<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Are hedge fund managers stretching the truth?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/are-hedge-fund-managers-stretching-the-truth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/are-hedge-fund-managers-stretching-the-truth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/are-hedge-fund-managers-stretching-the-truth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="display: block;"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/08/pinocchio_200_032106.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>Out of every five <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/hedgefundmanagers/">hedge fund managers</a>, one is prone to fibbing, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a8d7c636-b835-11de-8ca9-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">according to research from NYU's Stern School of Business</a>. This is likely to pour salt in the wound of an industry that's been in rough shape for the past year. And, it'll probably add a bit more pressure for transparency.</p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Do_hedge_fund_managers_LIE'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>
<p>The <a href="http://www.stern.nyu.edu/" target="_blank">NYU</a> report uses data from 444 due diligence reports that investors commissioned from 2003 to 2008. The research team put the information against the test of reality to see where the differences are. The most common stretch of the truth was the amount of their own money the managers put into their <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/hedgefunds/">hedge funds</a>, fund performance and regulatory and legal histories. One fund inflated its assets under management by $300 million, while another wasn't up front about one of its partner's legal records (he had stolen a Chinese junk).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/are-hedge-fund-managers-stretching-the-truth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are hedge fund managers stretching the truth?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/are-hedge-fund-managers-stretching-the-truth/">Are hedge fund managers stretching the truth?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a8d7c636-b835-11de-8ca9-00144feab49a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/are-hedge-fund-managers-stretching-the-truth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19194943/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/are-hedge-fund-managers-stretching-the-truth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business school</category><category>business schools</category><category>BusinessSchool</category><category>BusinessSchools</category><category>featured</category><category>fund managers</category><category>FundManagers</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>hedge fund management</category><category>hedge fund managers</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>HedgeFund</category><category>HedgeFundManagement</category><category>HedgeFundManagers</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>new york university</category><category>NewYorkUniversity</category><category>nyu</category><category>stern</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mark McGoldrick, Goldman Sachs (GS) and the Fed: How peer pressure moves markets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/goldman-sachs-gs-and-the-fed-how-peer-pressure-moves-markets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/goldman-sachs-gs-and-the-fed-how-peer-pressure-moves-markets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/goldman-sachs-gs-and-the-fed-how-peer-pressure-moves-markets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p>If you've been through high school, you know how peers can pressure you to do things you might ordinarily avoid. This came to mind while reading two articles in yesterday's <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. The common theme was how individual actors in markets -- whether top traders or big banks -- are acutely influenced in their behavior by what they observe their peers doing.</p>
<p>In the first, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118740076313301636.html">Mark McGoldrick decided to leave</a> [subscription required] the <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) because he felt his $70 million in 2006 compensation was not enough for the $4 billion in profit he contributed to the firm. He wanted what other hedge fund players were making -- $1.2 billion for his group (representing the typical compensation of a hedge fund -- a 2% management fee plus 20% of the profits). Instead, Goldman paid his group a mere $500 million (less than 15% of his group's profits).</p>
<p>Similarly, the Fed spent a significant amount of time <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118735319666500894.html">trying to get banks to use its Discount window</a> to take out loans after Friday's 50 basis point rate cut. The Fed feared that banks would not use the Discount window because it made them look weak in the eyes of their peers.</p>
<p>It remains to be seen whether the Fed's effort to make peer pressure work will breath life into borrowing from its Discount window. But McGoldrick has already left Goldman to do -- what else? -- start his own hedge fund so he can keep up with his peers. </p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in Goldman.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/goldman-sachs-gs-and-the-fed-how-peer-pressure-moves-markets/">Mark McGoldrick, Goldman Sachs (GS) and the Fed: How peer pressure moves markets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/goldman-sachs-gs-and-the-fed-how-peer-pressure-moves-markets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/968499/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/goldman-sachs-gs-and-the-fed-how-peer-pressure-moves-markets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>compensation</category><category>Discount window</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GS</category><category>hedge fund management</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mark McGoldrick</category><category>peer pressure</category><category>the Fed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Others echo Overstock chief's cries of collusion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/others-join-overstock-ceos-cries-of-collusion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/others-join-overstock-ceos-cries-of-collusion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/others-join-overstock-ceos-cries-of-collusion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p>Quite a while ago, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/overstock-com-inc/ostk/nas">Overstock.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/overstock-com-inc/ostk/nas">OSTK</a>) CEO Patrick Byrne concluded that hedge fund managers were colluding with journalists and finance writers to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/20/is-cramer-a-market-manipulator/">manipulate stock prices</a> of public companies. Byrne was vilified a bit for that stance, but now he's being vindicated a little with support from some surprising areas.<br /><br />Both Jim Cramer and even reports from Bloomberg News state that there is indeed market manipulation going on to this day in commonplace fashion. I still can't get over why anyone would base an investing strategy (outside of day trading) on Cramer's <span style="font-style: italic;">Mad Money </span>unless they are mesmerized by his showmanship, but I digress. The guy is smart, but there are plenty of other portfolios with better returns. Do your own research.<br /><br />Anyway, Cramer's allegation that the financial press is easily duped by short sellers and hedge funds makes sense to me if you look at the daily activity levels and know precisely what to monitor to see patterns. Cramer also stated that <a href="http://news.com.com/Overstock+CEO+reflects+on+Cramer+debacle/2100-1030-6171494.html">federal regulators aren't smart enough to stop it</a> -- another thing I agree with him on. The markets weren't set up for this kind of nonsense, but if there is short-term money to be made and the power of regulation is turtle-slow, you can bet people will be acclimating to it like bugs to a porch light. <br /><br />Perhaps Byrne was right all along, as he did accuse a number of investment bankers, financial journalists and hedge fund managers of collaborating to ruin the reputations of companies in order to profit when their stock prices tumbled. It may be time for the federal henchmen to enter the picture and let Byrne finally bask in what he's wanted for quite some time.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/others-join-overstock-ceos-cries-of-collusion/">Others echo Overstock chief's cries of collusion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/Overstock+CEO+reflects+on+Cramer+debacle/2100-1030-6171494.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/others-join-overstock-ceos-cries-of-collusion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/863114/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/others-join-overstock-ceos-cries-of-collusion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Hedge fund management</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>HedgeFundManagement</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Overstock.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:22:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
