Out of every five hedge fund managers, one is prone to fibbing, according to research from NYU's Stern School of Business. This is likely to pour salt in the wound of an industry that's been in rough shape for the past year. And, it'll probably add a bit more pressure for transparency.

The NYU report uses data from 444 due diligence reports that investors commissioned from 2003 to 2008. The research team put the information against the test of reality to see where the differences are. The most common stretch of the truth was the amount of their own money the managers put into their hedge funds, fund performance and regulatory and legal histories. One fund inflated its assets under management by $300 million, while another wasn't up front about one of its partner's legal records (he had stolen a Chinese junk).

Continue reading Are hedge fund managers stretching the truth?

Are hedge fund managers stretching the truth? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

What began as a $6 million endeavor in 1996 is coming to a (partial) close. Atticus Capital is shuttering two of its three hedge funds and is returning $3 billion to shareholders. The move is strictly a personal one, according to CEO Timothy Barakett in a letter to investors. Atticus is slicing its flagship fund and a smaller one, but is keeping its European Fund, which has $1.2 billion under management.

Prevailing market conditions led Barakett to begin liquidating many of the Atticus Global portfolio's holdings, an effort he expects to be complete by the end of September. Investors can expect to receive around 95% of their money in early October, with the rest being disbursed after the fund's final audit later in the year.

Continue reading Atticus to cut two of three hedge funds

Atticus to cut two of three hedge funds originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Continue reading Bernard Madoff is a horse thief: Sentencing set for June 29

Bernard Madoff is a horse thief: Sentencing set for June 29 originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Ben Stein is generally seen as a fiscally conservative Republican (something about writing speeches for Richard Nixon ...), but even he thinks the insanely favorable tax treatment that hedge funds receive is outrageous. Referring to the extraordinary compensation many hedge fund managers receive:

Somehow, by some alchemy of brilliant tax lawyers, these people are paying long-term capital gains rates of 15 percent on their compensation (even though much of their pay is tied to trades with holding periods that last seconds). Doctors and lawyers and writers and actors pay about two times that amount.

That's it. End of discussion. Why should private equity and hedge fund managers receive such special treatment when they are making such an enormous amount of money. In the words of Johnnie Cochran, "It does not make sense!"

Stein then makes another brilliant proposal:

Why don't we just have a tax holiday for people who are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan for five years after they get back? ...

Let's keep it real: Congress can take notice of a mammoth inequity in taxation during wartime and make the tax on private equity and hedge funds approximate the treatment of other highly paid people - or it can continue down the road to the Bastille.

Brilliant as usual, Mr. Stein. Why isn't this guy running for office? Oh wait, he actually makes sense.

More from Ben Stein:
Ben Stein blasts Supreme Court for failing to protect shareholders
Ben Stein outlines his perfect portfolio and gives more sage advice
Ben Stein: Sit back, relax, and enjoy the dips

Ben Stein sees through hedge fund lobby's baloney originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

A few months ago a doctor asked me why hedge fund managers make more money than he and his colleagues. After all, Doctor, when used before a name, is capitalized, while hedge fund manager isn't. While I'm joking about the capitalization -- it does reflect the much greater level of societal acclamation doctors receive from the moment they set their minds on an MD to their obituaries. So why doesn't societal acclamation translate into money?

Before trying to answer this question, it's worth noting that I just spent some time trying to find a list of the highest paid doctors -- but I failed. I found one list which said surgeons make an average of $247,536-- and a 1999 survey suggesting that neuro-surgeons make $500,000. But hedge fund managers do get ranked by income, as this New York Times article (registration required) points out.

My post on top-ranked James Simons (2006 income: $1.7 billion), suggested hedge fund managers out-earn doctors because top performing hedgies can leverage their time more efficiently. That is -- while a hedge fund manager can take on an additional $1 billion under management without adding a huge number of additional analysts, if a doctor takes on many more patients, he or she will need to hire a proportionately larger number of doctors to treat them. Most hedge fund managers let computers do much of the work -- something doctors can't do.

Continue reading Why hedge fund managers outearn doctors

Why hedge fund managers outearn doctors originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 23 May 2007 16:55:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.