<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Should Gap go private?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/30/should-gap-go-private/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/30/should-gap-go-private/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/30/should-gap-go-private/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a></p><p>Yesterday, I wrote about Jim Cramer's prediction that The Gap, Inc. (NYSE:GPS) would be taken private in the not-so-distant future. Today, the Motley Fool continued the speculation with a <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/01/30/dueling-fools-should-gap-go-private.aspx">series of "Dueling Fool" posts debating the future of the company.</a></p>
<p>One argument for taking the company private is that we are in the midst of "feeding frenzy" of leveraged buyouts and that a favorable private equity deal may not be favorable a few years down the road. Going private would remove the company from the scrutiny of public opinion and allow the company to take more drastic steps to improve.</p>
<p><iframe width="175" scrolling="no" height="125" frameborder="0" align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1089&amp;view=101545&amp;pollId=101630&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1" border="0"></iframe>If I were a shareholder of Gap, I would probably support the idea of a sale. The company has been under-performing for years and the turnaround efforts have not worked. A buyout could put Gap shareholders out of their misery at a nice premium to the current price.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/30/should-gap-go-private/">Should Gap go private?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/30/should-gap-go-private/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/745360/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/30/should-gap-go-private/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dueling fools</category><category>DuelingFools</category><category>Gap buyout</category><category>GapBuyout</category><category>going private</category><category>GoingPrivate</category><category>motley fool</category><category>MotleyFool</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:16:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
