<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable no longer stuck in the muddle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/24/time-warner-cable-no-longer-stuck-in-the-muddle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/24/time-warner-cable-no-longer-stuck-in-the-muddle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/24/time-warner-cable-no-longer-stuck-in-the-muddle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p>As a long-term shareholder I appreciated news of the <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2006/tc20061018_677954.htm">breakout of Time Warner Cable</a>.</p>
<p>Now, I'm sure some clicking on this post thought that maybe a typo had escaped the editors, but I did mean<em><strong> "muddle"</strong></em> in the title of this post and not <strong>"<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-STYLE: italic">middle"</span></strong>. Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) has been encouraged for some time by shareholders, Carl Icahn, analysts, and various prognosticators and their like to give the market place a clear picture of the company's assets, company's goals, and to unlock their hidden value. This is value that many viewed as mired in a muddle of slow-moving, misdirected pieces aggregated in a conglomerate, lead by a board that just did not get it or get with it.</p>
<p>The news that <em>TWX is going to release Time Warner Cable</em>, which flies under the banner TWC, from its corporate bondage was welcomed by Wall Street and I'm sure Mr. Icahn. In fact this plan may be one of the things shared with Carl Icahn months ago that pacified him and his investor group from "throwing things" in the meetings with Chairman Richard Parsons. This and dramatic changes at the AOL division which are still ongoing.</p>
<p>Continued clarity of purpose and strong leadership will continue to bring value to TWX in the coming years so I will be holding on for a while.</p>
<p>There are many companies stuck in the muddle that should give some thought to this issue of clarity and give investors something they can understand while demonstrating they themselves (corporate executives) know what they are doing.</p>
<p>Other companies that I believe are stuck in the muddle include the following: <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Yahoo</span> (YHOO); <strong>Sun</strong> <strong>Microsystems</strong> (SUNW) which is just plain stuck; <strong>General Electric</strong> (GE) which should at least tell us why they must continue to own NBC; <strong>Microsoft</strong> (MSFT) is less muddled lately and 2007 should be their opportunity to come clean; <strong>Citigroup</strong> (C) is going nowhere fast with lots of potential and nothing happening -- this is one that should definitely <em>"speed up, slow down, or get the hell out of the way";</em> <strong>Ford</strong> (G) and <strong>General Motors</strong> (GM)... could they be more muddled up? Anybody want to add to the list of muddled companies? There are plenty.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: In addition to owning TWX, I own Ford bonds bought at a discount to face value. I hold no other position long or short in any other stock mentioned.</em></p>
<p>Other recent articles:</p>
<p><a title="View Energy: Going forward while looking back on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/energy-going-forward-while-looking-back/" target="_blank"><font color="#0b497a">Energy: Going forward while looking back</font></a></p>
<p><a title="View All Cramer needs now is a PIE in the FACE on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/all-cramer-needs-now-is-a-pie-in-the-face/" target="_blank">All Cramer needs now is a PIE in the FACE</a><br /><a title="View DOW 14,000 here we come! on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/29/dow-14-000-here-we-come/" target="_blank">DOW 14,000 here we come!</a><br /><a title="View Business contends with illegal 'aliens,' immigrants in a Ghost Town? on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/29/which-widely-held-companies-contend-with-illegal-aliens-immig/" target="_blank"><font color="#0b497a">Business contends with illegal 'aliens,' immigrants in a Ghost Town?</font></a></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>Sheldon Liber</em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for Design and Research of an Architecture &amp; Planning firm.</em></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/24/time-warner-cable-no-longer-stuck-in-the-muddle/">Time Warner Cable no longer stuck in the muddle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/24/time-warner-cable-no-longer-stuck-in-the-muddle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/689042/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/24/time-warner-cable-no-longer-stuck-in-the-muddle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>Citigroup (C)</category><category>Citigroup(c)</category><category>Ford (F)</category><category>Ford(f)</category><category>General Motors (GM)</category><category>GeneralMotors(gm)</category><category>Intvestor value</category><category>IntvestorValue</category><category>Microsoft (MSFT)</category><category>Microsoft(msft)</category><category>Richard Parsons</category><category>RichardParsons</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Sun Microsystems (SUNW)</category><category>SunMicrosystems(sunw)</category><category>Time Warner (TWX)</category><category>Time Warner Cable (TWC)</category><category>TimeWarner(twx)</category><category>TimeWarnerCable(twc)</category><category>Yahoo (YHOO)</category><category>Yahoo(yhoo)</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If GOOG sinks GOOG stinks!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/19/if-goog-sinks-goog-stinks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/19/if-goog-sinks-goog-stinks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/19/if-goog-sinks-goog-stinks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a></p><p>Google has been moving up recently very nicely with the overall market; but I don't care what the upside potential is, <em><strong>it STINKS as an investment even if it goes to $1,000!</strong></em></p>
<p>Today GOOG sank about 3% and was down as much as 7% during the day on another company's news. (Perhaps this was just profit taking?) Yahoo reported that its sales will be in the lower half of market guidance. See: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yhoo/nas/extRedirect?sym=yhoo&amp;date=20060919150000&amp;type=news.featureview&amp;provider=CNNMoney&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmoney.cnn.com%2F2006%2F09%2F19%2Ftechnology%2Fyahoo%2Findex.htm%3Fsource%3Daol_quote">Yahoo sees weakness, stock tumbles</a> - <em>CNNMoney</em> </p>
<p>So the market penalized Google -- Why? What if the reason Yahoo! is doing poorly is because Google is doing so well? Perhaps it should have gone up, some more, instead of down. But it did not go up because of the skittish speculation in the stock. <em>Can you imagine what would have happened if Google itself reported some earnings disappointment -- Lookout below!</em></p>
<p>How can anyone even call it an investment? It is pure speculation. Various analysts and prognosticators have continued to speculate about 12-month price targets based on their perceived revenue models. Google has such a relatively short history that there is little track record to rely upon. You know what I think of analysts, see: <span class="meta"><a title="View Analyzing the Analysts - It's all a joke right? on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/analyzing-the-analysts-its-all-a-joke-right/" target="_blank">Analyzing the Analysts - It's all a joke right?</a></span></p>
<p>Of course, analysts have had plenty to say recently; Cramer said that the stock should reach $500, as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/13/cramer-reiterates-that-goog-shares-to-reach-500/">Brian White pointed out</a>. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/19/if-goog-sinks-goog-stinks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>If GOOG sinks GOOG stinks!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/19/if-goog-sinks-goog-stinks/">If GOOG sinks GOOG stinks!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/19/if-goog-sinks-goog-stinks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/671577/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/19/if-goog-sinks-goog-stinks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>Ford (F)</category><category>Ford(f)</category><category>Google (GOOG)</category><category>Google(goog)</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Yahoo (YHOO)</category><category>Yahoo(yhoo)</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:38:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
