<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Guru Strategy: Don't look to high yield stocks for high returns]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/dont-look-to-high-yield-stocks-for-high-returns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/dont-look-to-high-yield-stocks-for-high-returns/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/dont-look-to-high-yield-stocks-for-high-returns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/moroney.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Stocks are up this year but not everyone is profiting. One reason is that many investors, stung by the market collapse, have been looking for safety by investing in dividend paying stocks. But Richard Moroney, editor of <em><a href="http://www.dowtheory.com/"><strong>Dow Theory Forecasts</strong></a></em><em><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1245368190943*/"><strong>,</strong></a> </em>says<em> </em>that investing for yield is a flawed strategy. </p>
<p>Moroney, a chartered financial analyst, points out that while the S&amp;P 1500 Index is up about 16% so far this year, investors in high-yielding stocks (with yields of 4% or more) have a year-to-date return of just 4%. And he says that stocks that do not pay dividends are up an average of 29%. </p>
<p>We spoke with Richard Moroney to find out why this is the case -- and what income investors should do.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/dont-look-to-high-yield-stocks-for-high-returns/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Guru Strategy: Don't look to high yield stocks for high returns</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/dont-look-to-high-yield-stocks-for-high-returns/">Guru Strategy: Don't look to high yield stocks for high returns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/dont-look-to-high-yield-stocks-for-high-returns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19071409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/dont-look-to-high-yield-stocks-for-high-returns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>astrazeneca</category><category>dow theory forecasts</category><category>DowTheoryForecasts</category><category>featured</category><category>general dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>richard moroney</category><category>RichardMoroney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikhil Hutheesing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investing with the stars: Top stocks from top managers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/investing-with-the-stars-top-stocks-from-top-managers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/investing-with-the-stars-top-stocks-from-top-managers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/investing-with-the-stars-top-stocks-from-top-managers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/txn/" rel="tag">Texas Instruments (TXN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/noc/" rel="tag">Northrop Grumman (NOC)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/stars.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />"Golf has Tiger Woods, novelists have Tom Clancy, and the investment community has stars such as Bruce Berkowitz, Bill Nygren, Charlie Dreifus, and Mario Gabelli," states <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3129 ">Paul Tracy</a>.</p>
<p>In his <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3129 ">The Street Authority Market Advisor</a>, he suggests, "These money managers are at the pinnacle of their craft." Here, he takes a look at these "celebrities" and some of their current top stock holdings.</p>
<p>"These money managers have all amassed prodigious gains over the years for their shareholders. Over the past few months, these gurus have come out with ringing endorsements for certain stocks. This isn't empty talk -- they are putting their money where their mouth is.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/investing-with-the-stars-top-stocks-from-top-managers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investing with the stars: Top stocks from top managers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/investing-with-the-stars-top-stocks-from-top-managers/">Investing with the stars: Top stocks from top managers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 May 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/investing-with-the-stars-top-stocks-from-top-managers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1552807/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/investing-with-the-stars-top-stocks-from-top-managers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ba</category><category>beverages stocks</category><category>Bill Nygren</category><category>BillNygren</category><category>boeing</category><category>Bruce Berkowitz</category><category>BruceBerkowitz</category><category>Charlie Dreifus</category><category>CharlieDreifus</category><category>dps</category><category>dr. pepper snapple group</category><category>etf authority</category><category>EtfAuthority</category><category>Fairholme Fund</category><category>featured</category><category>gabelli value fund</category><category>gd</category><category>general dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>gymb</category><category>gymboree</category><category>illinois tool works</category><category>IllinoisToolWorks</category><category>itw</category><category>maine maritimes</category><category>MaineMaritimes</category><category>mam</category><category>mario gabelli</category><category>miscrosoft</category><category>msft</category><category>noc</category><category>northrop grumman</category><category>Oakmark Fund</category><category>OakmarkFund</category><category>omc</category><category>omnicom</category><category>paul tracy</category><category>PaulTracy</category><category>pfe</category><category>pfizer</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>streetauthority market advisor</category><category>StreetauthorityMarketAdvisor</category><category>texas instruments</category><category>TexasInstruments</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>ti</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investing in Everyone: Defense, Food, Power, Clinton, Obama, and McCain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/investing-in-everyone-defense-food-power-clinton-obama-and/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/investing-in-everyone-defense-food-power-clinton-obama-and/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/investing-in-everyone-defense-food-power-clinton-obama-and/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adm/" rel="tag">Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/duk/" rel="tag">Duke Energy (DUK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/so/" rel="tag">Southern Company (SO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bg/" rel="tag">Bunge Ltd. (BG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pot/" rel="tag">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)</a></p><p><img title="Grains &amp; Oilseeds" style="WIDTH: 259px; HEIGHT: 192px" height="206" alt="Grains &amp; Oilseeds" src="http://www.bunge.com/images/headers/hdr_pic_grain_origination.jpg" width="290" align="right" border="0" />I have not decided who I am voting for yet. Or maybe it would be more accurate to say I have decided on multiple occasions only to become undecided again. While some will see me as fickle, or worse, others may be in the same boat.</p>
<p>I am also continuing to think about what difference any of the candidates can make on the economy, and based on these musings, where to invest. My current belief is that none of them will have a profound impact on our economy.</p>
<p>There are no financial wizards among them. Here is the shocker though: <strong>I like all three candidates</strong>, or at least can find some good in each of them. Each of them is a fighter, and I believe each one of them brings certain skill sets to the job. There are also things about each candidate that are inescapably negative. Clinton has so much baggage, Zsa Zsa Gabor would be jealous. Obama does not have the experience and he has a degree of arrogance <em>(right sweetie)</em>; McCain is an old stick-in-the-mud who, as a long-time senator, has spent more hours with lobbyists than almost anybody, though he is pretending otherwise.</p>
<p>Where does this leave me from an investment perspective? My first choice, for stability with moderate growth and dividends, remains the defense sector. I wrote <a title="View Defense sector rolls over S&amp;P 500 for 8th straight year on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/defense-sector-rolls-over-sandp-500-for-8th-straight-year/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b"><strong>Defense sector rolls over S&amp;P 500 for 8th straight year</strong></font></a> a while back and I still think that it is the most secure. Here's why:</p>
<p>A) None of the candidates will want to appear soft on defense when we are at war, and all three have made threatening remarks in some country's direction to make sure the electorate knows that.</p>
<p>B) The War in Afghanistan and Iraq rages on, and even the most optimist view is that a draw-down will take years.</p>
<p>C) Even if all war ceased immediately, the upgrading and replenishment of the hardware will cost billions of dollars and most of the defense contractors have that in their backlogs now. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/chasing-value-general-dynamics-and-raytheon-the-defense-does-not/"><font color="#55629b">Chasing Value: General Dynamics &amp; Raytheon -- The defense does not rest</font></a></p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p><em></em></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/investing-in-everyone-defense-food-power-clinton-obama-and/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investing in Everyone: Defense, Food, Power, Clinton, Obama, and McCain</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/investing-in-everyone-defense-food-power-clinton-obama-and/">Investing in Everyone: Defense, Food, Power, Clinton, Obama, and McCain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 May 2008 19:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/investing-in-everyone-defense-food-power-clinton-obama-and/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1199882/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/investing-in-everyone-defense-food-power-clinton-obama-and/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADM</category><category>Archer-Daniels-Midland</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>BG</category><category>Bunge Ltd</category><category>BungeLtd</category><category>Clinton</category><category>DUK</category><category>Duke Energy</category><category>DukeEnergy</category><category>GD</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>hilary clinton</category><category>HilaryClinton</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>mike huckabee</category><category>MikeHuckabee</category><category>Obama</category><category>POT</category><category>potash corp</category><category>PotashCorp</category><category>Presidential Politics</category><category>PresidentialPolitics</category><category>Raytheon</category><category>RTN</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Southern Company</category><category>SouthernCompany</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: General Dynamics &amp; Raytheon: The defense does not rest]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/chasing-value-general-dynamics-and-raytheon-the-defense-does-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/chasing-value-general-dynamics-and-raytheon-the-defense-does-not/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/chasing-value-general-dynamics-and-raytheon-the-defense-does-not/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2008/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2008</a></p><p><img alt="General Dynamics (NYSE: GD) logo" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/general-dynamics-gd-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />When it comes to defense spending over the last nine years, there has not been any rest. As I have reported on numerous occasions, the defense sector has beaten the market indices year after year. This year is no exception and two of my recommendations remain ahead of the market and are reporting new contracts every day.</p>
<p>Today, the<em>The Arizona Republic</em> <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/2008/05/27/20080527biz-gdynamics0527.html">reports</a> [registration required] that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">General Dynamics</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">GD</a>) is to receive billions in contracts for its C4 Systems as part of the Army's extensive modernization plan. The company is building a communications network for the Army and is the lead contractor with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/financials/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys/key-ratios">Lockheed Martin</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/financials/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys/key-ratios">LMT</a>) for a wireless network that will deliver mobile connectivity to soldiers on the field.</p>
<p>General Dynamics is up about $10 (12.5%) in the last year and offers a 1.5% dividend yield. Its current P/E is 16.5 and its P/S is 1.33 with a 15% ROIC. It opened today at $90.58.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/chasing-value-general-dynamics-and-raytheon-the-defense-does-not/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: General Dynamics &amp; Raytheon: The defense does not rest</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/chasing-value-general-dynamics-and-raytheon-the-defense-does-not/">Chasing Value: General Dynamics &amp; Raytheon: The defense does not rest</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 May 2008 14:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/chasing-value-general-dynamics-and-raytheon-the-defense-does-not/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1206945/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/chasing-value-general-dynamics-and-raytheon-the-defense-does-not/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>GD</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>Raytheon</category><category>RTN</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deal Rumor: Will General Dynamics buy Harris Corp.?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/deal-rumor-will-general-dynamics-buy-harris-corp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/deal-rumor-will-general-dynamics-buy-harris-corp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/deal-rumor-will-general-dynamics-buy-harris-corp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a></p><p><em><a href="http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0103/t.13505.html">Radio World</a></em> reported that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/harris-corporation-del/hrs/nys">Harris Corp.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/harris-corporation-del/hrs/nys">HRS</a>) might sell itself. I just spoke with an analyst who said that there's a rumor that the suitor might be military contractor <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">General Dynamics</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">GD</a>).</p>
<p>Harris is based in Melbourne, Fla., and has a market capitalization of $7.3 billion. Perhaps Harris thinks its growth potential in the defense industry is "less attractive" than anytime since Sept. 11, 2001. Harris has 16,000 employees and reported $5.1 billion in revenues and net income of $410 million over the last 12 months, ending March 28, 2008.</p>
<p>General Dynamics may be able to cut costs and increase revenues by combining the two firms. And Harris stock is clearly rising -- it's up 2.8%. Could it be due to this rumor? Please comment if you know more.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>.</em><em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/deal-rumor-will-general-dynamics-buy-harris-corp/">Deal Rumor: Will General Dynamics buy Harris Corp.?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 May 2008 11:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/deal-rumor-will-general-dynamics-buy-harris-corp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1197552/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/deal-rumor-will-general-dynamics-buy-harris-corp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GD</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>Harris Corp</category><category>HarrisCorp</category><category>HRS</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Cool trade -- Alum.Co. of China for General Dynamics]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/chasing-value-cool-trade-alum-co-of-china-for-general-dyna/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/chasing-value-cool-trade-alum-co-of-china-for-general-dyna/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/chasing-value-cool-trade-alum-co-of-china-for-general-dyna/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ach/" rel="tag">Aluminum Corp of China ADS (ACH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2008/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2008</a></p><p><img style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 4px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; WIDTH: 100px; PADDING-TOP: 3px; HEIGHT: 100px" height="100" alt="Aluminum Pipes &amp; Tubes" src="http://images-partners-tbn.google.com/images?q=tbn:YWpTgolSapXQLM:www.global-b2b-network.com/direct/dbimage/50320235/Aluminum_Pipes___Tubes.jpg" width="100" align="right" />Last year, my best <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> recommendation was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aluminum-corporation-of-china-limited/ach/nys">Aluminum Corp of China ADS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aluminum-corporation-of-china-limited/ach/nys">ACH</a>), which sailed from $22 per share to a 52-week high of $90.95. I will take credit for finding a winner, but I cannot in all honesty say that I thought it would more than quadruple -- that part was luck. (The original story was <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/03/chasing-value-aluminum-corporation-of-china-ads/" rel="bookmark">Chasing Value: Aluminum Corporation of China ADS</a>, which I still think is worth a read today.)</p>
<p>If you acquired what is often referred to as Chalco (China Alum. Co.) anywhere near the time I recommended it and still own it you are probably still very content with only perhaps a 90% gain as the stock has come down some, closing last Friday May 9 at $40.98</p>
<p>Another of my recommendations was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">General Dynamics Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">GD</a>), which closed Friday at $90.92. This one is only up a few percentage points from my starting point of $88 per share, but you will note, curiously, that it is only 3 cents off ACH's high. Given the market's bad year, a gain when the market is losing is a bigger plus than the casual observer would perceive. The defense sector has provided the anticipated market defense as I discussed.</p>
<p><em><span class="symbol"></span></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/chasing-value-cool-trade-alum-co-of-china-for-general-dyna/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Cool trade -- Alum.Co. of China for General Dynamics</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/chasing-value-cool-trade-alum-co-of-china-for-general-dyna/">Chasing Value: Cool trade -- Alum.Co. of China for General Dynamics</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 May 2008 14:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/chasing-value-cool-trade-alum-co-of-china-for-general-dyna/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1192690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/chasing-value-cool-trade-alum-co-of-china-for-general-dyna/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ACH</category><category>Aluminum Corp of China</category><category>AluminumCorpOfChina</category><category>Chalco</category><category>GD</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: General Dynamics may win MoD contract ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/newspaper-wrap-up-general-dynamics-may-win-mod-contract/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/newspaper-wrap-up-general-dynamics-may-win-mod-contract/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/newspaper-wrap-up-general-dynamics-may-win-mod-contract/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to senior industry sources, the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5c16efb6-1c82-11dd-8bfc-000077b07658.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported that the Ministry of Defense could ask <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">General Dynamics Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">GD</a>) to provide the vehicle design for a new generation of armored vehicles for the army. It is unclear whether General Dynamics, in competition with Nexter and Artec, will be awarded the contract or will be named the preferred bidder.</li>
    <li>Following the collapse in March of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">The Bear Stearns Companies Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>), the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/48034c9e-1c83-11dd-8bfc-000077b07658.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> also reported that the SEC will soon require Wall Street banks to publicly disclose more details about liquidity and capital positions. Cox also urged lawmakers to pass legislation that would allow the SEC, or another regulator, the "explicit mandate to supervise" investment banks.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/business/worldbusiness/08citi.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=business&amp;adxnnlx=1210242637-auXymYf/tPF2wmUnQqnWcw"><em>New York Times</em></a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Incorporated</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) will move senior investment banker Alberto Verme to Dubai by the end of the month in the hopes of establishing a stronger foothold in the region, a crucial area for global banks.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/business/08oil.html?ref=business"><em>New York Times</em></a> also reported that several large oil companies, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP Plc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">ConocoPhillips</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">COP</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">Chevron Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">CVX</a>), agreed to pay nearly $423M in cash in order to settle a lawsuit that alleged water contamination from methyl tertiary butyl ether, a gasoline additive. Under the terms of the deal, the oil giants also agreed to pay 70% of the future cleanup costs for the next 30 years. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">Exxon Mobil Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) and several other companies named in the suit did not agree to the deal.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/newspaper-wrap-up-general-dynamics-may-win-mod-contract/">Newspaper wrap-up: General Dynamics may win MoD contract </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 May 2008 08:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/newspaper-wrap-up-general-dynamics-may-win-mod-contract/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1189794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/newspaper-wrap-up-general-dynamics-may-win-mod-contract/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BP</category><category>BP Plc</category><category>BpPlc</category><category>BSC</category><category>C</category><category>Chevron</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>ConocoPhillips</category><category>COP</category><category>CVX</category><category>Dubai</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>GD</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Defense stocks should be on your radar screen]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/defense-stocks-should-hit-your-radar-screen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/defense-stocks-should-hit-your-radar-screen/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/defense-stocks-should-hit-your-radar-screen/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/utx/" rel="tag">United Technologies (UTX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/noc/" rel="tag">Northrop Grumman (NOC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/pentagon.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />President <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/04/bush.budget.ap/">Bush recently submitted a $3.1 trillion dollar budget</a> to congress with the biggest proposed increases in defense spending, and homeland security. The Pentagon would get a $35 billion increase to $515 billion for core programs, about 7% with war costs additional (but how much is additional?) This further supports my investment posture for this year and next that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/chasing-value-general-dynamics-gd-revisited/">the defense sector is the place to be</a> as I posted earlier today and many times over the past few months -- <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/defense-sector-rolls-over-sandp-500-for-8th-straight-year/">the BIG BUYS.</a><br /><br />Some of our big defense contractors, all of which should benefit to some degree include: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BA</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Dynamics</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GD</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lockheed Martin</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LMT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northrop-grumman-corporation/noc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Northrop Grumman</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northrop-grumman-corporation/noc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NOC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?from=view_symbol">Raytheon Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?from=view_symbol">RTN</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-technologies-corporation/utx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">United Technologies</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-technologies-corporation/utx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">UTX</a>). I am not suggesting that you jump into these stocks immediately, but you should add them to your watch list. Perhaps, for some investors dollar cost averaging into them over six months would make sense. Each has a varying degree of exposure to defense spending. For example, United Technologies is the parent of Sikorsky helicopters which makes the Black Hawk. Lockheed Martin and Boeing make fighter jets. Raytheon makes defense electronics and missile while General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman supply warships to the US Navy. Northrop also makes aerial vehicles that are being used in the Iraq War.
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/defense-stocks-should-hit-your-radar-screen/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Defense stocks should be on your radar screen</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/defense-stocks-should-hit-your-radar-screen/">Defense stocks should be on your radar screen</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/defense-stocks-should-hit-your-radar-screen/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1109287/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/defense-stocks-should-hit-your-radar-screen/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BA</category><category>Boeing</category><category>China</category><category>defense spending</category><category>DefenseSpending</category><category>fiscal repsonsibility</category><category>FiscalRepsonsibility</category><category>GD</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>George Bush budget</category><category>GeorgeBushBudget</category><category>inthenews</category><category>liber</category><category>LMT</category><category>Lockheed Martin</category><category>LockheedMartin</category><category>middle east</category><category>MiddleEast</category><category>NOC</category><category>Northrop Grumman</category><category>NorthropGrumman</category><category>Raytheon</category><category>RTN</category><category>United technologies</category><category>UnitedTechnologies</category><category>UTX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: General Dynamics (GD) revisited]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/chasing-value-general-dynamics-gd-revisited/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/chasing-value-general-dynamics-gd-revisited/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/chasing-value-general-dynamics-gd-revisited/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2008/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2008</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="General Dynamics (NYSE: GD) logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/general-dynamics-gd-logo.jpg" />In recent months I have been recommending that investors take a look at the defense sector as a safe haven during this erratic stock market -- erratic and down. My most recent post on the subject was <a title="View Chasing Value: Raytheon (RTN) up on earnings &amp; 2008 outlook on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/chasing-value-raytheon-rtn-up-on-earnings-and-2008-outlook/" target="_blank">Chasing Value: Raytheon (RTN) up on earnings &amp; 2008 outlook</a>. The defense sector has beaten the S&amp;P 500 index for eight years running and this year may mark the ninth straight. </p>
<p>In a previous post I trumpeted <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys/detailedquotes?tabs=detailedquotes">General Dynamics Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys/detailedquotes?tabs=detailedquotes">GD</a>) and still believe in the stock. The price-to-sales is a modest 1.33. The P/E of 16 and dividend are average, but it has a healthy ROE near 20%. If you believe the forward looking P/E it is only 14. GD makes the Gulfstream aircraft for the wealthy jet-setter and the Abrams tank for the military. How many of those will need parts or replacement in the coming years?</p>
<p>When I was evaluating <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/05/chasing-value-final-list-8-stocks-for-2008/">my 2008 picks</a> I looked at most of the large defense contractors and included RTN over GD. If you look at the chart below and the original story <a title="View Chasing Value: General Dynamics (GD) looking long and flying high! on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/chasing-value-general-dynamics-gd-looking-long-and-flying-hig/" target="_blank">Chasing Value: General Dynamics (GD) looking long and flying high!</a>, you will find I was looking at General Dynamics around $90 a share. We bought in at $88 so you know I like it even more in the area of $83 where it is trading now.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/chasing-value-general-dynamics-gd-revisited/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: General Dynamics (GD) revisited</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/chasing-value-general-dynamics-gd-revisited/">Chasing Value: General Dynamics (GD) revisited</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/chasing-value-general-dynamics-gd-revisited/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1072855/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/chasing-value-general-dynamics-gd-revisited/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Defense Sector</category><category>DefenseSector</category><category>featured</category><category>GD</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>Raytheon</category><category>RTN</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Defense sector rolls over S&amp;P 500 for 8th straight year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/defense-sector-rolls-over-sandp-500-for-8th-straight-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/defense-sector-rolls-over-sandp-500-for-8th-straight-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/defense-sector-rolls-over-sandp-500-for-8th-straight-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/utx/" rel="tag">United Technologies (UTX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtn/" rel="tag">Raytheon Company (RTN)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="US Apache gunship helicopter "  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/helicopter.jpg" />In searching out investments for 2008 -- what is likely to be a precarious stock market -- I have been touting the defense industry for the last two months as one of the stories for next year in terms of growth and safety. A <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/defense-sector-set-to-outperform-the/n20071219093909990003">press release</a> today noted: "The benchmark <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-spade-defense-index/%24dxs.x/asi">SPADE Defense Index</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-spade-defense-index/%24dxs.x/asi">DXS</a>) currently has a year-to-date gain of 21.5%, nearly 20% better than the widely followed S&amp;P500 broad-market index."</p>
<p>Certainly this might have been expected in the aftermath of the September 11 tragedy, and given that the U.S remains at war in Iraq and Afghanistan. But this is just one aspect of the industry. Some companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys?pid=9&amp;tabs=quotesandnews">Boeing Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys?pid=9&amp;tabs=quotesandnews">BA</a>) are doing equally well in the private sector selling new planes and replacement parts for aging fleets.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Raytheon Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">RTN</a>) is heavily involved not just with airport security, but develops radar and monitoring systems for airport safety. This is of growing concern as the skies become more congested and airports more impacted. <br /></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-technologies-corporation/utx/nys?pid=9&amp;tabs=quotesandnews">United Technologies</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-technologies-corporation/utx/nys?pid=9&amp;tabs=quotesandnews">UTX</a>) makes military helicopters that are also used for civilian fleets and fire fighting. UTX also is a world leader in the private sector owning Otis Elevator, Carrier Air Conditioning and more.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/defense-sector-rolls-over-sandp-500-for-8th-straight-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Defense sector rolls over S&amp;P 500 for 8th straight year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/defense-sector-rolls-over-sandp-500-for-8th-straight-year/">Defense sector rolls over S&amp;P 500 for 8th straight year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/defense-sector-set-to-outperform-the/n20071219093909990003>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/defense-sector-rolls-over-sandp-500-for-8th-straight-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1066853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/defense-sector-rolls-over-sandp-500-for-8th-straight-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ba</category><category>boeing</category><category>Defense Sector</category><category>Defense spending</category><category>DefenseSector</category><category>DefenseSpending</category><category>featured</category><category>gd</category><category>general dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>raytheon</category><category>rtn</category><category>united technologies</category><category>UnitedTechnologies</category><category>utx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin, defense stocks on a roll]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/lockheed-martin-lmt-defense-stocks-on-a-roll/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/lockheed-martin-lmt-defense-stocks-on-a-roll/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/lockheed-martin-lmt-defense-stocks-on-a-roll/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.lockheedmartin.com/investor/index.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="LMT logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/lmt-lockheed-martin-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Lockheed Martin Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">LMT</a>) shares are trading higher today after competitors <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northrop-grumman-corporation/noc/nys">Northrop Grumman</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northrop-grumman-corporation/noc/nys">NOC</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">General Dynamics</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">GD</a>) both posted <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-10-24T144125Z_01_N24480398_RTRIDST_0_DEFENSE-RESULTS.XML">positive earnings reports today</a>, in the wake of LMT's positive release yesterday. Additionally, Lockheed announced today that the company was awarded a $52.5 million contract to provide next generation convoy trainers to the US Marines. If you think that the company won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on LMT.
<p>Lockheed stock has shot up over the past three months, hitting a one-year high of $113.74 earlier this month. LMT opened this morning at $106.16. So far today the stock has hit a low of $106.15 and a high of $108.90. As of 11:05, LMT is trading at $108.70, up $1.73 (1.6%). The chart for LMT looks bullish and steady, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.<br /><br />For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a January <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $90 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make an 8.7% return in just 3 months as long as LMT is above $90 at January expiration. Lockheed would have to fall by more than 17% before we would start to lose money. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/lockheed-martin-lmt-defense-stocks-on-a-roll/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lockheed Martin, defense stocks on a roll</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/lockheed-martin-lmt-defense-stocks-on-a-roll/">Lockheed Martin, defense stocks on a roll</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/lockheed-martin-lmt-defense-stocks-on-a-roll/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1020779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/lockheed-martin-lmt-defense-stocks-on-a-roll/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defense</category><category>earnings</category><category>GD</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>LMT</category><category>Lockheed Martin</category><category>LockheedMartin</category><category>NOC</category><category>Northrop Grunman</category><category>NorthropGrunman</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Remember when Boeing was a laughingstock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/remember-when-boeing-was-a-laughingstock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/remember-when-boeing-was-a-laughingstock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/remember-when-boeing-was-a-laughingstock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Boeing (NYSE: BA) Dreamliner" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/boeingdreamliner.jpg" />Remember four, five years ago when everything that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/08/business/08boeing.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;position=&amp;oref=slogin">could go wrong did go wrong </a>for<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"> Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>)? The company not only lost market share to Airbus SAS but ousted its CEO, Phil Condit, and his successor, Harry Stonecipher, for among other things having affairs with subordinates. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51778-2004Nov15.html">Former CFO Michael Sears</a> was sent to prison for his role in one of many Pentagon scandals involving the company.<br /><br />  Under Chief Executive James McNerney, who joined the plane maker from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/3m-company/mmm/nys">3M Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/3m-company/mmm/nys">MMM</a>) in 2005, Boeing has managed to put its problems behind it. The company reported net income of $1.11 billion, or $1.44 a share on revenue of $16.5 billion, beating Wall Street expectations. Boeing also raised earnings, revenue and cash flow guidance for the year. It trimmed back its forecasts for 2008, but that's to be expected given the delays in the 787 Dreamliner and the slowdown in the defense business.<br /><br />Shares of the Chicago-based company <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=marketsNews&amp;storyID=2007-10-24T131954Z_01_N24420927_RTRIDST_0_BOEING-RESULTS-UPDATE-2.XML">are up about 6% this year</a>, underperforming peers <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Lockheed Martin</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">LMT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Dynamics</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GD</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys">Raytheon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company/rtn/nys">RTN</a>) mainly because of worries about the Dreamliner. This reaction is overblown. First of all, the fact that new, sophisticated aircraft has been delayed is hardly surprising. If the delays continue however, that's more serious. For now, Boeing's customers haven't lost faith, placing 710 firm orders.<br /><br />If the Dreamliner stays on track and the company gets its fair share of defense spending, the shares may head higher.<br /><br /><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings">Visit <span style="font-weight: bold;">AOL Money &amp; Finance</span> for more earnings coverage</a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/remember-when-boeing-was-a-laughingstock/">Remember when Boeing was a laughingstock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/financial/2007q3/2007q3.pdf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/remember-when-boeing-was-a-laughingstock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1020708/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/remember-when-boeing-was-a-laughingstock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIRBUS SAS</category><category>AirbusSas</category><category>ba</category><category>Boeing</category><category>Boeing Airlines</category><category>BoeingAirlines</category><category>commercial aviation</category><category>CommercialAviation</category><category>defense spending</category><category>DefenseSpending</category><category>gd</category><category>general dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>james mcnerney</category><category>JamesMcnerney</category><category>lmt</category><category>mmm</category><category>pentagon</category><category>planemaker</category><category>planes</category><category>raytheon</category><category>rtn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New market leaders: Six-pack of blue chips]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/six-pack-of-new-market-leaders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/six-pack-of-new-market-leaders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/six-pack-of-new-market-leaders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>"New leadership often emerging during corrections," says <strong>Richard Moroney</strong> in <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=1131">Dow Theory Forecasts</a>, who highlights 6 relative strength blue chips.</p>
<p>The advisor explains, "Stocks have retreated sharply and broadly, reflecting concerns that turmoil in the corporate-junk-bond and mortgage-debt markets will spill over to the broader economy - and perhaps halt the boom in takeovers."</p>
<p>Near-term volatility seems likely, he suggests, and a pullback to 12,700 to 13,350 on the Dow Industrials would be consistent with a secondary correction in an ongoing bull market. While holding some cash on the sidelines seems prudent, he advises, his recommended cash position remains at 5% to 10%.</p>
<p>Looking to find the stocks that will qualify as "new leadership" for after this correction, he notes, "A stock's ability to outperform during such pullbacks is a bullish indicator." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/six-pack-of-new-market-leaders/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New market leaders: Six-pack of blue chips</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/six-pack-of-new-market-leaders/">New market leaders: Six-pack of blue chips</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/six-pack-of-new-market-leaders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/957280/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/six-pack-of-new-market-leaders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bluec chip stocks</category><category>dow theory forecasts</category><category>gd</category><category>general dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>hewlett packard</category><category>hpq</category><category>ibm</category><category>lmt</category><category>lockheed martin</category><category>new market leadership</category><category>oceaneering international</category><category>oii</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsico</category><category>richard moroney</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[My Yankee Doodle Dandy portfolio]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/my-yankee-doodle-dandy-portfolio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/my-yankee-doodle-dandy-portfolio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/my-yankee-doodle-dandy-portfolio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/de/" rel="tag">Deere and Co (DE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><p align="left">Let me introduce my Yankee Doodle Dandy portfolio, a compilation of red, white and blue stocks for investors to consider as they celebrate our nation's independence. </p>
<p align="left">Regardless of your views on the Iraq war, there's no denying that defense stocks including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Lockheed Martin Corp</a>. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys"> LMT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northrop-grumman-corporation/noc/nys">Northrop Grumman Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northrop-grumman-corporation/noc/nys">NOC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company-new/rtn/nys">Raytheon Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raytheon-company-new/rtn/nys">RTN</a>) and<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys"> General Dynamics Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">GD</a>) are reasonably valued. This is especially noteworthy considering that defense spending will need to be maintained at pretty high levels for years to come in order to replace equipment that's been worn out from combat. President Bush is proposing to spend a record $439 billion in fiscal 2007 on defense and another $42.7 billion on homeland security.</p>
<p align="left">Lockheed, the maker of the F-16, seems especially cheap, trading at a forward multiple of 14.6. Its shares have only gained 4.6% this year even though the company reported better-than-expected first-quarter results and raised earnings guidance. Missile and defense electronics company Raytheon, up less than 3%, is in the same situation.</p>
<p align="left">Investors often overlook the huge businesses that Lockheed and Raytheon have in areas outside of defense, including computer systems and air-traffic control. The managements of both companies also have vastly improved over the past few years. Northrop and General Dynamics have always been pretty well run.</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>), notably the second-largest defense contractor, also looks worth snapping up. Its stock is up less than 3% this year, which is surprising considering how well it's rebounded against European rival Airbus. The company trades at a forward multiple of 17.7. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/my-yankee-doodle-dandy-portfolio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>My Yankee Doodle Dandy portfolio</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/my-yankee-doodle-dandy-portfolio/">My Yankee Doodle Dandy portfolio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/my-yankee-doodle-dandy-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/932082/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/my-yankee-doodle-dandy-portfolio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>archer daniels midland</category><category>ArcherDanielsMidland</category><category>ba</category><category>barbecue</category><category>barbecue grill sales</category><category>BarbecueGrillSales</category><category>barbecues</category><category>corn</category><category>corn prices</category><category>CornPrices</category><category>de</category><category>defense</category><category>defense spending</category><category>DefenseSpending</category><category>dod</category><category>ethanol</category><category>f-16</category><category>gd</category><category>general dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>Independence Day</category><category>IndependenceDay</category><category>July Fourth</category><category>JulyFourth</category><category>lmt</category><category>noc</category><category>northrop grumman</category><category>NorthropGrumman</category><category>patriotic companies</category><category>patriotic stocks</category><category>PatrioticCompanies</category><category>PatrioticStocks</category><category>patriotism</category><category>raytheon</category><category>rtn</category><category>stocks</category><category>war</category><category>war in iraq</category><category>WarInIraq</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The week in Defense and Aerospace]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/the-week-in-defense-and-aerospace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/the-week-in-defense-and-aerospace/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/the-week-in-defense-and-aerospace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/dod-318.jpg" alt="" />Boeing Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BA</a>): Rival <a href="http://www.komotv.com/news/business/6376802.html">Airbus booked its first firm order for the A350 XWB</a>. Finnair converted an order for nine of the old A350s to the new version and added two more. The first planes are booked for delivery beginning in 2014.<br /><br />Continental Airlines <a href="http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2007/q1/070312d_nr.html">ordered five 787-9 Dreamliners from Boeing</a> this week, bringing its total order from the 787 line to 25 planes. Delivery of their first 787-9s is scheduled for 2009.<br /><br />L-3 Communications Holdings (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/l-3-communications-holdings-inc/lll/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LLL</a>): <a href="http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=29452">L-3 Communications received a $43 million, five-year contract</a> from the U.S. Army to develop software technology for networked warfare.<br /><br />Lockheed Martin (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LMT</a>) and Northrop Grumman (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northrop-grumman-corporation/noc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NOC</a>): A $<a href="http://www.seacoastonline.com/news/03182007/business-18sun-guard.contract.html">600 million combined project of Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman Corp</a>. to build a dozen fast-response cutters was canceled last week. The project, on hold for the last year, was beset with cost overruns and had come under sharp criticism from Sen. John Kerry. The Coast Guard plans to re-bid the project.<a href="http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/nation/16927886.htm"><br /></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/the-week-in-defense-and-aerospace/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The week in Defense and Aerospace</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/the-week-in-defense-and-aerospace/">The week in Defense and Aerospace</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/the-week-in-defense-and-aerospace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/855417/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/the-week-in-defense-and-aerospace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aerospace industry</category><category>AerospaceIndustry</category><category>ba</category><category>boeing</category><category>defense industry</category><category>DefenseIndustry</category><category>gd</category><category>general dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>l-3 communications</category><category>L-3Communications</category><category>lll</category><category>lmt</category><category>lockheed martin</category><category>LockheedMartin</category><category>noc</category><category>northrop grumman</category><category>NorthropGrumman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades 1-25-07: L-1 Identity could lose contract, gets downgraded]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/analyst-downgrades-1-25-07-l-1-identity-loses-contract-gets-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/analyst-downgrades-1-25-07-l-1-identity-loses-contract-gets-do/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/analyst-downgrades-1-25-07-l-1-identity-loses-contract-gets-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvg/" rel="tag">Convergys Corp (CVG)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/aol-fly-logo.gif" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> WCI Communications Inc (WCI) and L-1 Identity Solutions Inc (ID) topped today's list of downgrades:<br />
<ul>
    <li>JMP Securities downgraded shares of <span style="font-weight: bold;">WCI Communications Inc </span>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wci-communities-inc/wci/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WCI</a>) to Underperform from Market Perform to reflect the negative Q4 pre-announcement and lower-than-expected traditional home net orders.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">L-1 Identity Solutions Inc </span>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/l-1-identity-solutions-inc/id/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">ID</a>) was downgraded to Sell from Neutral at Oppenheimer, noting that the Transportation Security Administration is prepared to award the Transportation Worker Identification Card contract to Lockheed instead of L-1. </li>
</ul>
<br /><strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">General Dynamics Corp </span>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GD</a>) was downgraded to Hold from Buy by AG Edwards, citing valuation. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Matrix USA downgraded <span style="font-weight: bold;">Microtune Inc </span>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microtune-inc/tune/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">TUNE</a>) to Strong Sell from Sell on valuation. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Convergys Corp</span> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/convergys-corporation/cvg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CVG</a>) was downgraded to Sell from Hold, with a $22 target, based on valuation. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">BancFirst Corp </span>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bancfirst-corporation/banf/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">BANF</a>) was downgraded to Underperform from Market Perform, with a $45 target, at Keefe Bruyette following the disappointing Q4 report.</li>
</ul>
Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com </a>(subscription required).<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/analyst-downgrades-1-25-07-l-1-identity-loses-contract-gets-do/">Analyst downgrades 1-25-07: L-1 Identity could lose contract, gets downgraded</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/analyst-downgrades-1-25-07-l-1-identity-loses-contract-gets-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/742403/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/analyst-downgrades-1-25-07-l-1-identity-loses-contract-gets-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>bancfirst</category><category>banf</category><category>convergys</category><category>cvg</category><category>downgrade</category><category>gd</category><category>general dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>id</category><category>L-1 Indentity</category><category>L-1Indentity</category><category>microtune</category><category>rating change</category><category>RatingChange</category><category>ratings</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>tune</category><category>wci</category><category>wci communications</category><category>WciCommunications</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst upgrades 1-8-07: IBM upgraded to Buy at UBS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/analyst-upgrades-1-8-07-ibm-upgraded-to-buy-at-ubs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/analyst-upgrades-1-8-07-ibm-upgraded-to-buy-at-ubs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/analyst-upgrades-1-8-07-ibm-upgraded-to-buy-at-ubs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/aol-fly-logo.gif" alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>International Business Machines Corp (IBM) and General Dynanics (GD) were the most notable upgrades this morning: <br />
<ul>
    <li>UBS upgraded <strong>International Business Machines Corp </strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) to Buy from Neutral with a $118 target, citing improving fundamentals and expectations that software acquisitions will contribute to expanding organic growth rates, increased margins and multiple expansions. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><strong>G</strong><strong>eneral Dynamics </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GD</a>) was upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Cowen, as the firm sees better-than-expected growth for General Dynamics Combat business, driven by the DoD's 2007 supplemental budget. </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER UPGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Bear Stearns upgraded shares of <strong>TiVO Inc</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tivo-inc/tivo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">TIVO</a>) to Peer Perform from Underperform, as the company believes risk/reward is now more favorable. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Bernstein upgraded shares of <strong>Constellation Brands</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/constellation-brands-inc-cl-a/stz/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">STZ</a>) to Market Perform from Underperform citing valuation.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Goldman Sachs added <strong>Royal Caribbean Cruises</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/royal-caribbean-cruises-ltd/rcl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">RCL</a>) to their America's Conviction Buy List, beliving that RCL's overhang from higher energy expenses is abating and that pricing trends may be slightly better than expectations.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/analyst-upgrades-1-8-07-ibm-upgraded-to-buy-at-ubs/">Analyst upgrades 1-8-07: IBM upgraded to Buy at UBS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/analyst-upgrades-1-8-07-ibm-upgraded-to-buy-at-ubs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/731470/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/analyst-upgrades-1-8-07-ibm-upgraded-to-buy-at-ubs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>Constellation Brands</category><category>ConstellationBrands</category><category>gd</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>ibm</category><category>rating change</category><category>RatingChange</category><category>ratings</category><category>rcl</category><category>Royal Caribbean</category><category>RoyalCaribbean</category><category>stz</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>tivo</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst initiations 12-5-06: General Dynamics with Average]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/analyst-initiations-12-5-06-general-dynamics-with-average/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/analyst-initiations-12-5-06-general-dynamics-with-average/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/analyst-initiations-12-5-06-general-dynamics-with-average/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/"><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" align="right" vspace="4" /></a><strong>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> </p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>General Dynamics Corp.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GD</a>) was the only noteworthy company initiated today; Caris initiated the military equipment-maker with an Average rating based on valuation. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>OTHER INITIATIONS:</strong> </p>
<ul>
    <li>Merriman initiated <strong>Bankrate Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bankrate-inc/rate/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">RATE</a>) with a Buy rating; the firm said Bankrate has a number of attractive assets and competitive strengths that include a high level of direct-to-site traffic, high quality traffic, pricing leverage and strong management. </li>
    <li>Deutsche Bank started <strong>Color Kinetics Inc. </strong>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/color-kinetics-incorporated/clrk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CLRK</a>) with a Buy rating and $23 target, as it believes Color Kinetics is an attractive play on the rapid adoption of LEDs. </li>
    <li>HSBC initiated <strong>Peabody Energy Corp.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/peabody-energy-corporation/btu/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BTU</a>) and <strong>Arch Coal Inc.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arch-coal-inc/aci/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">ACI</a>) with Overweight ratings.</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Analyst summaries provided by </em><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/"><em>TheFlyOnTheWall.com</em></a><em> (subscription required).</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/analyst-initiations-12-5-06-general-dynamics-with-average/">Analyst initiations 12-5-06: General Dynamics with Average</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/analyst-initiations-12-5-06-general-dynamics-with-average/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/713061/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/analyst-initiations-12-5-06-general-dynamics-with-average/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arch coal</category><category>ArchCoal</category><category>bankrate</category><category>color kinetics</category><category>ColorKinetics</category><category>General Dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>peabody energy</category><category>PeabodyEnergy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades 10-20-06: Yahoo!, SanDisk only start the list]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/analyst-downgrades-10-20-06-yahoo-sandisk-only-start-the-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/analyst-downgrades-10-20-06-yahoo-sandisk-only-start-the-list/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/analyst-downgrades-10-20-06-yahoo-sandisk-only-start-the-list/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><strong><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" align="right" vspace="4" />MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> Yahoo! (YHOO), SanDisk (SNDK) and General Dynamics (GD) top today's extensive list of downgrades. </p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Yahoo!, Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>)  was downgraded to Hold from Buy at Stifel Nicolaus &amp; Co. The firm believes that Google (GOOG) is the only company to recommend in the large-cap Internet media/search sector. </li>
    <li><strong>SanDisk Corp.</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandisk-corporation/sndk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SNDK</a>) was downgraded at Citigroup and Oppenheimer to Neutral from Buy at both firms. Oppenheimer believes margins have peaked, pricing is aggressive and oversupply will hit the company in the first half of 2007. </li>
    <li><strong>General Dynamics Corp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GD</a>) was downgraded at Goldman Sachs to Neutral from Buy on valuation. </li>
</ul>
<p>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </p>
<ul>
    <li>JMP Securities downgraded <strong>Labor Ready, Inc.</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/labor-ready-inc/lrw/nys">LRW</a>) to Outperform from Strong Buy citing the slowdown in the residential housing market and other peripheral markets.  The firm does not see a strong catalyst for Labor Ready until late-2007. </li>
    <li>Stifel Nicolaus &amp; Co. downgraded <strong>Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/coca-cola-enterprises-inc/cce/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CCE</a>) to Hold from Buy. Stifel believes further negative estimate revisions are likely. </li>
    <li><strong>United Parcel Service, Inc.</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-inc/ups/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">UPS</a>) was downgraded at Raymond James to Outperform from Strong Buy. </li>
    <li><strong>Pfizer, Inc.</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PFE</a>) was also downgraded by Raymond James, to Market Perform from Strong Buy. The firm cited poor earnings quality for Pfizer's downgrade.  </li>
    <li>Finally, Merriman downgraded <strong>P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/p-f-chang-s-china-bistro-inc/pfcb/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">PFCB</a>) to Neutral from Buy. The firm believes the current valuation reflects the improving sales trends and they expect management to remain conservative with 2007 guidance. </li>
</ul>
<p><em>Analyst summaries provided by </em><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/"><em>TheFlyOnTheWall.com</em></a><em> (subscription required).</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/analyst-downgrades-10-20-06-yahoo-sandisk-only-start-the-list/">Analyst downgrades 10-20-06: Yahoo!, SanDisk only start the list</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/analyst-downgrades-10-20-06-yahoo-sandisk-only-start-the-list/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/688200/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/analyst-downgrades-10-20-06-yahoo-sandisk-only-start-the-list/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gd</category><category>general dynamics</category><category>GeneralDynamics</category><category>pfe</category><category>pfizer</category><category>sandisk</category><category>sndk</category><category>ups</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:06:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
