<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[GOP's Gain Could Be First Solar's Loss, Warns JPMorgan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/03/gops-gain-could-be-first-solars-loss-warns-jpmorgan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/03/gops-gain-could-be-first-solars-loss-warns-jpmorgan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/03/gops-gain-could-be-first-solars-loss-warns-jpmorgan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="First Solar (FSLR)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/first-solar-logo-240.jpg" />Now that Republicans have taken control of the House of Representatives, analysts at JPMorgan are taking a look at the election's potential impact on the stock market. In a research note this morning, JPMorgan cited alternative energy issue First Solar (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/first-solar-inc/fslr/nas">FSLR</a>) as one equity that could be damaged by the GOP's Congressional gains.<br />
<br />
"Most of the downside is accounted for by the possibility of fiscally conservative measures, such as budget cuts and the reduction/elimination of certain subsidies," wrote JPMorgan in <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jpmorgan-cites-stocks-possibly-hurt-by-election-2010-11-03">a note to clients</a>. <br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/03/gops-gain-could-be-first-solars-loss-warns-jpmorgan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GOP's Gain Could Be First Solar's Loss, Warns JPMorgan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/03/gops-gain-could-be-first-solars-loss-warns-jpmorgan/">GOP's Gain Could Be First Solar's Loss, Warns JPMorgan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/03/gops-gain-could-be-first-solars-loss-warns-jpmorgan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19701172/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/03/gops-gain-could-be-first-solars-loss-warns-jpmorgan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst ratings</category><category>Congress</category><category>election</category><category>First Solar</category><category>FSLR</category><category>House of Representatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investor sentiment</category><category>JPMorgan</category><category>options</category><category>puts</category><category>Republicans</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Contractor Spending in Afghanistan Includes $1 Billion Wasted]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/us-soldier-iraq.jpg" />An audit memorandum prepared by Senator Claire McCaskill's staff puts the amount of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BH02S20091218">money spent on reconstruction and redevelopment contracts in Afghanistan</a> at $23 billion, with $1 billion of it waste. So, was $22 billion well spent?<br />
<br />
The funds have been spent on a variety of projects, including the construction of roads and the development of power generation utilities to agriculture, urban development and water sanitation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Contractor Spending in Afghanistan Includes $1 Billion Wasted</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/">Contractor Spending in Afghanistan Includes $1 Billion Wasted</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BH02S20091218>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19286182/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>afghanistan</category><category>Afghanistan war</category><category>AfghanistanWar</category><category>Homeland Security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>house of representatives</category><category>HouseOfRepresentatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>military</category><category>military contracts</category><category>MilitaryContracts</category><category>Senate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[House votes on risk bill, bank breakup power included]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/house-votes-on-risk-bill-bank-breakup-power-included/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/house-votes-on-risk-bill-bank-breakup-power-included/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/house-votes-on-risk-bill-bank-breakup-power-included/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/08/washington-dc-us-01-200a022807.jpg" />The federal government is a step closer to having vast powers over financial services firms. The U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee voted on Wednesday to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5B14NO20091203" target="_blank">give regulators the authority to carve up financial firms</a> when economic stability is at stake. The bill would also open up the Federal Reserve to much more congressional oversight. This comes more than a year after firms such as AIG (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys" target="_blank">AIG</a>) and Citigroup (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys" target="_blank">C</a>) needed profound financial intervention to prevent a broad collapse of the global economic system.</p>
<p>Of course, the measure is getting mixed reviews. The <a href="http://www.icba.org/" target="_blank">Independent Community Bankers of America</a>, a lobbying group for smaller entities, says it will "create a more equitable financial system and hold too-big-to-fail firms accountable for the risks they pose." Meanwhile, the <a href="http://www.fsround.org/" target="_blank">Financial Services Roundtable</a>, which represents larger banks, such as Bank of America (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" target="_blank">BAC</a>), says it will "stifle creativity and the free-flow of ideas and capital."</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/house-votes-on-risk-bill-bank-breakup-power-included/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>House votes on risk bill, bank breakup power included</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/house-votes-on-risk-bill-bank-breakup-power-included/">House votes on risk bill, bank breakup power included</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/house-votes-on-risk-bill-bank-breakup-power-included/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19263063/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/house-votes-on-risk-bill-bank-breakup-power-included/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>bac</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>banking sector</category><category>banking stocks</category><category>banking system</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>house of representatives</category><category>insurance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>treasury department</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Government poised to take charge of student loan business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/degree200x150.jpg" />A new bill that would revamp student loan programs in the United States <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/college/2009-09-17-ed-bill_N.htm" target="_blank">passed the House of Representatives</a>. The proposed program, which would affect the largest change on college aid since they came into existence in the 1960s would push private lenders out of the business and put the U.S. government in control.</p>
<p>The new measure would end subsidies for private lenders, increase Pell Grants available for students in financial need, and create grants for community colleges. The proposal includes almost all of President Obama's key points on higher education from the campaign trail. It passed the House 253 - 171, with most representatives sticking to party lines.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Government poised to take charge of student loan business</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/">Government poised to take charge of student loan business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19167056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>congress</category><category>congressional budget office</category><category>education</category><category>house of representatives</category><category>pell grants</category><category>president obama</category><category>student loans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market to $810 billion bailout plan: Yawn]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/market-to-810-billion-bailout-plan-yawn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/market-to-810-billion-bailout-plan-yawn/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/market-to-810-billion-bailout-plan-yawn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26987291/">$810 billion</a> bailout plan was just approved by the House of Representatives after a second vote by a margin of <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26987291/">263-171</a>. That's a lot of taxpayer money for a plan that misses the target. And with stocks falling well off the highest levels of the day, I gather that investors are not too surprised that it passed.
<p>To put this in perspective, the Dow now trades 631 points below where it was on the morning of the record 778 point decline on Monday. That's when the House voted thumbs down on the original plan. I guess taxpayers will need to spend a few trillion dollars to get more of those triple digit gains.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I think that unless the Treasury can solve the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/businessweeks-brilliant-solution-to-the-financial-mess/">thorny problem</a> of setting a price for the mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), then it will fail to solve the real economic problem -- which is a lack of trust in the financial system. I've proposed what I thought would be a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/businessweeks-brilliant-solution-to-the-financial-mess/">better solution</a>.</p>
<p>Maybe we can try that one next week if stocks drop another 700 points. There seems to be no limit to the amount of taxpayer money the government is willing to throw at this financial crisis.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/market-to-810-billion-bailout-plan-yawn/">Market to $810 billion bailout plan: Yawn</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/market-to-810-billion-bailout-plan-yawn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1332563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/market-to-810-billion-bailout-plan-yawn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>collateralized debt</category><category>CollateralizedDebt</category><category>dow</category><category>featured</category><category>house of representatives</category><category>HouseOfRepresentatives</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>MortgageBackedSecurities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/george-w-bush.jpg" />American President George Bush announced his <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bush-unveils-31-trillion-spending-plan/20080204114409990002">new budget spending plan</a> today, and the package came out to a total of $3.1 trillion.<br /><br />Today's federal budget proposal marks the first time in America's history that a budget plan has been in excess of $3 trillion. Bush claims that his budget is "good" and "solid" and that the passing of this budget will help keep the troubled American economy growing.<br /><br />All in all, this budget looks to lift government spending by 6% during the fiscal year 2009, and it will probably come to no one's surprise that defense gets a nice little boost from today's budget. Bush is looking to allocate 8.2% of his spending on security, and the budget is looking to stake a $70 billion "placeholder" for war costs during 2009. The Pentagon should be pleased with its figures, as Bush is looking to allocate $515.4 billion its way... the highest allocation since WWII (and represents a 7.5% jump).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/">Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1106092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>Congress</category><category>featured</category><category>federal budget</category><category>FederalBudget</category><category>George Bush</category><category>GeorgeBush</category><category>Harry Reid</category><category>HarryReid</category><category>House of Representatives</category><category>HouseOfRepresentatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Judd Gregg</category><category>JuddGregg</category><category>Kent Conrad</category><category>KentConrad</category><category>medicare</category><category>Pentagon</category><category>politics</category><category>Senate</category><category>Steny Hoyer</category><category>StenyHoyer</category><category>war</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
