers are absolutely essential pieces of software. That is, in part, why the EC put pressure on Microsoft to open up the playing field to lesser known browser utilities. With their demands, European regulators essentially cut Microsoft's exclusive IE umbilical cord in July of 2009.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft and the Browser Wars</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/">Microsoft and the Browser Wars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8551317.stm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19386405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>avant</category><category>browser</category><category>firefox</category><category>flock</category><category>Google Chrome</category><category>green</category><category>internet</category><category>internet explorer</category><category>k-meleon</category><category>maxthon</category><category>opera</category><category>safari</category><category>sleipnir</category><category>slimbrowser</category><category>web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Google's browser a threat to Microsoft?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/goog-google-logo.jpg" alt="" />The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/technology/02google.html?hp">New York Times</a></em> reports that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc</a></strong>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) will introduce its own browser -- named Chrome -- but will it cost <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) any revenues? Since Microsoft gives away its browser, the answer is no. However, Google's move may force Microsoft to divert resources to upgrade its browser to avoid losing market share.</p>
<p>And Microsoft' still dominates the browser market. The <em>Times </em>reports that Microsoft "still holds 73 percent of the browser market. [Open-source browser] Firefox's [share] has climbed to 19 percent, while <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.'s</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) Safari has 6 percent." And Google's Chrome introduction marks "a shift for Google, which has strongly backed Firefox." </p>
<p>So why is Google doing this? It could be so that as Google develops applications -- such as search, word processing, spreadsheets, presentation and e-mail programs -- designed to run on browsers for PCs and handheld devices it wants to avoid being so dependent on Microsoft. <em>InfoTech</em> reports that a "new feature in the latest beta of Microsoft IE 8 makes it easier for users to block information about their browsing habits, a move which could hamper Google's interests in display advertising." And while Firefox keeps pressure on Microsoft to upgrade its browser, Google has far more resources to threaten Microsoft's share. So Chrome could divert more Microsoft cash and staff.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Google's browser a threat to Microsoft?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/">Is Google's browser a threat to Microsoft?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/technology/02google.html?hp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301728/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>chrome</category><category>featured</category><category>firefox</category><category>firefox-3</category><category>firefox3</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>internet explorer</category><category>internet explorer 7</category><category>internet explorer 8</category><category>internet explorer mobile</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>InternetExplorer7</category><category>InternetExplorer8</category><category>InternetExplorerMobile</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>safari</category><category>safari 3</category><category>Safari3</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google (GOOG) puts horse into browser race]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) will offer its own internet browser to compete with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Internet Explorer and the Mozilla Firefox product. </p>
<p>The software may be plagued by the law of unintended consequences, doing more damage to Firefox than to Microsoft. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122029908090487903.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, Google says the "software is designed to make it faster to browse the Web and easier to run applications without downloading software to a computer."</p>
<p>Most PCs come loaded with Internet Explorer as part of Microsoft Windows. That leaves Google with the challenge of getting consumers to download its new browser. Firefox is also software which must be downloaded. Google may end up competing more with Firefox, a product it has supported in the past, than with IE.</p>
<p>Most consumers don't care what browser they use as long as they have access to the internet. Microsoft's largest advantage is that it is part of the PC software package that people use without any thought as to how it might be changed.</p>
<p>Google will end up hurting an ally without doing any damage to its primary rival.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/">Google (GOOG) puts horse into browser race</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122029908090487903.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301593/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrome</category><category>Firefox</category><category>GOOG</category><category>google</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mozilla</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox an investment worth it for every website business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/mozilla-firefox-an-investment-worth-it-for-every-website-busines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/mozilla-firefox-an-investment-worth-it-for-every-website-busines/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/mozilla-firefox-an-investment-worth-it-for-every-website-busines/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/mozilla_logo.jpg" alt="" />When I read that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9986201-7.html">website didn't officially support</a> the world's second-largest web browser until just recently, I was stunned. The Mozilla Foundation, maker of the super-popular Firefox web browser, now <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox">commands about 19%</a> of the global web browser market, behind <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>)'s Internet Explorer web browser. <br /><br />Yet, many (many) websites I visit (some very high-profile ones) were made for Internet Explorer only. These websites break at various points when using the Firefox web browser, mine, and millions others, favorite.<br /><br />What are these Fortune 500 companies thinking? If a product has nearly 20% of any market, you darn well better pay attention to it. With more and more time being spent online instead of in front of the TV, website publishers need to recognize the value of supporting more than just the leading web browser. I can easily understand not designing a web experience for products that have lower single-digit market shares, but that's not what we're talking about here.<br /><br />So, it was with disdain that I recently read that a Bank of America web support representative stating, "Please note Bank of America does not support Firefox." With email, actual workflow applications, multimedia and an entire media consumption empire existing on the web, the challenge for many websites will be to not forget the other large pieces of the pie. Ignore web browsers with growing market share at your peril, I say.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/mozilla-firefox-an-investment-worth-it-for-every-website-busines/">Mozilla Firefox an investment worth it for every website business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9986201-7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/mozilla-firefox-an-investment-worth-it-for-every-website-busines/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1250059/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/mozilla-firefox-an-investment-worth-it-for-every-website-busines/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Browser</category><category>Firefox</category><category>Mozilla Foundation</category><category>MozillaFirefox</category><category>MozillaFoundation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Farewell, old friend Netscape]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/farewell-old-friend-netscape/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/farewell-old-friend-netscape/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/farewell-old-friend-netscape/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>It appears that we are just about a week away from the changing of the guard on the old Browser Wars. If you look on the <a href="http://netscape.aol.com">netscape.aol.com</a> site, you'll see that the old Netscape Browser support will officially end on March 1, 2008. Even the Netscape Blog <a href="http://blog.netscape.com/2008/02/20/netscape-9-users-time-to-flock-or-firefox/">advises a switch</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) has been making many changes at AOL and its properties over the last two years. In fact, Netscape, AOL, Advertising.com, AIM, and just about everything else has changed. Unfortunately, some change also means the death of certain parts, and that part appears to be Netscape.<br /><br />If you will remember back to the 1990's, this was its own public company with the "NSCP" ticker that had roughly a 90% market share. People even paid for AOL-acquired Netscape when its market share was steadily declining, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) ended up paying out roughly $750 million in an antitrust settlement over search and bundling. Netscape is still loaded up on many PC's both on its own and via one of those old AOL access dial-up bundle offerings that used to be included with PC's. Now almost no one uses it. I used to use it exclusively, but those days are long gone. What a difference a decade makes.<br /><br />Even Linux seller <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/red-hat-inc/rht/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Red Hat</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/red-hat-inc/rht/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">RHT</a>) paid money at one point for some of Netscape's security software. <br /><br />Frankly, Mozilla's Firefox has taken the place of Netscape in today's world and it is now almost an equally-yoked rival to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) Internet Explorer that has been downloaded onto millions of computers. The business of owning a Web Browser is really nothing more than a project. Sure, there are others like Opera, but most web sites only want to support Explorer and Firefox now. Such is life in a world where free is becoming more and more of an expectation. <br /><br />Even if it is merely for old times sake, <em>"Farewell, old forgotten friend."</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/farewell-old-friend-netscape/">Farewell, old friend Netscape</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/farewell-old-friend-netscape/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1122134/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/farewell-old-friend-netscape/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Firefox</category><category>Internet Explorer: Opera</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mozilla</category><category>Netscape</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netscape Navigator on the web's endangered species list]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/netscape-navigator-on-the-webs-endangered-species-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/netscape-navigator-on-the-webs-endangered-species-list/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/netscape-navigator-on-the-webs-endangered-species-list/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tech-for-the-rest-of-us/" rel="tag">Tech for the Rest of Us</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img width="244" height="NaN" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/vid-display-at-244-by-a--g-sattler.jpg" alt="video display" />Although <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/aol-pulls-plug-on-netscape-web-browser/n20071228172809990024">AOL has chosen to withdraw continuing development of the Netscape Navigator browser,</a> you'll be able to continue using it indefinitely. Honestly though, who would want to?<br /><br />Netscape doesn't have much in the way of loyalists in the realm of content suppliers, and web users seem not to care much what browser they use as long as the utility is fast, accurate and simple. I myself switched from Netscape to Firefox during the last year because Navigator was giving me image handling problems and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=Mozilla%20Firefox">Mozilla Firefox</a> proved to be easier, faster and less burdensome.<br /><br />Since 1994, Netscape has been a leading-edge web utility. However in recent years, competition from Mozilla Firefox has relentlessly scooped away market share from Netscape and a strong and victorious competitive battle has been waged in the interest of Internet Explorer by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). Although Netscape proved to be a strong web utility, in the last few years it lacked any significant improvements in user friendliness. I think that situation is in part due to Microsoft's reluctance to make the Windows operating system play nice with Netscape Navigator. We may take pause to wonder if <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) ever properly applied pressure on Microsoft over the situation ... probably not.<br /><br />In the big picture, no one is going to miss <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=Netscape%20Navigator">Netscape Navigator</a>. Yes, some few loyalists might whine for a while and some people with fully loaded hard drives might find their machines maxed out by the downloading of a new browser and the system changes associated with that, but in the end it's all good if it makes the browsing experience faster and easier for the end user. Besides, it might force the sale of some new computers, yes?<br /><br />Perhaps AOL should just spin off Netscape, take a bit of cash for it and write the rest off. That might be easiest in the long run. When given the fact that AOL will apparently be relegating <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Netscape/">Netscape</a> to second-tier status, do you really think it'll ever get better? <br /><br />Stick a fork in it gang, it's done.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/netscape-navigator-on-the-webs-endangered-species-list/">Netscape Navigator on the web's endangered species list</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/aol-pulls-plug-on-netscape-web-browser/n20071228172809990024>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/netscape-navigator-on-the-webs-endangered-species-list/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1075428/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/netscape-navigator-on-the-webs-endangered-species-list/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>browser</category><category>Explorer</category><category>Firefox</category><category>Internet</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Mozilla</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Navigator</category><category>Netscape</category><category>surf</category><category>Time-Warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay, Yahoo!, Firefox, Facebook: This ain't good folks.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><img width="160" height="NaN" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/blogginggary.jpg" />This Internet is starting to tighten up a bit and I don't like it. Mostly, I'm a little irritated that moves are being made that seek to pigeonhole our options as content producers and seekers. Call me the consummate conspiracy theoretician if you want to, but I say right at the head of this movement is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>). The following scenario components may provide special interest to the fanciers of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). You may also be interested in these tidbits if you hold a chunk of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). <br /><br />About two months ago the online auction proposition was dumped by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) They gave no real explanation as to why they were doing it. They just closed up shop. Now, they have entered into a joint venture regarding a <a href="http://www.revenuesource.com/internet-marketing-articles/16937-yahoo-ebay-turn-out-toolbar.html">Yahoo! search tool for eBay.</a> Now that answers some questions, doesn't it.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>eBay, Yahoo!, Firefox, Facebook: This ain't good folks.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/">eBay, Yahoo!, Firefox, Facebook: This ain't good folks.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/945145/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bar</category><category>digital</category><category>eBay</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Firefox</category><category>Google</category><category>images</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Mozilla</category><category>search</category><category>tool</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft to push IE 7.0 via automatic updates]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/microsoft-to-push-ie-7-0-via-automatic-updates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/microsoft-to-push-ie-7-0-via-automatic-updates/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/microsoft-to-push-ie-7-0-via-automatic-updates/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p>In a bid to push its new suite of integrated applications and tools, <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1994511,00.asp?kc=EWINFEMNL072606EOAD">Microsoft is planning its initial deployment of Internet Explorer 7.0 via Microsoft's Automatic Updates Service</a>. <br /><br />So as to not cause another WGA (Windows Genuine Advantage) debacle, whereby downloaded 'Automatic Updates' were functioning beyond the expected scope of users ('dialing' back to Microsoft Servers automatically); IE 7.0 will be designated as a High Priority download, but users will be able to opt-out of downloading the product.<br /><br />While the opt-out option is certainly a nod to user choice advocates, distribution of IE 7.0 at all via the Automatic Updates channel is in question. Automatic Updates should remain a primary channel for security updates only.<br /><br />Distribution of a product should be initiated through a product distribution channel, either through standard retail or Microsoft's Download Center.<br /><br />Of course from a business standpoint, this is a very logical move for Microsoft, taking a play from classic marketing textbooks. Have customers 'opt-out' rather than 'opt-in'. That way, by default you are capturing market share, and only by effort of the end user are you losing market share.<br /><br />With alternative OS options emerging in lieu of the upcoming Windows Vista (ie. consumer and commercial flavored linux releases) and market penetration of the Macintosh platform, it is imperative that Microsoft hook users onto individual Microsoft applications which through integration with other MS products will synergistically push the Microsoft platform. <br /><br />In the standalone browser market, IE 7.0 will launch before Firefox 2.0, though Opera 9.0 has launched and has gathered a relatively small but loyal following.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/microsoft-to-push-ie-7-0-via-automatic-updates/">Microsoft to push IE 7.0 via automatic updates</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1994511,00.asp?kc=EWINFEMNL072606EOAD>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/microsoft-to-push-ie-7-0-via-automatic-updates/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/647335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/microsoft-to-push-ie-7-0-via-automatic-updates/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>firefox</category><category>ie7</category><category>opera</category><category>wga</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard Tsung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:27:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
