<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Big Stimulus Money Is Hitting the Wires]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/big-stimulus-money-is-hitting-the-wires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/big-stimulus-money-is-hitting-the-wires/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/big-stimulus-money-is-hitting-the-wires/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/newjerseytransit240x160-1265640876.jpg" alt="" />One facet of the Obama administration's sweeping stimulus initiatives of which I have taken particular interest is its protracted effort to increase our national broadband access and capabilities. In pursuit of that end, The Broadband Technologies Opportunities Program (BTOP), which seeks to build and enhance broadband access in unserved and underserved regions of our country, has been provided with over $4.5 billion in Recovery Act funds.</p>
<p>I am pleased to report that amazingly, <a href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/">BTOP</a> has already dispensed with much of the red tape that might normally bog down an effort of this magnitude. Large chunks of BTOP funds are beginning to be granted. In the short term, the benefit of this program may well be to create jobs. In the long term, these infrastructure improvements could possibly increase the profit bases of companies such as Verizon Communications (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>), Sprint Nextel Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">S</a>), AT&amp;T (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/atandt-inc/att/nys">ATT</a>) and a host of other digital communication and entertainment providers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/big-stimulus-money-is-hitting-the-wires/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Big Stimulus Money Is Hitting the Wires</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/big-stimulus-money-is-hitting-the-wires/">Big Stimulus Money Is Hitting the Wires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/big-stimulus-money-is-hitting-the-wires/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19348095/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/big-stimulus-money-is-hitting-the-wires/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ATT</category><category>Broadband Technologies Opportunities Program</category><category>BTOP</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>National Broadband Mapping Program</category><category>Sprint Nextel</category><category>stimulus</category><category>Verizon</category><category>VZ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S.'s Infrastructure: Hardly Ready for the 21st Century]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/u-s-s-infrastructure-hardly-ready-for-the-21st-century/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/u-s-s-infrastructure-hardly-ready-for-the-21st-century/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/u-s-s-infrastructure-hardly-ready-for-the-21st-century/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/interchange_reconstruction.jpg"  alt="" />One aspect of American life that has to change is the scattershot quality of the U.S.'s infrastructure. <br />
<br />
<em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) Columnist <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/thomaslfriedman/index.html">Thomas Friedman</a> has written and spoken about it often, and he offers many illuminating observations on conditions in Western Europe and in Asia, given his many travels.<br />
<br />
Friedman has written about how the U.S. -- despite being the strongest, most dynamic, and technologically advanced economy in the world -- nevertheless has managed to tolerate sub-standard infrastructure conditions (such as too small airports), compared to our Asian and European neighbors. Anyone who has flown into New York's John F. Kennedy or La Guardia airports (as I frequently do) can attest to the need to upgrade these transportation facilities, and many others.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/u-s-s-infrastructure-hardly-ready-for-the-21st-century/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S.'s Infrastructure: Hardly Ready for the 21st Century</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/u-s-s-infrastructure-hardly-ready-for-the-21st-century/">U.S.'s Infrastructure: Hardly Ready for the 21st Century</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/u-s-s-infrastructure-hardly-ready-for-the-21st-century/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19314332/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/u-s-s-infrastructure-hardly-ready-for-the-21st-century/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>infrastructure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Thomas Friedman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Caterpillar is a patience-builder]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/caterpillar-is-a-patience-builder/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/caterpillar-is-a-patience-builder/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/caterpillar-is-a-patience-builder/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/cat-caterpillar-logo.jpg" />If you already own the stock, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/caterpillar-incorporated/cat/nys">Caterpillar</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/caterpillar-incorporated/cat/nys">CAT</a>) is a play that's likely to test the patience of most investors. <br /><br />In general, analysts expect CAT to post lower earnings per share through the first half of 2009, then recover in the second half, as various international markets start to recover.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/caterpillar-is-a-patience-builder/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Caterpillar is a patience-builder</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/caterpillar-is-a-patience-builder/">Caterpillar is a patience-builder</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/caterpillar-is-a-patience-builder/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1517232/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/caterpillar-is-a-patience-builder/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAT</category><category>construction</category><category>infrastructure</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A GE play is possible, but it's not for the squeamish]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/a-ge-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/a-ge-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/a-ge-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" />The U.S. economy remains in a pronounced recession. So far, there's little to suggest that job market and household formation trends -- two tell-tale stats regarding prospects for a resumption of both revenue and earnings growth -- have bottomed. <br /><br />Without question you'd call this a selective market: select the wrong stock, and there's a 30-40% haircut up ahead; select the correct stock, and you're positioned for the recovery with modest downside exposure.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/a-ge-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A GE play is possible, but it's not for the squeamish</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/a-ge-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/">A GE play is possible, but it's not for the squeamish</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/a-ge-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1476219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/a-ge-play-is-possible-but-its-not-for-the-squeamish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>emerging markets</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>infrastructure</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fluor (FLR) knows there's plenty of work to be done in the U.S.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/fluor-flr-knows-theres-plenty-of-work-to-be-done-in-the-unite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/fluor-flr-knows-theres-plenty-of-work-to-be-done-in-the-unite/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/fluor-flr-knows-theres-plenty-of-work-to-be-done-in-the-unite/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><a href="http://www.fluor.com/Pages/default.aspx"></a>
<div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oil-refinery.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
Investing, like the politics that leads to U.S. public policy, is the art of the possible. <br /><br />Conditions shift, windows of opportunity present themselves, even amid choppy seas. One such opportunity is presenting itself with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fluor-corporation/flr/nys">Fluor</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fluor-corporation/flr/nys">FLR</a>). <br /><br />Fluor is a leading international design, engineering, and contracting firm with projects that include designing and building manufacturing facilities, refineries, pharmaceutical facilities, health care buildings, power plants and telecommunications and transportation infrastructure.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/fluor-flr-knows-theres-plenty-of-work-to-be-done-in-the-unite/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fluor (FLR) knows there's plenty of work to be done in the U.S.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/fluor-flr-knows-theres-plenty-of-work-to-be-done-in-the-unite/">Fluor (FLR) knows there's plenty of work to be done in the U.S.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/fluor-flr-knows-theres-plenty-of-work-to-be-done-in-the-unite/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1462098/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/fluor-flr-knows-theres-plenty-of-work-to-be-done-in-the-unite/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>construction</category><category>design</category><category>engineering</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>FLR</category><category>Fluor</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>maintenance</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[John Deere: How bumpy a ride?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/john-deere-how-bumpy-a-ride/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/john-deere-how-bumpy-a-ride/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/john-deere-how-bumpy-a-ride/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/de/" rel="tag">Deere and Co (DE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/john-deere-de-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The world's largest maker of farm equipment is due to report earnings on February 18 and the outlook is generally bleak. All of the major drivers behind <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deere-and-company/de/nys">Deere's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deere-and-company/de/nys">DE</a>) formidable business appear to be headed into a tailspin. Global agricultural commodity prices have come down significantly from peaks in 2007 and 2008, leaving farmers with less money to spend.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/john-deere-how-bumpy-a-ride/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>John Deere: How bumpy a ride?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/john-deere-how-bumpy-a-ride/">John Deere: How bumpy a ride?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/john-deere-how-bumpy-a-ride/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1461487/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/john-deere-how-bumpy-a-ride/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AG</category><category>agriculture</category><category>CAT</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>DE</category><category>farming</category><category>industrials</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ten stocks to fall in love with again: #2 Caterpillar (CAT)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/ten-stocks-to-fall-in-love-with-again-2-caterpillar-cat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/ten-stocks-to-fall-in-love-with-again-2-caterpillar-cat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/ten-stocks-to-fall-in-love-with-again-2-caterpillar-cat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/obama-picks/" rel="tag">Obama Picks</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/caterpillar.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The industrial equipment giant's brand is synonymous with big, bad earthmoving construction machinery. In fact, it's doubtful that any major construction project performed in America since the Great Depression hasn't been performed without the help of a "Cat."</p>
<p>Given the Obama administration's focus on shovel-ready infrastructure construction jobs as the answer to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/stock-market-nightmare.html">what's ailing our economy</a>, it stands to reason that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/caterpillar-incorporated/cat/nys">Caterpillar</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/caterpillar-incorporated/cat/nys">CAT</a>) equipment will once again be called upon to help rebuild and remodel America's crumbling roads, tunnels and bridges. </p>
<p>Think about this, every time you hear the words "shovel-ready jobs," you should think about the makers of the actual shovels. And there is no denying that Caterpillar makes the biggest and best shovels on the planet.</p>
<p><em>Take a look at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/ten-stocks-to-fall-in-love-with-again/">all ten stocks to fall in love with again</a>.</em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.optionszone.com/expert-traders/optionszone-experts/jim-woods.html">Jim Woods</a> is a Senior Editor for <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/obama-seven-trades.html ">OptionsZone.com</a>.</em></p>
<p><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/ten-stocks-to-fall-in-love-with-again-2-caterpillar-cat/">Ten stocks to fall in love with again: #2 Caterpillar (CAT)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/ten-stocks-to-fall-in-love-with-again-2-caterpillar-cat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458969/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/ten-stocks-to-fall-in-love-with-again-2-caterpillar-cat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>infrastructure</category><category>infrastructure stocks</category><category>InfrastructureStocks</category><category>jim woods</category><category>JimWoods</category><category>valentines day</category><category>valentines day stocks</category><category>ValentinesDay</category><category>ValentinesDayStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Woods]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Water and agriculture: ETFs for a resources rebound]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/water-and-agriculture-etfs-for-a-resources-rebound/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/water-and-agriculture-etfs-for-a-resources-rebound/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/water-and-agriculture-etfs-for-a-resources-rebound/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/obama-picks/" rel="tag">Obama Picks</a></p><p>"In a few years we'll be staring at new highs in the prices of many natural resources," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2806">Larry Edelson</a>, a specialist in resource-related stocks. In <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2806">Real Wealth</a>, he looks at two exchange-traded funds focused on food and water.</p>
<p>"Mind you, the U.S. and global economies will not get back to the growth levels we've recently seen, not anytime soon.</p>
<p>"But they don't have to for natural resource prices to soar again. The chief reason they will climb again: Massive, worldwide currency devaluations, especially in the U.S. dollar.</p>
<p>"Moreover, natural resources will get a huge boost from the massive infrastructure spending that is now commencing around the world. I expect two key sectors in particular to get a big boost, almost immediately - agriculture and water.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/water-and-agriculture-etfs-for-a-resources-rebound/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Water and agriculture: ETFs for a resources rebound</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/water-and-agriculture-etfs-for-a-resources-rebound/">Water and agriculture: ETFs for a resources rebound</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/water-and-agriculture-etfs-for-a-resources-rebound/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458307/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/water-and-agriculture-etfs-for-a-resources-rebound/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ag stocks</category><category>agriculture stocks</category><category>AgricultureStocks</category><category>AgStocks</category><category>commodities</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>larry edelson</category><category>LarryEdelson</category><category>real wealth</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>water infrastucture</category><category>water resources</category><category>water stocks</category><category>WaterInfrastucture</category><category>WaterResources</category><category>WaterStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Meadow Valley: A private equity deal can get done]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/meadow-valley-a-private-equity-deal-can-get-done/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/meadow-valley-a-private-equity-deal-can-get-done/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/meadow-valley-a-private-equity-deal-can-get-done/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img height="53" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/meadow.jpg" width="234" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It got little buzz this week, but <a href="http://www.meadowvalley.com">Meadow Valley Corporation</a> was able to close its <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/meadow-valley-completes-going-private-merger/story.aspx?guid=%7B79E5BC9C-8EE5-4E81-B49A-4FFF571A123B%7D&amp;dist=msr_2">going-private transaction</a>. True, the deal size was modest, coming to $61.3 million.</p>
<p>Although, bear in mind that the deal was announced in July of last year -- just before the implosion of the global financial markets. Thus, the private equity sponsor, Insight Equity, had the courage to get the deal done, which will certainly bring credibility to the firm.</p>
<p>Based on the <a href="http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934749/000095015308002024/p76406dedef14a.htm">proxy statement</a>, the decision to go private actually began in 2007 (yes, it seems like a different era back then). All in all, it was a diligent process and management was definitely focused.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/meadow-valley-a-private-equity-deal-can-get-done/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Meadow Valley: A private equity deal can get done</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/meadow-valley-a-private-equity-deal-can-get-done/">Meadow Valley: A private equity deal can get done</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/meadow-valley-a-private-equity-deal-can-get-done/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1453359/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/meadow-valley-a-private-equity-deal-can-get-done/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>infrastructure</category><category>Meadow Valley</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Missed the stem cell move? Make a play at Jacobs Engineering]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/missed-the-stem-cell-move-make-a-play-at-jacobs-engineering/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/missed-the-stem-cell-move-make-a-play-at-jacobs-engineering/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/missed-the-stem-cell-move-make-a-play-at-jacobs-engineering/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stem/" rel="tag">StemCells Inc. (STEM)</a></p><p>Do not underestimate the power of a new administration in Washington. With the ability to spend a huge amount of dollars, team Obama can wield tremendous influence in the market.</p>
<p>Case in point is the stem cell space. It is widely expected that Obama will issue an executive order eliminating restrictions on stem cell research. </p>
<p>Stocks like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/stemcells-inc/stem/nas">StemCells Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/stemcells-inc/stem/nas">STEM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/geron-corporation/gern/nas">Geron Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/geron-corporation/gern/nas">GERN</a>) have been moving higher since the inaugural.</p>
<p>Coincidentally, on Friday, GERN announced approval for human trials for its treatment of spinal chord injuries using stem cells. Both GERN and STEM were up big as a result.</p>
<p>Another space expected to do well under the Obama administration is construction. A massive stimulus plan is said to be coming in February. A key point of the plan will be to boost <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/jon_markman/articles/beneficiary-obama-infrastructure-plan.html">infrastructure spending</a>.</p>
<p>The dollars will benefit companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fluor-corporation/flr/nys">Fluor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fluor-corporation/flr/nys">FLR</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jacobs-engineering-group-inc/jec/nys">Jacobs Engineering</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jacobs-engineering-group-inc/jec/nys">JEC</a>). Unlike stem cells, the market has yet to move these stocks higher. FLR is down more than 10% and JEC is down nearly 18% so far this year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/missed-the-stem-cell-move-make-a-play-at-jacobs-engineering/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Missed the stem cell move? Make a play at Jacobs Engineering</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/missed-the-stem-cell-move-make-a-play-at-jacobs-engineering/">Missed the stem cell move? Make a play at Jacobs Engineering</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/missed-the-stem-cell-move-make-a-play-at-jacobs-engineering/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1439362/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/missed-the-stem-cell-move-make-a-play-at-jacobs-engineering/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>flr</category><category>fluor</category><category>fluor corp</category><category>fluor corporation</category><category>gern</category><category>geron</category><category>geron corp</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>jacobs engineering</category><category>jec</category><category>stem cell research</category><category>stem cells</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. infrastructure building will require some pruning, too]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/u-s-infrastructure-building-will-require-some-pruning-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/u-s-infrastructure-building-will-require-some-pruning-too/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/u-s-infrastructure-building-will-require-some-pruning-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/interchange_reconstruction.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys"><span style="font-style: italic;">New York Times</span></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) columnist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/21/opinion/21friedman.html?_r=1&amp;em">Thomas Friedman</a> in his latest column and again Tuesday night on <a href="http://www.charlierose.com/schedule/"><span style="font-style: italic;">'The Charlie Rose Show'</span></a> returned to his theme of the U.S. effort at nation building. <br /><br />Nation building, that is, <span style="font-style: italic;">at home.</span> Friedman, among others, has underscored the need for the nation to begin, in a comprehensive way, to rebuild its dilapidated and/or outmoded infrastructure that includes its electric grid, highways, roads, bridges, mass transit systems, schools and other public buildings.<br /><br />Further, one doesn't have to be a civil engineer or a mechanical engineer to see that the nation's infrastructure has been neglected, and while at times Friedman's discourses on the gleaming magnificence of yet another high tech airport in Asia can begin to grate, his overall conclusion regarding a period of pronounced underinvestment in U.S. public assets is valid. <br /><br /><strong>'Action' is a two-edge sword</strong><br /><br />Friedman wants 'radical' action, i.e. bold action by President Obama to make up for lost time, infrastructure-wise, and he believes 'Obi 44' has a rare opportunity to act in a big way, given the economic crisis facing our nation, his high public approval rating, and the general desire of public officials across the spectrum to see him succeed.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/u-s-infrastructure-building-will-require-some-pruning-too/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. infrastructure building will require some pruning, too</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/u-s-infrastructure-building-will-require-some-pruning-too/">U.S. infrastructure building will require some pruning, too</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/u-s-infrastructure-building-will-require-some-pruning-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1436737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/u-s-infrastructure-building-will-require-some-pruning-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>federal budget</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><category>Thomas Friedman</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top Stock Picks '09: Granite Construction (GVA)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-granite-construction-gva/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-granite-construction-gva/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-granite-construction-gva/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2009/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2009</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a special annual report -- <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/favorite-stocks-for-2009-top-picks-from-75-advisors/">Top Stock Picks '09</a> -- in which TheStockAdvisors.com asked 75 leading newsletter advisors to select their favorite investment for the new year.</em></p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/todd_salamone.jpg" align="left" vspace="4" border="1" />"<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/granite-construction-incorporated/gva/nys">Granite Construction</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/granite-construction-incorporated/gva/nys">GVA</a>) is a play on President-elect Barack Obama's plans to plow vast amounts of money into infrastructure," notes contrarian <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2689">Todd Salomone</a>.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2689">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>, the analyst explains, "Granite Construction -- my top pick for 2009 -- provides civil construction services, including projects designed to improve streets, roads, highways and bridges."</p>
<p>"Investing in infrastructure is one of Obama's solutions to address a deteriorating economy. There is $64 billion in 'ready-to-go' projects, of which GVA should be a beneficiary.</p>
<p>"The shares Granite Construction have performed admirably in 2008 amid an extremely weak broad market. For example, through mid-December, GVA shares were up 24% as the broader S&amp;P 500 Index was down 38%.</p>
<p>"In November 2008, the equity climbed above the 40 area, which has capped the shares' rally attempts during the previous 12 months. For chart watchers, a concern would be the 48 area, which would mark a 50% retracement of the August 2007 high and the October 2008 low. Such retracement areas can sometimes act as technical resistance for a stock.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-granite-construction-gva/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top Stock Picks '09: Granite Construction (GVA)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-granite-construction-gva/">Top Stock Picks '09: Granite Construction (GVA)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-granite-construction-gva/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1411492/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-granite-construction-gva/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>building stocks</category><category>construction stocks</category><category>grantie construction</category><category>gva</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>infrastructure stocks</category><category>obama stocks</category><category>schaeffer investing research</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>todd salamone</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Obama plan add four million jobs?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/can-obama-plan-add-four-million-jobs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/can-obama-plan-add-four-million-jobs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/can-obama-plan-add-four-million-jobs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>President-elect Barack Obama has said his $700 billion stimulus package will add three million jobs to the economy. Skeptics don't think this is possible because the recession has grown stronger at a speed most economists did not anticipate.</p>
<p>Now, Obama's people think he can do ever better. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hEx3tiPJhZQLVqjNmHR_oP6FZMuwD95KF70G0">According to the AP</a>, "President-elect Barack Obama countered critics with an analysis Saturday by his economic team showing that a program of tax cuts and spending like he's proposed would create up to 4.1 million jobs." That math is hard to defend.</p>
<p>The economy lost 540,000 jobs in December. Some experts say it could stay on that pace for the first half of this year. If so, the economy will drop another three million jobs. Certainly looking at the full year, the three million number is certainly reasonable.</p>
<p>Much of the Obama plan is based on building out infrastructure for the energy grid, medical IT, and public works. Programs of that magnitude could take several quarters to get in place. They will involve complex logistics and new agencies to supervise them. By the time most of that is up and running, it could be near to the close of the year.</p>
<p>The reasons that adding four million jobs in America is unlikely is that the economy will shed jobs faster than a stimulus package can ad them, certainly during the period when the economy may be taking its hardest hit. Obama can't fill in that hole fast enough, let alone build a mountain on top of it.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/can-obama-plan-add-four-million-jobs/">Can Obama plan add four million jobs?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/can-obama-plan-add-four-million-jobs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1426028/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/can-obama-plan-add-four-million-jobs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>infrastructure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>stimulus package</category><category>tax cuts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[An infrastructure play that's still really cheap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/an-infrastructure-play-thats-still-really-cheap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/an-infrastructure-play-thats-still-really-cheap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/an-infrastructure-play-thats-still-really-cheap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>Not all <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2009/01/5-infrastructure-stocks-to-build-into-your-portfolio.html">infrastructure plays</a> are created equal. What has been a <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/andrew-houghton-nick-atkeson/gallery/nine-winning-trades.html">fabulous trend to ride</a> since the lows of November has left a few players behind. One of those is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-manitowoc-company-inc/mtw/nys">Manitowoc Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-manitowoc-company-inc/mtw/nys">MTW</a>).</p>
<p>Granted MTW has improved off it lows, but it has not shared the same momentum heading into 2009 as others. Shares MTW sold off to the tune of 12% Thursday and lost another 3% on Friday. </p>
<p>The company stated that profit will likely come in at the low end of its previously announced guidance range of $3.15 to $3.25 per share. Given that there's only a 3% difference between earning $3.15 per share and $3.25 per share, what accounts for the other 9% of today's sell-off?</p>
<p>The company manufactures and sells cranes: lattice-boom crawler cranes, mobile telescopic cranes, tower cranes and boom trucks for use in energy, petrochemical, industrial projects and infrastructure development such as the building of roads, bridges, commercial and residential construction, and mining and dredging.</p>
<p>These are just the things that will do well once the new administration passes its <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/andrew-houghton-nick-atkeson/gallery/nine-winning-trades.html">massive infrastructure spending bill</a>. For whatever reason, the stock cannot ride the coattails of this expected boom to its business. MTW now forecasts earnings for '09 of just $1.35 to $1.60 per share. Analysts, on average, were expecting earnings of $2.63 per share, so I take the sell-off not as an indictment of 2008 earnings, but of <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/12-keys-to-trading-earnings.html">2009 earnings</a>.</p>
<p>These downside revisions are troubling to be sure, but do they set the table for future earnings gains?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/an-infrastructure-play-thats-still-really-cheap/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>An infrastructure play that's still really cheap</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/an-infrastructure-play-thats-still-really-cheap/">An infrastructure play that's still really cheap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/an-infrastructure-play-thats-still-really-cheap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1425210/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/an-infrastructure-play-thats-still-really-cheap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>government spending</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>infrastructure plays</category><category>obama</category><category>obama stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The myth of job creation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/the-myth-of-job-creation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/the-myth-of-job-creation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/the-myth-of-job-creation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/interchange_reconstruction.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />President-elect Barack Obama campaigned -- and has continued to generate positive press -- on his commitment to job creation.</p>
<p>I've been scratching my head at this for awhile and wondering: Why is job creation a worthy goal? Shouldn't the goal be economic growth, and job creation is a happy byproduct of that?</p>
<p>Writing in <em>Reason</em>, Jacob Sullum, dissects exactly why <a href="http://www.reason.com/news/printer/130303.html">Obama's rhetoric on job creation</a> is nonsensical, illogical, and flies in the face of economics:</p>
<blockquote>Obama also wants to spend $60 billion to "provide financing to transportation infrastructure projects across the nation." He says "these projects will create up to two million new direct and indirect jobs and stimulate approximately $35 billion per year in new economic activity. Fixing a bridge, widening a highway or building a light rail system may or may not make economic sense. But the fact that it involves paying people to operate jackhammers and pour concrete does not make it any more worthwhile. If creating jobs can justify transportation projects, why not fill the country with bridges to nowhere.</blockquote>
<p>My optimistic hope is that Obama realizes that job creation is not a worthy goal and mentions only because he's politically savvy enough to know that it will generate consensus around his ambitious proposals. But if his billions of dollars in infrastructure projects are motivated by a desire to create jobs, we are in a lot of trouble.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/the-myth-of-job-creation/">The myth of job creation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reason.com/news/printer/130303.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/the-myth-of-job-creation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1411535/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/the-myth-of-job-creation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Economics</category><category>Infrastructure</category><category>Jacob Sullum</category><category>Job Creation</category><category>Jobs</category><category>Obama</category><category>Reason</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ray of light: This way to the recovery -- solar power, solar jobs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/ray-of-light-this-way-to-the-recovery-solar-power-solar-jobs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/ray-of-light-this-way-to-the-recovery-solar-power-solar-jobs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/ray-of-light-this-way-to-the-recovery-solar-power-solar-jobs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p>The U.S. housing sector remains in deep recession. Consumer spending is down. Business investment remains lackluster, with industrial production indicators hitting new lows monthly. And lay-offs have hit alarming levels. <br /><br />Against this backdrop it's understandable if one holds a not-so-optimistic view regarding the U.S. economy and the markets for early 2009: the economy's fundamentals are weak, and it's going to take a lot of stimulus, fiscal and otherwise, to turn them around. <br /><br />Nevertheless, there are bright spots -- in this case<span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"> literally</span>, as well as macroeconomically -- regarding the U.S. economy of tomorrow.<br /><br /><strong>This way to the future</strong><br /><br />One small, but significant data point: despite the plunge in oil prices to around $50 per barrel, demand for solar energy and solar panels remains strong. Demand for solar energy systems increased 45% in 2007 and is expected to register another impressive gain in 2008, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/jobs/14starts.html?ref=jobs"><span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The New York Times</span></a> reported.<br /><br />About 25,000-35,000 workers -- installers, manufacturers, distributors, project developers, and material suppliers -- are currently directly employed in the solar energy sector, which is expected to grow to more than 110,000 in 2016, according to Solar Energy Institute Association data, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/jobs/14starts.html?ref=jobs"><span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Times</span></a> reported. <br /><br />And here's an equally important stat: the jobs pay between $15-30 per hour, with many solar companies offering health benefits, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/jobs/14starts.html?ref=jobs"><span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Times</span> reported.</a> <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/ray-of-light-this-way-to-the-recovery-solar-power-solar-jobs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ray of light: This way to the recovery -- solar power, solar jobs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/ray-of-light-this-way-to-the-recovery-solar-power-solar-jobs/">Ray of light: This way to the recovery -- solar power, solar jobs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/ray-of-light-this-way-to-the-recovery-solar-power-solar-jobs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1401935/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/ray-of-light-this-way-to-the-recovery-solar-power-solar-jobs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energy</category><category>energy policy</category><category>environment</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>jobs</category><category>Obama</category><category>Obama Administration</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>solar energy</category><category>solar power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama plans $1 trillion dollar stimulus -- who benefits?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/obama-plans-1-trillion-dollar-stimulus-who-benefits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/obama-plans-1-trillion-dollar-stimulus-who-benefits/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/obama-plans-1-trillion-dollar-stimulus-who-benefits/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/construction.jpg" />President-elect Obama has said that he wants to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4BC1PV20081214">rebuild our infrastructure</a> as a way of jump starting our economy and creating jobs. What does this really mean? To better understand this concept, let's look at a single imaginary construction project. Let's also assume that the Federal Government acts to approve projects submitted by state and local governments. Which people and what skills are involved in it? <br /></p>
<p>Well, first you need people who are skilled at creating and preparing budgets, who know Federal, State and Local laws and regulations and who also know environmental laws at the federal, state and local levels. You need people who know how to write and submit bids with reasonable time constraints. You need computer programmers to write the programs for the project.</p>
<p>Then you need contractors who can perform and complete the project. They, in turn, hire project managers, foremen/women and construction crews. You need civil engineers, architects, and surveyors. You need material suppliers and manufacturers. You also need inspectors, consultants, accountants, auditors and tax specialists. And throughout this process, there are a host of federal, state and local agencies and their employees who must be involved.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/obama-plans-1-trillion-dollar-stimulus-who-benefits/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama plans $1 trillion dollar stimulus -- who benefits?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/obama-plans-1-trillion-dollar-stimulus-who-benefits/">Obama plans $1 trillion dollar stimulus -- who benefits?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4BC1PV20081214>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/obama-plans-1-trillion-dollar-stimulus-who-benefits/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1401522/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/obama-plans-1-trillion-dollar-stimulus-who-benefits/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>infrastructure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>obama</category><category>stimulus plan</category><category>StimulusPlan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama's infrastructure spending program, largest since 1950s, could jump-start U.S. GDP]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/obamas-infrastructure-spending-program-largest-since-1950s-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/obamas-infrastructure-spending-program-largest-since-1950s-co/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/obamas-infrastructure-spending-program-largest-since-1950s-co/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/caterpillar.jpg" />The key feature in President-elect Barack Obama's proposed infrastructure spending program? <br /><br />Construction and renovation projects must be initiated now, and in the immediate months ahead, in order to provide as much stimulus to the U.S. economy when it's needed: which is right now. (The use-it-or-lose-it requirement: programs must be 'shovel-ready.')<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">GDP-increasing investments</span><br /><br />Another dimension of the program, which until now has not received as much news coverage as it should have, in economist David H. Wang's interpretation: upgrades to systems (schools, electric grid, energy, Internet) that will help make the United States more competitive in the global economy.<br /><br />"School modernization will be a major, low-profile, value adder. Full, modern schools, all with full science labs, full libraries, massive broadband access will amplify learning and knowledge, particularly in poorer school districts," Wang said. "Education investment is strongly correlated with increases in both GDP and employee productivity." <br /><br />President-elect Obama said his administration will make the single, largest, new investment in the nation's infrastructure since the creation of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Interstate_Highway_System">interstate highway system</a> in the 1950s under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/07/us/politics/07radio.html?em"><span style="font-style: italic;">The New York Times</span> reported.</a> Governors told Obama they have $136 billion in road, bridge, water, and related projects ready to go; local regional transmit systems have $8 billion in projects that could begin immediately.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/obamas-infrastructure-spending-program-largest-since-1950s-co/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama's infrastructure spending program, largest since 1950s, could jump-start U.S. GDP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/obamas-infrastructure-spending-program-largest-since-1950s-co/">Obama's infrastructure spending program, largest since 1950s, could jump-start U.S. GDP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/obamas-infrastructure-spending-program-largest-since-1950s-co/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1394542/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/obamas-infrastructure-spending-program-largest-since-1950s-co/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Could $136 billion in infrastructure spending create 5.4 million jobs?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/could-136-billion-in-infrastructure-spending-create-5-4-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/could-136-billion-in-infrastructure-spending-create-5-4-million/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/could-136-billion-in-infrastructure-spending-create-5-4-million/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>President-elect Obama plans to use fiscal policy to put the brakes on the economic slump. He intends to do that through infrastructure spending. And figures as high as <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/05/news/economy/trillion_stimulus/index.htm">$500 billion to $1 trillion</a> have been mentioned. Does this make sense? How would the money be spent? How many jobs would it create?</p>
<p>At this point, infrastructure spending does make sense. That's because the first line of defense against an economic contraction is to cut interest rates. But the Fed is pretty much <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/can-the-fed-fight-deflation-how/">out of bullets</a> since short-term rates are near zero. It will try to lower longer-term rates, but the economy has not responded to efforts to get people to borrow more money to fix a problem created by too much borrowing. Government spending is the next line of defense and it could increase aggregate demand which would help.</p>
<p>The money would be spent on different projects to strengthen U.S. infrastructure; make it more energy efficient and improve internet access. Such projects include building or repairing roads, bridges, schools, sewer systems, and other public utilities. Obama also proposes to "make government buildings more energy efficient, modernize school classrooms and libraries with computers, expand access to broadband Internet service and upgrade information technology in hospitals and doctors' offices," according to the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/07/us/politics/07radio.html?hp">New York Times</a></em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/could-136-billion-in-infrastructure-spending-create-5-4-million/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Could $136 billion in infrastructure spending create 5.4 million jobs?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/could-136-billion-in-infrastructure-spending-create-5-4-million/">Could $136 billion in infrastructure spending create 5.4 million jobs?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/could-136-billion-in-infrastructure-spending-create-5-4-million/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1393215/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/could-136-billion-in-infrastructure-spending-create-5-4-million/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal reserve</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monet</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Siemens news in China bad for GE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/siemens-news-in-china-bad-for-ge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/siemens-news-in-china-bad-for-ge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/siemens-news-in-china-bad-for-ge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) has looked to Asia as an engine for growth in its infrastructure business, which is the company's largest division. Management has repeatedly talked about offsetting slowing growth in the U.S. and the EU with increased business in developing nations, with China, the world's most populated country, out in front. Despite its GDP growth, China is still behind many other countries in building large projects to provide energy and transportation.</p>
<p>GE's plans got a blow when its most direct global competitor, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/siemens-a-g-adr/si/nys">Siemens</a>, (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/siemens-a-g-adr/si/nys">SI</a>), announced that its business was being hurt because of cutback in spending in China. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122841703046180153.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "Heavy government spending on infrastructure to boost economic growth has the potential to benefit Siemens because its portfolio includes transformers for ultrahigh voltage power lines, control systems for high-speed trains, and oil and gas equipment." But now it sees those orders slowing quickly. </p>
<p>The news has to be a significant blow to GE. As the recession spreads, its entertainment business, NBCU, is likely to be hurt along with its huge medical devices business. Its financial arm is already experiencing trouble due to the credit crisis.</p>
<p>The last hope for rapid earnings growth was the world's continuing need to upgrade infrastructure. It appears that opportunity is walking out the door with the rest of GE's business.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/siemens-news-in-china-bad-for-ge/">Siemens news in China bad for GE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122841703046180153.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/siemens-news-in-china-bad-for-ge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1392140/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/siemens-news-in-china-bad-for-ge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>GE</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SI</category><category>siemens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:55:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
