<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's new Office product to compete for free with Google Docs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/office.jpg" />When <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) released Google Docs a few years back, it may have scared software competitor <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) just a bit. Office is one of Microsoft's largest cash cows and the company knows many previous software applications are being ported to jut the web -- not to your local PC. Google's entire existence is based on this. So, when will we see Microsoft Office for the web?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's new Office product to compete for free with Google Docs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/">Microsoft's new Office product to compete for free with Google Docs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE56C34T20090713>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19097111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Dosc</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleDosc</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>Microsoft Office</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MicrosoftOffice</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Bing has Google running scared? Yeah, right.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/bing.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has hit an initial home run with its Bing "decision engine" that it has been advertising like crazy. But, with over 60% of the search market share in the U.S., should leader <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) be worried about the newer competitor?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's Bing has Google running scared? Yeah, right.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/">Microsoft's Bing has Google running scared? Yeah, right.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/06142009/business/fear_grips_google_174235.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19066969/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>Google seatch</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>GoogleSeatch</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kiss of death: GOOG $2,000 &amp; AAPL $300]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/isrg/" rel="tag">Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/logo-google.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/apple.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Towards the end of 2007 when the overall stock market was softening, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple/usa?tabs=quotesandnews">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple/usa?tabs=quotesandnews">AAPL</a>) were still soaring to new highs, and the optimism most assuredly reached euphoria and beyond. What is the next level beyond euphoria -- madness -- and that's the kiss of death!
<p> </p>
<p>When the notorious Henry Bloggett proclaimed that GOOG was destined to reach $2,000 I do not think there was a dry eye in the house, either laughing at this ridiculous comment, which by the way offered no time frame or reference point, or crying for the shame of it all -- that was the kiss of death.</p>
<p>When I read about this I could not resist tempering the madness and posted <a title="View Serious Money: Google (GOOG) $2,000? No way, it's too high now! on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/serious-money-google-goog-2-000-no-way-its-too-high-now/" target="_blank">Serious Money: Google (GOOG) $2,000? No way, it's too high now!</a> The madness produced many interesting metrics to prove a point, including that you could have traded Google for both <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BRK.A</a>) and<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuitive-surgical-inc/isrg/nas"> Intuitive Surgical</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuitive-surgical-inc/isrg/nas"> ISRG</a>), two of my favorites, as an even swap (in capitalization only). That would be a heck of deal don't you think?!</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kiss of death: GOOG $2,000 &amp; AAPL $300</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/">Kiss of death: GOOG $2,000 &amp; AAPL $300</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1136126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Intuitive Surgical</category><category>IntuitiveSurgical</category><category>ISRG</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top five CEOs: Jobs (Apple), Schmidt (Google), Blankfein (Goldman), McNerney (Boeing), and Smith (FedEx)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p>The <em><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/11182007/business/poll__jobs_is_tops_in_ceo_world_80788.htm">New York Post</a></em> reports on <em>Corporate Leader</em> magazine's poll of the top CEOs based on a survey of analysts and investors. Here's my assessment of the top five:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Steve Jobs</strong>, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Apple Inc.</a></strong> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews"> AAPL</a>). With its stock up 94.4% in the last year -- though 13% below its 52-week high -- Apple's new products this year have been outstanding. But it's a pretty pricey stock; it trades at a Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio of 1.56 on a P/E ratio of 42.3 and Earnings Per Share (EPS) growth of 27.2% to $6.26 in fiscal 2009. </li>
    <li><strong>Eric Schmidt</strong>, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc. </a></strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>). With its stock up 27.8% in the last year -- though 15% below its 52-week high -- Google continues to take share from traditional advertisers while struggling somewhat to profit from all its innovations. But it's a somewhat pricey stock; it trades at a PEG ratio of 1.39 on a P/E ratio of 49.6 and EPS growth of 35.8% to $18.19 in 2008. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top five CEOs: Jobs (Apple), Schmidt (Google), Blankfein (Goldman), McNerney (Boeing), and Smith (FedEx)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/">Top five CEOs: Jobs (Apple), Schmidt (Google), Blankfein (Goldman), McNerney (Boeing), and Smith (FedEx)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1043448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>BA</category><category>Boeing Inc.</category><category>BoeingInc.</category><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>FDX</category><category>FedEx</category><category>Frederick Smith</category><category>FrederickSmith</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>James McNerney</category><category>JamesMcnerney</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>The New York Post</category><category>TheNewYorkPost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google continues its slide on no news]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/google-continues-its-slide-on-no-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/google-continues-its-slide-on-no-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/google-continues-its-slide-on-no-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a></p><p>What do you do when a stock that you own is falling on no news? That is the case for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas/detailedquotes?freq=1">Google Inc</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas/detailedquotes?freq=1">GOOG</a>) shares which closed down today $31.90 bottoming out at $632.07. This is down from it's recent high of $747.24, losing $115.17 or about 20%.</p>
<p>When it was going up there was plenty of good news and hoopla to embellish stories of it reaching $2000, but on the way down there has actually been good news too. I could rationalize all kinds of intriguing stories as to why this has occurred but the most obvious is that it got too expensive and traders started thinking it was time to take some profits. </p>
<p>There are also plenty of investment fund managers wanting to record earnings this year that sold off some of their holdings to make their advertised returns look prettier -- window dressing they call it.</p>
<p>From my perspective Google is a $550 to $600 dollar stock giving it full credit for forward earnings of say $20 per share. Last month <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/serious-money-google-goog-2-000-no-way-its-too-high-now/"><em>I questioned why investors would pay next years price this year </em></a><em>.</em> I guess Google's recent vertical leap could only sustain itself so long before other investors started asking the same question.</p>
<p>To find potential opportunities and verify my track record, read <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> or <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/google-continues-its-slide-on-no-news/">Google continues its slide on no news</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/google-continues-its-slide-on-no-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1038075/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/google-continues-its-slide-on-no-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Value investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google (GOOG) down 10% in a week - why?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/google-goog-down-10-in-a-week-why/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/google-goog-down-10-in-a-week-why/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/google-goog-down-10-in-a-week-why/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/google.jpg" alt="Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) logo " />During previous recent market downturns <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has held up well. This past week the NASDAQ stocks have been retracing their steps, giving back a sizable portion of their recent gains. Google, though, has been giving back more than most over the past two days, slipping about 10% off its high.</p>
<p>There could be any number of reasons. Dubious earnings reports from other tech companies might be the culprit. Or it could be the news that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/will-aols-quigo-be-a-google-killer-cramer-thinks-sog/">AOL is buying Quigo</a>, giving the appearance of some vulnerability. To me, that does not seem like it would be a major factor either. There is plenty of dour economic news at the moment, but that hits everyone. Google established a recent new all-time high of $747.24, but is trading around $671 now and has traded down as low as $663. <strong>(UPDATE: GOOG closed at $663.97 on Friday.)</strong></p>
<p>Every indication is that Google is not that expensive compared to other rivals. Until I hear some negative news that is specific to Google, I think a large portion of this drop can simply be attributed to profit taking. There is plenty of juggling going on in the fund market this time of year. Have you been re-balancing your portfolio? Have you been taking profits? Is there some other reason for the sell-off? Where might Google land? Is this a buying opportunity, or if not, at what price do the Google bulls stop the slide? Some say short the stock, maybe, and maybe you get creamed -- that I would not do unless you have really deep pockets.</p>
<p>To find potential opportunities and verify my track record, read <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> or <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/google-goog-down-10-in-a-week-why/">Google (GOOG) down 10% in a week - why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/will-aols-quigo-be-a-google-killer-cramer-thinks-sog/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/google-goog-down-10-in-a-week-why/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1035513/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/google-goog-down-10-in-a-week-why/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Quigo</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: Google volatility elevated as GOOG falls below $700]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/option-update-google-volatility-elevated-as-goog-falls-below-7/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/option-update-google-volatility-elevated-as-goog-falls-below-7/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/option-update-google-volatility-elevated-as-goog-falls-below-7/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"><strong><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></strong><strong>Google Inc.</strong></a><strong> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is recently trading down $20.58 to $699.78. Bear Stearns has a 2008 price target of $700 with an Outperform rating on GOOG. GOOG call option volume of 71,718 contracts compares to put volume of 35,680 contracts. GOOG November 700 straddle is priced at $39.40. GOOG December option implied volatility of 35 is above its 26-week average of 29 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/option-update-google-volatility-elevated-as-goog-falls-below-7/">Option update: Google volatility elevated as GOOG falls below $700</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/option-update-google-volatility-elevated-as-goog-falls-below-7/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1034271/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/option-update-google-volatility-elevated-as-goog-falls-below-7/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Maps helps ease the pain of $4 gas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/googlemaps-helps-ease-the-pain-of-4-gas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/googlemaps-helps-ease-the-pain-of-4-gas/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/googlemaps-helps-ease-the-pain-of-4-gas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Google Maps (NASDAQ: GOOG) logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/google-maps-goog-logo.jpg" />Just as gasoline prices promise to rise to record levels, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has found a new outlet for its Google Maps -- the gas pump. I think this is a splendid idea, particularly for drivers who need gas and directions, although there seems to me to be some danger that Google could tarnish its Do No Evil brand by associating itself so closely with the oil industry.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/google-to-offer-directions-at-gas-pump/20071107073509990001">The Associated Press</a><em> </em>reports that 3,500 gas pumps, made by Gilbarco Veeder-Root, will include an internet connection and will display Google's mapping service in color on a small screen. Motorists will be able to scroll through several categories to find local landmarks, hotels, restaurants and hospitals selected by the gas station's owner. After the driver selects a destination, the pump will print out directions. Eventually, Gilbarco Veeder-Root hopes to enable motorists to type in a specific address and get directions.</p>
<p>Google will not put advertisements on the maps but the participating retailers will be able to make extra money from other merchants that offer coupons on the service. Google seems to think that giving away its maps at the gas pump will increase the number of people who use the service in places where it does advertise. I just wonder whether people will feel good about Google as they watch the price of filling up their tanks climb towards $100.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>.<br /></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/googlemaps-helps-ease-the-pain-of-4-gas/">Google Maps helps ease the pain of $4 gas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/google-to-offer-directions-at-gas-pump/20071107073509990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/googlemaps-helps-ease-the-pain-of-4-gas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1032823/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/googlemaps-helps-ease-the-pain-of-4-gas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Gilbarco Veeder-Root</category><category>GilbarcoVeeder-root</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>GoogleMaps</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google ups the ante in Facebook face-off with Microsoft]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/google-ups-the-ante-in-facebook-face-off-with-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/google-ups-the-ante-in-facebook-face-off-with-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/google-ups-the-ante-in-facebook-face-off-with-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="Facebook" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/facebook-screenshot.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><em><a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/24/in-facebook-race-google-said-to-be-hiking-price/">DealBook</a></em> reports that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is shoving more chips to the middle of the table in its battle for a stake in Facebook.</p>
<p>Facebook's investors, which include Accel Partners and Greylock Partners, want a deal that values Facebook between $10 billion and $15 billion. That would mean that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) or Google would have to fork over $1.5 billion for a 5% to 10% stake.</p>
<p>Who will win this Facebook face-off? Google wants to raise the price so high that Microsoft will walk away. But Microsoft is said to be willing to pay any price to keep Facebook away from Google. We'll know who wins in 24 to 48 hours. </p>
<p>But we won't need to wait that long to find the real winner -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his investors are guaranteed to make big bank on this deal regardless of who wins the Google-Microsoft face-off.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/25/technology/24cnd-facebook.html?hp">New York Times</a></em> reports that Microsoft won the Facebook face-off -- paying $240 million for a 1.6% stake -- valuing Facebook at $15 billion. That's <strong>100 times its expected $150 million in 2007 revenue</strong> -- valuing $1 of Facebook's sales at 7.1 times more than a dollar of Google's -- whose Price/Sales (P/S) ratio is 14.1 -- and 17.5 times that of Microsoft's which sports a P/S ratio of 5.7. It looks like the old school Harvard ties paid off (that's where Gates, Ballmer, and Zuckerberg attended college).</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in Google or Microsoft.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/google-ups-the-ante-in-facebook-face-off-with-microsoft/">Google ups the ante in Facebook face-off with Microsoft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/google-ups-the-ante-in-facebook-face-off-with-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1020770/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/google-ups-the-ante-in-facebook-face-off-with-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Accel Partners</category><category>AccelPartners</category><category>Facebook</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>Greylock Partners</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mark Zuckerberg</category><category>MarkZuckerberg</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: Google active into EPS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-google-active-into-eps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-google-active-into-eps/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-google-active-into-eps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Google Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is expected to report 3Q EPS of $3.78 after the close according to Thomson First Call. GOOG is recently trading down $1.24 to $632.38. GOOG will host an analyst meeting on October 24. GOOG call option volume of 59,064 contracts compares to put volume of 38,118 contracts. GOOG October 630 straddle went out at $34.10. GOOG November option implied volatility of 39 is above its 26-week average of 28 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk. October options expire on October 19.</p>
<p><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-google-active-into-eps/">Option update: Google active into EPS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-google-active-into-eps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1016476/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-google-active-into-eps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Henry Blodget should go away]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/why-henry-blodget-should-go-away/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/why-henry-blodget-should-go-away/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/why-henry-blodget-should-go-away/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p align="left">Peter Cohan, my colleague here at BloggingStocks, recently <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/03/blodget-misses-limelight-calls-for-google-goog-2-000/">wrote about</a> Henry Blodget's latest prediction: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is going to $2,000! Cohan summed up my reaction nicely: "Is this achievable? Who knows. But one thing's for sure, I am one sucker who took the bait to write about Blodget's call. So while the SEC has banned Blodget from providing investment advice, he remains as media savvy as ever."<br /><br />After he agreed to a lifetime ban from the securities industry for his role in promoting internet companies (while trashing them in private emails), Blodget has managed to stay in the spotlight. He wrote a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/go-away-henry-blodget/">terrible book</a> called The Wall Street Self-Defense Manual, which leads me to the thing I dislike most about Blodget. I would love for Mr. Blodget to be a great redemption story but the sad fact is, this man doesn't really seem to take responsibility for what he did. Consider this snippet from his book:<br /><br /><em>If missing the top had been my only mistake, I would have survived . . . I also made a more serious mistake, however, which was to write a lot of emotional unprofessional e-mails, especially during the heat of the crash. Later, amid the wreckage, when the press, public, and regulators began calling for blood, my emails did me in . . . I was accused by New York State Attorney General Elliot Spitzer of having made remarks in e-mails that were "inconsistent" with my research (<strong>popular translation: "privately trashing stocks he was public recommending"</strong>). Along with others, I agreed to pay a humongous fine and be barred from the industry. <strong>(Bold added by me)<br /> </strong></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/why-henry-blodget-should-go-away/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Henry Blodget should go away</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/why-henry-blodget-should-go-away/">Why Henry Blodget should go away</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Oct 2007 01:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/henry-blodget-finds-willing-accomplice/story.aspx?guid=%7BCAEBA56C%2D5501%2D4265%2D9D7E%2D71D63109D90F%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/why-henry-blodget-should-go-away/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1005095/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/why-henry-blodget-should-go-away/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Analysts</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>Henry Blodget</category><category>HenryBlodget</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 01:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: volatility Flat as GOOG trades at record]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/option-update-9-27-07-volatility-flat-as-goog-trades-at-record/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/option-update-9-27-07-volatility-flat-as-goog-trades-at-record/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/option-update-9-27-07-volatility-flat-as-goog-trades-at-record/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></a></strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is expected to report EPS on 10/18. GOOG October at the money 570 straddle is priced at $35. GOOG October option implied volatility of 28 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional risk.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wyeth/wye/nys">Wyeth</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wyeth/wye/nys">WYE</a>) implied volatility Flat into $5 billion stock buyback. WYE, is engaged in the discovery, development, manufacture, distribution, and sales of products in pharmaceutical, healthcare and animal health. WYE announced a $5 billion share repurchase program. WYE has a market cap of $60 billion. WYE October option implied volatility of 27 is near its 26-week average of 25 according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional risk.</p>
<p><br /><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">theflyonthewall.com.</a></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/option-update-9-27-07-volatility-flat-as-goog-trades-at-record/">Option update: volatility Flat as GOOG trades at record</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/option-update-9-27-07-volatility-flat-as-goog-trades-at-record/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/999954/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/option-update-9-27-07-volatility-flat-as-goog-trades-at-record/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Big pharma</category><category>BigPharma</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>options</category><category>WYE</category><category>Wyeth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mortgage meltdown - to spread to online ads?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/mortgage-meltdown-to-spread-to-online-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/mortgage-meltdown-to-spread-to-online-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/mortgage-meltdown-to-spread-to-online-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img width="212" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="48" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/rubiconproject.jpg" />In a recent piece on C/NET, there's some chatter that the mortgage mess will <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9778809-7.html">ultimately lower online spending</a> -- taking some of the wind out of biggies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"> YHOO</a>).</p>
<p>Hey, just based on my own browsing, I'm not seeing many mortgage banners. So should we be worried?</p>
<p>I had a chance to interview Frank Addante, who is a veteran of the online advertising world. He sold one of his companies to DoubleClick and his latest gig is <a href="http://www.rubiconproject.com">The Rubicon Project</a>. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/mortgage-meltdown-to-spread-to-online-ads/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mortgage meltdown - to spread to online ads?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/mortgage-meltdown-to-spread-to-online-ads/">Mortgage meltdown - to spread to online ads?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9778809-7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/mortgage-meltdown-to-spread-to-online-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/996933/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/24/mortgage-meltdown-to-spread-to-online-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banner advertising</category><category>BannerAdvertising</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>mortgage</category><category>Online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>Rubicon</category><category>The Rubicon Project</category><category>TheRubiconProject</category><category>Yahoo! Inc.</category><category>Yahoo!Inc.</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google unveils 'Universal Search' across all its services]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/google-unveils-universal-search-across-all-its-services/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/google-unveils-universal-search-across-all-its-services/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/google-unveils-universal-search-across-all-its-services/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/goog.gif" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) continues to try to integrate its internet search with its other services. The search giant wants its search user base to use the other services Google offers. To do just that, the company has announced that it has combined its different internet search services into <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1625056220070516?src=051607_1611_DOUBLEFEATURE_">one Universal Search service</a>. What will that do, you may ask? In addition to the regular expected search results from a customer's query, it will also present results from other Google's properties including news, blogs, video and other services Google offers.<br /><br />You can see it now if you subscribe to Google's services -- there is a new, combined "More" drop-down box that lists Google's search methods in a rather long list. So, if you're searching for "Bill Gates" at www.google.com, you'll now see results from the web, from news websites, from blogs, from Google Video entries (YouTube as well) and other Google services.<br /><br />This gets customers used to seeing search results in several of Google's lairs, with the intent that those customers will, over time, begin using those service. This should come as no surprise as Google tries to get its internet search customers to use the plethora of other services the company now offers. As more customers use the new Universal Search, the more relevant the advertising becomes (according to Google) as the company learns the fine threads about how, where and why customers search for information across all facets of the Google network. That, in turn, will lead to more click-throughs on ads, which is what Google is really after.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/google-unveils-universal-search-across-all-its-services/">Google unveils 'Universal Search' across all its services</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 May 2007 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1625056220070516?src=051607_1611_DOUBLEFEATURE_>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/google-unveils-universal-search-across-all-its-services/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/897849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/google-unveils-universal-search-across-all-its-services/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>Google search</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>GoogleSearch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google: Up or down in 2007?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/google-up-or-down-in-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/google-up-or-down-in-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/google-up-or-down-in-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[Most investors agree that Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) is a great company. There is less agreement, however, about its stock price. The billion dollar question is whether Google can keep growing fast enough to justify its high price. <br /><br />At $460 a share, its PE ratio is about 60. This suggests that at the first sign of slowing growth, the stock could easily fall by half. This is definitely not what Google enthusiasts have in mind.<br /><br />The <a href="http://aol.fool.com/investing/general/2006/12/21/the-worst-stock-for-2007-google.aspx?logvisit=y&amp;source=eptaollnk308100&amp;npu=y&amp;bounce=y">pessimistic case</a> for Google is made today over at The Motley Fool. Chuck Saletta points out that Google's revenues are about $9.3 billion. This means that a one percent growth in revenue requires an additional $93 million dollars. The advertising market is notoriously turbulent, and can quickly shrink in the event of an economic turndown. So revenue growth for Google is by no means assured. There is also the competition to worry about. Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ:YHOO) and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) are not sitting on the sidelines watching Google dominate internet search. Both companies are spending millions to claw their way into Google's territory and there's good reason to think that they will have some success -- which means a lower price for Google in 2007.<br /><br />The optimistic case for Google is harder to nail down. Somehow $2.4 billion in earnings is supposed to justify a market cap of over $140 billion (!). But if any company is worth such a rich valuation, it's Google. There's a great scene in the movie <em>Chinatown</em> where the troubled hero Jake Gittes (Jack Nicholson) asks all-powerful Noah Cross (John Huston) why he tries so hard to control everything around him. Here's the scene:<br /><br />Jake Gittes: I just want to know what you're worth. Over ten million?<br />Noah Cross: Oh my, yes.<br />Jake Gittes: Why are you doing it? How much better can you eat? What can you buy that you can't already afford?<br />Noah Cross: The future, Mr. Gittes, the future. <br /><br />I think Google may be our Noah Cross (though hopefully without all the incest and murder). More than any other company, Google is poised to dominate our collective future. What company is better positioned to control an age of pure information? Such power may be hard to price, but it's certainly worth a lot. So maybe $460 a share is a small price to pay for controlling the future -- a future which includes an even higher share price for Google in 2007.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/google-up-or-down-in-2007/">Google: Up or down in 2007?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://aol.fool.com/investing/general/2006/12/21/the-worst-stock-for-2007-google.aspx?logvisit=y&amp;source=eptaollnk308100&amp;npu=y&amp;bounce=y>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/google-up-or-down-in-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/722906/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/google-up-or-down-in-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chinatown</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>NASDAQ:GOOG</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rainey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:52:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
