<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Google Faces Threats as Web Is Changing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/18/google-faces-threats-as-web-is-changing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/18/google-faces-threats-as-web-is-changing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/18/google-faces-threats-as-web-is-changing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/e.jpg" alt="Google" />Google (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has been all over the news recently -- if it was the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/16/google-looks-to-strike-gold-with-jambool-deal/">small acquisitions</a> or the proposed <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/google-verizon-deal-evil-pact-or-pragmatic-victory-for-mon/19593878/">net neutrality deal</a> with Verizon (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>). But perhaps more seriously are the different articles in the media about how the Web is changing and how that's going to affect the search engine giant.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/08/ff_webrip/all/1"><em>The Web Is Dead. Long Live the Internet</em></a> is the provocative title of a <em>Wired</em> article published Tuesday. Chris Anderson explains how we changed our habits from using the "wide-open Web to semiclosed platforms that use the Internet for transport but not the browser for display." Most importantly, he adds, "it's a world Google can't crawl."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/18/google-faces-threats-as-web-is-changing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Faces Threats as Web Is Changing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/18/google-faces-threats-as-web-is-changing/">Google Faces Threats as Web Is Changing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/18/google-faces-threats-as-web-is-changing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19598480/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/18/google-faces-threats-as-web-is-changing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Android</category><category>Chris Anderson</category><category>David Olive</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>groupon</category><category>internet</category><category>internet search</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Michael Wolff</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>twitter</category><category>Verizon</category><category>web</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Baidu.com Could Benefit from Google's Misfortunes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/baidu-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Yesterday was a good day for Baidu (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas">BIDU</a>), the Chinese Internet search portal, after some Wall Street analysts noted that the departure of Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) from China could "<a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/baidu-shares-regain-momentum-on-google-flap-2010-02-01">benefit Baidu tremendously</a>."</p>
<p>BIDU has traded well in the United States, hovering in the upper reaches of the $380 region -- but GOOG's decision to operate in China without censoring local search results after recent cyber attacks pushed BIDU as high as $470 before the stock settled into the lower $400s.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Baidu.com Could Benefit from Google's Misfortunes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/">Baidu.com Could Benefit from Google's Misfortunes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19341142/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/baidu-com-could-benefit-from-googles-misfortunes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baidu</category><category>Baidu.com</category><category>BIDU</category><category>cyber attack</category><category>CyberAttack</category><category>featured</category><category>Internet search</category><category>inthenews</category><category>search engine</category><category>search portal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Go for growth with Google (GOOG)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/go-for-growth-with-google-goog/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/go-for-growth-with-google-goog/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/go-for-growth-with-google-goog/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>"<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) remains the dominant search engine on the web," notes <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3167 ">Paul Tracy</a>. In his <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3167 ">StreetAuthority Market Advisor</a>, he views the stock as a solid buy for growth investors.</p>
<p>"In economic downturns, one of the first costs most companies cut is advertising. Not surprisingly, over the past year, most companies have slashed their advertising budgets in response to the severe economic downturn.</p>
<p>"But online ad spending has remained remarkably resilient. GOOG's system targets specific ads based on what users type into their search box, geographic location and other factors. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/go-for-growth-with-google-goog/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Go for growth with Google (GOOG)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/go-for-growth-with-google-goog/">Go for growth with Google (GOOG)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/go-for-growth-with-google-goog/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19060608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/go-for-growth-with-google-goog/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising stocks</category><category>AdvertisingStocks</category><category>computer stocks</category><category>ComputerStocks</category><category>google</category><category>internet search</category><category>internet stocks</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>online advertising</category><category>online stocks</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>OnlineStocks</category><category>paul tracy</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>street authority market advisor</category><category>StreetAuthorityMarketAdvisor</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's search marketshare inches forward in April; also named most-visited site by ComScore]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/googles-search-marketshare-inches-forward-in-april/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/googles-search-marketshare-inches-forward-in-april/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/googles-search-marketshare-inches-forward-in-april/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/goog.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)'s market share in April increased once again, going from 67.25% to 67.90% of all internet searches performed in the U.S. Sounds like a tiny increase, but we're talking hundreds of millions of additional searches here. Even a tenth of 1% is a major increase.<br /><br />Google also earned the distinction today of being named the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/apwire/63262a7c3e186457ab61696d29555f6b.htm">No. 1 most-visited site</a> by ComScore, topping Yahoo for the first time.<br /><br />Both <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) saw decreases in search market share due to Google's continued dominance. April data from internet traffic research firm Hitwise indicated that Google <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9943944-7.html">continues to dominate U.S. internet searches</a>, while being responsible for the lion's share of connecting web searchers with specific industries as well.<br /><br />For example, 31% of of web traffic and health and medical sites was supplied by Google, as well as 23% of web traffic to travel websites. This alone demonstrates the power Google has over the web. Some industries would see huge decreases in traffic if Google were to go away. In effect, Google's web search dominance has a very broad and meaningful over entire industries on the web, including shopping and classifieds, news and media, entertainment and others.<br /><br />Still think Google is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">worth $576.30</a> per share?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/googles-search-marketshare-inches-forward-in-april/">Google's search marketshare inches forward in April; also named most-visited site by ComScore</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 10:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9943944-7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/googles-search-marketshare-inches-forward-in-april/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1195974/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/googles-search-marketshare-inches-forward-in-april/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Goog</category><category>Google</category><category>Google marketshare</category><category>GoogleMarketshare</category><category>internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>msft</category><category>search advertising</category><category>SearchAdvertising</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: Google volatility increases as shares sell off to nine-month lows]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/option-update-google-volatility-increases-as-shares-sell-off-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/option-update-google-volatility-increases-as-shares-sell-off-to/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/option-update-google-volatility-increases-as-shares-sell-off-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Google</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is recently down $14.54 to $471.80 in pre-open trading. <br /></p>
<p>Smith Barney says: "Weak January Click Data from comScore." BMO Capital Markets says: "US Search Data Points Curb Enthusiasm." <br /></p>
<p>GOOG March option implied volatility of 39 is above its 26-week average of 34 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/option-update-google-volatility-increases-as-shares-sell-off-to/">Option update: Google volatility increases as shares sell off to nine-month lows</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/option-update-google-volatility-increases-as-shares-sell-off-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1124789/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/option-update-google-volatility-increases-as-shares-sell-off-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google criticizes Microsoft over Yahoo! bid]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/google-criticizes-microsoft-over-yahoo-bid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/google-criticizes-microsoft-over-yahoo-bid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/google-criticizes-microsoft-over-yahoo-bid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) does not much like the fact that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is making a bid for internet portal firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). So the world's largest search company has decided to start a PR campaign to get the government to kill the deal.</p>
<p>In a blog post, Google Senior Vice President David Drummond asks whether Microsoft could "now attempt to exert the same sort of inappropriate and illegal influence over the Internet that it did with the PC," <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120206856800138831.html?mod=djemalertTECH">according to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required). Microsoft immediately took the other side of the argument by saying that Google dominates the global search market. A purchase of Yahoo! would not knock Google out of the No.1 spot.</p>
<p>The bickering over the matter probably makes little difference. Google is so powerful now in internet search that Microsoft may not make much progress there even by owning Yahoo!. There will be all sorts of integration problems if its bid goes through. Google probably will keep gaining search share in the meantime. The government knows all of that. There is little reason for it to oppose the deal.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/google-criticizes-microsoft-over-yahoo-bid/">Google criticizes Microsoft over Yahoo! bid</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/google-criticizes-microsoft-over-yahoo-bid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1105328/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/google-criticizes-microsoft-over-yahoo-bid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>David Drummond</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>internet search</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[China's Baidu.com doubles profit, but future guidance causes jitters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Baidu (NASDAQ: BIDU) logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/baidu-bidu-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas?from=lookup">Baidu.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas?from=lookup">BIDU</a>), China's largest search engine, said this week that it <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-10-26T113325Z_01_N25238040_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-BAIDU-RESULTS-DC.XML">beat profit expectations</a> by doubling its most recent quarterly profit, but shares still are trading quite a bit below where they were just a few weeks ago as the company's management warned on profit guidance moving forward, which fell a little flat compared to what analysts were expecting. Maybe analysts are expecting too much, too soon? It wouldn't be the first time for recklessly, short-mindedness palpitations from Street "experts."<br /><br />Baidu.com's shares have been on a speculative and hyped journey this year (they are priced way out of whack considering fundamentals), but reality did return to the picture a bit as of a few weeks ago when <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/12/does-drop-in-baidu-bidu-call-a-tech-top/">those shares came crashing down</a> in what could be seen as a needed correction. Although Baidu.com operates as the largest search provider in the world's most populous country, it's no <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) when it comes to monetizing all those eyeballs -- yet.<br /><br />Baidu.com has a very enterprising future in front of it, although a large question remains on whether it can rake up those revenues like Google has managed to do in many global markets. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) is in a similar position: It captures billions of views every month, but lacks the advertising prowess to smartly monetize that traffic compared to industry leader Google. But an advertising explosion is still in the infant stages in China, and Baidu.com -- if it plays its cards right -- has a huge potential in front of it. But torrid, rapid growth? That may still be too much to expect in the next quarter or so.<br /><br />  <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings">Visit <span style="font-weight: bold;">AOL Money &amp; Finance</span> for more earnings coverage</a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/">China's Baidu.com doubles profit, but future guidance causes jitters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-10-26T113325Z_01_N25238040_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-BAIDU-RESULTS-DC.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1022571/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baidu</category><category>Baidu.com</category><category>BIDU</category><category>China</category><category>Chinese search engine</category><category>ChineseSearchEngine</category><category>Google</category><category>Internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>search</category><category>Search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and AOL sign browser deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/hewlett-packard-hp-hpq-logo.jpg"  alt="Hewlett Packard NYSE:HPQ logo" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) has inked a deal with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) AOL unit to install AOL's web browser start page, toolbar and search on HP personal computers sold worldwide. This may not sound like a big deal, but it is, since the vast majority of computer users never change the default start pages that load when their Internet Explorer web browser starts up. Having AOL's search engine, which is powered by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), as the default is a biggie as well. HP, after all, sells more desktop and laptop computers than any company on the planet at this time.<br /><br />AOL will use its custom "myAOL" homepage as the default website on all HP PCs, which will encourage new HP owners to use AOL's services like email, news, finance and weather. While some computer users complain of unwanted "bloatware" that ships on new PCs, the practice of providing new PC owners with default relationships to service providers such as AOL is likely to continue. <br /><br />Now, what is unanswered here is how this will affect <a href="http://news.stepforth.com/blog/2006/09/yahoo-inks-deal-with-hp-to-be-primary.php">HP's existing relationship</a> with internet portal <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) which has been in place for almost one year. Since HP did not make a single reference to this relationship, one must surmise that HP is dumping Yahoo! completely from its systems and replacing Yahoo!'s services with AOL's services. If that is the case, Yahoo! just earned a huge black eye and AOL came out very rosy. With HP competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) using Google services as the default on its PCs, this leaves Yahoo! in a tough position without a top-tier PC partner.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and AOL sign browser deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201807017>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/992106/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America Online</category><category>AmericaOnline</category><category>AOL</category><category>default</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>HP</category><category>HPQ</category><category>internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>page</category><category>search</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google loses insignificant piece of market share]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>With <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) set to release its quarterly financial performance report this afternoon, will the internet search and advertising leader have another blowout quarter? All signs point to yes, according to my magic 8-ball. But until then, the Mountain View, Calif., company can soak up the knowledge that, gasp, it actually <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1525">lost a tiny percentage</a> of internet search market share in June. Oh no! Let loose the hounds! <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/microsofts-search-division-has-a-big-june/">Microsoft made a few gains</a> as well -- so is Google sweating? Very doubtful.<br />
<p>Actually, fluctuations happen every single month among the internet search kingpins like Google, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews"> YHOO</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Ask.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">IACI</a>). When Google and Yahoo! swap a half of a percentage point in market share for internet search, blog entries (like this one) and the media play it up. It's a non-issue, though. There are an infinite number of variables during each month globally -- like PC shipments, broadband internet penetration, mobile phone sales and marketing programs from all the search leaders -- which all affect market share in these nice little percentage slices.<br /><br />Google web properties held fast in June with a 49.5% share of the U.S. search market, while Yahoo! sat at a comfortable 25.1% of the U.S. market. Microsoft was in third place with 13.2% and Ask.com and its network saw a market share of 5%. In fifth was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>)'s AOL unit, with 4.2%. To put those percentages into perspective, U.S. internet customers conducted 8 billion searches in June, up 26% from June 2006. So, although the percentages are staying pretty much the same in terms of proportion, the actual volume has spiked nicely from a year ago. And, Google is still taking the lion's share. Minor percentage drop? Google's still sitting very pretty.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/">Google loses insignificant piece of market share</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1525>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/942589/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/google-loses-insignificant-piece-of-market-share/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google share</category><category>Google, Inc.</category><category>Google,Inc.</category><category>GoogleShare</category><category>IACI</category><category>Internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>MSFT</category><category>TWX</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google after the bell for 05-22-06: Still the search king]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/google-after-the-bell-for-05-22-06-still-the-search-king/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/google-after-the-bell-for-05-22-06-still-the-search-king/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/google-after-the-bell-for-05-22-06-still-the-search-king/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p>Google closed up to $370.95 ($0.93 or 0.25%) today on modest trade volume of 8.5+ million shares after comScore announced that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/google-still-the-one/">Google was still the internet search king</a> with 43.1% of the search market, with Yahoo! trailing at 28% and MSN at barely under 13% (or should we say, Live Search?). Nothing was really expected here, as Google continues to dominate the search arena against two mighty formidable competitors.<br /><br />While we <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/google-is-smart-to-stay-tight-lipped-about-its-operations/">mused a little today</a> on how Google has been -- and continues to be -- mum about how it runs its business (operationally), one can't help see that only good things are in store for the search powerhouse if it can continue to give customers what they need, when they need it and on many different devices and platforms. <br /><br />One thing that continues to stick in my mind is how <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/">Microsoft and Yahoo! are ever going to challenge Google</a> -- which has a commanding lead. It's not enough to have a big name -- you have to create branding in the consumer mind that plants the notion of the world's best search as key to your business -- and neither Yahoo! nor Microsoft seems to be doing that.<br /><br />If anything speaks loudly, it's that Google's competitors are building search engines with an advertising network meant to almost mimic what Google does -- and what it's done for years with excellent success. Never mind that we rarely hear the "quality of search" argument from Softie or Yahoo! -- no, <em>each wants to enjoy the ad success</em> of Google -- but do they want to build a better search product? <br /><br />With that mindset, Google should only increase its share in search as the other two search providers (of any significance) decide on whether to actually make a better product (if that's possible) or simply try to ride the wave of revenue from copying Google's tactics. I'm not sure <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/256748_yahoo24.html">Yahoo! even has this focus</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/google-after-the-bell-for-05-22-06-still-the-search-king/">Google after the bell for 05-22-06: Still the search king</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 May 2006 16:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=goog&amp;exch=USA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/google-after-the-bell-for-05-22-06-still-the-search-king/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/620738/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/google-after-the-bell-for-05-22-06-still-the-search-king/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 16:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Microsoft and Yahoo! won't threaten Google's search dominance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/ngc300.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />We continue to hear about how Google could face stiff competition in the Internet search arena from the likes of a re-energized Yahoo! and Microsoft. Both competitors have been&nbsp;reinventing their search businesses in an attempt to get in on the lucrative paid-search advertising business that Google now essentially owns. </p>
<p>But Google has an advantage: The core competency of the company is search. That is Google's<em> brand identity</em> and therefore, the one core service that customers turn to it for.<br /><br />I mention this because try as it might, Yahoo! won't be able to compete to the point of causing Google lost sleep in the Internet search business -- <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/256748_yahoo24.html">and strangely it has even admitted this</a>. It plans instead to focus&nbsp;on building content relationships with its customers and offering distinguishing services that are compelling. </p>
<p>Microsoft, arguably the toughest competitor in the computing age, also will not be able to take much share away from Google regarding search. It may be able to beef up search relevance under the new Windows Live moniker. But branding is all important&nbsp;in the consumer mind (just ask <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Nike</span> or <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Apple</span> about this). And, try as it might, &nbsp;Microsoft's brand will never stand for search.<br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Microsoft and Yahoo! won't threaten Google's search dominance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/">Why Microsoft and Yahoo! won't threaten Google's search dominance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 May 2006 09:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/4367/53/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/620428/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>MSFT Microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>Windows Live</category><category>WindowsLive</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 09:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google says Microsoft stealing search with new IE7 browser]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="msn search in ie"src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/i37.jpg" />Microsoft's next-next-next gen browser, Internet Explorer7, has a search box in the upper right corner of the browser window. It goes to Google, right? Heh. I was just testingyou. No, it goes straight to MSN's search engine - where, of course, Microsoft gets all the ad revenue.<br /><br/>According to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/01/technology/01google.html?">a <em>New York Times</em>article</a>, Google is complaining about this tactic to both the U.S. Justice Department and the European Commission,insisting that it smacks of Microsoft's infamous anti-competitive practices in the '90s. Currently, MSN has an 11%share of the search market, whereas Google rocks a 49% share. (Yahoo! is at 22%, in case you're keeping track.)<br/><br />None of the previous IE browsers had included default search tools, although Firefox, Opera and Safari haveincluded them (featuring: Google, but offering a drop-down menu) for a while now. Microsoft argues that, after all, auser can <em>change</em> the default search engine (and I'm sure I'm not the only one who realizes the typicalconsumer, won't).<br /><br />I'm not a fan of anti-competitive practices but... who's the monopoly here? Did someonesay something about 49% of the market? That's <em>awfully </em>close to a majority. If the consumers don't like it,there's always Firefox, where Google still reigns supreme.<br /><br />[Image <ahref="http://www.flickr.com/photos/haipunk/104867531/">Haipunk</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/">Google says Microsoft stealing search with new IE7 browser</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 May 2006 08:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/01/technology/01google.html?>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/613579/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anticompetitive practices</category><category>AnticompetitivePractices</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>google search</category><category>google vs. microsoft</category><category>GoogleSearch</category><category>GoogleVs.Microsoft</category><category>ie</category><category>ie7</category><category>internet explorer</category><category>internet search</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft vs. google</category><category>MicrosoftVs.Google</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>msn search</category><category>MsnSearch</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search wars</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchWars</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 08:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google upgrades corporate search engine technology]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/google-upgrades-corporate-search-engine-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/google-upgrades-corporate-search-engine-technology/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/google-upgrades-corporate-search-engine-technology/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right"src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/04/_40197630_google_enterp203g.jpg" alt="" />In what the this AP-sourcedarticle calls Google's attempt to "rely less on internet advertising", Google (<ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=goog&amp;exch=USA">GOOG</a>) is re-hashing their corporatesearch product into something that could start being a decent revenue streamer into its already-huge coffers. This is avery good strategy -- mostly because finding something on a huge corporate intranet can be much, much harder thanfinding something on the public internet.<br /><br />Is Google trying to shoehorn into the corporate world in futurehopes of offering other business-type services, such as email and its new calendar service, as CEO Eric Schmidt says?Probably - they may be using the "sneak attack" method of trying to steal customers from Microsoft. Maybethat is Google's overall game plan for the future, eh?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/google-upgrades-corporate-search-engine-technology/">Google upgrades corporate search engine technology</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/1700AP_Googling_Business.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/google-upgrades-corporate-search-engine-technology/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/610242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/google-upgrades-corporate-search-engine-technology/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Internet Search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:44:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
