I've seen it many times: a cool product that finds few customers. That seems to be the case with Helio's mobile phones. Basically, customers didn't want to pay premium prices for such things as access to MySpace and other new-fangled features.

It's a tough lesson (and expensive). SK Telecom and EarthLink (NASDAQ: ELNK) formed Helio as a joint venture in 2005 with start-up capital of $440 million. SK Telecom invested an additional $270 million in the venture last year.

Yet, in the end, Helio turned out to be a big dud. That is, the company sold out for a measly $39 million to Virgin Mobile USA (NYSE: VM). In fact, the space is full of dead companies, such as Disney Mobile and Amp'd Mobile.

I had a chance to interview Frank Dickson, the co-founder and chief research officer of MultiMedia Intelligence. According to him:

Honestly, the merger is a desperate move. Overall, the MVNO (Mobile Virtual Network Operator) model makes sense in a limited number of situations. For example, if a cable MSO wants to leverage its customer base and offer triple or quadruple play offering, there is a clear distinctive competency and the MVNO route makes sense.

Since its IPO last year, the shares of Virgin Mobile USA Inc. (NYSE: VM) have imploded -- going from $15.69 to a low of $1.90. The stock has lifted somewhat lately though, and is now trading at $3.43.

Actually, the company has confirmed that it is talking with Helio -- majority owned by SK Telecom (NYSE: SKM) -- about a possible merger.

Both companies are known as mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs), which means that they provide cell services by using another carrier's infrastructure. Unfortunately, the MVNO model has been extremely difficult to pull off (in fact, there have been several high-profile blow-ups in the space, such as Amp'd).

So will a combination help things?

To get some perspective on things, I had a chance to interview Frank Dickson, who is the Chief Research Officer at MultiMedia Intelligence. According to him:

Earthlink, Inc. (NASDAQ: ELNK) is a dial-up and broadband provider that has been stuck in the mud for the last year. Although Wall Street's focus this week will be on the company's earnings, due out before the bell Thursday, I think you, the individual investor, need to focus on the long-term perspective on this stock.

While I'm not saying that Earthlink is going to have a bad quarter (I simply don't have enough insight into this quarter), I'm arguing that Earthlink's long-term potential easily trumps any short-term opportunity in the stock.

Basically, the company is losing subscribers every quarter for its dial-up business, a business that is clearly technologically inferior to broadband and other new internet connection offerings. But the company is adding voice and "PeoplePC" subscribers every quarter. For those unfamiliar with PeoplePC, it is a discount dial-up service with speeds 5x as fast as normal dial-up. This product is very popular in lower- to middle-class families who want an upgrade from dial-up but don't want to pay broadband prices. Lastly, the company offers municipal wireless services.

Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S) has seen its shares rise as much as 16% as of Monday afternoon (after market close) as rumors and talks of a possible buyout began circulating in the media. This time, instead of Sprint rumors related to a Verizon (NYSE: VZ) buyout, South Korea's SK Telecom was seen as possible suitor for the third-largest wireless carrier in the U.S. behind AT&T (NYSE: T) and Verizon Wireless.

SK Telecom, South Korea's largest telecom operator, owns the MVNO (mobile virtual network operator) Helio, which rents airwaves from Sprint already. When asked, SK Telecom said that a possible takeover rumor regarding Sprint was "groundless". Generally, a descriptive word like that is defensive enough to make some think that no takeover is in the works. However, half the time cover is laid, the rumor turns out to be true. SK Telecom even used harsher language to state that the rumor was not true.

Perhaps SK Telecom needs to dredge up more than about $62 billion to wrest control of Sprint Nextel (based on closing price Monday afternoon) before it starts warming to the rumors. It would make the $18 billion SK Telecom buyout quite large since Sprint's valuation is more than three times its own. Would SK Telecom take such a large risk to own a national wireless carrier with one of the largest 3G wireless data networks in existence, along with 53 million customers? Never say never -- those kinds of figures would make some lick their chops if they believe the future is all-wireless. Perhaps a partial deal is more palatable for SK Telecom than an entire takeover?