<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Top growth fund manager sours on Apple, U.S. tech]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/top-growth-fund-manager-sours-on-apple-u-s-tech/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/top-growth-fund-manager-sours-on-apple-u-s-tech/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/top-growth-fund-manager-sours-on-apple-u-s-tech/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="172" border="1" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/aapl-apple-logo.jpg" alt="" />One of the top performers in the U.S. growth fund <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AN5GT20091124">sector has lost his appetite for tech</a>. Jerry Jordan has booted almost all his Apple (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) holdings from his portfolio, and he's done the same with Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). Both, Jordan says, have become too expensive. In fact, he's getting out of almost all U.S. and European tech companies for that reason -- and is turning his attention to China.</p>
<p>Jordan tells Reuters, "The growth [in China] is much faster, it's much more of a green field opportunity."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/top-growth-fund-manager-sours-on-apple-u-s-tech/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top growth fund manager sours on Apple, U.S. tech</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/top-growth-fund-manager-sours-on-apple-u-s-tech/">Top growth fund manager sours on Apple, U.S. tech</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AN5GT20091124>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/top-growth-fund-manager-sours-on-apple-u-s-tech/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19253412/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/top-growth-fund-manager-sours-on-apple-u-s-tech/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>Apple</category><category>commodities</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>growth funds</category><category>GrowthFunds</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>InstitutionalInvestors</category><category>Massey Energy</category><category>netease</category><category>ntes</category><category>oceaneering international</category><category>oii</category><category>s and p 500</category><category>SAndP500</category><category>SOHU</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Despite stock's sluggishness, Hess remains a buy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/despite-stocks-sluggishness-hess-remains-a-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/despite-stocks-sluggishness-hess-remains-a-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/despite-stocks-sluggishness-hess-remains-a-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/indigoprime.jpg" alt="" />So far, institutional investors (IIs) have not noticed that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hess-corporation/hes/nys">Hess Corp.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hess-corporation/hes/nys">HES</a>) upstream operations (exploration and production) should benefit from high oil prices in the $80 per barrel range. But the argument here is that eventually they will, preferably starting in early 2010, which is why I'm reiterating my Buy rating for the company, first recommended <a href="http:// http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/hess-shares-continue-to-meander/#continued">on April 22, 2009</a> at a price of $50.41. <br /><br />Right now, IIs are fixated on the lower margins of downstream operations, which Hess and other refiners are coping with, as a result of recession-induced sluggish U.S. gasoline sales. The First Call FY2009/FY2010 EPS estimates for HES <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=hes">are $1.63 to $3.66</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/despite-stocks-sluggishness-hess-remains-a-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Despite stock's sluggishness, Hess remains a buy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/despite-stocks-sluggishness-hess-remains-a-buy/">Despite stock's sluggishness, Hess remains a buy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/despite-stocks-sluggishness-hess-remains-a-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19227028/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/despite-stocks-sluggishness-hess-remains-a-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>HES</category><category>Hess Corp.</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>InstitutionalInvestors</category><category>oil</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coca-Cola: Pull-back is an opportunity to take a position]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/coca-cola-pull-back-is-a-buying-opportunity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/coca-cola-pull-back-is-a-buying-opportunity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/coca-cola-pull-back-is-a-buying-opportunity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/cokebottle.jpg" alt="" />Coca-Cola's Q3 <a href="http:// http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/coca-cola-ko-beats-earnings-estimates-but-revenues-fall-short/#">earnings of 83 cents per share</a> beat the First Call Q3 EPS consensus estimate <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=KO">of 82 cents per share,</a> and, of course, Wall Street <em>drove the shares lower</em> on the morning of the announcement. <br /><br />Most likely, the above selling stems merely from short-term institutional investors (IIs) exiting the stock, which is why I'm reiterating my Buy rating for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">The Coca-Cola Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>), first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/consider-cola-cola-because-no-one-ever-went-broke-holding-coke/#">on February 15, 2009</a> at a price of $42.68.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/coca-cola-pull-back-is-a-buying-opportunity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Coca-Cola: Pull-back is an opportunity to take a position</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/coca-cola-pull-back-is-a-buying-opportunity/">Coca-Cola: Pull-back is an opportunity to take a position</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/coca-cola-pull-back-is-a-buying-opportunity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19203060/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/coca-cola-pull-back-is-a-buying-opportunity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coca cola</category><category>CocaCola</category><category>drinks</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>InstitutionalInvestors</category><category>soda</category><category>sport drinks</category><category>SportDrinks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America (BAC) rises on institutional buying]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bank-of-america-bac-rises-on-institutional-buying/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bank-of-america-bac-rises-on-institutional-buying/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bank-of-america-bac-rises-on-institutional-buying/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://investor.bankofamerica.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=71595&amp;p=irol-irhome"><img width="153" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="40" border="0" align="right" alt="BAC logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/bac-bank-of-america-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nysys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nysys">BAC</a> - <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today on news that <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/ap/paulson-fund-buys-168m-shares-of-bank-of-america/rfid241071378?channel=pf">the hedge-fund firm Paulson &amp; Co. bought 168 million shares of the stock</a>, now worth $2.7 billion, during the second quarter, according to a regulatory filing. It was the firm's biggest purchase of the quarter, and investors appear to be reading the disclosure as a strong endorsement of the stock, especially since this firm was one of the few that saw the financial trouble coming. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on BAC.<br /><br />BAC opened this morning at $16.66. So far today the stock has hit a low of $16.23 and a high of $16.77. As of 11:45, BAC is trading at $16.73 up 80 cents (5.0%). The chart for BAC looks neutral and <a target="_blank" href="http:// www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives BAC a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bank-of-america-bac-rises-on-institutional-buying/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America (BAC) rises on institutional buying</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bank-of-america-bac-rises-on-institutional-buying/">Bank of America (BAC) rises on institutional buying</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bank-of-america-bac-rises-on-institutional-buying/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19128373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bank-of-america-bac-rises-on-institutional-buying/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>HedgeFund</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>InstitutionalInvestors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LBO loans become bigger problem for banks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/lbo-loans-become-bigger-problem-for-banks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/lbo-loans-become-bigger-problem-for-banks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/lbo-loans-become-bigger-problem-for-banks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/jpm-jpmorgan-logo.jpg" />It has looked like LBO loans were going to be hard for banks to syndicate to institutional investors. They tend to be fairly risky because the companies taken private often have to do very well to cover the debt service. Concerns about that happening in a recession are growing.</p>
<p>All of this means that big money center banks are being stuck with the loans. Since they are almost certainly worth less than their face value, that could lead to another round of write-downs at banks.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120222620470044309.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "w</em>ith the prices of existing loans tumbling, investors have little incentive to buy new loans unless they are sold at steep discounts, something banks are reluctant to do." <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpm/usa">JPMorgan</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpm/usa">JPM</a>) held $26.4 billion in LBO loans at the end of last year. Other large banks probably have similar amounts on their balance sheet. Many of these will be sold for 90 cents on the dollar, if they get sold at all. </p>
<p>Banks may have another series of financial problems just around the corner.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/lbo-loans-become-bigger-problem-for-banks/">LBO loans become bigger problem for banks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120222620470044309.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/lbo-loans-become-bigger-problem-for-banks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1107977/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/lbo-loans-become-bigger-problem-for-banks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank loans</category><category>BankLoans</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>InstitutionalInvestors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>lbos</category><category>leveraged buyouts</category><category>LeveragedBuyouts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who says the stock market is too cheap?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/who-says-the-stock-market-is-too-cheap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/who-says-the-stock-market-is-too-cheap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/who-says-the-stock-market-is-too-cheap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tol/" rel="tag">Toll Brothers (TOL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><span class="news_story_title">According to an article published by Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aqWQVmr.QlMw&amp;refer=home">Cheapest Stocks in 16 years draws investors</a>, "</span><span class="news_story_title"><em>Investors are preparing to snap up shares of telephone, health-care and computer companies after last week's $2.1 trillion global stock market rout left U.S. equities the cheapest in 16 years."</em></span></p>
<p><span class="news_story_title">I am always pondering stock valuations in search of bargains and have been thinking that there are many bargains to be had. Having come to this conclusion though is not based on the relative market strength or weakness, or whether the over all market is cheap or not. I am not interested in bear markets or bull markets. The average investor should view all markets and promoters of said markets as <em><strong>full of bull</strong></em>. The best way to invest in stocks is the same way you invest in friends - one by one, respectfully, fairly and refraining from judging the proverbial book by it's cover. You should look deeper and think long term.</span></p>
<p><span class="news_story_title">Some companies have reported terrific earnings <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuitive-surgical-inc/isrg/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Intuitive Surgical</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuitive-surgical-inc/isrg/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ISRG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Apple Inc</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AAPL</a>) and some have been lackluster <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-38-johnson/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-38-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>). Some have been dismal like housing stocks <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pulte-homes-inc/phm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Pulte Homes</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pulte-homes-inc/phm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PHM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toll-brothers-inc/tol/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Toll Brothers</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toll-brothers-inc/tol/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TOL</a>). While one could make the argument that stock valuations are at a low point there is more to the story.</span></p>
<p><span class="news_story_title">Since valuations -- think price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios -- are at a cumulative low, and the market prices stocks based on future earnings and growth of equity potential, then one has to assume the brokerage houses, investment banks, hedge funds, institutions and the like have priced in a continuation of the same low interest, high liquidity conditions that lead to this economic situation. I do not have such clarity in regards to this future.</span></p>
<p><span class="news_story_title">Maybe the headline should not read "Stocks are the cheapest they have been in 16 years", maybe it should read "Large investors are more tenative than they have been in 16 years". After all look how fast they were jumping ship last Thursday and Friday. </span><span class="news_story_title">In any event, I will continue to write about specific opportunities and resist characterising the over all markets.</span></p>
<span class="news_story_title">
<p>Those of you who are new to BloggingStocks can check out my other stories and read <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> or <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a> to find more potential opportunities and verify my track record as well.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: As of this writing I own shares of ISRG and JNJ.</em> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm.</em></p>
</span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/who-says-the-stock-market-is-too-cheap/">Who says the stock market is too cheap?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aqWQVmr.QlMw&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/who-says-the-stock-market-is-too-cheap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/953568/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/who-says-the-stock-market-is-too-cheap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple Inc (AAPL)</category><category>AppleInc(aapl)</category><category>Bloomberg</category><category>Cheap stocks</category><category>CheapStocks</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>InstitutionalInvestors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Intuitive Surgical</category><category>Intuitive Surgical (ISRG)</category><category>IntuitiveSurgical</category><category>IntuitiveSurgical(isrg)</category><category>Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson(jnj)</category><category>Pulte Homes (PHM)</category><category>PulteHomes(phm)</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Stock valuations</category><category>StockValuations</category><category>Toll Brothers (TOL)</category><category>TollBrothers(tol)</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barron's "Most Respected" list: GE is No. 2, WMT is No. 33, TWX is last]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/barrons-most-respected-list-ge-is-no-2-wmt-is-no-33-twx/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/barrons-most-respected-list-ge-is-no-2-wmt-is-no-33-twx/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/barrons-most-respected-list-ge-is-no-2-wmt-is-no-33-twx/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><p>In <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB115775662561058166.html?mod=9_0001_b_this_weeks_magazine_home">the current issue of Barron's</a> (subscription required) (September 11, 2006), the financial weekly conducts a survey of 85 institutional investors. The purpose of the poll is to rate the 100 largest public corporations based on market capitalization in order of the respect they have garnered from these institutions. The survey allows the companies to be ranked in one of four categories: "respect highly", "respect", "respect somewhat," and "don't respect." The respondents said that they key factors they used to make their decisions were strong management, sound business strategy, consistent sales and profit growth, ethical business practices, and competitive edge.</p>
<p>The company that scored the highest was Johnson &amp; Johnson with a mean score of 3.97. The lowest score was assigned to Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) with a mean score of .63, ranking its last on the 100 company list. None of the respondents rated Time Warner "respect highly." Fifteen of the institutions polled gave the company a "respect" rating. Forty-two ranked the company "respect somewhat" and thirty-two rated Time Warner "don't respect." The Barron's article said that the failure of the AOL merger and $584 million in restated earnings were the main factors that pushed the company to the bottom of the list</p>
<p>The top five companies were rounded out by General Electric Company (NYSE: GE), Procter&amp;Gamble, Toyota Motor, and Berkshire Hathaway. Several companies did not have large enough market caps to make last year's list but were on for 2006. This included Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG) at No. 20, and Comcast at No. 52. </p>
<p>A few companies also made big moves. Microsoft Corporation (Nasdaq: MSFT) dropped from No.3 to No. 22. Home Depot dropped from No.15 to No. 67. Intel dropped from No. 8 to No. 28. </p>
<p>Companies with notable moves up from last year included Honda, which rose from No 20 to No. 9. Also rising was Wal-Mart Stores (NYSE: WMT) from No. 22 to No. 17, and Chevron which moved from No. 44 to No. 26.</p>
<p>Time Warner's largest competitors also made the list. Disney was at No. 46, up from No. 76 last year. News Corp came in at No. 43. Last year the company was not large enough to be ranked. </p>
<p>While the survey is bad news for Time Warner, it also shows that companies can resurrect their images fairly quickly. Disney's jump in the survey with Robert Iger at the helm is a good example of this.</p>
<p>Investors would expect that Time Warner would have to make fairly significant changes to be viewed differently by institutional investors, but at least it can be done.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/barrons-most-respected-list-ge-is-no-2-wmt-is-no-33-twx/">Barron's "Most Respected" list: GE is No. 2, WMT is No. 33, TWX is last</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/barrons-most-respected-list-ge-is-no-2-wmt-is-no-33-twx/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/666380/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/barrons-most-respected-list-ge-is-no-2-wmt-is-no-33-twx/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barron's</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>InstitutionalInvestors</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:37:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
