<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[A Bidding War for Potash?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/a-bidding-war-for-potash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/a-bidding-war-for-potash/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/a-bidding-war-for-potash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bhp/" rel="tag">BHP Billiton Ltd ADR (BHP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pot/" rel="tag">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Potash Corp. logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/potash.jpg" />Reportedly, Potash (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys" target="_blank">POT</a>) is considering <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/potash-reportedly-seeks-new-offer-to-counter-bhp-2010-08-19" target="_blank">joining forces with global firms</a> that would be able to present an offer to compete with <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bhp-billiton-limited/bhp/nys" class="inlinked">BHP</a> Billiton's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bhp-billiton-limited/bhp/nys" target="_blank">BHP</a>) $38.6 billion bid.</p>
<p>According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, people "familiar with the matter" stated that there could be a global <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Consortium" class="inlinked">consortium</a> in the works to make a <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Counteroffer" class="inlinked">counteroffer</a> for Potash. BHP has gone straight to Potash shareholders with its offer of $130 per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/a-bidding-war-for-potash/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A Bidding War for Potash?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/a-bidding-war-for-potash/">A Bidding War for Potash?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/a-bidding-war-for-potash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19601762/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/a-bidding-war-for-potash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BHP</category><category>bidding war</category><category>featured</category><category>fertilizer</category><category>fertilizer stocks</category><category>hostile takeover</category><category>inthenews</category><category>POT</category><category>potash</category><category>takeover</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cadbury continues to fight a hostile takeover from Kraft]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cadbury-continues-to-fight-a-hostile-takeover-from-kraft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cadbury-continues-to-fight-a-hostile-takeover-from-kraft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cadbury-continues-to-fight-a-hostile-takeover-from-kraft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hsy/" rel="tag">Hershey Co (HSY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/new-kraft-logo-200.jpg" alt="" />This morning, Cadbury <span id="articleText">(<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cadbury-plc/cby/nys">CBY</a>)</span> <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/cadbury-lifts-sales-target-in-kraft-defense-2009-12-14" target="_blank">lifted its sales and margin forecasts</a>. Some believe this is a move to stop a hostile takeover from Kraft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys" target="_blank">KFT</a>). Cadbury upped its sales and margin forecasts to reflect organic revenue growth of 5% to 7% a year during the next four years. This forecast is up from its previously forecast range of 4% to 6%. Cadbury also believes it will have improved margins of 16% to 18% by 2013. <br /><br />Cadbury chairman Roger Carr told shareholders, "Kraft is trying to buy Cadbury on the cheap to provide much-needed growth to their unattractive low-growth conglomerate business model. Don't let Kraft steal your company with it derisory offer."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cadbury-continues-to-fight-a-hostile-takeover-from-kraft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cadbury continues to fight a hostile takeover from Kraft</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cadbury-continues-to-fight-a-hostile-takeover-from-kraft/">Cadbury continues to fight a hostile takeover from Kraft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cadbury-continues-to-fight-a-hostile-takeover-from-kraft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19277632/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cadbury-continues-to-fight-a-hostile-takeover-from-kraft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadbury</category><category>cby</category><category>Dog of the Dow</category><category>DogOfTheDow</category><category>Dow</category><category>hostile takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>hsy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kft</category><category>takeover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kraft launches hostile takeover of Cadbury]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/new-kraft-logo-200.jpg" alt="" />Ahead of the pre-determined deadline, Kraft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>) decided to launch its <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/permalinks/entry.php/KFT;CBYid1161230">formal offer</a> for U.K.-based chocolate maker Cadbury (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cadbury-plc/cby/nys">CBY</a>). KFT announced that the cash-and-stock bid is worth $16.46 billion (9.8 billion pounds) or 717 pence per U.K.-listed CBY share. <br /><br />At that rate, KFT said the bid is 37% higher than CBY's July 3 close. KFT added that no other potential buyer has declared interest in CBY. KFT is offering CBY shareholders $5 in cash and 0.26 share in KFT. For each American CBY share, KFT is offering $20 cash and 1.04 shares.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kraft launches hostile takeover of Cadbury</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/">Kraft launches hostile takeover of Cadbury</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19228704/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/kraft-launches-hostile-takeover-of-cadbury/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cadbury</category><category>CBY</category><category>chocolate</category><category>hostile takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>inthenews</category><category>KFT</category><category>Kraft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: InBev says its bid for Anheuser Busch will turn hostile]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121453486987809815.html?mod=wsjcrmain"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported that is is not yet certain whether <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch &amp; Co Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) will need to raise money. If it does, selling common stock could be expensive due to a 12-month protection the bank offered the investors that bought $12B in common and preferred shares earlier this year and selling assets like its interest in Bloomberg may present a different problem.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121450442776707845.html?mod=2_1566_leftbox"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> also reported that investigators from the European Union are probing deeper into the pharmaceutical industry in an effort to determine whether drug companies have used unfair tactics to increase prices and block competition. Investigators have reportedly ask for views on direct-to-pharmacy distribution channels, which <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/astrazeneca-plc/azn/nys">AstraZeneca Plc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/astrazeneca-plc/azn/nys">AZN</a>) recently established in Britain.</li>
    <li>After <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) said it would reject InBev's $46B bid as "financially inadequate," InBev said it would launch a hostile bid. According to court documents, the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2409d0a4-43c2-11dd-842e-0000779fd2ac.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported that InBev is preparing to launch a proxy battle seeking the removal of Anheuser's entire board.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/35a7da52-43e7-11dd-842e-0000779fd2ac.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> also reported that soaring energy prices are forcing U.S. consumer goods company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">The Procter &amp; Gamble Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) to rethink how it distributes products. The company may consider shifting manufacturing sites closer to consumers in order to lower its transport bill.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/">Newspaper wrap-up: InBev says its bid for Anheuser Busch will turn hostile</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1238452/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-inbev-says-its-bid-for-anheuser-busch-will-tu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser</category><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>AstraZeneca</category><category>AZN</category><category>BUD</category><category>EU probe</category><category>EuProbe</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>hostile takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>InBev</category><category>MER</category><category>Merill Lynch</category><category>MerillLynch</category><category>PFE</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>PG</category><category>Procter Gamble</category><category>ProcterGamble</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pier 1 (PIR) wants to import Cost Plus (CPWM)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/pier-1-pir-wants-to-import-cost-plus-cpwm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/pier-1-pir-wants-to-import-cost-plus-cpwm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/pier-1-pir-wants-to-import-cost-plus-cpwm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/pier1.jpg" alt="" />Things are getting hostile in the furniture business. That is, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pier-1-imports-inc/pir/nys">Pier 1 Imports</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pier-1-imports-inc/pir/nys">PIR</a>) has <a href="http://www.pier1.com/SideMenu/IR/PressReleases/tabid/94/default.aspx?ReleaseID=1163508">announced</a> a $4 unsolicited bid for rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cost-plus-inc-calif/cpwm/nas">Cost Plus</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cost-plus-inc-calif/cpwm/nas">CPWM</a>). That comes to about $88 million. On news of the deal, Cost Plus' shares rose 13% to $3.47.</p>
<p>Although, the folks at Cost Plus are skeptical, calling the deal "highly conditional." Of course, the board will meet to discuss the proposal. </p>
<p>With the recession and real estate bust, it's a good bet we'll see more consolidation in the furniture business. Simply put, it will be a way to cut capacity as well as reduce cost structures.</p>
<p>No doubt, Cost Plus will want to get a higher price, but in light of the challenging environment, that's probably going to be tough. Besides, Cost Plus and Pier 1 have many common shareholders, who may pressure for a transaction. What's more, Cost Plus's "poison pill" will expire on June 30th.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/tomtaulli">Tom Taulli</a> is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" /> and <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" />. He also operates <a href="http://www.mergerbook.com">MergerBook.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/pier-1-pir-wants-to-import-cost-plus-cpwm/">Pier 1 (PIR) wants to import Cost Plus (CPWM)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/pier-1-pir-wants-to-import-cost-plus-cpwm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1220102/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/pier-1-pir-wants-to-import-cost-plus-cpwm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cost Plus</category><category>CostPlus</category><category>cpwm</category><category>Hostile Takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Pier 1 Imports</category><category>Pier1Imports</category><category>pir</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ballmer wimps out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/steve-ballmer-msft.jpg" />I was convinced that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) would go hostile on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). Microsoft is known as a tough player, right? And Yahoo seems to be a good strategic fit.</p>
<p>But of course, Microsoft's CEO, Steve Ballmer, has <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aDnk8NZHUQKo&amp;refer=home">thrown in the towel</a> on the $31 buyout offer. Apparently, he lobbed $33 per share - but the folks at Yahoo wanted $4 extra.</p>
<p>I can certainly understand why Ballmer doesn't want to overpay. After all, many M&amp;A studies show that this is often deadly for dealmaking.</p>
<p>At the same time, Microsoft had the option of a proxy fight and a direct offer to Yahoo shareholders. However, Ballmer thought such things would be too distracting. But doesn't Microsoft have legions of attorneys and investment bankers?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ballmer wimps out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/">Ballmer wimps out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 May 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aDnk8NZHUQKo&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1186208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Hostile Takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow Jones and News Corp: Very 'Guys &amp; Dolls,' very wrong]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/wsj_frontpage_spcummings.jpg" />It was the news as soon as I logged into my computer this morning from my West Coast office: Rupert Murdoch's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) had made a whopping $5 billion bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">Dow Jones &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">DJ</a>). The bid was unsolicited and, it seems, entirely <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-you-didn-t-have-me-at-5-billion/">hostile to the Bancroft family</a>, who controls Dow Jones and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-bancrofts-rejects-murdochs-offer/">seems to be rejecting the generous offer</a>.<br /><br />It's a cute story, very <em>Guys &amp; Dolls</em>. On one hand we have Dow Jones with its flagship brand, the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. The paper is everything about wealth -- its very emblem the center of all the world's markets, Wall Street -- the editors are known for their conservative bent, the writers are known for their unparalleled and brainy research, even the design is known for its long-time avoidance of peripherals like color printing and photographs. On the other hand, we have Rupert Murdoch and his gang of vagabonds, from FOX broadcasting (need I really say more than "Next on FOX... <em>Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader?</em>") to the vast spoiled brat of recent acquisition MySpace. They're very other-side-of-the-tracks, the kind of news organization that would get a tattoo on its buttocks and then try to slip it in as the senior picture in the high school yearbook. <br /><br />They're not a match made in heaven. They're a match made for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Millionaire"><em>Joe Millionaire</em></a>, or Broadway. It's not real life; it wouldn't work. Whether or not the money is right, the styles are so vastly different, the respective organizations' reputations so opposite, any so-called "synergy" would be lost before the first page of the merger agreement was drafted.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow Jones and News Corp: Very 'Guys &amp; Dolls,' very wrong</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/">Dow Jones and News Corp: Very 'Guys &amp; Dolls,' very wrong</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 May 2007 20:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/886713/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bancroft</category><category>bancroft family</category><category>BancroftFamily</category><category>bid</category><category>dj</category><category>dow jones</category><category>DowJones</category><category>fox</category><category>hostile</category><category>hostile bid</category><category>hostile takeover</category><category>HostileBid</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>media</category><category>merger</category><category>murdoch</category><category>news</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspaper</category><category>nws</category><category>paper</category><category>rupert</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>takeover</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[US Airways ups the ante for Delta]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/us-airways-ups-the-ante-for-delta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/us-airways-ups-the-ante-for-delta/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/us-airways-ups-the-ante-for-delta/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/lcc_delta.jpg" alt="" />US Airways Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-airways-group-inc/lcc/nys">LCC</a>) is trying to pull out all the stops in its attempted hostile takeover of Delta Air Lines Inc. by <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/us-air-works-to-save-delta-bid/20070129071809990012?cid=403">lifting its offer by $1 Billion</a>. <br /><br />In order for the offer to get lifted, US Airways wants the official committee to request Delta to open itself up for due diligence by US Airways, to have a bankruptcy judge to postpone a hearing next week on Delta's restructuring plan and agree to support the start of a formal antitrust review.<br /><br />The committee of Delta creditors will have until Thursday to decide if it wants to proceed with the US Airways offer. For now, I would be willing to bet that Delta is not going to go for this current offer and instead decide to follow the advice of its chief executive, Gerald Grinstein, who has repeatedly insisted the airline would be better off to emerge from bankruptcy-court protection on its own later this year<br /><br />The main reason behind the raise in the current offer can be traced to a meeting between US Airways and some Delta creditors who aren't part of the official committee that advised the Airliner to increase its current bid by $2 billion. Will this be enough to sway some votes in US Airways favor? I doubt it, but we should get a better picture of the current takeover situation over the next few days.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Michael Fowlkes has worked as a stock trader for seven years and spent the last two years working as an analyst for the online investment advisory service </span><a href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblog_mf" style="font-style: italic;">Investor's Observer</a><span style="font-style: italic;">.</span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/us-airways-ups-the-ante-for-delta/">US Airways ups the ante for Delta</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/us-air-works-to-save-delta-bid/20070129071809990012?cid=403>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/us-airways-ups-the-ante-for-delta/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/744324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/us-airways-ups-the-ante-for-delta/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dalrq</category><category>delta</category><category>delta airlines</category><category>DeltaAirlines</category><category>hostile bid</category><category>hostile takeover</category><category>HostileBid</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>lcc</category><category>merger</category><category>offer</category><category>takeover</category><category>us airways</category><category>UsAirways</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Steel Deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/steel-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/steel-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/steel-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.taulli.com"><img width="240" height="220" align="right" alt="tata" src="http://static.flickr.com/104/274629281_b8bd3a7e4d_m.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>The global consolidation in the steel industry continues apace. The latest mega deal is <a href="http://www.tatasteel.com/">Tata Steel's</a> $7.7 billion purchase of <a href="http://www.corusgroup.com/en/">Corus Group</a> (which is the former British Steel company).</p>
<p>The combined company will be ranked #5 worldwide in the steel business.</p>
<p>True, there is talk of other bidders coming to the table, such as SeverStal, Novolipetsk and CSN. However, based on the current valuation - and deal terms - a hostile bid would certainly be pricey and time-consuming. Corus is selling at roughly 6.6x EBITDA. Keep in mind that <a href="http://www.arcelormittal.com/index.php?lang=en&amp;page=0">Mittal's </a>deal for Arcelor was for a value of 4.8x EBITDA.</p>
<p>Success in the steel business is about huge scale - on a global basis. It helps these companies get contracts as well as realize economies of scale. Combine this with the growth in steel in emerging markets - such as China and India - these mega deals make a lot of sense.</p>
<p>What's more, this is an early sign of the rise of India's economic power on the global stage.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and operates InvestorOffering.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/steel-deal/">Steel Deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/steel-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/688199/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/steel-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Buyout</category><category>Corus Group</category><category>CorusGroup</category><category>Hostile Takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>India</category><category>Mittal</category><category>Steel</category><category>Tata Steel</category><category>TataSteel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barbarians hunt for Gateway]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/barbarians-hunt-for-gateway/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/barbarians-hunt-for-gateway/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/barbarians-hunt-for-gateway/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.taulli.com"><img height="240" alt="gateway" hspace="4" src="http://static.flickr.com/66/221200967_7dc293a1a2_m.jpg" width="215" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dell.com">Dell</a> is not the only <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/18/dell-shares-drop-as-sec-probe-is-unveiled-and-earnings-drop-by-h/">troubled</a> PC maker. <a href="http://www.gateway.com">Gateway</a> is also in a mess. Actually, it seems like Gateway really is another way of saying "troubled." This stock has been torture, which is at a lowly $1.50. The high for the past year was $3.25.</p>
<p>Well, <a href="http://www.harbert.net/">Harbinger Capital Partners</a>, a hedge fund, sees this as an opportunity to agitate for change (i.e., a better stock price). To this end, the firm scooped up 10.2% of Gateway's outstanding shares. Harbinger Capital Partners also hired a group that knows how to attack lackluster managements: <a href="http://www.firebrandpartners.com">Firebrand Partners</a> (yes, the name says it all). Steve Galloway is the founder of the firm, who also built the ecommerce site <a href="http://www.redevenope.com">Red Envelope</a> and is also a Clinical Associate Professor at The Stern School of Business, where he teaches brand strategy to 2nd-year MBA students. </p>
<p>The Gateway deal is potentially lucrative for Galloway. That is, he gets a 10% cut of any profits on the adventure.</p>
<p>His first step? He sent a letter to Gateway's management.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/barbarians-hunt-for-gateway/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barbarians hunt for Gateway</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/barbarians-hunt-for-gateway/">Barbarians hunt for Gateway</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/barbarians-hunt-for-gateway/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/657065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/barbarians-hunt-for-gateway/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dell</category><category>Firebrand Partners</category><category>FirebrandPartners</category><category>Gateway</category><category>Harbinger Capital Partners</category><category>HarbingerCapitalPartners</category><category>Hostile Takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:26:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
