<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">Paul Krugman argues,</a> in so many words, that, indeed, the United States must go back, to get to the future.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">Krugman's advice</a> for President-elect Barack Obama? Think big. Contrary to selected, conservative arguments about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fdr">President Franklin D. Roosevelt's</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal">New Deal,</a> the reason the New Deal had limited, short-term success was the fact that FDR's economic policies were too cautious, he said. <br /><br /><strong>The New Deal: new life</strong><br /><br />The New Deal's long-term success and achievements, including the structural changes to the U.S. economy (including Social Security and bank deposit insurance), have proved to be both durable and essential, most economists, including Krugman, agree. <br /><br />Hence, President-elect Obama should think big from the get-go, Krugman says, and avoid the mistaken belief that 'government spending made <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression_in_the_United_States">the Great Depression</a> worse,' and Obama should move forward with a large fiscal stimulus to put people back to work, for work that needs to be done in these United States.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/">NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1368796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1920s</category><category>1930s</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Democrats</category><category>FDR</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>Franklin D. Roosevelt</category><category>gdp</category><category>Great Depression</category><category>Hoover</category><category>Keynes</category><category>Keynesians</category><category>New Deal</category><category>Obama</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>pump priming</category><category>Republicans</category><category>Roaring 20s</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>World War II</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Could U.S. economy, American people tolerate more government intervention?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Could the U.S. economy tolerate, and, equally significant, will the American people push the nation's chief executive, the president, in the direction of more government intervention?<br /><br />The view from here is: probably not. Everything in the American ethos and culture speaks against it. <br /><br />Unlike in <a href="http://us.franceguide.com/">France,</a> where the French Government is simply, "France," Americans, for the most part, view their government -- save defense spending -- usually as part of the problem, not the solution. <span style="font-style: italic;">'Government is best which governs least' </span>is a longstanding Americanism. And most investors/readers know about candidates who say they want to <span style="font-style: italic;">"get the Washington bureaucrats off the backs of the American people"</span> and <span style="font-style: italic;">"clean up the mess in Washington!"</span><br /><br />Americans are anti-central government, and they are anti-state (they generally dislike the limited federal government that exists). In the United States, it is always private first, public second.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Could U.S. economy, American people tolerate more government intervention?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/">Could U.S. economy, American people tolerate more government intervention?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1305838/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1930s</category><category>capitalism</category><category>corporate capitalism</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>FDR</category><category>federal government</category><category>France</category><category>Franklin D. Roosevelt</category><category>free markets</category><category>gdp</category><category>Great Depression</category><category>McCain</category><category>New Deal</category><category>Obama</category><category>private sector</category><category>public sector</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Government</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:08:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
