Housing Bubble posts
FeedPosted Aug 23rd 2009 11:10AM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Housing, Recession
It looks like the housing market is coming back, but there's still reason to be careful. In July, home resales had their highest monthly increase in at least a decade. The rush is driven in part by a tax credit that expires on November 30, 2009. The rate of sale grew 7.2%, ahead of expectations.
Last month, sales hit a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.24 million in July -- up from a 4.89 million in June. This is the fourth month in a row in which seasonally adjusted sales increased, and it was the strongest growth rate since August 2007. A Thomson Reuters survey had forecast 5 million, but the reality exceeded that.
Continue reading Housing sales come back, led by first-timers
Posted Dec 23rd 2008 3:15PM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Housing, Recession
This post is part of our feature on Money Losers of 2008. See all 20.
For a second year in a row, American homeowners are among the biggest losers of 2008. In 2007, predictions were that American homeowners would lose over $103 billion. Now at the end of 2008 the number jumped to losses of $2 trillion as the value of homes continue to fall with no end in sight. As job losses increase, even more families will be forced into foreclosure.
Homeowners who bought at the top of the housing bubble between 2005 and 2006, could wait decades for the prices to reach that level again. People who must move for a new job or family crisis find they either have to come up with cash for closing (if they find a willing buyer) or they must walk away from the loan and give the house back to the bank either through foreclosure or through a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.
The housing bubble that started to inflate in 2002 and burst in 2007 drove housing prices way out of the normal range. The normal ranges for housing prices track these measures:
- Income: The house price should not exceed three times your average household income, which was true from 1950 to 2000. In 2006 the average household income was $66,600, so the average home price should have been about $200,000. But during that year the average home price was about $300,000.
Continue reading Money losers of 2008: The American homeowner, still sinking after the bubble burst
Posted Oct 24th 2008 3:56PM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Forecasts, Industry, Politics, Housing, Recession, Financial Crisis
Every once in while during a crisis or history-altering event, you run across a quote or an observation that sort of summarizes events on the ground, in a nutshell. Former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman
Paul Volcker articulated one such observation during a recent chat he had with
PBS's Charlie Rose.
"It seems to me what our nation needs is more civil engineers and electrical engineers and fewer financial engineers,"
Volcker said.
U.S.: a decade of descentAnd there you have it -- the United States' decade of descent, in a nutshell. Volcker's observation speaks volumes about where the United States economy -- and the nation, at large, for that matter -- is today.
For reasons that historians will undoubtedly debate for decades (globalization, automation, flawed public policies, inadequate regulations, overconsumption, the availability of foreign capital, greed) the United States embarked on a financing boom -- creating an increasing array of creative and untenable mortgage types, accompanied by an equally problematic set of mortgage backed securities. It generated an unsustainable housing bubble, which ended as all bubbles do -- badly -- triggering the global financial crisis.
And yet, all the while, as Volcker observed, public investment in infrastructure -- the physical backbone of the economy, of the nation, really -- declined. That infrastructure is now in a state of disrepair. The nation's schools, hospitals, roads/bridges/mass transit systems/air travel system and even our electric grid are inadequate to meet the nation's current requirements, let alone the requirements of an expanding, vibrant, dynamic, twenty-first century economy.
Continue reading Volcker: U.S. needs more civil engineers and fewer financial engineers
Posted Oct 2nd 2008 3:39PM by Sheldon Liber (RSS feed)
Filed under: Other issues, Rants and raves, Interviews, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Money and Finance Today, Media World, Politics, Housing, Recession

The Oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffett, of
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:
BRK.A) spent a few moments on CNN answering some key questions about the economy at a Fortune Magazine Forum. He was asked where he would place the blame for the current financial crises being played out on the world stage, and he said he is not one to point fingers. There is plenty of blame to go around.
Initially Buffett quipped that
"every saint has a past, and every sinner has a future." He went on to say that the everyone participated in the creation of the housing bubble with the unrealistic expectation that prices would continue to rise.
He summarized that home ownership is worshiped in the United States, and once cheap funding became available and prices started to rise there became the feeling that if you did not buy a home now you would be facing higher prices next year and perhaps less favorable interest rates as well.
Continue reading Fortune interviews Buffett on CNN
Posted Sep 15th 2008 2:19PM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: International markets, Forecasts, Industry, Employees, Economic data, Housing, Recession
Many economists, analysts, traders and others agree it's way too soon to assess the impact of this latest, mortgage-related jolt on the stock and bond markets, and on the U.S. and global economies.
There are too many moving parts, and too many unknowns to form meaningful, enduring conclusions. The reason? The financial world order we see today may not, in fact, be the financial world order we see tomorrow. The
Dow was down about 256 points to 11,165 early Monday afternoon.
But there is one conclusion U.S. investors / citizens can form regarding the U.S. economy, so says an economist: expanding credit and rising home prices, in and of themselves, are not engines of economic growth.
Now, everyone's recognizing 'the obvious'
"We have now entered the age of recognizing the obvious," economist Richard Felson said. "Almost everyone knew that the booming housing market would slow down as soon as all potential buyers had been tapped and as the American economy slowed. But few foresaw the impact the slowdown would have on mortgage bonds, their owners, and the financial system. We now have to rebuild the American credit market, and global credit market, as well, to a degree. It will be a major task."
The primary source of all the above, in Felson's interpretation? Structural problems in the U.S. economy, primarily a lack of jobs, or low job growth, he said.
"For the better part of four years, America went blithely along, confident that the fundamentals of the [U.S.] economy were sound. Yet all the while, job growth and its companion, rising median wages, were inadequate. But they were ignored because corporate earnings were up and home values were rising. But it was a building constructed on quicksand," Felson said. "The boom was not sustainable. The [U.S.] economy did not have growth engines in place for sustainable growth. "
Continue reading Easy credit and rising home prices are not engines of economic growth
Posted Sep 8th 2008 2:24PM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Forecasts, Economic data, Housing, Federal Reserve, Recession

New York Times
columnist Paul Krugman, a person who freely and proudly states his liberal economic outlook, (See Krugman's book:
The Conscience of a Liberal) and his disagreement with the Bush Administration's economic conservatism, once again reminds investors/readers that the U.S. financial crisis is resembling that of Japan's in the late 1980s.
Investors/readers will recall that in the late 1980s, fanned by easily obtainable credit, commercial and residential real estate prices skyrocketed in Japan, with investors and speculators continuing to bid-up prices, despite the fact that numerous indicators signaled that prices were astronomically overvalued. Further, Japan's real estate boom occurred during only a modest increase in household formation and amid an aging population. What followed was inevitable: the bubble burst, albeit slowly, and the correction led to a decade-long economic slump for Japan.
Fast-forward to the United States, 2003-2007: intoxicating rises in home prices, fueled by 'extremely creative' mortgage plans, and a belief that out-sized gains would not end soon. Yet all the while, job growth remained modest at best, with falling real wages in many job categories. The U.S. economy was growing, but the growth was not sustainable because it was rooted in a bubble - - a real estate bubble - - not in an increase in the nation's productive capacity and good jobs, so says economist Glen Langan. Or as Langan called it, the U.S. economy in 2003-2007 was, largely, "an asset appreciation economy."
Continue reading Is U.S.'s economic slump mirroring Japan's late-1980s slump?
Posted Aug 31st 2008 3:30PM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Housing, Recession

The real estate research firm
Zillow.com released a sobering statistic, and it took some by surprise: more than one-third of homeowners who bought in the past five years have negative equity in their homes.
Negative equity is owing more on your mortgage than the market value of your home. On the heels of the United States' greatest residential real estate boom in the modern era, how did the above occur?
Two factors, so says economist Peter Dawson.
First, many regions of the U.S., particularly the west, experienced abnormal gains during the 2003-2007 real estate boom. "Total appreciation rates over 300% were not unusual during the period. It was an amazing run, fueled by adequate national GDP growth, and low mortgage rates," Dawson said. "But as we've seen, ultimately the appreciation rates proved to be unsustainable, everywhere they occurred."
Dawson says a 7-9% annual increase in the U.S. median home price is normal, and his models label a 10% annual increase or higher as "outsized" -- a deviation from the mean that calls for a correction at some point in time. "But during the boom, it was not uncommon to see 30%, 40%, 50% annual increases over multiple years," Dawson said. "Clearly unsustainable. Downright frothy. But these conclusions were largely ignored during the boom, on the fallacy of 'what has occurred will continue.' "
Second, a financial habit shifted, Dawson said. Way, way back in the twentieth century, Dawson recalled, the biggest stigma when he grew up in a typical neighborhood in
White Plains, N.Y., a suburb about an hour north of New York City, was... Not gaining acceptance at a good college? No. Not getting the hottest date for the high school senior prom? No. "We learned that the Smith's [not their real name] down the street had to take out...a second mortgage," Dawson said.
Continue reading Some old financial habits experience a comeback
Posted Aug 12th 2008 11:00AM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: Economic data, Housing, Federal Reserve, Recession

Want more proof of the awfulness of the housing market? According to
Zillow, one-third of U.S. homeowners who bought in the last five years now owe more on their mortgages than their properties are worth.
Among the findings:
- Second quarter home prices fell 9.9% from a year earlier resulting in 29% of homeowners getting negative equity;
- Forty-five percent of homeowners who bought at the peak of the market in 2006 are underwater;
- Overall, U.S. home values in the second quarter posted the largest year-over-year decline in the past 12 years;
- The median U.S. home value has not been this low since the fourth quarter of 2004;
- Nationwide, nearly one in four (23.7%) homes sold during the past year sold for a loss while nearly 15% of sales were foreclosures.
These figures are unbelievable. They underscore that the housing market is nowhere near a bottom. The effects of the downturn will be felt for years to come since the biggest asset of many Americans is their home. You have to pity people who are trying to move closer to their jobs because of high gas prices. They are screwed no matter what they do.
"For homeowners who need to sell, this is a gravely serious situation," Zillow's Stan Humphries said in an interview with Bloomberg. "It can also be harmful to communities where the number of unsold homes adds more to inventory and puts downward pressure on prices."
The housing market won't improve until the huge amount of unsold inventory is cleared out, including "spec homes" being put up by builders in the hopes of luring buyers. Things are going to remain ugly for a while.
Posted Aug 6th 2008 10:00AM by Douglas McIntyre (RSS feed)
Filed under: Morgan Stanley (MS), Economic data, Housing
Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) has decided it does not want to take the risk of laying out more money on many of the home equity loans it has given to customers. Many of the houses backing these funds are now worth less than their mortgages. According to Bloomberg, Morgan "told thousands of clients this week that they won't be allowed to withdraw money on their home-equity credit lines."
Since most other banks and brokerages with similar loans out to their customers have the same problems Morgan does, it appears that the market is at the beginning of a period where, for many people. getting money from these facilities will come to an end.
Since consumers are already faced with high commodities and oil prices, costly credit, and falling home and stock values, the home-equity loan was one of the last places people could turn for capital.
The news is almost certainly bad for retailers and auto companies. Consumer access to capital seems to be shrinking by the day. Cutting off home-equity withdrawals may take balance sheet risk away for Morgan and its peers, but their customers will get squeezed even harder than the economy is squeezing them now.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.
Posted Aug 4th 2008 1:50PM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Housing, Recession
During the
roaring 1990s, it was called 'merger Monday' -- due to the plethora of corporate mergers announced on the day, driven by the robust U.S. economy.
In the current sluggish (or perhaps worse) U.S. economy, it's becoming known as 'morbid Monday' -- due to the spate of unpleasant predictions publicized on the day.
Oppenheimer analyst Meredith Whitney filled the August 4 installment of the latter by predicting that housing prices will fall more than 30% and banks will remain reluctant to lend until the credit crisis wanes,
CNBC reported Monday.
To be sure, the housing sector is a jumbled, uncertain morass, so in order to provide some clarity on the sector (and to either confirm / refute several conventional wisdom points), BloggingStocks Monday corralled economists Peter Dawson and David H. Wang.
Point 1: Those states hardest hit by the housing sector, California, Florida, Nevada, will be the first to recover. Dawson: Not true. Wang: Most un-true. "You may find a $300,000 or $350,000 bargain in California or Florida, but understand that five years down the road that home may be roughly the same price in real terms, after inflation," Wang said. "Job creation in an area will determine which way house prices are going in a region in the years ahead, much more than how bad the local housing market is now."
Continue reading Dispelling a few home buying / selling myths
Posted Jul 14th 2008 9:15AM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Products and services, Federal Natl Mtge (FNM), Politics, Housing, Federal Reserve
Investors in Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) must be applauding the government bailout. To my knowledge, it is unprecedented for the government to trade this openly in the stock of a private company. It is as if the government has become Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) which is not surprising since the Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson, used to run Goldman.
Based on what has happened it looks to me like the Administration is trying to prove just how incompetent government is so we will agree to cut its budget. There are two possibilities: either the government knew how bad things were and did nothing or it didn't know. If it did know how bad things were, it should have done something to fix the problem, such as requiring Fannie and Freddie to raise more capital a year or two ago.
Perhaps it knew last week how bad things are and did not release data supporting its claim that they were in good shape because such data did not exist. If they were in good shape, the government should have been able to release comforting data and the problem would have gone away. The need to announce the bailout plan as a way to save them suggests an amazing lack of insight into their ability to cover their liabilities years or a realization that they were bankrupt and needed to be bailed out.
Continue reading Fannie, Freddie spike following unprecedented government bailout
Posted Jul 12th 2008 2:40PM by Tom Taulli (RSS feed)
Filed under: Federal Natl Mtge (FNM), Housing, Recession
I've lived through the internet bubble (and have some scars) and tried to avoid the real estate bubble (it wasn't easy). But, bubbles have a way of being painful and longlasting.
So, no doubt, the real estate bubble has been painful (may be the worst market for at least the past 50 years). But, could this be a short-run thing?
Perhaps so. In fact, this is the view from the front-cover piece in this week's Barron's [a paid publication]. Actually, there may be the start of a real estate recovery by the end of this year.
This is certainly a controversial stand. Keep in mind that inventory levels are stubbornly high (helped by foreclosures) and housing prices seem to fall further and further. What's more, the credit crunch is still here and there are serious problems with major real estate operators, such as with the implosion of IndyMac Bancorp (NYSE: IMB), as well as the deterioration of Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE).
OK, so why the optimism? Well, if you peel back some of the recent housing data, it appears that things are stabilizing in terms of home sales and inventories. Basically, market forces are making the necessary adjustments.
Continue reading Barron's: Real estate poised for the giddy days again?
Next Page >