<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Hedge fund investors happier now than a year ago]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/hedge-fund-investors-happier-now-than-a-year-ago/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/hedge-fund-investors-happier-now-than-a-year-ago/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/hedge-fund-investors-happier-now-than-a-year-ago/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/2-resolucion-conseguir-mejor-salario-200sl122006.jpg" alt="" />It's not exactly a shock, but tangible confirmation is always nice. Alternative investment research firm <a href="http://www.preqin.com" target="_blank">Preqin</a> found in a recent survey that institutional investors are <a href="http://www.preqin.com/go.aspx?lid=952&amp;uid=45789" target="_blank">happier with their hedge fund returns</a> now than they were a year ago. But, the gaps between happy and sad aren't as wide as you might expect.</p>
<p>A September 2009 survey of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/institutionalinvestors/">institutional investors</a> revealed that 62% say "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/hedgefund/">hedge fund</a> returns have met expectations," compared to 53% in October 2008, when the market was consumed by all kinds of calamity. Only 11% responded this year that "hedge funds have exceeded expectations," which is up slightly from last year's 9%. Remember, though the market hit its worst late last year, the problem was building momentum for a while. Participants who do not feel that hedge funds have hit the mark shrank from 38% last year to 27% this year. And 66% are confident or very confident that their hedge fund investments will reach their objectives.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/hedge-fund-investors-happier-now-than-a-year-ago/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hedge fund investors happier now than a year ago</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/hedge-fund-investors-happier-now-than-a-year-ago/">Hedge fund investors happier now than a year ago</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/hedge-fund-investors-happier-now-than-a-year-ago/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19196269/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/hedge-fund-investors-happier-now-than-a-year-ago/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative investments</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>hedge fund collapse</category><category>hedge fund managers</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>institutional shareholder services</category><category>preqin</category><category>research</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ugliness over Semel's Yahoo! pay package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ugliness-over-semels-yahoo-pay-package/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ugliness-over-semels-yahoo-pay-package/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ugliness-over-semels-yahoo-pay-package/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>Two proxy consulting firms, Proxy Governance Inc. and Institutional Shareholder Services, said that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) shareholders should withhold support for members of the company's compensation committee. They reason that Terry Semel was paid too much. By <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/yahoo-ceos-pay-too-high/story.aspx?guid=%7B5EF3058B%2D4769%2D452E%2D8609%2D882796ED0625%7D">their calculations</a>, which includes stock grants and bonuses, Semel made $107.5 million. Nice work, if you can find it.</p>
<p>Based on studies of "peer group" companies, which would include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), Semel's pay is 926% above the mean compensation.</p>
<p>Mr. Semel has already proven that he can be ham-handed with Wall Street. He was enthusiastic about first half 2007 earnings. The first quarter was poor and forecasts for the second were disappointing. The only action keeping the stock up would appear to be rumors of a bid for the company from Microsoft. </p>
<p>Semel has also missed out on the chance to buy DoubleClick and Feedburner, two companies that could have added to Yahoo!'s marketing arsenal. Google ending up the winner in bidding for both companies.</p>
<p>Yahoo!'s net income in the first quarter was $124 million, almost as much as Mr. Semel made in the previous year.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ugliness-over-semels-yahoo-pay-package/">Ugliness over Semel's Yahoo! pay package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/yahoo-ceos-pay-too-high/story.aspx?guid=%7B5EF3058B%2D4769%2D452E%2D8609%2D882796ED0625%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ugliness-over-semels-yahoo-pay-package/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/913538/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ugliness-over-semels-yahoo-pay-package/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>compensation</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>Institutional Shareholder Services</category><category>InstitutionalShareholderServices</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>Proxy Governance</category><category>ProxyGovernance</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Verizon: More nonbinding shareholder votes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/verizon-more-nonbinding-shareholder-votes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/verizon-more-nonbinding-shareholder-votes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/verizon-more-nonbinding-shareholder-votes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><p>Perhaps 2007 is the year of shareholder activism, but if the resolutions passed by stockholders are not binding, why bother? And, that being said, it certainly is not much of a revolution.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">Verizon Communications Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) was the latest company to report that its shareholders had <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117953537031608301.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">passed a proposal</a> to give them a say in executive compensation. It took two weeks to count all of the votes and the proposal made it by with a thin 50.18% margin. It could have been 99.9%. The resolution is not binding on the board or management in any way.</p>
<p>Verizon was good enough to say that it will review the resolution and "consider what actions to take." Which means that the company will do exactly nothing. </p>
<p>The proposal had some energetic supporters, including both of the large proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass, Lewis, &amp; Co. A number of Verizon's large institutional shareholders also voted "yes" for the measure. All of that means that some real time and effort went into a vote that is essentially meaningless.</p>
<p>They might as well take the money spent on getting the resolution approved and bet it at the blackjack tables in Vegas.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/verizon-more-nonbinding-shareholder-votes/">Verizon: More nonbinding shareholder votes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 May 2007 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/verizon-more-nonbinding-shareholder-votes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/verizon-more-nonbinding-shareholder-votes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>executive compensation</category><category>Glass, Lewis and Co.</category><category>Institutional Shareholder Services</category><category>InstitutionalShareholderServices</category><category>nonbinding resolutions</category><category>proxy advisory firms</category><category>ProxyAdvisoryFirms</category><category>shareholder activism</category><category>ShareholderActivism</category><category>stockholder resolutions</category><category>Verizon</category><category>Verizon Communications</category><category>VZ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Genesis HealthCare: Begging for a buyout doesn't work]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/genesis-healthcare-begging-for-a-buyout-doesnt-work/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/genesis-healthcare-begging-for-a-buyout-doesnt-work/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/genesis-healthcare-begging-for-a-buyout-doesnt-work/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/gen.bmp" /><a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/">Private equity</a> firms Formation Capital LLC and JER Partners tried hard for their $1.25 billion offer for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genesis-healthcare-corporation/ghci/nas">Genesis HealthCare Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genesis-healthcare-corporation/ghci/nas">GHCI</a>). But <a href="http://www.issproxy.com/index.jsp">Institutional Shareholder Services</a> thought the valuation was too low and that shareholders should reject the offer.<br /><br />In response, Genesis <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/10/genesis-healthcare-begs-shareholders-for-buyout-deal/">wrote a letter</a> to shareholders - practically begging them to vote for the deal.<br /><br />Well, money works better. So, this week, Formation and JER upped their offer from $63.00 to $64.25 per share. That translates to a market value of roughly $1.7 billion (including the assumption of $475 million in debt). It's also the "best and final offer."<br /><br />Lately, hedge funds have been getting more aggressive on buyout scenarios. By purchasing big positions in the stock, they can exert lots of power on a deal. And that appears to be the case with Genesis.<br /><br />On the news, the stock price is up $0.22 to $63.34.<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/genesis-healthcare-begging-for-a-buyout-doesnt-work/">Genesis HealthCare: Begging for a buyout doesn't work</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/genesis-healthcare-begging-for-a-buyout-doesnt-work/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/878850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/genesis-healthcare-begging-for-a-buyout-doesnt-work/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Formation Capital</category><category>FormationCapital</category><category>Genesis HealthCare Corp</category><category>GenesisHealthcareCorp</category><category>GHCI</category><category>Hedge Funds</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>Institutional Shareholder Services</category><category>InstitutionalShareholderServices</category><category>JER Partners</category><category>JerPartners</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to make the most of proxy season]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/how-to-make-the-most-of-proxy-season/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/how-to-make-the-most-of-proxy-season/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/how-to-make-the-most-of-proxy-season/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/annual-meetings/" rel="tag">Annual Meetings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><p>It's coming up on that time of year again! Proxy season: the one time where corporate management teams can actually be held accountable to their shareholders. According to the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117408589203939951.html?mod=home_we_banner_left">Wall Street Journal</a></em> (registration required), only about one third of individual shareholders actually vote their proxies, which allow them a say in electing directors, certain corporate policy proposals and, more often now, executive compensation.</p>
<p>How well is a stock you own doing on the corporate governance front? Institutional Shareholder Services prepares Corporate Governance Quotients on many publicly traded companies. You can view the company score on Yahoo!finance. For example, on the <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=MCD">profile page for McDonald's</a>, we see that: "McDonald's Corp.'s Corporate Governance Quotient (CGQ(R)) as of 1-Mar-07 is better than <strong>59.5%</strong> of S&amp;P 500 companies, and <strong>94.3%</strong> of Consumer Services companies." For a more detailed look at a company CGQ score, you can go to the ISS's <a href="http://f9rl4krj.issueatlas.com/content/subscription/cgqreports/reports/CGQ_96478.html">Issue Atlas page for the company</a>.</p>
<p>Factors influencing the CGQ, according to the <a href="http://www.isscgq.com/abouttheratings.htm">ISS website</a> include: (1) board structure and composition, (2) audit issues, (3) charter and by-law provisions, (4) laws of the state of incorporation, (5) executive and director compensation, (6) qualitative factors, (7) D&amp;O stock ownership, and (8) director education. The score for each core topic reflects a set of key governance variables.</p>
<p>Use the CGQ to examine the corporate governance of every stock you own. Browse around on the ISS page for additional information about corporate governance and proxy voting.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/how-to-make-the-most-of-proxy-season/">How to make the most of proxy season</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/how-to-make-the-most-of-proxy-season/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/854675/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/how-to-make-the-most-of-proxy-season/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CGQ</category><category>corporate governance</category><category>Corporate Governance Quotients</category><category>corporate management</category><category>CorporateManagement</category><category>Institutional Shareholder Services</category><category>ISS</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonald's</category><category>Proxy</category><category>proxy voting</category><category>SEC</category><category>Voting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
