<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why did Google go on television to advertise?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/why-did-google-go-on-television-to-advertise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/why-did-google-go-on-television-to-advertise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/why-did-google-go-on-television-to-advertise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/google-chrome-browser-logo.jpg" alt="" />When anti-traditional media company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) indicated it would go on television to promote its Chrome web browser, I was befuddled. Why on Earth would the king of new media (and associated revenue) want to go to an age-old format to promote one of its most important products? Chrome, which was just released during the second half of 2008 and thus has barely any market share, seemed oddly-placed when it was released anyway. Does the world <em>really</em> need another web browser?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/why-did-google-go-on-television-to-advertise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why did Google go on television to advertise?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/why-did-google-go-on-television-to-advertise/">Why did Google go on television to advertise?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 May 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/08/AR2009050802839.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/why-did-google-go-on-television-to-advertise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1542230/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/why-did-google-go-on-television-to-advertise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Chrome</category><category>Google TV ads</category><category>GoogleChrome</category><category>GoogleTvAds</category><category>Inc.</category><category>web browser</category><category>WebBrowser</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
