Investors in Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) must be applauding the government bailout. To my knowledge, it is unprecedented for the government to trade this openly in the stock of a private company. It is as if the government has become Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) which is not surprising since the Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson, used to run Goldman.
Based on what has happened it looks to me like the Administration is trying to prove just how incompetent government is so we will agree to cut its budget. There are two possibilities: either the government knew how bad things were and did nothing or it didn't know. If it did know how bad things were, it should have done something to fix the problem, such as requiring Fannie and Freddie to raise more capital a year or two ago.
Perhaps it knew last week how bad things are and did not release data supporting its claim that they were in good shape because such data did not exist. If they were in good shape, the government should have been able to release comforting data and the problem would have gone away. The need to announce the bailout plan as a way to save them suggests an amazing lack of insight into their ability to cover their liabilities years or a realization that they were bankrupt and needed to be bailed out.
Are the days of wine, roses and interest rate cuts over? The answer for now seems yes.
In a statement released today, the Federal Open Market Committee said it decided to keep its target for the federal funds rate at 2% because data indicates that labor markets have soften further and financial markets remain under stress. Moreover, the credit crunch, the lousy housing market and rising energy prices are "likely to weigh on economic growth for the next few quarters." No kidding.
The FOMC's decision, which comes amid growing fears about the outlook for inflation, should not have come as a shock to investors. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and other top bankers have hinted for months that the days of wine, roses and interest rate cuts would be coming to an end. In fact, the market seemed to have already absorbed the market. The major stock market averages barely budged after the announcement was issued.
The U.S. housing slump is creating another negative ripple effect, this one by extension, or by association, if you will, as in condo/co-op association.
Owners in condo associations are having to chip-in to pay for unexpected association maintenance, tax, and related fees when other residents enter foreclosure or are substantially behind in payments, The New York Times reported Thursday.
The Times cited the case of condo owners in a 43-story Miami, Florida condo having to ante up more money after 1 in 6 residents battled foreclosure. The additional charge: an additional $1,000 assessment and $50 more a month for cable and internet fees, on top of the regular $450 monthly maintenance.
Connecticut-based appraiser Lawrence Schmidt, not a realtor but a former 15-year condominium owner with extensive knowledge of the sector, told BloggingStocks Thursday prospective buyers need to fully-research a condo association's membership status, including record of tax payments of individual members, in addition to the standard evaluation of the condo association's maintenance fees, contractor services, and quality-of-life issues, etc. Co-op buyers must do even more research on the co-op's balance sheet, monthly budget, cash flow, outstanding mortgage, and other related financials, he said.
AP reports that Countrywide Financial Corp(NYSE: CFC) lost $893 million in the first quarter. That $1.60 a share loss was not exactly what analysts had forecast -- they were looking for a profit of two cents a share.
Meanwhile the LA Times reports that Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo took in $10.8 million and cashed out $121.5 million in stock gains as his company got hammered by losses on sub-prime loans in 2007. Mozilo also enjoyed perks worth $176,513, including $44,454 in rides on the company's jet; $23,755 in automobile use; $8,581 in country club dues; and $31,238 in company-paid tax and investment advice. Mozilo faces an informal U.S. inquiry into his stock sales.
And Countrywide's financial condition is deteriorating fast. It set aside a $1.5 billion reserve to cover loan up 62% from $925 million in the fourth quarter of 2007. Moreover charge-offs totaled $606 million during the first quarter. Fortunately, Countrywide has an exit strategy. In January, Countrywide agreed to sell itself to Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) for about $4 billion in stock. The question is whether Bank of America will pull out of the deal now that it sees the rising costs it will incur if it moves forward. Since Countrywide trades 15% below that takeout price, the market has its doubts.
Investors don't seem happy with today's announcement -- the stock was down 5% in premarket trading.
We have heard and read a lot over the past year regarding the weakening U.S. real estate market, but what about the red hot Chinese market? Some evidence is starting to show that the Chinese real estate market is also starting to soften a bit.
For the past several years, the Chinese government has started to try to curb the rapidly surging housing market, which kick-started around the start of 2001. Now the first signs of a housing slowdown are starting to show themselves, as property brokers are scaling back their operations, or in some cases closing their doors altogether.
Just how much of a slowdown are we looking at? Consider this... in the first week of 2008, home sales in Beijing fell 20 percent compared to the week before. OK, I know what you are thinking... that's just one week, we shouldn't take too much from just one week's data. Well, that would be correct, so we can't just immediately assume the worst, but the writing is definitely starting to appear on the wall.
When the typical investor speaks, Wall Street listens, to a degree. When Alan Greenspan speaks, Wall Street listens very closely.
Greenspan, who served as Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve for 18 years, said that while it's too soon to say a U.S. recession is up ahead, "the odds are clearly rising," National Public Radio reported. Greenspan added that U.S. economic growth is "getting close to stall speed."
Greenspan, 81, left the Fed in January 2006 after nearly two decades as leader of the world's most powerful central bank. When he left, the U.S. economy was growing at or near trend levels, or what economists call 'sustainable growth' levels.
However, the increase in subprime mortgage and related asset defaults, the housing sector's correction and persistently high energy prices, are expected to cool the current U.S. economic expansion, which began in 2001. Many economists expect Q4 2007 GDP growth to slow to 2.5-2.9%. Some are predicting an economic recession at the start of 2008. The U.S. economy grew at a 4.9% rate in Q3 2007.
Everybody's been wondering when the housing market will finally hit bottom. Moody's decided to take a stab at that question with its new extensive report, "Aftershock: Housing in the Wake of the Mortgage Meltdown." It will cost you $3,995 to order the full report, but you can read excerpts from its Executive Summary.
While Moody's agrees the outlook for housing is daunting, it expects as the most likely scenario that housing should bottom by early 2009. That bottom is expected to result in an average annual national house price decline of 12%. Of course, some areas will be much harder hit and parts of Florida and California are predicted to bottom out with a 30% loss from the housing price peak.
Moody's believes the fallout from the current housing recession -- yes, they do call this a recession -- will be serious enough to characterize what we're now living through as a housing crash. Anyone doubting it? Moody's expects housing sales to hit bottom in early 2008, declining over 40% from their peak. Housing starts will reach their lowest point in mid-2008 and fall by 55% from their peak.
The banks pumped so much money into the housing market (with not so much as a whimper from the government) that it blew up in their faces. The depressed housing market exposed questionable lending practices at every level of the industry, from the solo mortgage broker to the largest of investment banks and their partners in crime, the rating agencies.
Thousands of mortgage brokers are now looking for work, as are the Chief Executive Officers of Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C)'s Chuck Prince, and Merrill Lynch & Co,, Inc. (NYSE: MER)'s Stanley O'neal. The difference between the two groups, however, is the multi-million dollar severance packages. The ex-CEO's may have seen their reputations damaged but not their bank accounts. I wonder where they bank - offshore perhaps?
The sad housing market is old news by now, although it keeps getting sadder. The real issue now is, how do we put trust back into a banking system that has proven itself so flawed? We have been seeing almost all of the banks write down the value of their holdings on a daily basis. Now what? The banks essentially were crushed by a Frankenstein monster of their own creation. Any stock portfolio that includes financial stocks has been poisoned for the next year at least.
Since writing today's story about how real estate investors are driving up foreclosures, I've been thinking about what could have been done to avoid this mess. I started researching what happened in Japan, where the real estate bubble burst in 1991 and is only now starting to show some significant signs of recovery. I happened upon this excellent 1995 New York Times story about lessons to be learned from Japan. Here are some of the key points in that story still relevant to what's happening in the U.S. today:
* Property values were cut in half and people are still stuck in homes they bought at prices too high. Even 14 years later many of these people can't sell their homes because they owe more than they can get from a sale.
* Speculators used paper profits (from real estate or the stock market) to buy homes and stock using risky financial vehicles, increasing prices in both the stock market and real estate market. In the U.S. we had two separate bubbles -- the stock market bubble that crashed in the early 2000s and the real estate bubble that just burst.
Economists expect growth to continue slowing. Still, they expect the U.S. economy to avoid falling into a recession even with the housing mess that Goldman Sachs Group economist Seamus Smyth calls an "ongoing train wreck." I think economists may be a bit optimistic even with that sobering news. Here's the numbers Bloomberg reported today from its survey of economists:
Reduction in the expected annual growth rate of the economy by 0.4% to a rate of 1.8%. The economy grew at a pace of 3.8% in the second quarter and advanced 3% a year since 2003.
The Conference Board reported that dropping property values and rising foreclosures reduced consumer confidence to the lowest level in about two years.
The International Council of Shopping Centers and UBS Securities LLC reported that retail sales increased in September at the slowest pace in five months raising fears that this holiday season may be the worst since 2002.
Consumer spending, which encompasses two thirds of the economy, grew even slower than expected. Bloomberg's survey of economists expect a 2.1% pace for the last three months, which is 0.2% lower than forecast last month.
I know it's the last thing anyone wants to read about these days, but today we get another sign of just how bad the foreclosure situation is getting in America. July saw a 9% jump in the number of foreclosures from June, which was already running at disastrous levels.
During the month of July there were a total of 179,599 foreclosure filings. That works out to be a 93.4% jump from the same month last year when there were 92,845 filings. Definitely not a pretty picture.
Just to put those numbers a little more in perspective. One out of every 693 homes were foreclosed in the month. The worst state in the country in July was Nevada, which had about three times as many filings as the national average, with one out of every 199 households filing for foreclosure.
While Nevada was falling behind the national average, foreclosures in Florida actually fell by 9% during the month but are still running 78% higher than June of last year.
Unfortunately, I think that we are going to see these numbers continue to rise over the next couple of months before things start to even themselves out.
Michael Fowlkes has worked as a stock trader for seven years and spent the last two years working as an analyst for the online investment advisory service Investor's Observer.
Home Depot, Inc. (NYSE: HD) opened at $38.70. So far today the stock has hit a low of $38.56 and a high of $39.05. As of 1:15, HD is trading at $38.913, up $0.03 (0.1%).
After hitting a one year high of $42.01 in February, the stock slipped later that month and has since found some support a bit lower around $38. HD is relatively flat this morning after competitor Lowe's (NYSE: LOW) missed earnings expectations and cut its forecast. The present housing slump has been wreaking havoc on these two retailers, but it looks like it could be hurting LOW a little bit more. Recent technical indicators for HD have been neutral and improving, while S&P gives the stock a very positive 5 STARS (out of 5) strong buy rating.
For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an August bull-put credit spread below the $35 range. HD hasn't been below $35 since September and has shown support around $38 recently. This trade could be risky if the still slowing housing market causes a lull in renovations, but even if that happens, HD has bounced off its 200-day moving average 3 times in the past 3 months. That level of support is currently at $38 and rising.
Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at Investors Observer. DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls a position in LOW. Mr. Archer does control a long position in HD.
The website Speculative Bubble has posted a short animated film that illustrates the size of the current housing bubble. The creator of the film used Yale economist Robert Shiller's famous chart of housing prices over the last 115 years and converted it into a roller coaster ride.
It's only three or four minutes long, and the really fun part comes at the end, when you get a visceral sense of where housing prices stand. Take a look:
I was listening to NPR's Marketplace this morning only to be assaulted by a stunning statistic -- Bill Gross, the manager of the largest bond fund, $102 billion Pimco Total Return Fund, thinks that housing prices could fall 20%. Is Gross right? If so, what should you do?
Gross's assumption is that 2003 was the last time home prices were 'normal' -- based on lower interest rates and demographics. He believes that since then, prices have jumped above that normal value and will therefore drop 20% in order to get back to where they belong. (This is not just idle speculation: home prices in Irvine, CA have already sunk 17% since June.) Gross believes that despite the Fed's talk of inflation vigilance, such a drop in housing prices will lead the Fed to cut interest rates from 5.25% to 4% to cushion the economic pain.
I think Gross may be right. As I've noted here, inflation continues to be a problem. But the Fed seems to be counting on an economic slowdown to solve the problem. And if housing prices do fall 20%, the economic impact may cause the Fed's fear of deflation to exceed its fear of inflation -- due to excess productive capacity in the U.S. economy.
What you should do depends on your situation. If you were thinking of buying a house, wait two years so you can buy after prices have tumbled and sellers are more desperate. If you must sell, cut your price and get out immediately. If you can wait to sell -- I would suggest holding for at least a decade which is how long I think it will take for things to return to normal.
I think 2007 is the year when home owners will be jolted into the realization that trees do not grow to the sky and prices can indeed drop. What do you think?
How does Lowe's Cos Inc. (NYSE:LOW) report better-than-expected earnings during a housing slump? Maybe it has something to do with the fact that its stores are pleasant places to shop.
Net income was $613 million, or 40 cents a share, compared $693 million, or 43 cents, a year earlier. Sales fell 3.7 percent to $10.4 billion. Comparable store sales fell 5.3 percent. Analysts were expecting profit of 37 cents on revenue of $10.36 billion, according to Thomson Financial.
The company gave pretty robust guidance for both the current quarter and the fiscal year.
It expects earnings in the fiscal first quarter of between 49 cents and 51 cents. Sales are expected to rise 5 to 6 percent. Wall Street expectations were for earnings of 51 cents and revenue of $12.46 billion, up 4.5 percent from a year earlier.
Lowe's forecasted profit for the fiscal year ending February 1, 2008 of between $2.02 to $2.09 and a 10 percent sales increase. That compares with analysts' forecasts of $2.03 on revenue of $50.4 million, up 7.6 percent, Thomson Financial said.
In the company's earnings press release, Chief Executive Robert Niblock was almost giddy with optimism. He's got good reason. Consumers continue to leave Home Depot Inc. (NYSE:HD) for his stores. In addition, if people aren't buying Toll Brothers Inc. (NYSE:TOL) McMansion, they are going to want to fix up their existing homes.
"We achieved clear market share gains in many categories and a 12.3 percent increase in net earnings, while positioning the business for long-term growth," he said. "We are encouraged by indications that our sales trends have bottomed. As a result, we believe our comparable store sales performance will gradually improve throughout 2007."