<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner Soars Following Strong Q4 Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/time-warner-soars-following-strong-q4-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/time-warner-soars-following-strong-q4-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/time-warner-soars-following-strong-q4-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Time Warner (TWX) logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/timewarnerlogo.jpg" />Shares of media conglomerate Time Warner (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" class="inlinked">TWX</a>) are trading sharply higher today after the company impressed Wall Street with its <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/03/business/media/03warner.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">fourth quarter earnings report</a> this morning.</p>
<p>As we noted in our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/31/time-warner-set-to-report-q4-earnings/">earnings preview for Time Warner</a>, analysts had been expecting to see the company report <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/" class="inlinked">earnings</a> of $0.62 per share. Actual earnings came in above estimates at $0.68.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/time-warner-soars-following-strong-q4-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner Soars Following Strong Q4 Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/time-warner-soars-following-strong-q4-report/">Time Warner Soars Following Strong Q4 Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/time-warner-soars-following-strong-q4-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19825600/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/time-warner-soars-following-strong-q4-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Scholastic's Q1 doesn't cast magic spell -- or does it?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mhp/" rel="tag">McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/tyranny_of_goals.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas">Scholastic</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas">SCHL</a>), the publisher of the <em>Harry Potter</em> books, issued its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/scholastic-reports-first-quarter-results-for-fiscal-2010/rfid254243154?channel=pf">first-quarter numbers</a> on Thursday. Although things do seem to be improving, I can't say I was wholly enchanted by the data.</p>
<p>Net sales from continuing operations rose 14%. Okay, that's a good start. Double-digit rises are always respectable. But then we get to the bottom line. Scholastic, which is a related business to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">McGraw-Hill</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">MHP</a>), lost 68 cents per share from continuing operations. Now, sure, the loss was considerably less severe than the year-ago black ink of $1.13 per share. But I always get nervous when I read about losses. Can't help it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Scholastic's Q1 doesn't cast magic spell -- or does it?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/">Scholastic's Q1 doesn't cast magic spell -- or does it?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19174253/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>books</category><category>educational</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mcgraw-hill</category><category>MHP</category><category>publishing</category><category>SCHL</category><category>Scholastic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IMAX loses less money in Q4 -- should we be excited?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/imax-loses-less-money-in-q4-should-we-be-excited/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/imax-loses-less-money-in-q4-should-we-be-excited/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/imax-loses-less-money-in-q4-should-we-be-excited/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/boxoffice.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/imax-corporation/imax/nas">IMAX</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/imax-corporation/imax/nas">IMAX</a>), the famous theater with huge screens and snazzy 3D technology, reported earnings for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/imax-corporation-reports-fourth-quarter/rfid193563982">fourth quarter</a> on Thursday. On a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/gaap">GAAP</a> basis, IMAX lost $0.21 per share this quarter compared to $0.25 per share in the year-ago period. On an adjusted basis, the loss was $0.11 per share this year versus a loss of $0.21 per share last year. So, no matter how you slice it, IMAX narrowed the red ink.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/imax-loses-less-money-in-q4-should-we-be-excited/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IMAX loses less money in Q4 -- should we be excited?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/imax-loses-less-money-in-q4-should-we-be-excited/">IMAX loses less money in Q4 -- should we be excited?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/imax-corporation-reports-fourth-quarter/rfid193563982>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/imax-loses-less-money-in-q4-should-we-be-excited/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1486435/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/imax-loses-less-money-in-q4-should-we-be-excited/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>IMAX</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Booksellers hope people read even during a recession (BKS, AMZN, BGP)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/harry_potter.jpg" alt="" />So, how will booksellers such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">Barnes &amp; Noble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">BKS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">Borders Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">BGP</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) fare during the holiday season? It's an interesting question, one which is examined in an article at <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/11/books/11book.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all">The New York Times</a></em>. The piece talks about how the current recession seems to be affecting consumers and their desire to buy books. At the beginning of the article, two shoppers are browsing in a bookstore -- one buys, the other doesn't. Both have been affected by the bad economy. What are we to make of this?</p>
<p>I'll give you my take on things. Books, unfortunately, are simply not so glamorous these days. And I do think that booksellers are going to have a hard time this holiday season. With all the competition from video games and other media, the printed page just isn't that exciting to a lot of consumers. I don't think that books will be a top priority as the wallet continues to get squeezed and while job security remains an issue. Our attention spans have been cut so short these days, and they're only getting shorter. In an era of MTV quick-edits and PowerPoint presentations, 100,000-word diversions don't feel so diverting anymore.</p>
<p> Books are probably even less exciting to young people. Seriously, how many kids have books on their Christmas lists this year? They may want the latest Blu-ray cartoon from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), or the latest <em>Call of Duty</em> game from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">Activision Blizzard</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">ATVI</a>), but I'm not so sure they want the latest Stephen King novel (as for me, I picked up King's latest short-story collection <em>Just After Sunset</em> at my local Barnes &amp; Noble). Many kids have been introduced to the joys of reading through the Harry Potter series, but I don't think Potter will be working his magic this season. If parents do cut back this year on presents, I figure they're going to err on the side of making sure that all the non-book gifts are acquired.</p>
<p>Is there anything the booksellers can do about this?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Booksellers hope people read even during a recession (BKS, AMZN, BGP)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/">Booksellers hope people read even during a recession (BKS, AMZN, BGP)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/11/books/11book.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1369378/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>ATVI</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>BarnesAndNoble</category><category>BBY</category><category>Best Buy</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>BGP</category><category>BKS</category><category>books</category><category>borders group</category><category>BordersGroup</category><category>call of duty</category><category>CallOfDuty</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>publishing</category><category>Stephen King</category><category>StephenKing</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The week in preview: A bottom for the housing sector?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/21/the-week-in-preview-a-bottom-for-housing-sector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/21/the-week-in-preview-a-bottom-for-housing-sector/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/21/the-week-in-preview-a-bottom-for-housing-sector/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img height="145" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/housing.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Earnings reports continue to dribble in as the quarter winds down. Much of the attention this week will be on homebuilders <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kb-home/kbh/nys">KB Home</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kb-home/kbh/nys">KBH</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lennar-corporation/len/nys">Lennar Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lennar-corporation/len/nys">LEN</a>) as investors look for any sign that the housing sector has bottomed (home sales numbers are also due out this week; see below). Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial anticipate that both companies will report that they narrowed their losses in the most recent quarter.</p>
<p>KB Home's expected $1.25 per share loss, on revenue of $725.5 million, compares to the previous quarter loss of $3.30 and to a year-ago loss of $6.19. However, KB Home's losses in the past few quarters have been <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/kb-home/kbh/nys/actuals-estimates">deeper than expected</a>. The Los Angeles-based homebuilder's long-range earnings growth forecast is 10.5%, less than the S&amp;P 500. Analysts continue to recommend <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/kb-home/kbh/nys/analyst-recommendations">holding KB Home</a>, and have for at least 120 days. Shares<strike>, however, reached a new 52-week high of $31.69 on Friday, and they</strike> are up 10.5% year to date.</p>
<p><a></a>Lennar is expected to post a loss of 52 cents per share, on revenue of $1.1 billion. That compares to the previous quarter's per-share loss of 76 cents and to a year-ago loss of $3.25. While Lennar also has tended in the past few quarters to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/lennar-corporation/len/nys/actuals-estimates">miss expectations</a>, the Miami-based company managed a positive surprise in the first quarter of 2008. Lennar's long-range earnings growth forecast is 10.3%, about the same as KB Home's. Analysts also recommend <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/lennar-corporation/len/nys/analyst-recommendations">holding Lennar</a>. <strike>Friday, </strike>shares of Lennar <strike>also reached a 52-week high, $27.75, but they</strike> are down 6.4% year to date.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/21/the-week-in-preview-a-bottom-for-housing-sector/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The week in preview: A bottom for the housing sector?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/21/the-week-in-preview-a-bottom-for-housing-sector/">The week in preview: A bottom for the housing sector?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/21/the-week-in-preview-a-bottom-for-housing-sector/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1319373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/21/the-week-in-preview-a-bottom-for-housing-sector/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3Com</category><category>Accenture</category><category>ACN</category><category>Aehr</category><category>ALOG</category><category>AM</category><category>American Greetings</category><category>Analogic</category><category>AutoZone</category><category>AZO</category><category>AZZ</category><category>BBBY</category><category>Bed Bath Beyond</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>BlackBerry</category><category>CarMax</category><category>CBK</category><category>Chattem</category><category>Christopher and Banks</category><category>CHTT</category><category>COMS</category><category>Copart</category><category>CPRT</category><category>CRA</category><category>CRAI</category><category>DFS</category><category>Diamond Foods</category><category>Discover</category><category>DMND</category><category>drugstore.com</category><category>DSCM</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>FactSet Research</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FDS</category><category>featured</category><category>Finish Line</category><category>FINL</category><category>FNM</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>FUL</category><category>Fuller</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>housing</category><category>Jabil</category><category>JBL</category><category>John McCain</category><category>KB</category><category>KB Home</category><category>KMX</category><category>LEN</category><category>Lennar</category><category>McCormick</category><category>MKC</category><category>MTN</category><category>NEOG</category><category>Neogen</category><category>Nike</category><category>NKE</category><category>Paulson</category><category>Paychex</category><category>PAYX</category><category>RAD</category><category>Research in Motion</category><category>RIM</category><category>RIMM</category><category>Rite Aid</category><category>SCHL</category><category>Scholastic</category><category>Smart Modular</category><category>SMOD</category><category>SNX</category><category>SPEC</category><category>Spectrum Control</category><category>Synnex</category><category>Texas Industries</category><category>Tibco</category><category>TIBX</category><category>TXI</category><category>Vail Resorts</category><category>WOR</category><category>Worthington</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[J.K. Rowling wins Harry Potter encyclopedia lawsuit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/j-k-rowling-wins-harry-potter-encyclopedia-lawsuit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/j-k-rowling-wins-harry-potter-encyclopedia-lawsuit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/j-k-rowling-wins-harry-potter-encyclopedia-lawsuit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><img height="158" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/harry_potter-logo_90894o.jpg" width="236" align="right" vspace="4" />U.S. District Judge Robert P. Patterson <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/08/news/newsmakers/harry_potter.ap/index.htm">has ruled</a> Steven Vander Ark's "Harry Potter Lexicon" website and proposed book infringe on copyrights held by author J.K. Rowling, and awarded Rowling and Warner Bros. -- a division of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) -- $6,750 in statutory damages. Given that Rowling earned an estimated <a href="http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/53/celebrities08_JK-Rowling_CRTT.html">$300 million</a> last year, it's doubtful she was in this one for the money.<br /><br />While authors are generally allowed to use material from other books in reference titles, the judge ruled that this case went beyond fair use because it "appropriates too much of Rowling's creative work for its purposes as a reference guide."<br /><br />Rowling had testified that the pending release of the guide had caused her great stress and interfered with her work on a new novel.<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.hp-lexicon.org/">hp-lexicon.org</a> site has already been taken down. It's a little bit disenchanting to see Ms. Rowling suing a former school librarian for producing a work that is clearly designed to appeal to die-hard Harry Potter fans, but she's certainly within her rights.<br /><br />Rowling's latest book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Tales-Beedle-Bard-Standard/dp/B001DB0HG2/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1220979853&amp;sr=8-1">The Tales of Beedle the Bard</a>, will be released on December 4.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/j-k-rowling-wins-harry-potter-encyclopedia-lawsuit/">J.K. Rowling wins Harry Potter encyclopedia lawsuit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/08/news/newsmakers/harry_potter.ap/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/j-k-rowling-wins-harry-potter-encyclopedia-lawsuit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1308527/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/j-k-rowling-wins-harry-potter-encyclopedia-lawsuit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>copyright</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>J.K. Rowling</category><category>J.k.Rowling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Harry Potter movie sequel delayed -- why?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/harry-potter-movie-sequel-delayed-the-reason-may-be-troubling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/harry-potter-movie-sequel-delayed-the-reason-may-be-troubling/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/harry-potter-movie-sequel-delayed-the-reason-may-be-troubling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/harry-potter.jpg" />Warner Bros. -- a division of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) -- made the surprising announcement that it's delaying the release of the sixth installment in the Harry Potter saga:<em> Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Price</em>.<br /><br />The release is being pushed back from November 11 of 2008 to July 17 of 2009. Warner Bros. President Alan Horn blamed the writers' strike, saying that "We agreed the best strategy was to move 'Half-Blood Prince' to July, where it perfectly fills the gap for a major tentpole release for mid-summer."</p>
<p>I'm not convinced -- isn't it a little close to the previously scheduled opening for the writers' strike that ended on February 12 to be the reason? Pali Research analyst Rich Greenfield <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/26207006">wrote that</a> "We believe TWX is shifting the film to help it achieve earnings expectations in 2008 (moving expensive P &amp; A out of Q4 2008, at the same time that several successful films are set to hit DVD for Warner)."<br /><br />If that's the case, investors should be concerned. Any time that a company starts messing with its operations in order to improve short-term earnings reports, you have a situation where long-term objectives could be neglected in favor of satisfying Wall Street expectations. In the long run, such a strategy will neither please Wall Street nor set the stage for long-term growth.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/harry-potter-movie-sequel-delayed-the-reason-may-be-troubling/">Harry Potter movie sequel delayed -- why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/26207006>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/harry-potter-movie-sequel-delayed-the-reason-may-be-troubling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1285665/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/harry-potter-movie-sequel-delayed-the-reason-may-be-troubling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings highlights: UBS, Best Buy, RIM, Monsanto, Family Dollar and others]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/05/earnings-highlights-ubs-best-buy-rim-monsanto-family-dollar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/05/earnings-highlights-ubs-best-buy-rim-monsanto-family-dollar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/05/earnings-highlights-ubs-best-buy-rim-monsanto-family-dollar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdo/" rel="tag">Family Dollar Stores (FDO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rht/" rel="tag">Red Hat Inc (RHT)</a></p><p>As one quarter rolls over into the next, here are some highlights from this past week's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/">earnings coverage</a> from BloggingStocks:</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/best-buy-incorporated/bby/nys"><strong>Best Buy Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/best-buy-incorporated/bby/nys">BBY</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/best-buy-bby-4q-earnings-top-estimates/">beat fourth-quarter expectations</a> and offered a positive outlook for fiscal 2009. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/carmax-inc/kmx/nys"><strong>CarMax Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/carmax-inc/kmx/nys">KMX</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/carmax-kmx-q4-earnings-beat-estimates/">beat Wall Street earnings estimates</a> for the fourth quarter. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citi-trends-inc/ctrn/nas"><strong>Citi Trends Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citi-trends-inc/ctrn/nas">CTRN</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/citi-trends-ctrn-share-price-defines-bullish-flag/">beat fourth-quarter estimates</a> and offered a rosy outlook for fiscal 2009. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/constellation-brands-inc/stz/nys"><strong>Constellation Brands Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/constellation-brands-inc/stz/nys">STZ</a>) swung to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/constellation-brands-stz-posts-4q-loss-on-charges/">a fourth-quarter loss</a> but beat estimates. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/family-dollar-stores-inc/fdo/nys"><strong>Family Dollar Stores</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/family-dollar-stores-inc/fdo/nys">FDO</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/family-dollar-stores-fdo-reports-weak-profit-amid-economic-slo/">beat second-quarter estimates</a> but slashed its full-year outlook. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/immucor-inc/blud/nas"><strong>Immucor Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/immucor-inc/blud/nas">BLUD</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/immucor-blud-shares-define-bullish-flag-pattern/">beat third-quarter expectations</a> and offered a positive full-year outlook. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monsanto-company/mon/nys"><strong>Monsanto Co.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monsanto-company/mon/nys">MON</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/monsanto-mon-2q-earnings-beat-estimates-but-outlook-disappoin/">beat second-quarter expectations</a> but the full-year outlook disappointed. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mosaic-company-the/mos/nys"><strong>Mosaic Co.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mosaic-company-the/mos/nys">MOS</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/mosaic-mos-third-quarter-profit-jumps-on-higher-prices/">third-quarter earnings surged</a> on strong demand and higher crop prices. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/paychex-inc/payx/nas"><strong>Paychex Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/paychex-inc/payx/nas">PAYX</a>) results on path to continue <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/31/paychex-tries-to-cash-in/">an 18-year earnings/revenue growth streak</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/red-hat-inc/rht/nys"><strong>Red Hat Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/red-hat-inc/rht/nys">RHT</a>) posted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/30/red-hat-sees-some-green/">solid fourth-quarter results</a> on strength of JBoss and other offerings. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas"><strong>Research in Motion Ltd.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/rims-q4-profit-soars-shares-up-in-after-hours/">fourth-quarter earnings and revenue</a> more than doubled. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ruby-tuesday-incorporated/rt/nys"><strong>Ruby Tuesday Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ruby-tuesday-incorporated/rt/nys">RT</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/ruby-tuesday-earnings-drop-50-from-last-year/">third-quarter earnings</a> beat low expectations; full-year outlook is bleak. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas"><strong>Scholastic Corp.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas">SCHL</a>) announced <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/scholastic-schl-not-so-bright/">disappointing third-quarter results</a> post-Harry Potter. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-new/ubs/nys"><strong>UBS</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-new/ubs/nys">UBS</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/ubs-ubs-writes-off-19-billion-chairman-out/">writes off $19 million</a> for the first quarter and shows chairman the door. </li>
</ul>
<p>Also, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/30/as-newspaper-spending-falls-some-companies-face-end/">prospects look grim for some newspapers</a>. The financial crisis in the U.S. prompted the IMF <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/02/imf-again-cuts-2008-global-growth-forecast-on-credit-crunch-ripp/">to cut its global growth forecast</a>.</p>
<p>Upcoming results to watch for include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys">Alcoa</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys">AA</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/circuit-city-stores-inc/cc/nys">Circuit City Stores</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/circuit-city-stores-inc/cc/nys">CC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bed-bath-and-beyond-inc/bbby/nas">Bed Bath &amp; Beyond</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bed-bath-and-beyond-inc/bbby/nas">BBBY</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings">Visit <strong>AOL Money &amp; Finance</strong> for more earnings coverage</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/05/earnings-highlights-ubs-best-buy-rim-monsanto-family-dollar/">Earnings highlights: UBS, Best Buy, RIM, Monsanto, Family Dollar and others</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/05/earnings-highlights-ubs-best-buy-rim-monsanto-family-dollar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1156560/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/05/earnings-highlights-ubs-best-buy-rim-monsanto-family-dollar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AA</category><category>Alcoa</category><category>BBY</category><category>Bed Bath and Beyond</category><category>Best Buy</category><category>BLUD</category><category>CarMax</category><category>CC</category><category>Circuit City</category><category>Citi Trends</category><category>Constellation</category><category>crop prices</category><category>CTRN</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>Family Dollar</category><category>FDO</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>IMF</category><category>Immucor</category><category>JBoss</category><category>KMX</category><category>MON</category><category>Monsanto</category><category>MOS</category><category>Mosaic</category><category>newspapers</category><category>Paychex</category><category>PAYX</category><category>Red Hat</category><category>RHT</category><category>RIM</category><category>RIMM</category><category>RT</category><category>Ruby Tuesday</category><category>SCHL</category><category>Scholastic</category><category>STZ</category><category>UBS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Scholastic (SCHL) not so bright]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/scholastic-schl-not-so-bright/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/scholastic-schl-not-so-bright/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/scholastic-schl-not-so-bright/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><p>If you have children in elementary school, then you know <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas">Scholastic Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas">SCHL</a>), operator of the annnual school book fair. Scholastic does an excellent job publishing high-quality children's literature and other educational materials. If only it could do so at a profit. Scholastic has been the U.S. publisher for the Harry Potter series these past few years. But even during the height of Pottermania, Scholastic did not turn much of a profit. This year is no exception. The company recently released <a href="http://www.scholastic.com">3Q 2008 results</a>. Revenue increased $12 million to $458 million, yet losses continue to widen to $4.6 million for the quarter in which there was no Harry Potter release.</p>
<p>YTD 2008 figures show revenue increased 20% and net income more than doubled due to the last Harry Potter release in the previous quarter. Yet YTD net loss now totals $9.3 million or $0.24 per share compared to net income of $20.5 million in the previous year. To be fair, Scholastic has taken huge losses -- $82 million in Q3 2008 alone -- to exit its direct-to-home sales channel. This led to a $77.5 million net loss in Q3. But even with all business segments "performing solidly," according to CEO Richard Robinson, the company continues to bleed money.</p>
<p>Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, the British publisher of Harry Potter, recently reported robust sales and profit from Harry Potter books. Given that Scholastic also published this year's Caldecott Medal winner, Brain Selznick's <em>The Invention of Hugo Cabret</em>, why is the company still drownding in red ink? S&amp;P Equity downgraded the comapny from Buy to Hold.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/scholastic-schl-not-so-bright/">Scholastic (SCHL) not so bright</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/scholastic-schl-not-so-bright/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1157821/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/scholastic-schl-not-so-bright/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst downgrades</category><category>AnalystDowngrades</category><category>Brian Selznick</category><category>BrianSelznick</category><category>Caldecott Medal</category><category>CaldecottMedal</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>Richard Robinson</category><category>RichardRobinson</category><category>SCHL</category><category>Scholastic Corporation</category><category>ScholasticCorporation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The magic is gone: Scholastic takes a nosedive, post-Potter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/the-magic-is-gone-scholastic-takes-a-nosedive-post-potter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/the-magic-is-gone-scholastic-takes-a-nosedive-post-potter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/the-magic-is-gone-scholastic-takes-a-nosedive-post-potter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><p>As a former English teacher, I can't count the times that I had to listen to a student complain about the "relevance" of this book or that book. I usually tried to explain how literature affects culture and books change the world. I only wish that I'd thought to check out Scholastic Corporation's finances.</p>
<p>On Thursday, citing a tough economy, Scholastic Corporation stated that its expectations for the forthcoming year were <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUKN2737124820080327">somewhat dark</a>. This, combined with a considerable quarterly loss, led to a 13.5% drop in its stock value, leaving it at $30.69 per share. Today, it dropped slightly more, and is currently at $30.25. </p>
<p>I have fond memories of reading Scholastic's books when I was a kid, and I certainly don't like to see the company in pain. However, as an author, I have to admit a certain amount of wondrous amazement at the situation currently unfolding. You see, Scholastic's dire predictions for 2008 center around the fact that it will not have a "Harry Potter" book to give its sales a shot of adrenalin. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/the-magic-is-gone-scholastic-takes-a-nosedive-post-potter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The magic is gone: Scholastic takes a nosedive, post-Potter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/the-magic-is-gone-scholastic-takes-a-nosedive-post-potter/">The magic is gone: Scholastic takes a nosedive, post-Potter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/the-magic-is-gone-scholastic-takes-a-nosedive-post-potter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1152066/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/the-magic-is-gone-scholastic-takes-a-nosedive-post-potter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>books</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>scholastic</category><category>ya literature</category><category>YaLiterature</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A year ago today on BloggingStocks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/16/a-year-ago-today-on-bloggingstocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/16/a-year-ago-today-on-bloggingstocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/16/a-year-ago-today-on-bloggingstocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p>Sometimes in a period of uncertainty, a look back can provide some perspective. So here are a few highlights from BloggingStocks on March 16, 2007,a year ago today.</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View Business &amp; Sports: Oil, Duke, &amp; Notre Dame - down on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/business-and-sports-oil-duke-and-notre-dame-are-down/" target="_blank"><strong>Business &amp; Sports: Oil, Duke, &amp; Notre Dame -- down</strong></a><strong>:</strong> What's bigger news, who's in the March Madness or oil dropping below $57 a barrel?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View Will '300' controversy result in higher ticket sales? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/will-300-controversy-result-in-higher-ticket-sales/" target="_blank"><strong>Will '300' controversy result in higher ticket sales?</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Yeah, because this should be the main source of contention between the U.S. and Iran.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View An OPIC to counter OPEC on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/an-opic-to-counter-opec/" target="_blank"><strong>An OPIC to counter OPEC</strong></a><strong>:</strong> An Organization of Petroleum Importing Countries? Whatever became of that?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View Harry Potter and the 12 million order on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/harry-potter-and-the-12-million-order/" target="_blank"><strong>Harry Potter and the 12 million order</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Will the final movie in the Harry Potter series -- er, make that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/13/seventh-harry-potter-book-to-be-split-in-two-for-film/">two movies</a> -- generate this kind of excitment? Will anything?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View The CPI Numbers: Wall Street breathes brief sigh of relief on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/the-cpi-numbers-wall-street-breathes-brief-sigh-of-relief/" target="_blank"><strong>The CPI Numbers: Wall Street breathes brief sigh of relief</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Wall Street could use another sigh of relief about now.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View Time magazine's facelift on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/time-magazines-facelift/" target="_blank"><strong>Time magazine's facelift</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Magazines? Is anyone still reading those?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View Microsoft's Ballmer takes more shots at Google on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/microsoft-s-ballmer-takes-more-shots-at-google/" target="_blank"><strong>Microsoft's Ballmer takes more shots at Google</strong></a><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has a beef with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)? Who'd have guessed?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View Heineken - the next Starbucks? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/heineken-the-next-starbucks/" target="_blank"><strong>Heineken -- the next Starbucks?</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Does Heineken still want <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) as a role model?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View CNBC: Blackstone prepping for mega IPO on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/cnbc-blackstone-prepping-for-mega-ipo/" target="_blank"><strong>CNBC: Blackstone prepping for mega IPO</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Remember the days when private equity was king?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View The Story You Didn't Read: Digital killed the TV star on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/the-story-you-didnt-read-digital-killed-the-tv-star/" target="_blank"><strong>The Story You Didn't Read: Digital killed the TV star</strong></a><strong>:</strong> TV is going digital? Seems like I heard something about that somewhere recently?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View Subprime investment opportunities? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/subprime-investment-opportunities/" target="_blank"><strong>Subprime investment opportunities?</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Investment banks struggling with the subprime mess? The more things change ...</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a title="View JetBlue passengers grounded ... again on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/jetblue-passengers-grounded/" target="_blank"><strong>JetBlue passengers grounded ... again</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Last year it was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jetblue-airways-corporation/jblu/nas">JetBlue</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jetblue-airways-corporation/jblu/nas">JBLU</a>) cancellations; this year it's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys">Southwest</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys" target="_blank">LUV</a>) cancellations.</div>
    </li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/16/a-year-ago-today-on-bloggingstocks/">A year ago today on BloggingStocks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/16/a-year-ago-today-on-bloggingstocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1141120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/16/a-year-ago-today-on-bloggingstocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>300</category><category>Ballmer</category><category>Blackstone</category><category>BX</category><category>digital TV</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>Heineken</category><category>IPO</category><category>Iran</category><category>JBLU</category><category>JetBlue</category><category>LUV</category><category>March Madness</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Notre Dame</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OPEC</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Southwest</category><category>Starbucks</category><category>subprime</category><category>Time magazine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seventh Harry Potter book to be split in two for film]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/13/seventh-harry-potter-book-to-be-split-in-two-for-film/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/13/seventh-harry-potter-book-to-be-split-in-two-for-film/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/13/seventh-harry-potter-book-to-be-split-in-two-for-film/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/harry-potter.jpg"  alt="" /><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120541636975433351.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">reported</a> [subscription required] this morning that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>)'s Warner Bros. Pictures plans to film the adaptation of the seventh "Harry Potter" book in two parts. The first part of <em>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows </em>will be released during the holiday season of 2010 and the second part will follow six months later. A similar proposal was made for the filming of the fourth book, before enough material was cut from the book to facilitate a single film. Warner Bros. Pictures said that filming the book in two parts was "necessary to stay true to the tome."<br /><br />The five "Harry Potter" films released thus far have grossed $4.5 billion according to the <span style="font-style: italic;">Journal</span>, and expectations are high that the sixth film, <em>Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,</em> will repeat that success when it is released later this year. Current director David Yates will stay on board for the final two installments, after directing the fifth film and the upcoming sixth film. In addition to "staying true to the tome," WB President Jeff Robinov admitted that "<em>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows</em> is 'packed with vital plot points' and that 'the best way to do the book, and its many fans, justice is to expand the screen adaptation.'"<br /><br />Clearly, part of the scheme of adding an eighth film to the series is to continue the success the films have seen, as well as the record-breaking sales that the book's have enjoyed as well. Fans will likely welcome the decision, although not the time lag between the films, and question why similar methods were not taken for the longer fourth and fifth books. At the same time, they may also question the economics of it but the films will likely still do quite well and bring in further revenue that Warner Bros. looks toward.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/13/seventh-harry-potter-book-to-be-split-in-two-for-film/">Seventh Harry Potter book to be split in two for film</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120541636975433351.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/13/seventh-harry-potter-book-to-be-split-in-two-for-film/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1139560/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/13/seventh-harry-potter-book-to-be-split-in-two-for-film/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>harry potter</category><category>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>HarryPotterAndTheDeathlyHallows</category><category>inthenews</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>Warner Bros. Pictures</category><category>WarnerBros.Pictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Driver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Spiderwick Chronicles' not such a great fantasy for Viacom]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/18/spiderwick-chronicles-isnt-such-a-great-fantasy-for-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/18/spiderwick-chronicles-isnt-such-a-great-fantasy-for-viacom/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/18/spiderwick-chronicles-isnt-such-a-great-fantasy-for-viacom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p>All movie studios want to find their own <em>Lord of the Rings/Harry Potter </em>franchise. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), for example, seems to be headed on the right track with its <em>Narnia </em>brand. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">VIA</a>) made a solid effort this past weekend by releasing <em>The Spiderwick Chronicles </em>to the mass multiplex marketplace -- unfortunately, things didn't turn out so well, at least as I'm seeing it. </p>
<p>According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>, <em>Spiderwick </em>is in a battle with Disney's <em>Step Up 2 the Streets </em>for second place. The latter is right now estimated to have grossed $19.7 million for the three-day weekend of February 15 through February 17; the former has just over $19 million to its credit. So, <em>Spiderwick </em>could exit its current third-place showing and move up in the rankings, but it won't catch up to the big winner, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) <em>Jumper</em>. I'll tell you, I had no idea this one was going to "jump" -- what a horrible, horrible pun, huh? -- to the top of the box office charts this weekend with a $27 million take.</p>
<p>Final numbers will be coming later today, and we'll get a better indication of how all the movies did once Monday's holiday figures are added; also, the second weekend is always the ultimate tell. But, as of now, I don't think Viacom's <em>Spiderwick </em>fantasy -- which is distributed by Paramount and is co-branded with Nickelodeon Movies -- will approach the economic prestige of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) <em>Potter </em>property. Better luck next time. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own shares in Disney.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/18/spiderwick-chronicles-isnt-such-a-great-fantasy-for-viacom/">'Spiderwick Chronicles' not such a great fantasy for Viacom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/18/spiderwick-chronicles-isnt-such-a-great-fantasy-for-viacom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1117936/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/18/spiderwick-chronicles-isnt-such-a-great-fantasy-for-viacom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Disney</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Lord of the Rings</category><category>LordOfTheRings</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>Nickelodeon</category><category>Paramount</category><category>Step Up 2 the Streets</category><category>StepUp2TheStreets</category><category>The Spiderwick Chronicles</category><category>TheSpiderwickChronicles</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Harry Potter book sells for $4 million to benefit disadvantaged children]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/harry-potter-book-sells-for-4-million-to-benefit-disadvantaged/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/harry-potter-book-sells-for-4-million-to-benefit-disadvantaged/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/harry-potter-book-sells-for-4-million-to-benefit-disadvantaged/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bid/" rel="tag">Sotheby's (BID)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><img width="165" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="237" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/harry-potter-deathly-hollows-art-400.jpg" alt="" /><em>The Tales of Beedle the Bard, a</em> book of fairy tales created, hand-written and illustrated by Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/books/2007-12-13-rowlingbook_N.htm">sold</a> for nearly $4 million at a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sotheby-s/bid/nys">Sotheby's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sotheby-s/bid/nys">BID</a>) auction on Thursday.<br /><br />The book is one of seven copies Rowling made, and she gave the other six away to people involved with the Harry Potter collection. The book had only been expected to fetch about $100,000, but soared far beyond that and was eventually sold to a London art agent for $4 million.<br /><br />The proceeds will benefit The Children's Voice, which campaigns for rights of children who grow up in institutions, particularly in Eastern Europe. To learn more about the charity, or perhaps make it part of your holiday giving plan, <a href="http://www.chlg.org/">visit its website</a>.<br /><br />It's impressive to see that the first thing that Rowling released upon the completion of the Harry Potter series was not another book to cash in on her name. In fact, Rowling, who is already a billionaire, won't be making any money from this book.<br /><br />J.K. Rowling has conducted herself with unbelievable class, and her good works and wariness of diving right into another book should only help build anticipation for her next project.<br /><br />Harry Potter fans looking for a peak of what the book consists of should head over to Amazon.com, which has a terrific <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?docId=1000179911">series of photos and a video</a> about the book. More photos and reviews of the stories will be uploaded.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/harry-potter-book-sells-for-4-million-to-benefit-disadvantaged/">Harry Potter book sells for $4 million to benefit disadvantaged children</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/books/2007-12-13-rowlingbook_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/harry-potter-book-sells-for-4-million-to-benefit-disadvantaged/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1062801/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/harry-potter-book-sells-for-4-million-to-benefit-disadvantaged/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BID</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Rowling</category><category>Sotheby's</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Scholastic (SCHL) gets new president, but still no magic]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/scholastic-schl-gets-new-president-but-still-no-magic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/scholastic-schl-gets-new-president-but-still-no-magic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/scholastic-schl-gets-new-president-but-still-no-magic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a></p><p>If you have a child younger than high-school age, then you know about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas">Scholastic Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas">SCHL</a>), the world's largest publisher of children's literature and educational material, and the sponsor of the annual school book fair. </p>
<p>Not incidentally, Scholastic also is Harry Potter's publisher, which one would think would be a fairly lucrative revenue stream. Apparently not. <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/scholastic-promotes-ellie-berger-to/n20071005120209990017">Ellie Berger has been named President</a> of Trade for Scholastic in part to figure out how to turn over a new (and hopefully profitable) leaf for Scholastic. Despite <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=85107&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;t=Regular&amp;id=1053710&amp;">record-setting revenue in 1Q FY 2008</a>, which included the release of <em>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows</em>, Scholastic still managed to post a loss. On revenues of $587 million, a 75% increase, Scholastic posted a net loss of $2.8 million for the quarter. But this loss is a huge improvement over the $47 million net loss a year earlier.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/scholastic-schl-gets-new-president-but-still-no-magic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Scholastic (SCHL) gets new president, but still no magic</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/scholastic-schl-gets-new-president-but-still-no-magic/">Scholastic (SCHL) gets new president, but still no magic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/scholastic-promotes-ellie-berger-to/n20071005120209990017>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/scholastic-schl-gets-new-president-but-still-no-magic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1009479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/scholastic-schl-gets-new-president-but-still-no-magic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>children's book publishing</category><category>Children'sBookPublishing</category><category>educational publishing</category><category>EducationalPublishing</category><category>Ellie Berger</category><category>EllieBerger</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SCHL</category><category>Scholastic Corporation</category><category>ScholasticCorporation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thomas Weisel noting value in Time Warner (TWX)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/thomas-weisel-noting-value-in-time-warner-twx/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/thomas-weisel-noting-value-in-time-warner-twx/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/thomas-weisel-noting-value-in-time-warner-twx/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/time-warner-twx-logo.gif"  alt="Time Warner (NYSE: TWX) logo" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) is seeing its shares being <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/ahead-of-the-bell-time-warner/n20070927083609990009">reiterated with an Overweight</a> rating at Thomas Weisel, and the brokerage firm has a $24.00 price target on the stock.<br /><br />One of the winning issues was the success of the latest Harry Potter film <em>Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix</em> that could help the media giant beat earnings estimates. The note also lists positive home video sales as a catalyst that could lift earnings.<br /><br />Thomas Weisel's analyst Gordon Hodge also notes the likelihood that over the next 18 months the media conglomerate may spin off its cable, AOL, or even publishing units. <em>Does this sound familiar or what?</em> I wrote about <a href="http://bax.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/time-warners-twc-twx-flirt-with-52-week-lows/">both scenarios</a> numerous times, mentioning the possible stake sale in cable, and how AOL can become its own tracking stock as well.<br /><br />Last week Time Warner was <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/09/pre-market-a-11.html">started with a Neutral rating</a> at Credit Suisse. There is obviously a lot of value that can be unlocked, and it seems analyst are slowly getting around the "unlocking value" story.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/thomas-weisel-noting-value-in-time-warner-twx/">Thomas Weisel noting value in Time Warner (TWX)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/ahead-of-the-bell-time-warner/n20070927083609990009>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/thomas-weisel-noting-value-in-time-warner-twx/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/999557/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/thomas-weisel-noting-value-in-time-warner-twx/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>Order of the Phoenix</category><category>Thomas Weisel</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Transformers' and 'Shrek' flex muscles: A review of the summer blockbusters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>This summer was a very profitable one for box offices nationwide, with four movies grossing over $300M, and at least another nine grossing over $100M -- signaling in a big way the resurgence of the movie industry, which had been struggling for the last few years.<br /><br />The four big $300M+ winners of the summer were <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corporation (ADR)</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) 's<em>Spider-Man 3</em>, which grossed $336M in the U.S., <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom, Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>)'s Paramount's <em>Shrek the Third</em>, which grossed $320M, <em>Transformers</em>, also from Paramount, which grossed $311M, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">The Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>)'s <em>Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End</em>, which grossed $308M. <br /><br />Three of the four were third installments of well established big-budget franchises, so their success is hardly shocking, but the <em>Transformers</em> success clearly marks the start of a new blockbuster franchise (the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/24/transformers-2-gets-a-release-date/">release date of the sequel</a> has been announced -- June 26, 2009). The robot-action extravaganza, which was directed by Michael Bay, was definitely a surprise, as I remarked in my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/">summer movie preview</a> that <em>Transformers</em> "has flop written all over it... there cannot possibly be enough substance in a story about alien robots that transform into vehicles to make this a hit with the general public." I was wrong -- very wrong. The movie killed at the box office, grossing over $330M on a $150M budget, and prompting a <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/19/extended-cut-of-transformers-hits-imax-next-month/">re-release on IMAX</a>, which opened last week.<br /><br /><em><br /></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Transformers' and 'Shrek' flex muscles: A review of the summer blockbusters</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/">'Transformers' and 'Shrek' flex muscles: A review of the summer blockbusters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/994529/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>20th century fox</category><category>20thCenturyFox</category><category>28 weeks later</category><category>28WeeksLater</category><category>blockbuster</category><category>cinema</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>evan almighty</category><category>EvanAlmighty</category><category>expire-images:2008-9-24</category><category>film</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>golden compass</category><category>GoldenCompass</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>hulk</category><category>imax</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>knocked up</category><category>KnockedUp</category><category>movie</category><category>new line cinemas</category><category>NewLineCinemas</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>paramount</category><category>pineapple express</category><category>PineappleExpress</category><category>pirates of the caribbean</category><category>PiratesOfTheCaribbean</category><category>pixar</category><category>punisher</category><category>rush hour 3</category><category>RushHour3</category><category>shrek the third</category><category>ShrekTheThird</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>spider-man 3</category><category>Spider-man3</category><category>summer</category><category>superbad</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>transformers</category><category>twx</category><category>universal</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><category>wall-e</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off: JRR Tolkien vs. JK Rowling]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars">Money Face-Offs</a></strong> feature. Let us know who you think comes out ahead in this head-to-head match-up, and check out our other Money Face-Off posts.</em></p>
<p align="center"><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/face-off-240-authors-cs091207.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />"I will take the Ring," he said, "though I do not know the way."<br />-- Frodo Baggins, The Fellowship of the Ring</em></p>
<p align="center"><em>"There is no good and evil, there is only power, and those too weak to seek it."<br />-- Voldemort, Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone</em></p>
<p>In the late 1920s, J.R.R. Tolkien started writing a fantastical story about magical creatures known as hobbits, elves, and dwarves, in a made up world he called Middle Earth, for the benefit of his children. The work he completed, <em>The Hobbit</em>, became the prelude to one of the great literary masterpieces of all time -- <em>The Lord of the Rings</em> trilogy. Some 70 years later, J.K. Rowling started writing a fantastical story about a different set of magical creatures known as witches and wizards, in a not so made up world called England, for the benefit of her daughter. That book, <em>Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone</em> (<em>Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone</em> here in the States), and the six books that followed in the series, have made Rowling the wealthiest woman in the world.</p>
<p>The authors share many similarities. Both are British, use initials in place of their first names, are famous for one major literary contribution (although Rowling, having the benefit of still being alive, will have many years to change that), and have had cinematic empires based on their works.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off: JRR Tolkien vs. JK Rowling</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/">Money Face-Off: JRR Tolkien vs. JK Rowling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/981745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bloomsbury</category><category>children of hurin</category><category>deathly hallows</category><category>expire-images:2008-9-15</category><category>harry potter</category><category>hobbit</category><category>jk rowling</category><category>jrr tolkien</category><category>lord of the rings</category><category>new line</category><category>peter jackson</category><category>schl</category><category>scholastic</category><category>sorcerer's stone</category><category>the hobbit</category><category>the lord of the rings</category><category>time warner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Even Harry Potter can't help Borders Group (BGP)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/even-harry-potter-cant-help-borders-group-bgp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/even-harry-potter-cant-help-borders-group-bgp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/even-harry-potter-cant-help-borders-group-bgp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/harry_potter.jpg" />Bookseller <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">Borders Group Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">BGP</a>) continues to bleed money even with the release of the latest Harry Potter volume. If anything, the losses, already substantial, are getting bigger. Despite the fact that consolidated sales as reported in <a href="http://www.bordersgroupinc.com">2Q 2007 results</a> were up 10% to $945 million, the company still posted a net loss of $25 million, or $0.43 per share, a 25% bigger loss than Wall Street had anticipated. Things have gotten so bad that CEO George Jones remarked he was encouraged by flat sales at Waldenbooks. For the last 7 quarters, Waldenbooks' same-store sales have fallen. </p>
<p>Borders stores posted a total sales increase of 9.7%. Excluding Harry Potter, organic sales growth -- a misleading term in this instance -- was less than half of 1%. This is an expensive business model that is not working. In an effort to lure customers into stores, Harry Potter was sold at a large discount to match prices at discount chains. Administrative expenses increased a bit, but debt increased by almost $200 million, to $663 million. No wonder Borders is now negotiating to amend its credit agreement with its banks and considering the possibility of selling its Borders International segment, which still somehow posted a $10 million operating loss even while total sales increased 31% to $170 million.</p>
<p>Waldenbooks is in an even worse situation. Total sales declined 7.7% and operating losses were the same as one year ago, meaning the chain has made made no improvements to its bottom line situation. BGP shares began the year trading at $22.46, reached a high of $23.41 in late May and have been tanking ever since, closing at $14.66 on Thursday, down $0.28.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/even-harry-potter-cant-help-borders-group-bgp/">Even Harry Potter can't help Borders Group (BGP)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/even-harry-potter-cant-help-borders-group-bgp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/977870/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/30/even-harry-potter-cant-help-borders-group-bgp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BGP</category><category>book retailers</category><category>book sales</category><category>BookSales</category><category>booksellers</category><category>Bookstores</category><category>Borders</category><category>Borders Group Incorporated</category><category>BordersGroupIncorporated</category><category>George Jones</category><category>GeorgeJones</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>Waldenbooks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barnes &amp; Noble (BKS) profits from Harry Potter magic]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/barnes-and-noble-bks-profits-from-potter-magic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/barnes-and-noble-bks-profits-from-potter-magic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/barnes-and-noble-bks-profits-from-potter-magic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a></p><p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="175" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/harry-potter-barnes-and-noble.jpg" alt="Harry Potter fans queue outside a Trondheim, Norway, book shop before the sale of &lt;i&gt;Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.&lt;/i&gt;" />Book seller <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-38-noble-inc/bks/nys">Barnes &amp; Noble Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-38-noble-inc/bks/nys">BKS</a>) pulled a rabbit out of its own hat and posted diluted <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/barnes-and-noble-reports-second-quarter/n20070823085509990012">EPS of $0.26 in 2Q 2007</a> last week. But there is always a catch. $0.12 of those earnings derived from a tax benefit and $0.03 derived from lower than expected costs related to closing a huge distribution warehouse. Net earnings for the quarter were just over $18 million or $0.12 per share. Total sales increased 7.6% to $1.2 billion. In-store sales were up 4.4% while online sales were up 18%. Enjoy these increases while they last. Almost all of the good news is a result of the release of the last Harry Potter installment. Barnes &amp; Noble sold just over 2 million copies of the title as of early August. Without Harry Potter, sales increased barely 1%. </p>
<p>Bricks and mortar book stores are a mature business. Possibilities for growth are very hard to come by. CEO Steve Riggio admits as much even while trying to sound upbeat about 3Q releases planned by former President Clinton, former Fed Chair Greenspan and musician Eric Clapton. No offense to these gentlemen, but Harry Potter they ain't. 3Q store sales are forecast to be flat with a loss per share of $0.06-$0.10. Barnes &amp; Noble also posted losses in 1Q, so an increase in FY guidance to $1.69-$1.87 from $1.49-$1.67 is puzzling. Perhaps management is expecting a huge 4Q surge in book buying for the December holidays. Guess they missed the recent report stating 25% of adults surveyed in the U.S. read ZERO books the previous year.</p>
<p>The company is still buying back its shares, adding 500,000 repurchased shares in 2Q to the 750,000 shares repurchased in 1Q. Barnes &amp; Noble has budgeted $400 million for stock buy backs. The stock is surprisingly volatile. It began the year trading at $40.29, hit $42.88 in May, but closed at $35.80 on 27 August. By all means, shop at Barnes &amp; Noble, but spend investment dollars elsewhere.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/barnes-and-noble-bks-profits-from-potter-magic/">Barnes &amp; Noble (BKS) profits from Harry Potter magic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/barnes-and-noble-bks-profits-from-potter-magic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/975261/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/barnes-and-noble-bks-profits-from-potter-magic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barnes and Noble Incorporated</category><category>BarnesAndNobleIncorporated</category><category>BKS</category><category>book stores</category><category>BookStores</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>Steve Riggio</category><category>SteveRiggio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:03:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
