<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Jumpy stock market but Special 'K' doing fine]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/k/" rel="tag">Kellogg Co (K)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bnd/" rel="tag">Vanguard Total Bond Market (BND)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/pumpkin.jpg" alt="" />What a week it was and it is starting off with more of the same! The day before Halloween the market gets spooked. The Dow drops 200 one day, rises 200 the next, and falls 250 to close the week. Yes, financial pundits could point to meaningful stories about the dollars rise, consumer spending sagging, the recession ending and so forth to explain market reactions but there is more to it than that.<br /><br />Even among the 15 positions discussed in <a target="_blank" title="View Where should granny put $50,000? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/">Where should granny put $50,000?</a> only the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vanguard-bd-index-fd-inc/bnd/nys">Vanguard Total Bond Market</a> exchange-traded fund (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vanguard-bd-index-fd-inc/bnd/nys">BND</a>) and the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys">Kellogg Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys">K</a>) were up last Friday. Good thing I advised "granny" to put half her funds in the ETF.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Jumpy stock market but Special 'K' doing fine</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/">Serious Money: Jumpy stock market but Special 'K' doing fine</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19217894/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BND</category><category>CIT</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>ford motor co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>K</category><category>kellogg company</category><category>KelloggCompany</category><category>serious money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Total Bond Fund</category><category>TotalBondFund</category><category>Vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford's Fusion sees record sales for fifth consecutive month]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/fords-fusion-sees-sales-record-for-fifth-consecutive-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/fords-fusion-sees-sales-record-for-fifth-consecutive-month/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/fords-fusion-sees-sales-record-for-fifth-consecutive-month/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/ford.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) continues to sell a ton of the Fusion mid-size sedans, as the passenger car set a sales record for itself for the fifth consecutive month in August. In addition, the average selling prices have been increasing. In the playing field with the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) Camry and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys">Honda Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys">HMC</a>) Accord, it's impressive to see the Fusion doing so well.<br /><br />The Fusion is all-new for the 2010 model year, so it could continue selling well into the latter half of 2009 when the new model arrives on dealer floors. Anything Ford can do to continue breaking into one of the largest segments of the U.S. auto market, though, would be a huge plus for the automaker.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/fords-fusion-sees-sales-record-for-fifth-consecutive-month/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford's Fusion sees record sales for fifth consecutive month</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/fords-fusion-sees-sales-record-for-fifth-consecutive-month/">Ford's Fusion sees record sales for fifth consecutive month</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20090829/ford-fusion-sees-mores-sales-growth-august.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/fords-fusion-sees-sales-record-for-fifth-consecutive-month/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19145657/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/fords-fusion-sees-sales-record-for-fifth-consecutive-month/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford Fusion</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>Ford sales</category><category>FordFusion</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>FordSales</category><category>Fusion sales</category><category>FusionSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford now sits as a disadvantage. At least, for now.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/ford-now-sits-as-a-disadvantage-at-least-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/ford-now-sits-as-a-disadvantage-at-least-for-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/ford-now-sits-as-a-disadvantage-at-least-for-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/ford.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) now stands alone as the sole American automotive company out of the "big three" that has not filed for bankruptcy. Ford CEO Alan Mulally made moves starting years ago to ensure Ford would dig itself out of many legacy problems, and it paid off. I even <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/18/ford-ceo-reshuffles-executive-management/">chided the man's salary</a> when he was hired. Was he worth it? Sure.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/ford-now-sits-as-a-disadvantage-at-least-for-now/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford now sits as a disadvantage. At least, for now.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/ford-now-sits-as-a-disadvantage-at-least-for-now/">Ford now sits as a disadvantage. At least, for now.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2009-06-01-bankruptcy-competition-ford_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/ford-now-sits-as-a-disadvantage-at-least-for-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19054717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/ford-now-sits-as-a-disadvantage-at-least-for-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Mulally</category><category>AlanMulally</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>F</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford resists cutting dealer network, unlike GM and Chrysler]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/ford-resists-cutting-dealer-network-unlike-gm-and-chrysler/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/ford-resists-cutting-dealer-network-unlike-gm-and-chrysler/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/ford-resists-cutting-dealer-network-unlike-gm-and-chrysler/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/ford.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys"> Ford Motor Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>), while suffering through the largest auto industry malaise in generations, won't be closing legions of dealerships like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) or <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/14/chrysler-announces-major-dealership-closings/">Chrysler</a>. In fact, Ford indicated that it will benefit from the closure of 2,000 auto showrooms from its domestic competitors -- one that has already <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/its-official-chrysler-files-for-chapter-11/">filed for bankruptcy</a> and another that is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/experts-say-general-motors-bankruptcy-is-inevitable/">expected to shortly</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/ford-resists-cutting-dealer-network-unlike-gm-and-chrysler/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford resists cutting dealer network, unlike GM and Chrysler</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/ford-resists-cutting-dealer-network-unlike-gm-and-chrysler/">Ford resists cutting dealer network, unlike GM and Chrysler</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 May 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/business/19ford.html?_r=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/ford-resists-cutting-dealer-network-unlike-gm-and-chrysler/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1550111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/ford-resists-cutting-dealer-network-unlike-gm-and-chrysler/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>Ford Motor</category><category>ford motor co</category><category>ford motor co.</category><category>ford motor company</category><category>FordMotor</category><category>FordMotorCo</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>FordMotorCompany</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bill Ford: What a great time to be in the auto business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/bill-ford-what-a-great-time-to-be-in-the-auto-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/bill-ford-what-a-great-time-to-be-in-the-auto-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/bill-ford-what-a-great-time-to-be-in-the-auto-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/f.jpg" />New technologies are starting to set the auto world on fire, says <a href="http://%20http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Corp. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://%20http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) executive chairman and former Ford CEO Bill Ford. Although auto sales have dropped sharply in the last eight months, Mr. Ford sure believes that products like electric vehicles and biofuels will enable the reinvention of the automobile.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/bill-ford-what-a-great-time-to-be-in-the-auto-business/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bill Ford: What a great time to be in the auto business</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/bill-ford-what-a-great-time-to-be-in-the-auto-business/">Bill Ford: What a great time to be in the auto business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10223736-54.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/bill-ford-what-a-great-time-to-be-in-the-auto-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1523318/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/bill-ford-what-a-great-time-to-be-in-the-auto-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto business</category><category>AutoBusiness</category><category>Bill Ford</category><category>BillFord</category><category>electric cars</category><category>ElectricCars</category><category>f</category><category>Ford</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Ford TV ads made by consumers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/ford-to-run-tv-ad-featuring-customer-web-contest-submissions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/ford-to-run-tv-ad-featuring-customer-web-contest-submissions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/ford-to-run-tv-ad-featuring-customer-web-contest-submissions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/f.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) is stepping into the consumer-created advertising content kingdom. It announced today that it will run a national ad featuring a short film that recently won an online competition. <br /><br />This is the secret that many companies are just now learning: your customers are your best advertising asset. When it comes to something as passionate about talking about the 2010 Ford Mustang, you definitely want to get out of your customer's way, right?<br /><br />This reminds me of Tide's "<a href="http://tide.com/en_US/tidetogo/index.jsp">Talking Stain</a>" ad during the last Super Bowl. The ad was more than a pitch for the product; it also sent viewers to Tide's website where they could send in their own "Talking Stain" video entries. Prizes were available and everything. The commercial was fairly low-budget, but the message and the strategy were brilliant. Perhaps Ford is trying to latch onto some of that effort. It's about time.
<p>The advertising industry's "same old, same old" tack on strategic consumer messaging is tired, no matter how innovative the ad glitz is. Engaging consumers by encouraging a two-way line of communication is where it's at for a whole new crop of consumers. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/ford-to-run-tv-ad-featuring-customer-web-contest-submissions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New Ford TV ads made by consumers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/ford-to-run-tv-ad-featuring-customer-web-contest-submissions/">New Ford TV ads made by consumers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSTRE48N15L20080924>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/ford-to-run-tv-ad-featuring-customer-web-contest-submissions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1323040/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/ford-to-run-tv-ad-featuring-customer-web-contest-submissions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>Ford TV ads</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>FordTvAds</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford (F): Do people really want hybrids?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/ford-f-do-people-really-want-hybrids/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/ford-f-do-people-really-want-hybrids/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/ford-f-do-people-really-want-hybrids/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ford.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) won't be rolling out hybrid vehicles at the pace of the competition, the company said recently. Instead, the troubled automaker is taking a "deliberate pace" introducing hybrids to ensure there is enough mass-market appeal for the vehicles. Ford wants to avoid spending hundreds of millions on hybrid technology that exceeds what the population wants.<br /><br />The competition is chomping at the bit to get hybrids of all shapes and sizes into the hands of consumers -- but do consumers really want to switch to more fuel efficient hybrids so quickly? Smaller cars like the Ford Focus are selling like hotcakes, which indicates that consumers are interested in fuel efficiency -- but not necessarily hybrids, which tend to have less space and cost thousands more. Think consumers interested in hybrids are doing it to be green? I would disagree -- they're looking for lower gas bills, plain and simple.<br /><br />Ford <a href="http://www.dispatch.co.za/article.aspx?id=248762">hybrid marketing manager David Finnegan</a> said, "We don't believe in making cars for hundreds of people or thousands of people . . . they have to be affordable to our customers and capable of sustaining millions (of vehicles) in sales volume." Well said. Until there is more actual demand, Ford's decision to develop hybrid vehicles in a delayed and deliberate fashion is a sound choice.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/ford-f-do-people-really-want-hybrids/">Ford (F): Do people really want hybrids?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dispatch.co.za/article.aspx?id=248762>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/ford-f-do-people-really-want-hybrids/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1315309/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/ford-f-do-people-really-want-hybrids/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>Ford hybrid</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordHybrid</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>Hybrid vehicles</category><category>HybridVehicles</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford to extend buyout offers to more employees next week]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/ford-to-extend-buyout-offers-to-more-employees-next-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/ford-to-extend-buyout-offers-to-more-employees-next-week/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/ford-to-extend-buyout-offers-to-more-employees-next-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/ford.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) will be handing out employee buyout offers next week at plants in Michigan and Ohio. Just as the automaker continues grappling with a declining market share and lower sales, it needs to trim its workforce to match.<br /><br />The automaker has already given employees at plants in Ohio and Kentucky the option of leaving the company with a payoff, so this is nothing new. Offers will be made to <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUKN2146158620080721">employees at 14 sites throughout Ohio and Michigan</a>, with possibly more buyout offers coming to more facilities in August.<br /><br />As expected, the buyout offers are for five assembly plants in addition to supporting facilities that make engines and transmissions. It's a pretty good guess that all those plants and parts come from the large truck and SUV world, as Ford said it is slowly trending away from building so many of these vehicles. What's amazing is that the automaker warned of slowing truck and SUV sales <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/03/AR2005100301657.html">way back at the end of 2005</a>. It's just now seeing the fruits of it not paying much attention pay off.<br /><br />Ford's Way Forward plan to return to profitability won't come in 2009 as expected, and will probably show progress in 2010. If gas prices stay near current levels into 2009 and Ford still hasn't rearranged its product portfolio to be as flexible as the U.S. customer needs it to be, it may be beyond 2010 for Ford to see a consistent profit.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/ford-to-extend-buyout-offers-to-more-employees-next-week/">Ford to extend buyout offers to more employees next week</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://uk.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUKN2146158620080721>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/ford-to-extend-buyout-offers-to-more-employees-next-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1263313/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/ford-to-extend-buyout-offers-to-more-employees-next-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>auto sales</category><category>AutoIndustry</category><category>automakers</category><category>AutoSales</category><category>F</category><category>Ford employee buyouts</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordEmployeeBuyouts</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>united auto workers</category><category>UnitedAutoWorkers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford Q4 earnings preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/ford-q4-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/ford-q4-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/ford-q4-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/ford.jpg" alt="" />When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) reports its fourth quarter earnings this Thursday, the U.S. automaker is widely expected to post yet another huge loss. Although Ford may have been called a <a href="http://www.autointell.com/nao_companies/ford/ford-manufacturing/ford-mfg-main.htm">leading manufacturing expert</a> in the past, the slow pace of its turnaround will continue hurting it for at least all of 2008. CEO Alan Mulally's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Way_Forward">Way Forward plan</a> is making progress, but people are buying less cars due to a slowing economy -- and Ford has just as much competition now as it ever had.<br /><br />Ford investors are well aware of this as shares in the automaker are already sitting at 16-year lows. This week's <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200801181427DOWJONESDJONLINE000862_FORTUNE5.htm">earnings results</a> won't change it for the better, as analysts expect a loss of $0.20 per share on sales of $38.3 billion. It's not just Ford that will suffer soon. Analyst David Silver said, "November and December were just horrible months for auto sales in the U.S." Encouraging words? Well, maybe not.<br /><br />Although Asia and Central America sales may be a sweet spot for Ford this Thursday, its domestic sales may continue the slide they saw in the Q3 period, when Ford lost a billion greenbacks in the U.S. market. It was 2007 and Ford still considered trucks and SUVs to be the heart of its product lineup. Trouble is, consumers are running away screaming from those product lines due to shabby fuel economy figures. A bright spot continues to be the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/09/ford-edge-sales-gain-momentum/">Ford Edge</a>, an SUV crossover (or, CUV) that is selling very well for Ford. It has car-like handling, SUV-like storage and car-like gas mileage. Go figure -- customers are swallowing them up. It still can't rescue Ford from many more quarters of lackluster performance.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/ford-q4-earnings-preview/">Ford Q4 earnings preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200801181427DOWJONESDJONLINE000862_FORTUNE5.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/ford-q4-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1092129/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/ford-q4-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>Ford quarterly earnings</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>FordQuarterlyEarnings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford models lead list of 'most delightful vehicles']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ford-models-lead-list-of-most-delightful-vehicles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ford-models-lead-list-of-most-delightful-vehicles/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ford-models-lead-list-of-most-delightful-vehicles/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/ford.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) continues to sit in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/14/ford-ready-to-shelve-some-autos-if-sales-fall-further/">pit of lagging sales</a> and mountains of losses, even as some of its vehicles continue racking up awards and industry praise. In the 2007 Strategic Vision report on "most delightful" vehicles, the Detroit automaker won or tied for first in six categories -- the most of any automaker. So, why aren't Ford's sales reflecting all this jubilation? Hard to tell, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/ford-shares-sink-as-toyota-takes-u-s-number-two-spot/">but you may want to ask</a> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) about it.<br /><br />Here are Ford's results from the six categories it won or tied for first in: Ford's Mazda3 (small car); Ford's Volvo V50 Wagon (medium multifunction); Ford 's Expedition EL (large SUV); Ford's Lincoln MKX (tied for near-luxury SUV); Ford's Land Rover Range Rover Sport (luxury SUV); and finally, the Ford F-250/350 (heavy-duty pickup).<br /><br />So, it really was not all Ford's nameplate, but a bevy of its brands that helped it achieve record success here. Although rival automaker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) garnered a decent awards showing as well, Ford took top honors across the board. But then again, 2008 automobile sales in the U.S. are expected to slow down to lead to a flat year of sales growth, so Ford won't be the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/14/ford-ready-to-shelve-some-autos-if-sales-fall-further/">only one seeing middling success</a> this year in the U.S. new car market. At least it will have some awards to plaster on those showroom marketing plaques.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ford-models-lead-list-of-most-delightful-vehicles/">Ford models lead list of 'most delightful vehicles'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080108/BUSINESS01/801080401/1014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ford-models-lead-list-of-most-delightful-vehicles/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1080928/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ford-models-lead-list-of-most-delightful-vehicles/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>AutoIndustry</category><category>automobiles</category><category>Best Ford cars</category><category>BestFordCars</category><category>F</category><category>Ford awards</category><category>Ford motor Co.</category><category>Ford vehicle awards</category><category>FordAwards</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>FordVehicleAwards</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford finding success in RVs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/ford-finding-success-in-rvs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/ford-finding-success-in-rvs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/ford-finding-success-in-rvs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/ford_rv.jpg" alt="" />Although <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) has not really been lighting up the sales board in recent quarters, CEO Alan Mulally seems to be on track to get the automotive giant profitable sometime in 2009. He may not have to worry about one specialized area within the Detroit auto giant, however. Can you guess which division that may be?<br /><br />Try recreational vehicles. Ford's market share has increased in the motor home segment this year while its automotive market share has shrunk in several popular consumer vehicle segments. Although Ford doesn't brand motor homes under its own name, it makes more motor home chassis than any other U.S. company. Using chassis designed and built here in the U.S., Ford's no slouch when it comes to this niche automotive market. Ford makes the base chassis, which RV manufacturers then customize with a plethora of options (and weight) to market to customers.<br /><br />Therein lies Ford's <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071126/AUTO01/711260332/1148">continuing market opportunity in this arena</a>. The baby boomer generation is beginning to retire at rates that won't see slowdowns for over a decade. Are these folks going to buy RVs and tour the U.S. (and Mexico and Canada) at rates similar to the previous generation? The law of averages says that market will increase (hence the term "boomers) simply due to the large number of Americans (60+ million) in this age classification. Could Ford's savior partially be . . . <em>motor homes</em>? That's a stretch, but the company needs home runs any way it can get them. This is one of them.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/ford-finding-success-in-rvs/">Ford finding success in RVs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071126/AUTO01/711260332/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/ford-finding-success-in-rvs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1047794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/ford-finding-success-in-rvs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>Ford recerational vehicles</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>FordRecerationalVehicles</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Motor Homes</category><category>MotorHomes</category><category>Mulally</category><category>RVs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford (F) making great cars -- but not in the U.S.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/ford-f-making-great-cars-but-not-in-the-u-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/ford-f-making-great-cars-but-not-in-the-u-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/ford-f-making-great-cars-but-not-in-the-u-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/ford_kuga.jpg" alt="" />A report at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/11/frankfurt-2007-ford-unveils-kuga-its-first-euro-made-cuv/">Autoblog</a> about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) first crossover (CUV) model aimed at the European market generated some remarkable comments. Most readers were impressed with the new Ford CUV, called the Kuga, but were angry that it was so much better than anything Ford offers in the United States. A few typical comments:
<ul>
    <li>While the new Escape looks like it emerged from the 1990s, this small SUV looks distinctly 21st century. Shame on Ford.</li>
    <li>It's like if you want a decent American car, you have to move to Europe to buy one.</li>
    <li>Ford, listen up. I love Fords. I always have. I love THIS Ford Kuga. Next time I go out to buy a car, it will not be a Ford - because you think I do not deserve the chance to buy the Kuga. And that, Ford is why your unit sales stateside are going to continue down the toilet.</li>
    <li>Americans also don't particularly care about quality - just look at the pervasiveness of mcdonald's et. al. what do Americans like? a lot of cheap, style-free [expletive]. kinda like the escape.</li>
    <li>Your home market deserves better, Ford. Stop slapping us in the face!</li>
</ul>
Of course, not all of the comments were negative. But most were, and I was impressed by how much negative feeling there is toward Ford and, presumably, the rest of the American auto markers. It seems that the mediocre design of American cars is a long-term problem for Detroit, one the Big Three will have to work hard to correct.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/ford-f-making-great-cars-but-not-in-the-u-s/">Ford (F) making great cars -- but not in the U.S.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/ford-f-making-great-cars-but-not-in-the-u-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/988813/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/ford-f-making-great-cars-but-not-in-the-u-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crossover</category><category>CUV</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>Kuga</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rainey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Liveblogging Ford Q2 earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/liveblogging-ford-q2-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/liveblogging-ford-q2-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/liveblogging-ford-q2-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/live-coverage/" rel="tag">Live Coverage</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/ford-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) is slated to have a conference call regarding its Q2 earnings here in a few minutes. If you're ready to see the full results before the show gets underway, <a href="http://www.ford.com/en/company/investorInformation/companyReports/financialResults/default.htm">see this</a>. Investors hope the results will show some strength for the world's third largest automaker on sales of its smaller Edge crossover and fleet vehicles. The automaker needs some good news to ensure its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/ford-revival-on-track-according-to-ceo-mulally/">"Way Forward" plan</a> under the helm of CEO Alan Mulally is moving forward according to plan. Did it make strides this past quarter?<br /><br />Ford still posted some huge quarterly losses before it begins to make gains into the land of profitability sometime in 2009, according to Mulally. Until then, the company will continue reorganizing its business and paying huge operating expenses while it sets itself up to be more flexible and in-tune to customer demands that can shift almost immediately based on housing and gas prices. Those never fluctuate, right?<br /><br />The automaker lost just over $12.5 billion last year and posted a loss of $282 million during Q1 this year, so the bets are on in regards to <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/07/24/ap3946856.html">how large Ford's loss will be this quarter</a>. Estimates range from $0.36 to $0.73, but given the enormous scope of changes in Ford's immediate backyard at the moment, I'm not sure any crystal ball could be an accurate predictor of any upcoming Ford quarters at this point. With that, here we go. Remember to use the "Refresh" key to ensure you see the minute-by-minute updates below. All times are in EST.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/liveblogging-ford-q2-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Liveblogging Ford Q2 earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/liveblogging-ford-q2-earnings/">Liveblogging Ford Q2 earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/liveblogging-ford-q2-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/949112/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/26/liveblogging-ford-q2-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>Ford cars</category><category>Ford earnings</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordCars</category><category>FordEarnings</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM dealing with higher labor costs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/gm-dealing-with-higher-labor-costs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/gm-dealing-with-higher-labor-costs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/gm-dealing-with-higher-labor-costs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p>General Motors is up nearly $1 so far today to $37.75 as of this post. An upgrade by J.P. Morgan is fueling today's rise.</p>
<p>Yet the road to recovery <a href="http://GM">General Motors </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GM</a>) continues to not be any easy one. In addition to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/liveblogging-gms-june-u-s-sales-results/">plummeting sales in June</a> for its U.S. operations, the company's recent share rally may be over in the face of labor worries once again. At least <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/general-motors-india-logs-43-sales-growth-in-june/">June sales for GM in India</a> posted a healthy gain, or there would not be that much to talk about on the positive side for the automaker.<br /><br />At the end of last week, GM shares took a downturn to the tune of more than 3% as investors sensed skittishness on the part of GM based on a downgrade from Bear Stearns from "peer perform" to "outperform." Again, union concessions from the UAW are to blame a bit, even in the midst of rumors that a more favorable labor deal may be on the way to GM, saving the automaker some cost as a result.<br /><br />As has been the case for quite a while, higher labor costs continue to nip at the heels of both <a href="http://F">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">F</a>) and GM -- and it's something that most foreign auto competitors have avoided. Want figures? How about GM's $70/hour employee cost versus<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> Toyota's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TM</a>) $40/hour employee cost? Yes -- both pay and benefits are factored in there. It's really not hard to see why GM has been (and probably will always be) at a cost disadvantage compared to the competition.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/gm-dealing-with-higher-labor-costs/">GM dealing with higher labor costs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/markets/2007/07/05/general-motors-closer-markets-equity-cx_af_0705markets35.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/gm-dealing-with-higher-labor-costs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/936792/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/gm-dealing-with-higher-labor-costs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>General Motors</category><category>General Motors Unions</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GeneralMotorsUnions</category><category>GM</category><category>GM labor costs</category><category>GmLaborCosts</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top 25 for NEXT 25 Years: Color Kinetics offered $34 by Philips]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/top-25-for-next-25-years-color-kinetics-offered-34-by-philips/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/top-25-for-next-25-years-color-kinetics-offered-34-by-philips/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/top-25-for-next-25-years-color-kinetics-offered-34-by-philips/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/25-stocks-for-next-25-years/" rel="tag">25 Stocks for Next 25 Years</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/clrk/" rel="tag">Color Kinetics (CLRK)</a></p><p> The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/05/top-25-for-the-next-25-years-color-kinetics-lighting-the-way/">first company in my series</a> of the top 25 stocks for the NEXT 25 years is about to be acquired. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/color-kinetics-incorporated/clrk/nas">Color Kinetics</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/color-kinetics-incorporated/clrk/nas">CLRK</a>) is <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/philips-offers-688m-for-color-kinetics/n20070619061809990006">being pursued</a> by Dutch-based company Philips Lighting for $34 per share. The Dutch company is the world's largest lighting company.</p>
<p> The $34 per share offer represents a $688 million total acquisition price. Color Kinetics management has endorsed the deal and is encouraging shareholders to accept the offer.</p>
<p> Color Kinetics brings a rich portfolio of patents to the marriage. With 64 patents having been granted and another 100+ patents-pending, Color Kinetics brings to Philips the next generation technology of LED lighting products. Color Kinetics had won many high-profile lighting contracts recently, including the dash-board lighting work for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Ford Motor</a> Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">F</a>). The new-generation LED-based lighting systems had not yet been economical for residential housing applications, but the market is indeed moving in that direction. </p>
<p> With Philips owning Color Kinetics technology, the residential market will be within its reach in the near future. Color Kinetics is selling to Philips for nearly 7 times revenues, a rich valuation, but certainly not when considering the growth rate of Color Kinetics, 35-40%, and its patent portfolio.</p>
<p> Oh well, we still have 24 companies left on the original list of 25 stocks for the NEXT 25 years...</p>
<p><em>Georges Yared is the CIO of <a href="http://www.georgesyared.com/">Yared Investment Research</a>. <br /></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/top-25-for-next-25-years-color-kinetics-offered-34-by-philips/">Top 25 for NEXT 25 Years: Color Kinetics offered $34 by Philips</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/top-25-for-next-25-years-color-kinetics-offered-34-by-philips/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921378/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/top-25-for-next-25-years-color-kinetics-offered-34-by-philips/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>25 Stocks for Next 25 Years</category><category>25StocksForNext25Years</category><category>CLRK</category><category>Color Kinetics</category><category>ColorKinetics</category><category>F</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>Philips Lighting</category><category>PhilipsLighting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler and GM: Makes no sense]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/chrysler-and-gm-makes-no-sense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/chrysler-and-gm-makes-no-sense/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/chrysler-and-gm-makes-no-sense/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dai/" rel="tag">Daimler (DAI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p>The Editorial director of Automotive News is claiming that General Motors Corporation (NYSE:GM) and DaimlerChrysler AG (NYSE:DCX) are in serious discussions for<a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/newsanalysis/automakers/10339450.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA"><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/newsanalysis/automakers/10339450.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA"> GM to acquire the Chrysler division from DCX. </a></a>You gotta be kidding.</p>
<p>GM has its own share of issues to work out. Why compound its problems with a failure like Chrysler? If Daimler cannot make it work -- and it has the resources, manpower and expertise -- what's going to allow GM to make it work?</p>
<p>The inevitable question will be: Can one plus one make three in this potential scenario? GM, and Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F) have been losing market share to the Japanese car makers on the low end-to high end markets, not to mention the small truck and SUV market. Chrysler has not been exactly setting any new sales records itself. </p>
<p>If GM were to absorb Chrysler, the initial upshot would be instant market share gains, but are they sustainable and more importantly, profitable? If Daimler couldn't make it a go in the USA with Chrysler, in spite of all the so-called cultural clashes within DCX, what's going to make GM successful? I don't think so...</p>
<p><em>Georges Yared is the author of </em><em>"Baby Boomer Investing...Where do we go from here?" and "Stop Losing Money Today."  For more info on both books go to <a href="http://www.georgesyared.com">http://www.georgesyared.com</a></em> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/chrysler-and-gm-makes-no-sense/">Chrysler and GM: Makes no sense</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/chrysler-and-gm-makes-no-sense/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/755652/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/chrysler-and-gm-makes-no-sense/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DCX</category><category>F</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>GM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[From Chevys to Toyotas in one generation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/from-chevys-to-toyotas-in-one-generation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/from-chevys-to-toyotas-in-one-generation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/from-chevys-to-toyotas-in-one-generation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p>The news coming out of Detroit these days is sickening. Not so surprising, maybe, but nauseating nevertheless. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/ford-feels-the-pain/">bloodletting at Ford Motor Company </a>(NYSE:F) and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/gm-delays-q4-results-sees-slower-january-sales/">the woes at General Motors</a> (NYSE:GM) is like watching a train wreck in slo-mo. <br /><br />But it's not surprising. With the SUV craze finally on the wane (thanks to gas prices that are only going to go up from here), Detroit doesn't seem to understand what regular folks want to drive: Well-made, fuel efficient cars. Doesn't hurt if they look cool, too. <br /><br />Somehow Toyota learned that lesson a long time ago. What's extremely ironic is that its quality and production principals were learned from a U.S. Army education program during the Post-war era. <br /><br />Whereas my parents, who came of age in the '50s, would never dream of driving a Japanese-made car, I learned to drive on a Toyota and would never drive anything else (OK, maybe a Honda...or a Beemer). My only experiences with American-made cars -- rentals all -- were less than impressive. And judging from Detroit's latest sales figures, I'm not the only American driver who doesn't like sluggish, gas-guzzling vehicles. <br /><br />Toyota clearly sees the future. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/cramer-calls-toyota-his-favorite-foreign-stock/">Jim Cramer's</a> been jumping around about the stock for a while now, and all he cares about is the bottom line. Is there any hope for the fat, ugly Americans?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/from-chevys-to-toyotas-in-one-generation/">From Chevys to Toyotas in one generation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/from-chevys-to-toyotas-in-one-generation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/743204/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/from-chevys-to-toyotas-in-one-generation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ford</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Toyota Motor</category><category>ToyotaMotor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Tilsner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should there be a deflation index?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dai/" rel="tag">Daimler (DAI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a></p><p>As I watch the retreating of prices on a selection of consumer goods I wonder where this is all going. Housing prices have dropped nationwide. Consumer electronics are sliding downward. The "big three", Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F), Daimler Chrysler (NYSE: DCX) and General Motors (NYSE: GM) are reducing sticker shock to the customer. Sure, these are nice things relative to the bottom line as consumers, but is this the signal of hard times to come? If I was seeing an overall increase of incomes at the same time as these price declines I'd be more excited about the "recession". Although the government says we're earning more, at ground level I just don't see it.</p>
<p>No, what I think is happening is the rising of a monster that I have feared for quite some time. We have lost such a significant share of the world's manufacturing output relative to our population that our economy is adjusting itself to compensate for the losses of those well-paying jobs. Don't let Washington fool you. Just because they say employment numbers are good doesn't mean you can sleep better tonight. When it takes three employees in the warehouse at a retail outlet like Best Buy (NYSE: BBY) to earn the same income as one dude used to earn building cars or vacuum cleaners, that's a sad state of affairs. Those three warehouse workers won't be buying flat screen TVs. The auto worker could have bought a couple of them.</p>
<p>Will our government wake up and send word to the World Trade Organization that we're starting to get a bit edgy over here? Maybe I'm wrong, but I think the WTO is a major obstacle to our success. They hold us to marketing price structures that are unrealistic by instituting tariffs and controls that strangle real free trade. At the same time, they refuse to have a hand in requiring the implementation of solid requirements regarding the compensation and treatment of the world's work force. Add in the inability of our own governments, both federal and state, to control spending and the continued upward spiral of out-of-control taxation and you have an economy that is being held hostage to the whims of a limited and scary percentage of power mongers. What can we as wage earners and consumers do about all this?</p>
<p>I'm open for suggestions.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/">Should there be a deflation index?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/720869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BestBuy</category><category>consumer prices</category><category>ConsumerPrices</category><category>DaimlerChrysler</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>recession</category><category>World Trade Organization</category><category>WorldTradeOrganization</category><category>WTO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford CEO reshuffles executive management]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/18/ford-ceo-reshuffles-executive-management/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/18/ford-ceo-reshuffles-executive-management/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/18/ford-ceo-reshuffles-executive-management/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/ford-logo.jpg" />Looks like new Ford CEO Alan Mulally has made his first executive level move at Ford. With a penchant for finding operational inefficiencies and with the job of cutting fat off a laggard automaker, Mulally has tapped Derrick Kuzak to run product development for the entire company instead of just the U.S. Hey, that's 'going global' in a sense, yes?<br /><br />As industries have changed from segmented, hierarchical silos that have disconnected strategies on global product development and marketing, Mulally apparently wants to get Ford in league with other companies who have a <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/12/14/ford-mulally-reorganizes-bix-cz_jf_1215ford.html?partner=daily_newsletter">cohesive global strategy</a> and the savings that come along with that. Mulally said, "An integrated, global product development team supporting our automotive business units will enable us to make the best use of our global assets and capabilities and accelerate development of the new vehicles our customers prefer, and do so more efficiently."<br /><br />It was no surprise that Mulally is making changes this early, as he indicated in an interview with Forbes recently that the company had too many teams working on similar products. This means that Mulally is a change agent for the better, something Ford needs as its costs spiral out of control. In what I consider an ultimate statement of why Ford needed to relearn the cost sensitivity of its customers, Mulally said "Ford has grown up as very independent, different Fords ... different teams do each car, so they are different. And a lot of that complexity customers don't want to pay for."<br /><br />Roger that, Alan.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/18/ford-ceo-reshuffles-executive-management/">Ford CEO reshuffles executive management</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/2006/12/14/ford-mulally-reorganizes-bix-cz_jf_1215ford.html?partner=daily_newsletter>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/18/ford-ceo-reshuffles-executive-management/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/719594/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/18/ford-ceo-reshuffles-executive-management/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Mulally</category><category>AlanMulally</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DaimlerChrysler plays the China card]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/daimlerchrysler-plays-the-china-card/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/daimlerchrysler-plays-the-china-card/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/daimlerchrysler-plays-the-china-card/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dai/" rel="tag">Daimler (DAI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" height="147" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/daimler-ceo.bmp" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Just call it an eastern hemisphere hedge for DaimlerChrysler AG (NYSE: DCX). </p>
<p>DaimlerChrysler announced Thursday that it plans to buy 297 million shares of China's Beiqi Foton Motor Co. LTD at 2.75 yuan per share for 816.7 million yuan or about $104 million. Those 297 million shares would represent a 24% stake in Beiqi Foton</p>
<p>Beiqi is China's largest truck maker, and one analyst/economist who follows European / Asia business and trade flows says Daimler's investment is both a hedge and a potential solid-win tactic. </p>
<p>"You have to like this move," said David Chandler, analyst/economist with the Econometrics Group. "Daimler gets a potential low-cost production source for medium and heavy trucks, while at the same time better-positioning itself in the promising Chinese truck market. There are always opportunity costs when you invest, but very rarely does a company get this type of hedge / market opportunity for $100 million. It's a bargain and a solid move." </p>
<p>Chandler said Daimler trails General Motors Corporation (NYSE:GM) in joint-venture deals with China-based companies, so the Beiqi deal represents progress against a major U.S. competitor, as well.</p>
<p>DaimlerChrysler's shares traded slightly lower Thursday at mid-day, down 15 cents to $58.29. Meanwhile, General Motors was down 43 cents to $29.07 and Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) had dipped 2 cents to $8.14.</p>
<p>Investment Analysis: The best way for the typical investor to play DaimlerChrysler? Investors who can tolerate a moderate level of risk should buy DCX now, in stages, over the next two weeks: 50% of your position today, 50% next week. Conservative investors -- those who can tolerate only a low level of risk -- should wait and see if DCX pulls back to $56. If it does, and bounces off $56, consider adding a small amount of shares to your portfolio.</p>
<p><em><img id="vimage_2" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Joseph Lazzaro is a news editor at </em><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><em>Theflyonthewall.com</em></a><em> (subscription required), based in New York.</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/daimlerchrysler-plays-the-china-card/">DaimlerChrysler plays the China card</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/daimlerchrysler-plays-the-china-card/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/710480/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/30/daimlerchrysler-plays-the-china-card/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>Daimler Chrysler</category><category>DaimlerChrysler</category><category>Ford Motor Co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
