<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook: Straighten Up and Fly Right]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/facebook-privacy-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/facebook-privacy-rumors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/facebook-privacy-rumors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/facebook-logo-240.jpg" alt="Facebook logo" />It's no longer fresh news that a contingent of social network users have rapidly become disenchanted with the privacy protocols over on Facebook (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). The Internet rumor mill has generated tales as wild as "60 percent of Facebook users are considering <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7741315/More-than-half-of-Facebook-users-could-quit-the-site-over-privacy-worries.html"> deleting their accounts</a>," and "Facebook <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/05/14/quit-facebook/">exodus planned</a> for May 31."</p>
<p>Now let's see if I have this straight here; I am supposed to believe that tens of millions of Internet users initially thought that they could register with Facebook, upload half their personal biographies to the site, and then remain virtually invisible to all but their chosen few friends? Then, it's expected I'll believe that tens of millions of disenchanted Facebook users are going to organize themselves, plan a virtual walk-out, and then successfully execute it? Somehow, I really find all of this difficult to believe. In fact, I think it's a bunch of baloney.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/facebook-privacy-rumors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook: Straighten Up and Fly Right</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/facebook-privacy-rumors/">Facebook: Straighten Up and Fly Right</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 May 2010 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/facebook-privacy-rumors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19488142/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/25/facebook-privacy-rumors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boycott</category><category>Facebook</category><category>friends</category><category>mass exodus</category><category>May 31</category><category>opt out</category><category>privacy settings</category><category>user profile</category><category>walk out</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dear New Media Executive: I am not your friend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/friends_facebook.jpg" />Given my position as a long-time denizen of the dot-com world, with dozens of contacts in new media and venture capital and all of the numbered Webs (1.0, 2.0 and maybe even 3.0), I'm quite frequently invited to things. Some are valuable networking tools, like <a href="http://www.linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a>; others are fun and a bit useful for keeping track of my virtual colleagues, like <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>. Still others, like <a href="http://aim.com">AIM</a>, are vital for day-to-day working life.<br /><br />And then there are the sites where my so-called "friends" hang out. It seems quite ironic that many of the former colleagues and distant contacts who invite me to "keep up with what he and your other friends are doing" were never what I would categorize as "friends." Vexing rivals? Quixotic bosses? Difficult customers? Unhappy underlings? Probably more like it. While I understand that social networking sites like Facebook.com and StumbleUpon and, to a lesser extent, MySpace and del.icio.us and the rest of them, are the rage right now -- and are used by many legitimate corporate types for actual work purposes -- well, I'm highly uncomfortable with the rampant use of the word "friend."<br /><br />Let's <em>face</em> it: even if I'm pleased because Brian in Legal delivered that contract to me quickly, he's not actually my "buddy"; nor is the receptionist you just hired ready to be asked to join your "circle of friends." Plenty of people with whom I could happily carry on pre-conference-call banter, while I'm sure they're quite lovely, just aren't friends. Flickr gives us a break and lets us designate lots of "contacts," while Twitter has recently changed its nomenclature to count those you are following, and those that follow you. This makes sense to me! This is not presumptuous or uncomfortable.<br /><br />Just because my name is in your contact list, Mr. and Ms. New Media Executive, it does not mean that you are my friend.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/">Dear New Media Executive: I am not your friend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/978039/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/dear-new-media-executive-i-am-not-your-friend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aim</category><category>contact</category><category>contacts</category><category>del.icio.us</category><category>delicious</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>friend</category><category>friends</category><category>friendster</category><category>linkedin</category><category>myspace</category><category>new media</category><category>NewMedia</category><category>stumbleupon</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Don't be afraid to discuss money with your friends!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/28/dont-be-afraid-to-discuss-money-with-your-friends/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/28/dont-be-afraid-to-discuss-money-with-your-friends/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/28/dont-be-afraid-to-discuss-money-with-your-friends/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>A <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/26/business/26shortcuts.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;oref=slogin">recent piece in the New York Times</a> discussed the number 1 cause of stress in America: money woes. It also offered a bit of advice on how to deal with it that might run counter to what is traditionally considered good manners: "Talking about it might be taboo, voyeuristic or impolite, but money is our No. 1 stress factor, according to the American Psychological Association, and guess what the research shows can help us enormously? Being open and honest about it. Not just with ourselves (that's a first step), but with other people."</p>
<p>Just as some religions advertise the cleansing power of confession, talking about your financial woes can help you feel better, and even get you on the path to a better place. Here's one reason why: People who are dealing with debt or other financial woes might feel alone and ashamed but the reality is that most people's lives are a financial mess. 70% live from paycheck to paycheck, and people are wracking up debt at record rates.</p>
<p>As Dave Ramsey told the reporter, "When you see Ken and Barbie sitting there, looking like the perfect couple, and then you hear they've had a big fight about money, and they're broke, too, it gives you encouragement." </p>
<p>One of the problems with money woes is that, in this era of consumer credit, it can often be hidden. You might not know that your neighbor leases his car and has a huge HELOC on his home. It's not like obesity, where people wear the signs of their struggle around their waists.</p>
<p>So take a chance. Next time you're feeling stressed about money, tell your friends. You might find that they have similar problems, and you can share war stories and learn from each other. At the very least, it should make you feel better.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/28/dont-be-afraid-to-discuss-money-with-your-friends/">Don't be afraid to discuss money with your friends!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 May 2007 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/26/business/26shortcuts.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/28/dont-be-afraid-to-discuss-money-with-your-friends/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/904551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/28/dont-be-afraid-to-discuss-money-with-your-friends/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Family</category><category>Friends</category><category>Money</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 07/25/06: Time Warner offers shows via iTunes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/apple-after-the-bell-07-25-06-time-warner-offers-shows-via-itun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/apple-after-the-bell-07-25-06-time-warner-offers-shows-via-itun/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/apple-after-the-bell-07-25-06-time-warner-offers-shows-via-itun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p>Apple ended the day up 50.8 cents at $61.928. That puts the company up almost $10 higher than it was the day before it announced earnings last week -- quite a one week run.<br /><br />Today saw news that Warner Brothers would be <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2006-07-25T185637Z_01_N25196333_RTRIDST_0_MEDIA-WARNERBROS.XML">offering TV shows via iTunes</a>. Friends, Babylon 5, The Jetsons, The Flintstones, and MAD TV sketches are all to be added to the iTunes library, putting Apple's lineup of offerings at 150 different TV shows. I had been worried that iTunes TV show lineups would slow down, but it looks like Apple is still the dominant way of getting these.<br /><br />[Disclosure: I own Apple stock at the date of this post]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/apple-after-the-bell-07-25-06-time-warner-offers-shows-via-itun/">Apple after the bell 07/25/06: Time Warner offers shows via iTunes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/apple-after-the-bell-07-25-06-time-warner-offers-shows-via-itun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/646897/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/apple-after-the-bell-07-25-06-time-warner-offers-shows-via-itun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>aquaman</category><category>babylon 5</category><category>Babylon5</category><category>friends</category><category>itunes</category><category>mad tv</category><category>MadTv</category><category>the flintstones</category><category>the jetsons</category><category>TheFlintstones</category><category>TheJetsons</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>tv shows on itunes</category><category>TvShowsOnItunes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AOL to show reruns? Mary-Kate and Ashley to be known as "the AOLsen Twins"?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/27/aol-to-show-reruns-mary-kate-and-ashley-to-be-known-as-the-aol/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/27/aol-to-show-reruns-mary-kate-and-ashley-to-be-known-as-the-aol/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/27/aol-to-show-reruns-mary-kate-and-ashley-to-be-known-as-the-aol/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>Other news from the Milken Conference: <ahref="http://www.timewarner.com/corp/management/executives_by_business/aol/bio/miller_jonathan.html">AOL Chairman andChief Exec Jonathan Miller</a> let the cat out of the bag that AOL is considering an online model that makes content --such as television reruns from Time Warner sister company Warner Bros. --&nbsp;available for an extended period to letthe audience accumulate. </p>
<p>While you&nbsp;may think of Warner Bros. as that&nbsp;benign force that brought us <ahref="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108757/"><em>ER</em></a>, <ahref="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108778/"><em>Friends</em></a>, and <ahref="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0362359/"><em>The O.C.</em>,</a> don't forget that we also owe Warner Bros.for&nbsp;such made-for-TV movies as <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119025/"><em>Dukes of Hazzard:Reunion!</em></a>&nbsp; and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0134610/"><em>Terror in the Mall</em></a>, as well asthe sitcom <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092359/"><em>Full House</em></a>.</p>
<p>As for prospects of lookingdeep into my computer monitor and&nbsp;seeing <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0756114/">Bob Saget</a> reprise his<em>Full House</em> role&nbsp;as cherubic widower Danny Tanner&nbsp;-- something I thought I'd left, along with my <ahref="http://cgi.ebay.com/vintage-MEMBERS-ONLY-JACKET-rainbow-maroon-COAT-emo-40_W0QQitemZ8410266390QQcategoryZ52405QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem">"MembersOnly" jackets</a> and <em>Thriller</em> cassette, safely in the 1980's -- well, Minesweeper is looking better andbetter...</p>
<p><img width="240" height="257" src="http://www.pulpvintage.com/pics/items/10020025.jpg" alt="" /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/27/aol-to-show-reruns-mary-kate-and-ashley-to-be-known-as-the-aol/">AOL to show reruns? Mary-Kate and Ashley to be known as "the AOLsen Twins"?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=twx&amp;exch=USA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/27/aol-to-show-reruns-mary-kate-and-ashley-to-be-known-as-the-aol/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/612492/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/27/aol-to-show-reruns-mary-kate-and-ashley-to-be-known-as-the-aol/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Ashley Olsen</category><category>AshleyOlsen</category><category>Bob Saget</category><category>BobSaget</category><category>celebrity</category><category>Danny Tanner</category><category>DannyTanner</category><category>Dukes of Hazzard</category><category>DukesOfHazzard</category><category>E.R.</category><category>Friends</category><category>Jonathan Miller</category><category>JonathanMiller</category><category>Mary-Kate Olsen</category><category>Mary-kateOlsen</category><category>Members Only</category><category>Members Only jacket</category><category>MembersOnly</category><category>MembersOnlyJacket</category><category>Milken Conference</category><category>MilkenConference</category><category>Minesweeper</category><category>Olsen Twins</category><category>OlsenTwins</category><category>Terror in the Mall</category><category>TerrorInTheMall</category><category>The O.C.</category><category>TheO.c.</category><category>Thriller</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>Warner Bros.</category><category>WarnerBros.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Judge decides on TWX's "Friends" lawsuit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/judge-decides-on-twxs-friends-lawsuit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/judge-decides-on-twxs-friends-lawsuit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/judge-decides-on-twxs-friends-lawsuit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/04/125px-Large_NBC_logo.png" vspace="4" border="1"alt="" />We all know that office water cooler chat can sometimes get you into a little bit of trouble with the"sensitive" people in your company. But while you might expect some normal forms ofpassive-aggressive&nbsp;co-worker revenge, like taking your stapler, you probably never expected anyone to slap youwith a lawsuit for an off-color remark that you offered in jest.</p>
<p>Well, the folks at NBC, Time Warner and a variety of other media parties expect the same thing. And, apparently, aLos Angeles judge agrees with them. </p>
<p><ahref="http://aolpf5.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=feed&amp;siteid=aolpf&amp;guid={DAA5DF63-0D10-44C1-AD2D-DCD98EF0EF2E}">Thecourt decision</a> handed down last Thursday basically suggests that discussing sex in the workplace is sometimes anecessary part of the the job, especially&nbsp;when you are a writer for show like prime-time sitcom like"Friends." (Funny, I don't remember any sex on "Friends." I just remember all of the bad jokes ...but I digress.)</p>
<p>In the lengthy, 48-page decision, the judge reasoned that discussions of&nbsp;sex at the workplace do notconstitute sexual harassment. (And the people at HBO take a HUGE collective sigh&nbsp;of relief.)</p>
<p>All I can say is that -- given this decision -- it's good to be a writer. At least according to this judge, I'venow&nbsp;got <em>carte blanche</em> to be rude and inappropriate in the workplace.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/judge-decides-on-twxs-friends-lawsuit/">Judge decides on TWX's "Friends" lawsuit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 06:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://aolpf5.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=feed&amp;siteid=aolpf&amp;guid={DAA5DF63-0D10-44C1-AD2D-DCD98EF0EF2E}>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/judge-decides-on-twxs-friends-lawsuit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/611540/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/judge-decides-on-twxs-friends-lawsuit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Friends</category><category>harassment</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>NBC</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 06:04:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
