<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is It Time for the U.S. to Remove Fiscal/Monetary Stimulus?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/is-it-time-for-the-u-s-to-remove-fiscal-monetary-stimulus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/is-it-time-for-the-u-s-to-remove-fiscal-monetary-stimulus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/is-it-time-for-the-u-s-to-remove-fiscal-monetary-stimulus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" /><em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) Columnist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/04/opinion/04krugman.html">Paul Krugman,</a> among others, has pointed out that it's way too early to think in terms of ending fiscal/stimulus. The economic expansion has barely begun -- let alone achieved self-sustaining status -- and the premature withdrawal of stimulus increases the likelihood of a double-dip recession, Krugman said. <br /><br />Further, the view from here argues that investors need to keep in mind that U.S. economic fundamentals have not placed the economy on a steady-growth track -- not yet. What we have is one quarter (Q3 2009) of GDP growth. That's it.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/is-it-time-for-the-u-s-to-remove-fiscal-monetary-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is It Time for the U.S. to Remove Fiscal/Monetary Stimulus?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/is-it-time-for-the-u-s-to-remove-fiscal-monetary-stimulus/">Is It Time for the U.S. to Remove Fiscal/Monetary Stimulus?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/is-it-time-for-the-u-s-to-remove-fiscal-monetary-stimulus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19304133/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/is-it-time-for-the-u-s-to-remove-fiscal-monetary-stimulus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>FiscalPolicy</category><category>growth</category><category>Krugman</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Global economy will contract in 2009 for first time since World War II, World Bank says]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/globe.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Investors received yet another indicator Monday that this is not your father's recession. <br /><br />The global economy will likely contract in 2009 for the first time since World War II -- including a decline in trade - - the World Bank announced in its <a href="http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:22093316~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.html">most recent report. </a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Global economy will contract in 2009 for first time since World War II, World Bank says</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/">Global economy will contract in 2009 for first time since World War II, World Bank says</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1482157/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>credit markets</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>FiscalPolicy</category><category>gdp</category><category>global economy</category><category>globalization</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>MonetaryPolicy</category><category>trade</category><category>World Bank</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The fiscal stimulus plan: Where is the missing element that solved the Great Depression?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/the-fiscal-stimulus-plan-where-is-the-missing-element-that-solv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/the-fiscal-stimulus-plan-where-is-the-missing-element-that-solv/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/the-fiscal-stimulus-plan-where-is-the-missing-element-that-solv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/dollar.jpg" alt="" />The most sweeping fiscal stimulus in a generation is about to be signed into law by President Obama. It amounts to $787 billion and includes tax incentives, infrastructure projects, renewable energy developments, and payment to state and local authorities.</p>
<p>However, investors appear to be skeptical as indicated by the performance of the markets today for a variety of reasons: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Some estimate that as much as 75% of the spending will not reach the economy until 2010. </li>
    <li>There are questions as to how many jobs in the United States will actually be created. </li>
    <li>People are uncertain as to how productive the spending bill will be and how much is actually just wasteful "pork."</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p><br /> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/the-fiscal-stimulus-plan-where-is-the-missing-element-that-solv/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The fiscal stimulus plan: Where is the missing element that solved the Great Depression?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/the-fiscal-stimulus-plan-where-is-the-missing-element-that-solv/">The fiscal stimulus plan: Where is the missing element that solved the Great Depression?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/the-fiscal-stimulus-plan-where-is-the-missing-element-that-solv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1463318/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/the-fiscal-stimulus-plan-where-is-the-missing-element-that-solv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defense</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>FiscalPolicy</category><category>FiscalStimulus</category><category>FreePass</category><category>great depression</category><category>GreatDepression</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama, Pelosi expect 'sobering' December jobs report on Friday]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/obama-pelosi-expect-sobering-december-jobs-report-on-friday/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/obama-pelosi-expect-sobering-december-jobs-report-on-friday/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/obama-pelosi-expect-sobering-december-jobs-report-on-friday/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/not_hiring_sign.jpg" />It looks like tomorrow could very well become yet another 'brace yourself Friday' or another edition of '<span style="font-style: italic;">As The U.S. Economy Turns.</span>'<br /><br />Still, hopefully it won't become a new rendition of 'down goes the Dow' with another visit by our old friend, you guessed it - - <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">Dow 8,000.</a> But analysts and economists haven't ruled the latter out. <br /><br />The reason? The December 2008 jobs report, to be released by the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/bls/newsrels.htm#schedules">U.S. Labor Department</a> at 8:30 a.m. EST. <br /><br /><strong>December jobs data won't be pretty</strong><br /><br />President-elect Barack Obama, D-Illinois, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, said they are bracing for a 'sobering' jobs report, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE50439I20090105">Reuters reported. </a><br /><br />Sobering is one way to lower expectations: economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> expect the December 2008 jobs report to show a loss of 500,000 jobs. If that occurs, the U.S. economy will have shed more than 2.5 million jobs in 2008 and a staggering 1 million jobs in the last two months alone, November / December 2008. It would also make 2008 the largest job loss year for the United States since World War II.<br /><br />Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks economists are becoming "very concerned" for two reasons. First, a trend line for job cuts has increased for more than six months. Second, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/automatic-data-processing-inc/adp/nas">ADP's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/automatic-data-processing-inc/adp/nas">ADP</a>) private sector job report showed the loss of a staggering 693,000 jobs, and even though the ADP report has not correlated well with the Labor Department report, it still is setting off alarm bells in economists' circles. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/obama-pelosi-expect-sobering-december-jobs-report-on-friday/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama, Pelosi expect 'sobering' December jobs report on Friday</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/obama-pelosi-expect-sobering-december-jobs-report-on-friday/">Obama, Pelosi expect 'sobering' December jobs report on Friday</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/obama-pelosi-expect-sobering-december-jobs-report-on-friday/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1423162/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/obama-pelosi-expect-sobering-december-jobs-report-on-friday/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>FiscalPolicy</category><category>gdp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>layoffs</category><category>Obama</category><category>Obama Administration</category><category>Pelosi</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can the Fed fight deflation? How?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/can-the-fed-fight-deflation-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/can-the-fed-fight-deflation-how/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/can-the-fed-fight-deflation-how/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>Based on October wholesale and consumer price <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/great-news-on-inflation-if-you-have-money-but-ominous-sign-fo/">reports</a>, July 2008 marked a shift from <strong>inflation</strong> into full-blown <strong>deflation</strong>. This has much to do with the declining price of oil, which in turn is related to the collapse of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/speculation-accounts-for-81-of-oil-trading-volume/">speculative buying of oil while shorting the dollar</a>; the decline in demand resulting from a global downturn; and the failure of producers to cut supply fast enough. </p>
<p>However, as I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/great-news-on-inflation-if-you-have-money-but-ominous-sign-fo/">posted</a>, there's a vicious cycle underway which leads to:</p>
<ol>
    <li>
    <div>Excess inventory,</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Price cuts, </div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Capacity and job reductions, </div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Less spending power, </div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Lower demand -- followed by a return to step 1. </div>
    </li>
</ol>
<p>And with jobless claims at <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=awlaebKn1pSQ&amp;refer=us">542,000</a> and the price of oil down below $50, it's pretty clear that this cycle is well underway. What can the Federal Reserve do to turn this vicious cycle into a virtuous one? It is likely to cut the Fed Funds rate to zero or very close to it -- 0.25% -- in January. But in a 2002 speech, Bernanke said that there are other ways the Fed could try to boost overall demand, which would reverse the deflationary cycle.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/can-the-fed-fight-deflation-how/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can the Fed fight deflation? How?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/can-the-fed-fight-deflation-how/">Can the Fed fight deflation? How?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=awlaebKn1pSQ&amp;refer=us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/can-the-fed-fight-deflation-how/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1378120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/can-the-fed-fight-deflation-how/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deflation</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>FiscalPolicy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>MonetaryPolicy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. initial jobless claims fall, but remain above Fed's ceiling]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-remain-above-feds-ceiling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-remain-above-feds-ceiling/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-remain-above-feds-ceiling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Initial jobless claims fell to 356,000 to for the week ended February 2 from the previous week, but came in above the 344,000 consensus estimate, the <a href="http://ows.doleta.gov/press/2008/020708.asp">U.S. Labor Department announced</a> Thursday. Claims for the previous week were revised up 3,000 to 378,000.<br /><br />Also, the four-week moving average jumped 11,000 to 335,000. Economists view the four-week average as a better indicator of unemployment conditions, as it smooths-out anomalies for strikes, holidays, or other idiosyncratic events. <br /><br />The largest increases in initial claims for the week ending Jan. 26 were in Wisconsin, +2,325; North Carolina, +715; Maryland, +504; Virginia, +340, and California, +233. The largest decreases were in Michigan, -7,546; Illinois, -4,483; Florida, -4,127; Ohio, -3,038; and Texas, -2887.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the number of continuing claims increased by 75,000 to 2.785 million from a revised 2.710 million for the week ended January 26, the latest period for which figures were available. <br /><br /><strong>Economic Analysis:</strong> Another poor weekly jobless claims statistic, one that continues to show a deterioration in employment conditions. Further, the four-week moving average continues to rise and is approaching the U.S. Federal Reserve's danger zone of 350,000. The U.S. Federal Reserve considers a four-week average above 350,000 a signal of soft labor market conditions. In addition, the rise in continuing claims, which measures the seasonally-adjusted uninsured, to 2.785 million, also indicates a tepid job market. If jobless conditions continue to worsen, additional monetary and fiscal measures undoubtedly will be needed to stimulate the U.S. economy.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-remain-above-feds-ceiling/">U.S. initial jobless claims fall, but remain above Fed's ceiling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-remain-above-feds-ceiling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1109039/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-remain-above-feds-ceiling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>FiscalPolicy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush, Congress reach tentative agreement on fiscal stimulus package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/bush-congress-reach-tentative-agreement-on-fiscal-stimulus-pack/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/bush-congress-reach-tentative-agreement-on-fiscal-stimulus-pack/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/bush-congress-reach-tentative-agreement-on-fiscal-stimulus-pack/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/george-w-bush.jpg" alt="" />This one may make the record books for an approved, federal stimulus package, if it becomes law within a month.<br /><br />U.S. Congressional officials from both parties and White House aides announced Thursday morning they have reached a tentative deal on an economic stimulus plan, an aide close to the negotiations said, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2335032020080124">Reuters reported</a>.<br /><br />"We have an agreement in principle," said the aide, who spoke on condition he not be identified. Plan costs were not immediately available.<br /><br />The Democratic Party-led U.S. Congress and the Republican Party-led White House have been negotiating a $140-160 billion fiscal packaged aimed at stimulating the U.S. economy, which most economists believe is growing well below trend-growth levels. Many believe the economy is growing at about 1.0-1.5%, if it hasn't already fallen into a recession. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/bush-congress-reach-tentative-agreement-on-fiscal-stimulus-pack/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush, Congress reach tentative agreement on fiscal stimulus package</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/bush-congress-reach-tentative-agreement-on-fiscal-stimulus-pack/">Bush, Congress reach tentative agreement on fiscal stimulus package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/bush-congress-reach-tentative-agreement-on-fiscal-stimulus-pack/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1095477/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/bush-congress-reach-tentative-agreement-on-fiscal-stimulus-pack/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Democrats</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>FiscalPolicy</category><category>FNM</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>GDP</category><category>President Bush</category><category>Republicans</category><category>tax rebate</category><category>taxes</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke expected to announce support for short-term economic stimulus package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/bernanke-expected-to-announce-support-for-short-term-economic-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/bernanke-expected-to-announce-support-for-short-term-economic-st/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/bernanke-expected-to-announce-support-for-short-term-economic-st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>When Ben Bernanke testifies before the House Budget Committee today, he's expected to announce his support for a short-term economic stimulus package, as long as it's based on measures that are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/business/17fiscal.html?hp">quick and temporary</a>, according to the <em>New York Times</em> this morning. He's told lawmakers he won't comment on proposals to link a stimulus package to the permanent extension of President Bush's tax cuts. </p>
<p>Finally some political sanity. I wish Alan Greenspan had taken that stance as President Bush continued to cut taxes during a war. If Greenspan had we wouldn't have added so much to U.S. debt and this country would be in much better shape fiscally to get us through the current credit storm.</p>
<p>Bernanke's support for the short-term fix is critical to getting many lawmakers to accept a stimulus package even if it means adding to the U.S. deficit. Without it, Congress probably could not pass a veto-proof economic stimulus package. President Bush would likely veto anything that doesn't include a permanent extension of his tax cuts to try to bully the Congress into continuing his economic folly - paying for a war on future debt. Our children certainly will hate us for a long time if we continue to ignore the burden we're putting on them. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/bernanke-expected-to-announce-support-for-short-term-economic-st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernanke expected to announce support for short-term economic stimulus package</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/bernanke-expected-to-announce-support-for-short-term-economic-st/">Bernanke expected to announce support for short-term economic stimulus package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/business/17fiscal.html?hp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/bernanke-expected-to-announce-support-for-short-term-economic-st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1089216/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/bernanke-expected-to-announce-support-for-short-term-economic-st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ben bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>FiscalPolicy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>MonetaryPolicy</category><category>tax cuts</category><category>TaxCuts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
