<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Google (GOOG) now undervalued?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/26/sunday-funnies-google-goog-now-undervalued/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/26/sunday-funnies-google-goog-now-undervalued/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/26/sunday-funnies-google-goog-now-undervalued/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a></p><p>On Friday my colleague Jonathan Berr posted <a title="View Henry Blodget blasts Mary Meeker's Google (GOOG) math on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/henry-blodget-blasts-mary-meekers-google-goog-math/" target="_blank">Henry Blodget blasts Mary Meeker's Google (GOOG) math</a>. In this story he outlined a slight difference of opinion. Actually a 1000%, regarding the potential revenue and earnings of YouTube. Since my own attempts at guessing what <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is worth (<a title="View Serious Money: What IS Google worth? One year later... on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/20/serious-money-what-is-google-worth-one-year-later/" target="_blank">Serious Money: What IS Google worth? One year later...</a>) proved more accurate than either of them, and since total stock value is of more importance, I had to comment. </p>
<p>Here are some real important numbers: If Google earns $18 per share over the next twelve months, its forward P/E is around 28. If they continue to make any progress with YouTube revenue at somewhere in between our battling pundits and hold market share, Google might be worth $600 in 12 months. Not the stuff investors are dreaming of but pretty darn good.</p>
<div> </div>
<p>If Google gains market share, adds any new revenue streams or improves its margins, it could reach 5% to10% above these figures. I do not believe this will happen because Google will not be able to achieve a return on investment for new business equal to that of its original idea. In addition, any new acquisitions, and there will be some, will not improve margins either. </p>
<div> </div>
<p>To verify my track record, including bad calls, read <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/26/sunday-funnies-google-goog-now-undervalued/">Sunday Funnies: Google (GOOG) now undervalued?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/26/sunday-funnies-google-goog-now-undervalued/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/973350/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/26/sunday-funnies-google-goog-now-undervalued/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chasing Value</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google value</category><category>Henry Blodget</category><category>Jonathan Berr</category><category>Mary Meeker</category><category>Serious Money</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>Sunday Funnies</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
