Google privacy posts

Feed

What does Google charge you to use its services?

If you're a Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) user, you probably enjoy the relatively high quality of the company's products at t cost of -- zero. How does Google give all this away for free, you ask? It's the same as any other company on the web that features quality products at no cost. The cost is your privacy. You are paying, and paying big.

Do you mind? It's hard to say what kind of personal, financial and psychological profile Google has on millions of its customers, but you can believe that this massive marketing database exists. How Google manages this will be the most important decision in the company's young, decade-old existence, but the question remains: do many of us sell our souls for freebies? Every time you sign up for something free but fill out a complete demographic profile to get it, you're selling out. Google is doing nothing different -- but its scale is so huge that all this data controlled by one entity does cause for concern among the informed consumer inside us all. It should, anyway.

Google, like anyone in business who is savvy, knows that giving away products or services for "free" on the front end is made up for on the back end. In other words, would you rather pay for every single product or service you use and not have any entity know how to market to you -- or would you rather get a good majority of your products and services at no cost but with the attached condition that there are many entities out there that know you better than you know yourself?

More importantly, they know how to push your exact buttons to have you behaving like a robotic consumer or a slot machine junkie? With the U.S. consumer responsible for two-thirds of economic activity (as little as that is at the moment), the harnessing of this kind of power becomes clear. Okay, I'm off to perform a Google search...

Keep your drapes closed: Google's in town

Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) unveiled yet another toy this week to add to its arsenal, Google Street View. For five U.S. communities -- New York, Miami, Denver, Las Vegas, and Los Angeles -- one can pull up street-level pictures of the main thoroughfares. The video was taken with an eleven-lens camera mounted atop an auto, but the images uploaded are only slightly clearer than those of convenience store holdups.
The coolness factor is the way it allows the viewer to pan at least 180 degrees from any point. The fear factor for those who mistrust Google is that its library of surveillance footage might just capture somebody with somebody else's wife, someplace other than the someplace they were supposed to be. However, I'd be hard-pressed to recognize individuals in the images I've seen. I do wonder if this is a factor of the source image, or a decision by big G to offer low-res images both to increase load speeds and diminish the likelihood that a figure in the shot can be identified. This should appease those who fear Goo-oogling.

What this feature does demonstrate is how quickly Google is assembling an image database that can be hugely important (and profitable) in the virtual worlds of gaming, flight and driving simulation, travel and emergency response. What we see here is, I suspect, just a nice side benefit of that initiative.

If you have trouble pulling up the site, be patient. It's being hammered today by vanity browsers, people who live in these cities looking for images of themselves.

More on Google's plans to sanitize private web search information

As Doug McIntyre wrote, Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) looks to finally start erasing all that information the company's servers log each time we perform that web search. After 18 to 24 months of performing a Google search, the company will make the last part of IP addresses anonymous. As a result, the traceable info Google captures from home PCs, work PCs, public PCs and cellphones (anywhere you can perform a Google search) will now become more anonymous.

As Doug noted, why is Google keeping the information at all, then? Most likely, Google wants to have computer-identifiable (if not personally-identifiable) information for law enforcement agencies for a while in case a subpoena comes up. The way law enforcement cases deal with online traceability, things will come up long before 18 months in most cases. Why, then, not anonymize the entire IP address of web searchers? What good will obfuscating the partial IP address of each web accomplish? It should be all or nothing, yes?

Since Google maintains these search logs forever right now, what will it do with all the search data already logged? Who knows, but at least Google users will have a little bit of privacy when conducting those searches, well, after 18 to 24 months. What I find interesting is this quote from Richard M. Smith, an Internet security and privacy consultant at Boston Software Forensics. Smith concluded that "Google should not be in the spy business ... by logging IP addresses and search strings they are running the largest intelligence operation in the world."

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-74.9212,454.83
NASDAQ-1.852,837.53
S&P 500-2.861,317.82

Last updated: May 27, 2012: 12:17 AM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

19.20-0.05(-0.26)

Alcoa

8.630.00(0.00)

Apple Inc

562.29-3.03(-0.54)

Google Inc 'A'

591.53-12.13(-2.01)

Bank of America

7.15+0.01(+0.14)

Wal-Mart Stores

65.31+0.24(+0.37)

Exxon Mobil Corp

82.08-0.53(-0.64)

Ford

10.60+0.01(+0.09)

Citigroup

26.47-0.19(-0.71)

IBM

194.30-1.79(-0.91)

Yahoo

15.36+0.01(+0.07)

Starbucks

54.56-0.20(-0.37)

Microsoft

29.06-0.01(-0.03)

Home Depot

49.44-0.27(-0.54)

DailyFinance Headlines

AOL Business News

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Sponsored Links

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

Page Loaded in 1338092225728 ms.