<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[What Happens to Oil Prices When 1.3 Billion Chinese Get Rid of Bicycles?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/chinese-oil-prices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/chinese-oil-prices/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/chinese-oil-prices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/06/1-china-bikes.jpg" />As China's huge population graduates from bicycles, what is going to happen to oil prices? China -- still lacking in domestic oil infrastructure -- is going to compete against the United States to buy oil on the international market. The new destination of the oil tankers leaving the gulf could be China, not the U.S.
<p>Americans usually move from a bicycle to a car around the age of 16 when they get a driver's license and money to buy their first car. And as China's middle class grows, so will the desire to move beyond bicycles. Whether it's a scooter, motorcycle or a car -- it is going to use gasoline.</p>
<p> </p>
Or will it?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/chinese-oil-prices/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What Happens to Oil Prices When 1.3 Billion Chinese Get Rid of Bicycles?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/chinese-oil-prices/">What Happens to Oil Prices When 1.3 Billion Chinese Get Rid of Bicycles?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/chinese-oil-prices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19512158/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/chinese-oil-prices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>climate change</category><category>electric bike</category><category>electric car</category><category>featured</category><category>global warming</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil demand</category><category>oil prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[We Are to Ignore February Jobless Numbers Because of Snow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/we-are-to-ignore-february-jobless-numbers-because-of-snow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/we-are-to-ignore-february-jobless-numbers-because-of-snow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/we-are-to-ignore-february-jobless-numbers-because-of-snow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/snow.jpg" alt="" />Okay, last week <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/25/increase-in-jobless-claims-blamed-on-snow/">I mocked the government</a> because of the assertion that the recent blizzards were a reason that we saw a larger-than-expected increase in jobless claims. I thought that perhaps this was the blame game going overboard, but that isn't the case.</p>
<p>White House economic adviser <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0111549320100301?type=marketsNews">Larry Summers reiterated</a> yesterday that "winter blizzards were likely to distort U.S. February jobless figures." Seriously. Yes, I know that some companies have weather-related issues and that could have some impact on the jobless picture, but this is just a bit much.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/we-are-to-ignore-february-jobless-numbers-because-of-snow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>We Are to Ignore February Jobless Numbers Because of Snow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/we-are-to-ignore-february-jobless-numbers-because-of-snow/">We Are to Ignore February Jobless Numbers Because of Snow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/we-are-to-ignore-february-jobless-numbers-because-of-snow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19379394/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/we-are-to-ignore-february-jobless-numbers-because-of-snow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Al Gore</category><category>global warming</category><category>initial jobless claims</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>Larry Summers</category><category>weather</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Global Warming Dead? Stocks to Dump ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/is-global-warming-dead-stocks-to-dump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/is-global-warming-dead-stocks-to-dump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/is-global-warming-dead-stocks-to-dump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/algore080707.png" />With the failed global warming submit; leaked emails, faked numbers, suppressed data and major snow storms hitting both Europe and America global warning aka "climategate" seems to have taken a major hit recently. <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-death-of-global-warming.html">Some</a> are even going as far as predicting the <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/">demise</a> of global warming. <br />
<br />
This could be a big turning point for global warming. Having been caught in a lie; they have lost massive amount of creditability and now face an uphill battle to convince a skeptical public. Certainly, global warming may regain public credibility, but it will face a lot of scrutiny as it tries.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/is-global-warming-dead-stocks-to-dump/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Global Warming Dead? Stocks to Dump ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/is-global-warming-dead-stocks-to-dump/">Is Global Warming Dead? Stocks to Dump ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/is-global-warming-dead-stocks-to-dump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19353720/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/is-global-warming-dead-stocks-to-dump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adm</category><category>al gore</category><category>bp</category><category>climate change</category><category>climategate</category><category>cvx</category><category>featured</category><category>fslr</category><category>global warming</category><category>mon</category><category>senate</category><category>snow</category><category>spwra</category><category>storms</category><category>xom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[You can profit from James Altucher's insanity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/forever-buffett-2.jpg" alt="" />James Altucher is a financial journalist for <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> and founder of Stockpickr.com. His articles cover every angle of the market; he also stars in feature videos with other financial luminaries. He is the author of <em>Trade Like a Hedge Fund, Trade Like Warren Buffett, SuperCa$h,</em> and <em>The Forever Portfolio.</em></p>
<p>He has taken a controversial path lately with numerous articles in the <em>New York Post</em> and Huffington Post. Some articles include: "Global Warming Is a Myth," "Should Insider Trading Be Made Legal?" "School of Hard Cash," "The Internet Is Dead (as an Investment)," and "5 Myths the Recession Taught Us."</p>
<p>Rumors of a new addition to the James Altucher library have entered the blogosphere, so I met with James to discuss a possible new book and the response from his recent aggressive views on finance and the stock market.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>You can profit from James Altucher's insanity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/">You can profit from James Altucher's insanity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19243099/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/12/you-can-profit-from-james-altuchers-insanity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>AOL</category><category>Cameco</category><category>capitalism</category><category>CCJ</category><category>climate change</category><category>DailyFinance</category><category>day trading</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Forever Portfolio</category><category>Fred Wilson</category><category>GlaxoSmithKline</category><category>global warming</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>GSK</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>Huffington Post</category><category>insider trading</category><category>institutional investing</category><category>James Altucher</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>naked short selling</category><category>naked shorting</category><category>New York Post</category><category>News Corp. NWS</category><category>PCLN</category><category>Priceline</category><category>recession</category><category>SanofiAventis</category><category>SNY</category><category>swine flu</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>Trade Like a Hedge Fund</category><category>Trade Like Warren Buffett</category><category>Twitter</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daleela Farina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google and State of California team to show climate change effects]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/google-and-state-of-california-team-to-show-climate-change-effec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/google-and-state-of-california-team-to-show-climate-change-effec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/google-and-state-of-california-team-to-show-climate-change-effec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/gearth.jpg" />Google, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is one of the tech leaders when it comes to operating one of the largest technology companies on the planet while at the same time being one of the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/google-nears-green-energy-goals-ceo-schmidt-slams-bing/">greenest companies</a>, ecologically speaking. <br /><br />So, it comes as no surprise that the company and its home state, California, are teaming up to try and raise awareness of climate change using Google Earth as the teaching medium.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/google-and-state-of-california-team-to-show-climate-change-effec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google and State of California team to show climate change effects</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/google-and-state-of-california-team-to-show-climate-change-effec/">Google and State of California team to show climate change effects</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.examiner.com/x-25061-Climate-Change-Examiner~y2009m12d5-California-and-Google-launch-tool-to-visualize-climate-change>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/google-and-state-of-california-team-to-show-climate-change-effec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19267878/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/google-and-state-of-california-team-to-show-climate-change-effec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>California</category><category>Climate change</category><category>ClimateChange</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Earth</category><category>GoogleEarth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Climate change law could cost 13 cents a gallon]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-law-could-cost-13-cents-a-gallon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-law-could-cost-13-cents-a-gallon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-law-could-cost-13-cents-a-gallon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gasoline-2.jpg" alt="" />Climate change isn't going to be free. A report by <a href="http://www.pointcarbon.com/" target="_blank">Point Carbon</a>, an independent consulting company that tracks global carbon and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/energy/">energy</a> markets, estimates that U.S. climate legislation could push the price at the pump 13 cents a gallon higher. The increase would result from the cost to oil companies for carbon permits, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5A157920091102" target="_blank">which they can pass along to consumers</a>. </p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/environment/Climate_change_law_could_cost_13_cents_a_gallon'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>
<p>This is a much rosier view than that of the oil industry, however, which believes a U.S. cap-and-trade system would thrash demand for <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/gasoline/">gasoline</a> and lead to the shuttering of many refineries.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-law-could-cost-13-cents-a-gallon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Climate change law could cost 13 cents a gallon</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-law-could-cost-13-cents-a-gallon/">Climate change law could cost 13 cents a gallon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5A157920091102>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-law-could-cost-13-cents-a-gallon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19219947/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-law-could-cost-13-cents-a-gallon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cap and trade bill</category><category>CapAndTradeBill</category><category>carbon credits</category><category>carbon emissions</category><category>CarbonCredits</category><category>CarbonEmissions</category><category>climate bill</category><category>climate change</category><category>emissionsreductions</category><category>energy</category><category>exelon</category><category>exxonmobil</category><category>gas prices</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>senate</category><category>xom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chamber of Commerce sues activists over climate change stunt]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/chamber-of-commerce-sues-activists-over-climate-change-stunt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/chamber-of-commerce-sues-activists-over-climate-change-stunt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/chamber-of-commerce-sues-activists-over-climate-change-stunt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/aapl-apple-logo.jpg" />The U.S. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/ChamberofCommerce/">Chamber of Commerce</a> is fighting back. The organization has filed a civil lawsuit against the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/YesMen/">Yes Men</a>, an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/activist/">activist</a> group that announced that the chamber had changed its position on climate change. </p>
<p>The Yes Men told the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/NationalPressClub/">National Press Club</a> on October 19, 2009 that the Chamber of Commerce would give up lobbying against the Senate's 800-page climate change bill. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33486161/ns/business-us_business/">Reuters, CNBC and Fox Business Network all reported on the story</a>, with the anchors correcting themselves midstream, when they learned that it was false. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/chamber-of-commerce-sues-activists-over-climate-change-stunt/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chamber of Commerce sues activists over climate change stunt</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/chamber-of-commerce-sues-activists-over-climate-change-stunt/">Chamber of Commerce sues activists over climate change stunt</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33486161/ns/business-us_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/chamber-of-commerce-sues-activists-over-climate-change-stunt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19211332/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/chamber-of-commerce-sues-activists-over-climate-change-stunt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>activism</category><category>activists</category><category>apple</category><category>chamber of commerce</category><category>ChamberOfCommerce</category><category>climate change</category><category>ClimateChange</category><category>exel</category><category>exelon</category><category>exeloncorp</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>inthenews</category><category>national press club</category><category>NationalPressClub</category><category>pacific gas and electric</category><category>PacificGasAndElectric</category><category>pcg</category><category>pcga</category><category>prank</category><category>yes men</category><category>YesMen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Soros to put $1 billion into clean-tech companies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eastern-europe/" rel="tag">Eastern Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="375" border="1" align="right" width="240" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/george-soros.jpg" /> The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/cleantechnology/">clean technology</a> wave just got a little bigger. This tends to be a side-effect of interest from billionaire investor <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/GeorgeSoros/">George Soros</a>. And, as usual, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMU3BkV3yqPU" target="_blank">it's more than just money; it's more than just a return</a>. Soros, yet again, is trying to save the world. Interestingly, the bold move was announced at a meeting on climate change sponsored by Project Syndicate - an international association consisting of 430 newspapers from 150 countries (and thus with clear ties to the past, rather than future). </p>
<p>The investor and founder of Soros Fund Management LLC is planning to put $1 billion into <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/cleantech/">clean-tech</a> opportunities using what he calls "rather stringent criteria," which involves being "profitable but should also actually make a contribution to solving the problem [i.e., of clean technology adoption and proliferation]." Soros didn't provide any other details on the nature or scope of his investments. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Soros to put $1 billion into clean-tech companies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/">Soros to put $1 billion into clean-tech companies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMU3BkV3yqPU>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19191887/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>california</category><category>clean</category><category>clean technology</category><category>cleantech</category><category>CleanTechnology</category><category>climate change</category><category>ClimateChange</category><category>george soros</category><category>GeorgeSoros</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>greenhouse</category><category>greenhouse gases</category><category>GreenhouseGases</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>san francisco</category><category>SanFrancisco</category><category>soros</category><category>soros management fund</category><category>sorosfundmanagement</category><category>SorosManagementFund</category><category>venture capital</category><category>VentureCapital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Migration from Chamber of Commerce over climate change]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/migration-from-chamber-of-commerce-over-climate-change/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/migration-from-chamber-of-commerce-over-climate-change/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/migration-from-chamber-of-commerce-over-climate-change/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pcg/" rel="tag">PG and E Corporation (PCG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/apple.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33184082/ns/business-us_business/" target="_blank">Apple just bailed on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce</a>, citing the business organization's view on climate change. The Chamber of Commerce doesn't accept the notion that people are the force behind global warming and has called for public hearings to question the evidence that many accept. But, this has led several companies to leave the group, with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" target="_blank">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" target="_blank">AAPL</a>) only the latest.</p>
<p>The technology company stated through Catherine Novelli, a vice president of government affairs, that it would "prefer that the chamber take a more progressive stance on this critical issue and play a constructive role in addressing the climate crisis." Apple resigned its membership "effective immediately." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/migration-from-chamber-of-commerce-over-climate-change/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Migration from Chamber of Commerce over climate change</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/migration-from-chamber-of-commerce-over-climate-change/">Migration from Chamber of Commerce over climate change</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33184082/ns/business-us_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/migration-from-chamber-of-commerce-over-climate-change/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19185795/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/migration-from-chamber-of-commerce-over-climate-change/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>chamber of commerce</category><category>climate change</category><category>exelon</category><category>global warming</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pacific gas and electric</category><category>pg and e</category><category>pnm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.N.: Eat less meat, invest in green]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/u-n-eat-less-meat-invest-in-green/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/u-n-eat-less-meat-invest-in-green/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/u-n-eat-less-meat-invest-in-green/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/digital-sextant.jpg" />Rajendra Pachauri, U.N. climate scientist, has good news and bad news. I'll give you the latter first: eat less meat. Doing so will help slow <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/globalwarming/">global warming</a>. The good news, also related to climate change, is that Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for the United Nations, investing in green technologies now is a smart move. So, by following Pachauri's advice, you <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-GreenBusiness/idUSTRE59200V20091003" target="_blank">cut down on your meat but reward yourself with a decent investment return</a>.</p>
<p>If you take his advice as a whole (pretending you don't know you can do one part without the other), it's like getting paid to eat your veggies. Everyone who's been five years old at some point knows that being given green to eat green is ample motivation. The fun part, here, is that you're financing it by investing in green. It all matches!</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/u-n-eat-less-meat-invest-in-green/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.N.: Eat less meat, invest in green</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/u-n-eat-less-meat-invest-in-green/">U.N.: Eat less meat, invest in green</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/u-n-eat-less-meat-invest-in-green/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183839/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/u-n-eat-less-meat-invest-in-green/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clean tech</category><category>clean technology</category><category>CleanTech</category><category>climate change</category><category>energy</category><category>energy stocks</category><category>global warming</category><category>green energy</category><category>green technology</category><category>inthenews</category><category>united nations</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A new hybrid sports car, an outlandish price tag ... and Al Gore]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/a-new-hybrid-sports-car-an-outlandish-price-tag-and-al-gore/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/a-new-hybrid-sports-car-an-outlandish-price-tag-and-al-gore/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/a-new-hybrid-sports-car-an-outlandish-price-tag-and-al-gore/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/fisker.jpg" />He discovered global warming; he created the Internet; and his wife shielded my young ears from curse words when I was growing up. Now Al Gore has decided it is time to single-handedly rescue the automotive world. Okay, not really, but Al Gore is a major backer of California-based Fisker Automotive, which has just <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125383160812639013.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories" target="_blank">secured a $529 million government loan</a> to build a hybrid sports car in Finland. <br /><br />Couple of problems here, but let's start with the idea of the car. I am so glad that Fisker is going to help the earth. I mean, who doesn't want to conserve fuel and reduce air pollution  while cruising around in their four-door sports car? I mean, who doesn't have an extra $89,000 lying around to spend on transportation? Seriously, it is now at the point that only celebrities can afford a hybrid car that doesn't look like it was built of Lego. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/a-new-hybrid-sports-car-an-outlandish-price-tag-and-al-gore/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A new hybrid sports car, an outlandish price tag ... and Al Gore</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/a-new-hybrid-sports-car-an-outlandish-price-tag-and-al-gore/">A new hybrid sports car, an outlandish price tag ... and Al Gore</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/a-new-hybrid-sports-car-an-outlandish-price-tag-and-al-gore/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19173445/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/a-new-hybrid-sports-car-an-outlandish-price-tag-and-al-gore/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Al Gore</category><category>AlGore</category><category>Fisker</category><category>global economy</category><category>Global Warming</category><category>GlobalEconomy</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>government waste</category><category>GovernmentWaste</category><category>hybrid</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Tesla</category><category>wasteful spending</category><category>WastefulSpending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Duke Energy's Q2 earnings fall along with temperatures]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/duke-energys-q2-earnings-fall-along-with-temperatures/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/duke-energys-q2-earnings-fall-along-with-temperatures/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/duke-energys-q2-earnings-fall-along-with-temperatures/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/duk/" rel="tag">Duke Energy (DUK)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/duke080707.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/duke-energy-corporation/duk/nys">Duke Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/duke-energy-corporation/duk/nys">DUK</a>) has to wonder if Al Gore knows exactly what he is talking about when it comes to global warming. </p>
<p>This morning, the power company announced that its second-quarter profit fell to 21 cents per share from 28 cents per share a year ago. Excluding items, the company would have earned 26 cents per share, which is a penny better than the consensus estimate. Revenue for the quarter fell to $2.91 billion from $3.22 billion a year ago and far short of the consensus estimate. The blame for the year-over-year profit decline falls squarely on the shoulders of <a href="http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=1026992&amp;Category=Top%20story">mark-to-market losses on economic hedges</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/duke-energys-q2-earnings-fall-along-with-temperatures/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Duke Energy's Q2 earnings fall along with temperatures</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/duke-energys-q2-earnings-fall-along-with-temperatures/">Duke Energy's Q2 earnings fall along with temperatures</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/duke-energys-q2-earnings-fall-along-with-temperatures/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19118608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/duke-energys-q2-earnings-fall-along-with-temperatures/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>al gore</category><category>DUK</category><category>Duke Energy</category><category>electric</category><category>energy</category><category>global warming</category><category>inthenews</category><category>power company</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[US: The world's cleanest third world country]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/apc/" rel="tag">Anadarko Petroleum (APC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2009/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2009</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/rsz_anadarko.jpg" alt="" />Last night it was <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idAFLD24221320090413?rpc=33">reported by Reuters</a>, following up on an interview in the Financial Times (subscription required) that James Hackett, chairman and chief executive of independent oil and gas company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anadarko-petroleum-corporation/apc/nys">Anadarko Petroleum</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anadarko-petroleum-corporation/apc/nys">APC</a>) said, "Washington's energy and environmental policy risks plunging the United States into an economic tailspin that could make it <em><strong>the world's cleanest third world country</strong></em>."<span id="midArticle_byline"></span></p>
<span id="midArticle_0"></span>
<p>Seems he is not partial to the global warming crowd as indicated by his statement that <em>"The histrionic and maniacal focus on carbon dioxide is intellectually repugnant to me,"</em> but how does he really feel?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>US: The world's cleanest third world country</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/">US: The world's cleanest third world country</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1516389/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anadarko Petroleum</category><category>AnadarkoPetroleum</category><category>APC</category><category>cap and trade</category><category>CapAndTrade</category><category>featured</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>government</category><category>government regulation</category><category>GovernmentRegulation</category><category>James Hackett</category><category>JamesHackett</category><category>profits</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock picks 2009</category><category>StockPicks2009</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Most likely, you'll determine the fuel for the car of the future]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gasoline-2.jpg" />Despite the onset of the latest high energy price era, it goes without saying that the car will remain the main mode of transportation in the United States as the 21st century progresses. <br /><br />First mass-produced on a national scale by <a href="http://www.thehenryford.org/">Henry Ford</a>, subsidized by the construction and expansion of the public interstate highway system after World War II, and immortalized by such films as George Lucas's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Graffiiti"><span style="font-style: italic;">American Graffit</span>i (1973)</a>, the car and car culture is intrinsic to modern American life. <br /><br /><strong>The car fuel alternatives</strong><br /><br />Cheap <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$WTIC">oil</a> is not intrinsic, however, and that's a major reason why the nation is exploring car / vehicle fuel alternatives. Many options exist, each with strengths / weaknesses, and currently there's no clear winner. <br /><br />Hence, in a very real sense, your say in the matter will play an important role in determining what fuel most Americans will use for car transportation in the decades ahead. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Most likely, you'll determine the fuel for the car of the future</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/">Most likely, you'll determine the fuel for the car of the future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1289975/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/20/most-likely-youll-determine-the-fuel-for-the-car-of-the-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Graffiti</category><category>autos</category><category>climate change</category><category>electric cars</category><category>ethanol</category><category>featured</category><category>flex fuel cars</category><category>fuel cells</category><category>fuel efficiency</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>global warming</category><category>Henry Ford</category><category>hybrid cars</category><category>hybrids</category><category>hydrogen</category><category>hydrogen cars</category><category>interstate highways</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>mpg</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[G-8 accomplishes little on greenhouse emission cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/g-8-accomplishes-little-on-greenhouse-emission-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/g-8-accomplishes-little-on-greenhouse-emission-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/g-8-accomplishes-little-on-greenhouse-emission-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p>Leaders of the G-8 (group of 8 wealthy nations) basically did nothing in their talks to cut global greenhouse emissions. They agreed to cut emissions in half by the year 2050. How many of them will even be alive by then? I've heard of five year economic plans but 42 year plans? Something tells me it just won't work. The U.S. also was victorious in not setting any actual numerical targets. </p>
<p>According to a MarketWatch <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/g8-leaders-share-vision-emission/story.aspx?guid=%7B3CD0C240%2DB67A%2D4E53%2DB9EE%2DA7DE03638298%7D#comments">report</a>: "The U.S. and several other developed countries have said they will not enter an agreement to reduce future greenhouse gas emissions which does not include binding commitments by growing industrial powers such as China and India to cut carbon." </p>
<p>And rightly so. Why should the U.S. bear the brunt of the economic costs of this initiative and growing economies, which are much bigger polluters, get off without having to accept any responsibility? It seems like a case of just trying to redistribute wealth from the west to emerging economies. </p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">IsraelNewsletter.com</font></em></a><em>. DISCLOSURE: Writer's fund has no position in any stock mentioned, as of 7/8/08.</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/g-8-accomplishes-little-on-greenhouse-emission-cuts/">G-8 accomplishes little on greenhouse emission cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/g8-leaders-share-vision-emission/story.aspx?guid=%7B3CD0C240%2DB67A%2D4E53%2DB9EE%2DA7DE03638298%7D#comments>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/g-8-accomplishes-little-on-greenhouse-emission-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1248714/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/g-8-accomplishes-little-on-greenhouse-emission-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carbon emissions</category><category>CarbonEmissions</category><category>emrging economies pollution</category><category>EmrgingEconomiesPollution</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>greenhouse gases</category><category>GreenhouseGases</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Americans have to slim down to fit into their cars?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/will-americans-have-to-slim-down-to-fit-into-their-cars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/will-americans-have-to-slim-down-to-fit-into-their-cars/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/will-americans-have-to-slim-down-to-fit-into-their-cars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/chevrloetbeat.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />When my wife and I were in Europe a few years ago, we saw the "Smart Cars," vehicles so small that they look like they could have come off an assembly line at a toy plant. The reason we were told that they were so popular in Europe was that gas was expensive and people there did not need to drive huge distances over crowded highways. Well, I thought these sort of vehicles would never sell in the U.S. where we like our cars as wide and free as freeway at the crack of dawn.</p>
<p>Thanks to $4 gas, my theory has been proven wrong.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) may start producing the Chevrolet Beat in the U.S., a vehicle which according to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aEJvUUe4iUlU&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a> is more than a foot shorter than any other vehicle and whose 40-mile-per-hour fuel efficiency is only topped by hybrids. The new service points out that the the automaker has little choice because its current market value is SMALLER than Matchbox car maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">Mattel Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">MAT</a>) and a 10th of what it was in 2000. It only took GM billions of dollars in losses but hey better late than never, right?</p>
<p>Don't get be wrong. I have nothing against the Chevrolet Beat. Judging from the pictures I have seen online. it looks okay, not my cup of tea, but then again that's why we have chocolate and vanilla. Thanks to Al Gore, I understand about global warming and feel guilty that I own the small SUV that I drive. Nonetheless, the Chevrolet Beat and other cars like it scare me.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/will-americans-have-to-slim-down-to-fit-into-their-cars/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Americans have to slim down to fit into their cars?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/will-americans-have-to-slim-down-to-fit-into-their-cars/">Will Americans have to slim down to fit into their cars?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/will-americans-have-to-slim-down-to-fit-into-their-cars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1245298/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/will-americans-have-to-slim-down-to-fit-into-their-cars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>al gore</category><category>automakers</category><category>Chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet beat</category><category>featured</category><category>global warming</category><category>GM</category><category>MAT</category><category>matchbox cars</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IEA calls for 'energy revolution' to lower fossil-fuel dependence]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/iea-calls-for-energy-revolution-to-lower-fossil-fuel-dependenc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/iea-calls-for-energy-revolution-to-lower-fossil-fuel-dependenc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/iea-calls-for-energy-revolution-to-lower-fossil-fuel-dependenc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/chesapeake-energy.jpg" />Almost on cue, following <a href="http://www.nymex.com">oil's</a> $12 rise in two days to $134, <a href="http://www.iea.org/Textbase/press/pressdetail.asp?PRESS_REL_ID=263">the International Energy Agency said</a> the world needs to invest an additional $45 trillion in the decades ahead to vastly expand both nuclear power and wind power capacity to meet global energy needs. <br /><br />Strictly speaking, the IEA's call to action was rooted in reducing the world's greenhouse gas emissions and achieving what it argues will be "a clean, clever, energy future" and not to move away from oil or fossil fuels solely on cost grounds. (<a href="http://www.iea.org/Textbase/techno/etp/fact_sheet_ETP2008.pdf">pdf</a>)<br /><br />Still, the report's <a href="http://www.iea.org/Textbase/press/pressdetail.asp?PRESS_REL_ID=263">2050 ETP Baseline scenario</a> projects that CO2 emissions will rise by 130% and oil demand will rise by 70% - - the latter total being equal to five times Saudi Arabia's current oil production. If the IEA's oil projection is correct, that would suggest additional large increases in the price of oil in the decades ahead - - on top of oil's more than 400% price rise since 2001.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/iea-calls-for-energy-revolution-to-lower-fossil-fuel-dependenc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IEA calls for 'energy revolution' to lower fossil-fuel dependence</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/iea-calls-for-energy-revolution-to-lower-fossil-fuel-dependenc/">IEA calls for 'energy revolution' to lower fossil-fuel dependence</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/iea-calls-for-energy-revolution-to-lower-fossil-fuel-dependenc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1217677/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/iea-calls-for-energy-revolution-to-lower-fossil-fuel-dependenc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>climate change</category><category>coal</category><category>emering markets</category><category>fossil fuels</category><category>gdp</category><category>global warming</category><category>globalization</category><category>IEA</category><category>International Energy Agency</category><category>inthenews</category><category>natural gas</category><category>nuclear power</category><category>oil prices</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>solar power</category><category>wind mills</category><category>wind power</category><category>WindMills</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The clean coal that may not be in the U.S.'s energy future]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/the-clean-coal-that-may-not-be-in-the-u-s-s-energy-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/the-clean-coal-that-may-not-be-in-the-u-s-s-energy-future/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/the-clean-coal-that-may-not-be-in-the-u-s-s-energy-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Clean coal has hit speed bump on the path to the nation's cleaner energy future.
<p>The United States Government has canceled support for a clean coal demonstration project after the project's development costs nearly doubled, to $1.8 billion, citing the need to limit taxpayer exposure, according to a<span style="font-style: italic;"> New York Times</span> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/business/30coal.html?scp=1&amp;sq=coal&amp;st=cse">report</a>.  </p>
<p>Further, more than a decade into the research process, it remains an unanswered question whether the clean coal technology -- capturing and injecting carbon dioxide back into the ground -- can be executed in a safe and cost-effective manner.  </p>
<p>Among other hurdles, scientists need to determine which soil formations are most environmentally appropriate for holding and organically processing the carbon dioxide, and that don't contain the risk of dioxide bubbling back to the surface, or polluting ground water.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/the-clean-coal-that-may-not-be-in-the-u-s-s-energy-future/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The clean coal that may not be in the U.S.'s energy future</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/the-clean-coal-that-may-not-be-in-the-u-s-s-energy-future/">The clean coal that may not be in the U.S.'s energy future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/the-clean-coal-that-may-not-be-in-the-u-s-s-energy-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1214220/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/the-clean-coal-that-may-not-be-in-the-u-s-s-energy-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clean coal</category><category>climate change</category><category>coal</category><category>energy crisis</category><category>energy policy</category><category>global warming</category><category>greenhouse gases</category><category>inthenews</category><category>natural gas</category><category>nuclear power</category><category>nuclear waste treatment</category><category>nulcear waste</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>U.S. Department of Energy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rockefellers keep pushing for change at Exxon Mobil]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/rockefellers-keep-pushing-for-change-at-exxon-mobil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/rockefellers-keep-pushing-for-change-at-exxon-mobil/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/rockefellers-keep-pushing-for-change-at-exxon-mobil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a></p>If you'd said a hundred years ago that the offspring of John D. Rockefeller would lead the charge for improved corporate governance, social responsibility, and an end to energy dependence and global warming, a lot of people would have laughed. But Neva Rockefeller Goodwin and Peter O'Neill, descendants of John D. Rockefeller, are pushing for change at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">Exxon Mobil</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>).<br /><br />Three resolutions supported by the family have no chance of passing, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/27/business/27exxon.html?ref=business">according</a> to the <em>New York Times</em>. One asks Exxon Mobil to study the impact of global warming on poor countries and another asks it to reduce its emissions. A third would encourage it to spend more money on research into renewable energy sources.<br /><br />The resolution most likely to pass seeks to separate the role of chairman and CEO, stripping imperial executive Rex Tillerson of a chunk of his power. (To get an idea of how he runs the company from a corporate governance perspective, check out Robert Monks' book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Corpocracy-Business-Roundtable-Hijacked-Greatest/dp/0470145099/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1211902712&amp;sr=8-1" style="font-style: italic;">Corpocracy</a>. )<em>The Economist</em> <a href="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?source=hptextfeature&amp;story_id=11413247">describes</a> Exxon's annual meeting as "a vigorous exercise in doing the minimum required by the law." The Rockefeller's and others are looking to change that.<br /><br />Operationally, the change would probably have no impact on the company's strategy or value. But in the long run, good corporate governance and stewardship of shareholder assets can be key contributors to total return.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/rockefellers-keep-pushing-for-change-at-exxon-mobil/">Rockefellers keep pushing for change at Exxon Mobil</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 May 2008 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/27/business/27exxon.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/rockefellers-keep-pushing-for-change-at-exxon-mobil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1206697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/27/rockefellers-keep-pushing-for-change-at-exxon-mobil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Rockefeller</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil: Don't waste money on global warming -- no to the Rockefeller's]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/annual-meetings/" rel="tag">Annual Meetings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p>As was reported in <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/rockefeller-family-takes-exxon-mobil/rfid98562583">AP online</a>, "Members of the Rockefeller family are pressuring <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">Exxon Mobil</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) to focus more on renewable energy. The family members, who say they are the oil giant's longest continuous shareholders, say Exxon is too focused on short-term gains from sky-high oil prices. They also argue splitting the roles of chairman and CEO will help the company be more flexible in the future." </p>
<p>Last time I checked, companies had a responsibility to provide value for shareholders, and no one has done it better than the oil giant. It has been producing record earnings quarter after quarter, and that is exactly what it is supposed to do. Corporations are not supposed to be politically correct organizations that throw money around at the latest fad. Maybe Exxon doesn't believe that there is a global warming problem? Or maybe it wants to see a lot more scientific evidence of the problem before committing billions and billions of dollars to research. If I were a shareholder, I would want management to take the exact approach that it has been taking. The fact that it is the most profitable company in the world means something. It should be commended for providing shareholder value.</p>
<p>In fact, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&amp;sid=aU.evtnk6DPo&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg</a> has an article that says that ocean cooling will stop global warming. Moreover, the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&amp;sid=aU.evtnk6DPo&amp;refer=home">article</a> indeed mentions that the authors tried to spin the article because of Exxon. "We thought a lot about the way to present this because we don't want it to be turned around in the wrong way," Keenlyside said. "I hope it doesn't become a message of Exxon Mobil and other skeptics." </p>
<p>Sounds to me that they are right to be skeptical.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em>IsraelNewsletter.com</em></a><em>. DISCLOSURE: Writer's fund has no position in any stock mentioned, as of 5/1/08</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/">Exxon Mobil: Don't waste money on global warming -- no to the Rockefeller's</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 May 2008 10:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/rockefeller-family-takes-exxon-mobil/rfid98562583>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1182754/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>corporate profits</category><category>CorporateProfits</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>glob</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>no global warming</category><category>responsibility to shareholders</category><category>Rockefeller</category><category>shareholder value</category><category>ShareholderValue</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:55:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
