Intel has had to keep roaring in order to keep the spotlight from shifting to "hotter" competitor AMD. It may be succeeding, although the battle, as they say, "has just begun." AMD's recent purchase of graphics chipmaker ATI will soon give AMD a full suite of chips and chipsets to better compete with Intel's scale.
But, Intel is no sitting still. Its recent Core Duo and Core Duo 2 chips are matching and beating comparable AMD chips in many tests, a sign that Intel's engineering prowess has finally caught up to the scrappy competition -- something that took years to do for the world's largest chipmaker.
Along those strong lines comes a new server chip that retains the older (and perceptibly dated and outmoded) moniker "Xeon". I'm not sure why Intel kept the name Xeon in the name, but larger customers like IBM and HP probably know it well, and those are the main customers -- so that angle, at least, makes sense. The new Xeon "Tulsa" is made in Oklahoma apparently -- just kidding.
The "Tulsa" server processor is meant for intensive database servers and promises -- according to Intel engineers -- to rapidly speed up server-based processing, especially when databases are used. With almost every e-commerce server I can think of using a database structure in some form or fashion, this seems like a pretty decent market.
Brian White has worked in various executive positions in technology and telecommunications and now focuses on editing and writing.
Tax Reform in This Election Year: It's Not Likely
Which Credit Card Rewards Does the IRS Care About?
All that pressure from the Dell shareholder community and screaming analysts must have finally wore down the folks at Dell. For the first time in its history, Dell won't be using Intel CPU chips in some upcoming multi-processor servers by year's end -- but instead will make the switch to rival AMD and its blazing-hot Opteron server chip. Does this signal anything significant for any of these companies -- Dell, Intel or AMD? Sure it does, and more than just symbolically.

